RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Gab@StFerdinandIII - Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from.  It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Archive - February 2021

DNA cannot be explained by Darwin's cult - neither its creation, nor its design.

Old ages and DNA just don't add up.

Bookmark and Share

 

DNA does not long survive in the natural environment.  It is impossible to find DNA or soft tissue dated ‘millions’ of years.  DNA is inherently unstable and quickly decomposes.  When ‘science’ now an asset of far-left groupthink and atheopathology, dictates that ‘we have found ‘Dinosaur xyz fossil’ and it contains soft tissue dated to ’75 million years ago’, it is a fiction premised on philosophy and world-views based on where it is in the ‘strata’, which assumes of course millions-billions-soon trillions of years of ‘slow accumulation’.  No evidence has ever been presented to justify the stratification of the earth’s geology, first proposed inter-alia by a lawyer Charles Lyell and rightly ridiculed in the 19th century.  Who said science or civilisation ‘evolves’ into ‘better systems’?  Devolution in intelligence and understanding is equally probable.

 

The Darwin cult announces the ‘oldest DNA evah found’.  Which of course proves evolution, except it doesn’t and has nothing to do with ‘evolving’.

Source

World’s oldest DNA reveals how mammoths evolved (Phys.org).

“This article explains that the age of the DNA was not measured directly but was inferred from “geological data” (stratigraphy based on evolutionary assumptions) and the “molecular clock” hypothesis, which assumes that mutations occur at predictable rates over evolutionary time.

This is the first time that DNA has been sequenced and authenticated from million-year-old specimens, and extracting the DNA from the samples was challenging. The scientists found that only minute amounts of DNA remained in the samples and that the DNA was degraded into very small fragments.

“This DNA is incredibly old. The samples are a thousand times older than Viking remains, and even pre-date the existence of humans and Neanderthals,” says senior author Love Dalén, a Professor of evolutionary genetics at the Centre for Palaeogenetics in Stockholm.

We sequenced the oldest ever DNA, from million-year-old mammoths (The Conversation). Love Dalén himself wrote this article. He tells how difficult it was to piece together the DNA.

The DNA sequences also had another characteristic of very old DNA – they were  extremely fragmented. Instead of the longer DNA sequences found in younger, better preserved mammoth samples from the permafrost, we only had short ones.

This caused another problem, because shorter sequences are increasingly difficult to place in their correct position of the genome. They can also be confused with contamination. To avoid this we had to discard all the sequences below a certain length threshold, which was painful but necessary.

He found another surprise; “most adaptations characteristic of the woolly mammoth were already present in its ancestral species that roamed the Siberian steppe over a million years ago.” This indicated to his team that the speciation event that led to the woolly mammoth did not require a fast adaptation rate. The adapted genes were already there. As for time limits,

We think permafrost preserved material holds the promise of even older DNA. However, since the oldest permafrost deposits are dated to the Early Pleistocene –around 2.6 million years ago – this may, sadly, put an upper limit on what is possible.

Source paper: van der Valk, Love Dalén et al., Million-year-old DNA sheds light on the genomic history of mammoths. Nature (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03224-9

 

The conclusion of the above is that your worldview determines your ‘science’.  These academics just assume millions of years of age for the mammoth based on flawed geology and a corrupt view of ‘mutations’ which detract functionality and render decomposition and entropy.  They further admit that there was no evolutionary processes at work.  The mammals of later dates were the same as the mammoth of this assumed long-age date.  In any event, they now have a problem.  Even given the long-age mendacity they now admit that DNA if frozen, and only if frozen, cannot exceed 2 million or so Darwinian years.  This renders the entire corpus of the cult irrelevant and unscientific.  Of course if truly independent scientists were given access to this specimen, the age of the mammoth, would be quite recent, but the cult of Darwin would never suffer such analysis or conclusion. 

 

Michael Denton: ‘The Miracle of the Cell’

Darwinism is Religulous.

Bookmark and Share

 

Darwinian theology is religulous.  It is not a science.  Biology and basic chemistry mock Darwinism.  Micro-biological detail and real science make it clear that Darwinism is a fraud.  What came first the heart or a circulatory system?  Blood or glucose?  A cell membrane or cytoplasm?  How would all the elements which comprise the infinite complexity of the cell, ‘evolve’ over ‘time’?  The cell would not survive.  It is all or nothing.  Denton has exposed the religulous credulity of the Darwin cult in a few books.  There is not a single refutation of this thesis of complexity.  Complex structures including software code, decompose.  The opposite has never been observed, seen, or even attempted in a laboratory, forget the natural environment.

 

Trillions of atoms self-assembling by chance? Really?

…instantiated is also far beyond ordinary experience. A cell consists of trillions of atoms, representing the complexity of a jumbo jet and more, packed into a space less than a millionth of the volume of a typical grain of sand. But unlike any jumbo jet, unlike any nano-tech, or indeed unlike even the most advanced human technology of any kind, this wondrous entity can replicate itself. Here is an “infinity machine” with seemingly magical powers.

 

Metabolism, oxygen diffusion, what came first and what ‘evolved’?

For the large body cells (more than ten microns across) of mammals, for instance, the diffusion rates of molecules, including oxygen in water, must be very close to what they are. If they were much less, a circulatory system in large multicellular organisms would be impossible, and cells with high metabolic rates like our own would be restricted to tiny bacterial-sized bags of molecules too small to contain an inventory of complex, higher-order molecular systems. Such systems feature microtubules, molecular motors, and other components of the cytoskeleton. These components are vital for abilities that are essential to the embryonic development of advanced multicellular organisms, abilities that include crawling, following chemical gradients, changing shape, and selectively adhering to other cells.

 

How did different cells magically ‘evolve’?  Who designed them?

One element of this fitness is manifest in their incomparable diversity of form. Contrast a neuron with a red blood cell, a skin cell with a liver cell, an amoeboid leucocyte with a muscle cell. Each of these different forms is found in the human body, and many more. Or consider the diversity of ciliate protozoans. From the trumpet-like Stentor to the dashing Paramecium, the universe of ciliate form is absurdly diverse. Or take the radiolarians (see Figure 1.1). Even within this small related group of organisms, the diversity of cell forms is stunning. And yet every member of this fantastic zoo of radiolarian forms is built on exactly the same canonical design.

 

Semi-permeable cell membrane ‘evolved’ along with the cell or what came first?

Perhaps the most important function of the membrane is providing the cell with a semipermeable bounding membrane to separate it from the external environment. No cell could survive without some sort of membrane that was relatively impermeable to the cell’s constituents, especially small metabolites such as sugars and amino acids but also larger molecules such as proteins and RNAs.

 

How did different cellular respiration methods ‘evolve’?  If they ‘evolved’ wouldn’t early cells just die?

cellular respiration refers to the aerobic type, which occurs in the mitochondria of all advanced aerobic organisms; but this is not the only type of cellular respiration. Many unicellular organisms use other electron acceptors as the terminal oxidant besides oxygen. Methanogens use CO2, which is reduced to methane (CH4). Other microbes reduce sulfate SO4 to sulfide. Some even “breathe metals,” reducing ferric ions Fe3+ to ferrous ions Fe2+, while others reduce Mn4+ to Mn2+. But all these alternative “oxidants” generate far less energy than the reduction of oxygen to water. All anaerobes using alternative oxidants instead of free oxygen are simple, unicellular lifeforms. Glycolysis and aerobic cellular respiration are carried out in different compartments of the cell. The reactions of glycolysis occur in the cytoplasm of our body cells while the reactions involved in cellular respiration occur in the mitochondria. Only cellular respiration, involving the complete oxidation of the body’s biofuels to CO2 and H2O, provides sufficient ATP to supply the energy demands of advanced metabolically active organisms such as ourselves.

 

Did ATP ‘evolve’?  If so how did ‘early’ cells survive? No ATP, no cellular survival.

ATP and energy-rich phosphates are uniquely suited for the roles they fill. Without them, no carbon-based cell, even the most primitive that we can conceive of, could ever have emerged, either on Earth or on some exoplanet in “a galaxy far, far away.”

 

How did chlorophyll ‘evolve’ using magnesium and if it did how was oxygen produced to support both flora and fauna life?

Chlorophyll: For oxygen-utilizing aerobic life forms, magnesium plays a vital role in the main light-collecting molecule, chlorophyll. Peter Atkins waxes lyrical about its role in the capture of sunlight: Without chlorophyll, the world would be a damp warm rock instead of the softly green haven of life that we know, for chlorophyll holds its magnesium eye to the sun and captures the energy of sunlight, in the first step of photosynthesis.…

 

How did the complex cellular development of the embryo ‘evolve’?  Without the completed process the embryo simply does not exist and does not develop into a living organism.

It is hard to envisage any material phenomenon more complex than the development of the embryo, involving as it does the integration of such a myriad of precisely coordinated events. The totality is beyond grasp. It involves a seeming infinity of subtle and exquisitely choreographed changes in the architecture and shape of cells in different parts of the embryo; precise spatial and temporal ordering of myriads of changes in cell surface properties in different parts of the embryo; numerous precisely ordered cell divisions, particularly in the earlier stages of embryogenesis; a vast diversity of emergent cell movements and cellular morphologies; the setting up of all manner of diffusion gradients; and the programming of numerous cell types to read their exact position in these gradients at precisely predetermined times.

 

Darwin’s cult cannot explain any of the above.  Nothing.  Complexity defeats Darwinism every single time.  This philosophy is just another world-view, divorced from science, but skilled in the usage of tautological statements, jargon and gibberish and of course fraud.

 

Great Reset is the 'Green Energy' and 'Build Back Better' Totalitarianism.

Using CV 19 as a template.

Bookmark and Share

 

 

The cult of ‘Green Science’.  Following the CV 19 Fascism the ‘Great Reset’ will be shrilly pronounced by the Billionaire elite.  It is Green Eco-Fascism, premised on fraudulent science that the Mother Gaia is running a rampant warm-fever and that every year is the ‘hottest year evah’.  In many places on the globe, temperatures have fallen since 1880, and even if some areas have seen a slight increase (less than 2C), that would be beneficial for plant growth, oxygen creation, food production and life in general.  It does not mean the end of the world.  Co2 is not a toxin and is only 0.04% gas by weight in the atmosphere, with only 5% produced by man (or person)-kind.  There is no emergency (just a pandemic of fraud and gullible stupidity). 

 

Then we have the issue of bird evisceration in which millions die each year in most countries, eaten by the bird-chopping turbines. There is the ecological devastation of using solar panels which mar and debase the natural topography and render useless vast areas of potential farmland and needed natural vegetation.  Then there is the economic destruction.  Green ‘Jobs’ are not jobs, they are subsidised welfare payments, to finance an industry that would not normally survive. 

 

 

Green energy projects destroy jobs.

According to Clean Energy Wire in their report of the findings of Europe’s largest trade union confederation, we can see in Germany (and replicated elsewhere), the massive economic disaster that is ‘Green Energy’.

 

The number of jobs in the German renewables sector (production and installation) has fallen from about 300,000 in 2011 to around 150,000 in 2018, the German Trade Union Association (DGB) found in an analysis of employment in the energy transition.

 

The drop in employment is mostly due to the collapse of Germany’s solar power industry over the past decade, as many companies were forced out of business thanks to cheaper competitors from China scooping up most of the market. The number of jobs in solar PV panel production and installation fell from a record 133,000 in 2011 to under 28,000 seven years later.

In the wind industry, the number of jobs dropped from its record of roughly 108,000 in 2016 to under 70,000 just two years later. “Employment with respect to construction renewable energy installations has been very dynamic in the last 20 years, both in a negative and in a positive way,” the DGB said, arguing that many more jobs could be created in the sector again.

 

 

Where have these jobs gone?  They were economically unviable and disappeared overseas to China, or simply make redundant.  China is not pursuing the ‘Green Reset’ but is building up ‘carbon energy’ systems to sustain further growth. 

 

 

Yet, Western Leaders, almost to an automaton, intone that the Green Reset will create ‘millions of jobs’, and the more insipid such as Boris Doris Johnson, with his current concubine or girlfriend writing his scripts, stating that all UK homes will be powered by ‘Green energy’ in every aspect of living, by 2030.  The Green Reset will result in financial bankruptcy for the state (and individual) and will lose millions of jobs.

 

 

Such outcomes have long been predicted by the ‘alt right’, ‘conspiracy’, ‘nutters’.  Green failure was predicted in a Global Warming Policy Foundation report published ten years ago by Dr Gordon Hughes, Professor of Economics at the University of Edinburgh.

 

 

Hughes in 2011:

 

For the longer term, there is little doubt that the primary beneficiary [of green energy policies] will be China. That is already apparent from the way the market is developing.

Renewable energy, he added, will always be a net jobs-killer because of its effects on the broader economy. By driving up the cost of energy — perhaps doubling it — and diverting capital spending from more efficient sectors of the economy, renewables destroy more jobs than they create.

In terms of the labour market, the gains for a small number of actual or potential employees in businesses specialising in renewable energy has to be weighed against the dismal prospects for a much larger group of workers producing tradable goods in the rest of the manufacturing sector.

 

Green energy is simply part of a ‘Great Reset’, where Billionaires and various International agencies manage national and individual lives, based on science fiction, fraud and hysteria.  It destroys the environment and jobs.  Yet the dogma will be similar to CV 19.  ‘Save the planet’.  ‘Guilt free energy production’.  ‘Do your duty’.  ‘This is the greatest threat since World War 2’.  ‘In it together’.  ‘Build Back Better’.

 

This is the main outcome of the CV 19 Pandemic totalitarianism.  The public have been proven to be sheep, imbibing and religiously believing any data or story-line presaged by the magical word ‘science’.  The Great Reset is not a conspiracy, but describes the Green Fascism the elite would like to impose on their compliant and easily terrified citizen-knaves.