RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Gab@StFerdinandIII - Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from.  It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Archive - May 2020

Human and Ape DNA is quite different

Unless you believe the Religion of Evolution's Data Fraud

Bookmark and Share

 

The scientific silliness of proposing that an ape, or an ape-like ancestor, or a ‘common ancestor’ to both Apes and Humans, became Human; or that Humans are just hairless examples of such primitives, is quite astounding.  There are billions of software coded differences (in DNA), between Apes and Humans.  And, of course, the Religion of Evolution has committed data-fraud, to propose that 99% of DNA material is the same, between Humans and Apes, thus ‘confirming’ the Evolutionary march from Bacteria, to Monkey, to Man.  

 

In reality, there is a great gulf – unbridgeable by the Church of Random Chance, Luck, ‘Mutations’, or ‘Genetic Drift’ – between Simians and Humans. I would guess in reality, no more than 60% of genetic material is similar, which considering the basic mechanisms which make up living creatures, is what I would expect.  A similar amount would be found if we compared a Volkswagen to a Jet Airliner.  Did the car mutate into the plane?

 

===

More detailed research has determined that the best genetic-comparison estimate is not 99, 95 or even 90 percent but 84 percent similarity. That 16 percent difference represents 3/4 of a billion base pair differences.  The length of the 23 human chromosomes is about six feet, and the only way this molecular length can be sequenced at present if to break up the strands into lengths that can be worked with, then reassemble the sections. In the early DNA-sequencing work scientists were able to sequence only very short DNA segments.

 

Thus, researchers focused on DNA segments that they knew would be highly similar between animals, such as blood globin proteins. Even in those genes there was a problem. The chimp genome is much longer than the human genome: there are 3,096,649,726 base pairs in the human genome and 3,309,577,922 base pairs in the chimpanzee genome – a 6.4% difference.

 

Furthermore, humans have forty-six chromosomes, chimps forty-eight. It is difficult to compare gene sections that are not even slightly comparable…

 

Evolutionists tend to ignore these large sections lacking congruence in their quest to focus on similarities. Non-coding regions used to be called ‘junk DNA’ back in the days before they were recognized as important segments with critical regulatory functions.

 

…one cannot glean meaningful comparisons between the common occurrence of DNA sequences existing only in humans, but not in chimps. Thus, the comparisons made are largely within the genic regions DNA, such as those that code for blood cell proteins like hemoglobin. One would expect they would have very similar genes because, for hemoglobin to function, the protein must be a very specific shape. Consequently, a good deal of sequence similarity exists between species that need the same functional similarity. But non-coding regions—which are just as important—show more variations, thus skewing the claimed similarities.

===

 

The ‘science’ of Data Fraud.  Evolution has always been a Religion in search of meaning.  Equating yourself with a Simian based on fraudulently data and self-loathing anti-Humanistic theology and philosophy, is emblematic of deep psychological trauma.

 

See: 

Bergman, Jerry. 2020. Apes as Ancestors: Examining the Claims About Human Evolution. Tulsa, OK: Bartlett Publishing. Co-Authored with Peter Line, Ph.D., and Jeffrey Tomkins, Ph.D. Chapter 5: “Are Humans and Chimps 98% Similar?” Jeffrey Tomkins, Ph.D. & Jerry Bergman, Ph.D.

Neo-Darwinsm: a philosophy with no supporting scientific proof

All hail the cult of Science and bow down to the altar of Chuckie

Bookmark and Share

 

 

Edited from Source

 

 

Neo-Darwinism was disproven (yet again), long ago in 2003 by 3 evolutionary believers (called scientists), in Spain.  Not that the Fake News-Fake Science circus would divulge such information.  Experiments, observations, reality which contravenes the Secular Religion of Darwinism-Evolution is studiously ignored, if not pilloried and calumnied.  Neo-Darwinism is a philosophical reflection, not a science.

 

The study performed at the Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de Valencia in Spain, was published in PNAS (i.e., 10/26/2003), and it found no support for the central tenets of neo-Darwinian theory: namely, that evolutionary adaptations arise by natural selection acting on beneficial mutations.

 

Neo-Darwinism, also termed the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology, was formulated in the 1940s to rescue Darwin’s views on natural selection from growing theoretical problems.  It incorporated the necessity of genetic mutations to provide the raw material for variation on which natural selection acts. This revision was necessary when the rediscovery of Mendel’s laws of inheritance ruled out ideas of blending inheritance, showing instead that inherited characters were based on discrete entities (genes) that were passed on unaltered to the offspring.

 

To test neo-Darwinian evolution in a microcosm, Rafael Sanjuán, Andrés Moya, and Santiago F. Elena worked with RNA viruses: organisms with a small, compact genomes that should respond quickly and noticeably to mutations. The team was looking for epistatic interactions: i.e., the effects of multiple independent (non-allelic) mutations on each other, rather than the effects of single mutations alone.

 

These interactions can be antagonistic or synergistic: they can work against one another or with one another. Epistasis is defined as “any interaction of nonallelic genes, especially the suppression by one gene of the effect of a nonallelic gene.” Of note in this paper are the opening lines in the abstract that tell how rarely this important concept has been studied before (this is science-speak for never):

 

The tendency for genetic architectures to exhibit epistasis among mutations plays a central role in the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology and in theoretical descriptions of many evolutionary processes. Nevertheless, few studies unquestionably show whether, and how, mutations typically interact. Beneficial mutations are especially difficult to identify because of their scarcity. Consequently, epistasis among pairs of this important class of mutations has, to our knowledge, never before been explored.

 

Let’s picture a 2×2 grid. On the left side, label the rows “beneficial” and “deleterious.” On the top, label the columns “synergistic” and “antagonistic.” Now put two dots in each box, with the dots representing mutations that will interact with one another.

 


The Spanish team performed two classes of experiments to measure the effects of epistasis on mutations and they did not find a single example of beneficial and synergistic mutations.

The researchers found that beneficial mutations do not add up, even in the best of circumstances.

 

Neo-Darwinian theory assumes that beneficial mutations act independently, but the team found that of the eight actual best-case scenarios (two beneficial mutations working antagonistically, since none worked synergistically) over half decreased the total fitness of the result from what would be expected if the beneficial mutations acted alone.

 

In conclusion, they caution evolutionary modelers to realize that they can no longer merely assume fitness gains (if any) add up.

 

In other words, there is no single scientific proof to support fish to fishermen, bacteria to bats, and hyenas to humans.

 

Corona and the death cult of Scientism

Obey the Fake Science. Don't be a Denier.

Bookmark and Share

 

Covid 19.  Mass hysteria, delusions, the madness of crowds, the cult of scientism and models; the nescient leading others into the necropolis.  Burn down the village to save it.

More people will die post Covid, from the Economic lock down than from Covid.  That is, if you believe the Covid death rates.  In the UK 2000 people die normally, every day, every year.  How many of those are now labelled ‘Covid’.  Were they tested? Was it proven the Covid not a co-morbidity killed them?  How do we know that governments have a clue about who did and did not die from Covid?  Can we see the source data please, if the pesants are allowed such liberties of course?

 

German Virologist:  Covid far less deadly than originally modelled.

He also presented data which gives an indication of an “Infected Fatality Rate” (IFR), eg. the percentage of people infected who will end up dying. New findings show a COVID-19 infection fatality rate of between 0.24 – 0.36% (as opposed to Neil Ferguson who claims the IFR to be just under 1%, perhaps 0.8-0.9%). Previous interviews with UnHerd, with experts like Johan Giesecke who believes the IFR is closer to 0.1%, or one in a thousand.

 

Professor: Economic Impact will cause more deaths than Covid.

“It’s so important to understand that the deaths of COVID-19 will be far less than the deaths caused by societal lockdown when the economy is ruined,” said Nilsson.

“Why? Because of unemployment and all the social problems with it. A bad economy will hurt and kill people in the future.”

 

Australia:  Suicides related to the Lock-down at record highs, surpassing Covid deaths.

Already this year global deaths by suicide are significantly higher than those attributed to the coronavirus. According to the respected Worldometers running tallies, there have already been 374,225 suicidessince the start of 2020, whereas the Wuhan coronavirus has claimed 251,898 lives, Johns Hopkins University reveals.

If the Australian research holds up for other nations as well, the global suicide rate could end up far outpacing the death toll from COVID-19.

 

EU will have worst recession on record  

The data shows that no EU member state is going to emerge from the COVID-19 crisis unscathed with countries in southern Europe set to be worst impacted. Even though Greece has made progress since the Financial Crisis and has earned plaudits for limiting the spread of the coronavirus, it is expected to suffer the worst decline in GDP our of all EU member states at 9.7 percent. Italy and Spain who have both been badly impacted by the pandemic are also expected to suffer GDP contractions greater than 9 percent this year.




 

UK, Bank of England -  worst economic decline since 1706.

The bank expects the economy will contract by 14% this year. According its own statistics, that would be the biggest annual rate of decline since 1706, and markedly more than anything seen in the aftermath of World War I, when the economy was also laid low by the Spanish flu pandemic. The projected fall is also three times greater than the recession of 2008-9 during the global financial crisis.

 

 

Covid was in the UK in November or December 2019.  The natural pattern of viral transmissions is not affected at all, by a lock-down starting in late March.  Only 1% of the population are affected and most of those are over 70, though the Fake News will focus on those who have died who are younger (without mentioning their pre-existing conditions).  There are far more intelligent ways to protect people against Covid than the inane, ignorant policy of ending life and using scientism, fake models and exagerrated Covid death rates as the casus belli.

How to kill your society – 5 easy Marxist and Relativist steps.

Prostrate yourself to the almighty State and its cults.

Bookmark and Share

 

In the era where a Virus ‘pandemic’ shuts down modern Western economies and life, we can all be reminded of the Orwellian themes, which permeate and distort modern life, via the modern-secular religions of ‘science’, relativism and the multi-kulti.

How to kill your society – 5 easy Marxist and Relativist steps.


1) Use Orwellian language; eg. Equate Illegal immigration with Legal

Words have meaning. Illegal immigration is illegal. Legal immigration involves accepting people who will support your culture, fill jobs you want filled; and not compromise your security. Illegal immigration especially of broken families, those who don't speak your language, those from vastly different cultures; the poor, and the uneducated, bankrupt your socialist welfare systems; change your politics for the worse; and irrevocably erase your culture. Yet in the mendacious narrative of politicians and the media, the adjective Illegal disappears from its noun Immigration. Suddenly a negative process which is full of crime, family breakdowns and slave-labour wages is conflated with Legal processes designed to protect culture, security and fill higher-end jobs. Stupid.

In the immoral world of relativity up is down, gay is normal; fraud is science; lying is truth; and immoral is moral. This is progress? Why?

2) Remove Western Civilisation and Heritage from your school system

State owned education belittles the Western experience and is anti-White, anti-European in orientation. Judeo Christian ideals are mocked; whilst hoaxes such as evolution [the rat mutated into the human don't you know] are proffered as science. Multi-culturalism – itself a logical impossibility [no cultures are relatively the same] – overrides anything that the Western world has developed or created. Into this insanity are inserted lies, historical rewriting, and open racism – against Whites that is. This nonsense is offered as history and science.

3) Conflate TV with 'entertainment' and the Media with 'news'.

Instead of rational thinking and positive pursuits, the modern man is told to be dumb. TV, most movies and most other entertainment forms are not entertainment but simply mentally damaging toxins. TV amongst other time-wasters is not just a useless mind-numbing exercise, it is a toxic experience in which the brain is subjected to a wide variety of negative imagery. Sex, sexism, violence, repugnant themes, innuendo, lies and outright idiocy fill the visual junk food store called TV. Too many 'entertainments' are in reality brain destroying toxins. Read a book. Go exercise. Blow up your cable connection. Use your brain. Learn a trade or a language. Do something.

4) Erect a massive state which funds its own theology

Worship of the state is the most pervasive cult in the world today. Statism takes many varieties but the essential element is fascistic to use a word that titillates national-socialists which is defined as: the individual being subsumed into the communal. The individual has no free-will, natural law rights, or even responsibilities. The individual is micro-managed by the state and will pay homage to that state and follow its dictums. In return you receive State 'benefits', 'support' and approbation [maybe even a medal?]. Hate speech laws in Western states are really anti-freedom laws designed to silence critics of the State and some of its post-modern insanity and relativity. All education and media pump out the state pablum and directives. Your job is to follow. This is one reason amongst many why Statist constructs and actors love Islam. The Moslem cult has exactly the same animus and low regard towards the individual human that Statists possess. The communal is uber-alles.

5) Stop thinking and start following

Various cults proliferate the detritus of State theology: Abortion is fun and a 'right'; Globaloneywarming due to a trace chemical is real; Islam-is-Peace though Moslems murder Kufars every day; the EU-topia is the 'future'; Electric cars are effective; Green 'technology' is productive; Socialized education, health and pensions are 'moral' and always just; Evolution in which life came from inanimate matter and the mouse's brain 'evolved' into the human is science. These cults and dogmas all have at their core 2 expressed aims: 1) to devalue the human and 2) to equate the human to at best a evolved animal, or at worse a virus, or a cancer. In this vein the State has a 'right' to both neuter and even to kill the hated human.

With morality effaced and with 'God is Dead' the State swaggers in as the salvific Christ, ready to redeem our animalist ignorance and innate barbarity. Life therefore becomes not only cheap – who cares if 1 million post-Apes as foetuses are murdered in North America each year? - but also something that the State must manage in great detail. Why should the stupid human have freedom? He will just waste it. Ergo death cults for the bien-pensant, and the lovers of State power are quite fashionable [see Islam, GlobaloneyWarming, Abortion].

All Statist constructs go bankrupt. They implode first culturally, then financially. But history is something to be rewritten, not adhered to or respected by the State and its Marxist cult members. Lies, propaganda, and State 'truths' are to be issued. Nothing can lie outside of the State, is how Mussolini described his fascism. A perfect and pithy summary of the current madness of States and cults. It will end and end very badly one day. But no one will blame the main actor – the Leviathan State with its Marxist dogma.