Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
The Logical consequences of Prophet Obamed's Islamic apology tour
It is the destruction of Israel.
by StFerdIII
One of the most important features of the Prophet's speech from Cairo was its location. Al Azhar university is well-known as a center of Muslim and Arab radicalism. It is famous for publishing decrees on why Jews and Christians can be killed, and why Muslims must turn to Jihad to make the world a community under Allah.
Its teachings helped form and than inspire the fascist group the Muslim Brotherhood and other Muslim terrorists and extremist organisations. Many of its professors are amongst the most radical in the Arab world [see here ], preaching a steady curricula of Islamic racism and supremacism.
And this is the site of the Prophet's outreach to Islam ?
The location of the Prophet's historic and inane speech should make Jews and Israeli's tremble with fear.
The message in giving an important speech from Al Azhar is obvious. The Prophet did not speak from Jerusalem which could be viewed as 'neutral' ground with obvious importance to the two Westernized religions and the Arab cult. He did not speak from a public space or a site with no apparent ideological linkages. He had to speak from one of the most radicalising instruments in the Sunni Arab and Islamic world – a university with a long history of anti-semiticism and hatred of the West. What is the real purpose of choosing this location ?
Its import is the message it sends to the Arab-Islamic world. Al Azhar is perhaps the most famous and in many ways the most extremist legal school in the Sunni world. By blessing it with his divine presence the Prophet is clearly implying that radical Islamic theology and culture, as taught at Al Azhar, is acceptable. This university is responsible for some fascistic teachings in for instance, the 'Hanafi' school of Sunni extremist 'thought'. Hanafism at Al Azhar as indicated in a key book taught at the school named, Al-Ikhtiyar fi Ta'lil Al-Mukhtar ' [by Abdallah Ibn Mahmoud Al-Mawsily ] teaches the next generation that:
“the war against the infidels is an obligation of all intelligent, healthy, free, and able men… And when the Muslims besiege their enemies in a town or a fortress, they must call upon them to convert to Islam. If they convert, [the Muslims] must cease fighting them, and if they do not convert, they must call upon them to pay the jizya [poll tax]. If they refuse to pay the jizya, the Muslims must call upon Allah's help in the war against them, to erect catapults, to destroy their fields and their trees, to burn them, and to pelt them [with catapult stones], even if [the enemies] use Muslims as a human shield…'"
[MEMRI source ]
Supremacist racism is being taught at this 'university', which could be viewed in part, as simply a propaganda outlet for modern Jihad. It is likely that most Western academics and media commentators would agree with Al Azhar or at least its defense of all things Islamic. They would view the above paragraph with indifference and divert attention away from real evidence of inspirational fascism, to some fairy-tale idea about the greatness of the mythical 'Arab Enlightenment'. In this view, modern Islamic fascism is a minor problem, abetted by a few radicals; instigated by modern White and Jew colonialism and imperialism.
It must be difficult being so deluded.
The implications of the Prophet's moral relativism emanating from a radical Sunni University, and his disregard of the self-created fascisms which dominate and distort Arab and Islamic society and history, bodes ill for freedom. There is no moral equivalence between Arabs and Jews, or between Jews and Muslims. Jewish culture and society has and always will be superior to that of Arabs and Muslims. Jewish faith premised on an ethical structure which has helped create the modern world is married to a belief in individuals, market dynamics, education and progress. Jews have been significant contributors in all aspects of the modern world. A Jewish list of notables dominates any category of achievement one cares to draw up. None of these attitudes or legacies exists anywhere in the Islamic or Arab world.
It was the Arabs who invaded Jewish territory in 636 A.D. and began the conversion or destruction of Jews, Christians and Greeks within Syria and Israel. It is thus the Arabs and Muslims who are still squatting on Jewish land who are the criminals, and it is the Arab blood lust for Jewish destruction which highlights the fascistic immorality of Arab culture and Koranic ideology. The Koran is replete and contains in every single Sura adjurations to wipe out Jews, Christians or the others. Such a mentality does not a civilisation create.
Obamed's moral relativism and appeasement will have dire consequences. Iran has been given a green light to develop a nuclear weapon. This will take years but if the Jews don't destroy the Iranian ability to produce such a weapon their state and their people or at least 5 million of them, will be annihilated in another holocaust. Once or if Iran has a nuclear weapon the days of the Israeli state will be numbered.
Arabs will be given yet another state from which to attack Israel for the so-called 'Palestinians' who are displaced Arabs, deranged by Arab wars against the Jewish state. Palestine has never existed in history and if Gaza is any indication another Palestinian statelet will be just another international welfare recipient using international money to kill Jews and innocents.
Across the wider Arab world the Prophet's speech will be seen as an excuse to prepare for a war of extermination. American relativism will most likely start another regional war as the Arabs and Muslims will assume that the historical US defense guarantee of Israel is now open to negotiation. If they start a war of annihilation against the Jews it is improbable that the Prophet and his European 'allies' will do anything to defend Israel. Arab calculations will be to use overwhelming force in order to destroy the Jewish state quickly, before international cries for peace or negotiations are organised. With 300 million Arabs surrounding Israel and a military preponderance of 7:1 in men, this is not without plausibility.
The Jews are thus the unfortunate and benighted beneficiaries of the Prophet's disturbed and quite mad world-view. Israel is a creation which has every right to exist, a country which is a safe-home for a people persecuted since before the time of Moses; and as the Prophet said, who have experienced a recent modern holocaust without parallel in written history. In essence the liberal structure of Israel is allowing Jews to re-settle in lands originally founded and settled by Semitic Hebrews and Canaanites some 3000 years ago. The Jewish state has been a remarkable success – a liberal entity in which 1/3 of its citizens are Arabs living in peace beside Jews. No corollary exists in the Arab or Islamic world.
Why then not defend this greatness ?
Moral relativism always fails. The world is black and white – not grey. Can one imagine Reagan, trying to appease Western academics and media airheads standing in Berlin in 1987 and saying, “Mr. Gorbachev, I congratulate you on this wall. It represents the greatness of Russian imperialism and the world is in debt to Russian genius which did so much to create the modern world. American is wrong to call your empire evil. The Russian imperial system is just as honorable as anything America has created. In fact one could say that America has a lot to learn from Russian fascism. There is much that unites our two ideologies and many similarities in outlook we can share and develop. Mr Gorbachev, please build your wall higher.”
Moral immaturity finds its expression in creeds such as politically-correct fascism; multi-culturalism; or support of various cults such as Globaloney Warming or Islam. What is dangerous about moral relativism is that it de-energizes a society from defending itself, or even caring about civilised progress. If Arabs and Muslims are at least as good as those living in Israel why bother to defend Jews or Christians, or Americans or Europeans from Islamic predations ?
Jewish society premised on a rich 3000 year old Jewish intellectual-spiritual order and the Western Enlightenment tradition is now portrayed as being similar to Arab-Islamic barbarism which has impoverished huge swathes of the world in totalitarianism and ignorance.
The logical outcome of moral relativity is first war, and second, slavery.
