Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from. It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
Evolution has nothing in common with science, the scientific method, rationality, experiential data or natural observations. It is a dogma full of non-science, mysticism, catch-all rhetoric, tautologies, and plenty of 'maybes', 'perhaps', 'might have', 'possibly evolved from'.....Neither the fossil record nor basic genetics and bio-chemistry supports the ludicrous idea that fish walked, lizards jumped into birds, or that the shrew 'evolved' into Mozart. Stupid.
Ferrell's 'Evolution Handbook', is full of scientific arguments, many by evolutionists, which disprove the cult of Darwin. Inter-alia, The Big Bust:
“Big Bang is a theoretical extreme, just as is a black hole. It is easy to theorize that something is true, when it has never been seen and there is no definitive evidence that it exists or ever happened. Let us not mistake Disneyland theories for science.
The key is that the Big Bang is a theory, not a fact. There are many problems with this idea:
“antimatter from the Big Bang would have destroyed all the regular matter. This fact is well-known to physicists. As soon as the two are produced in the laboratory, they instantly come together and annihilate one another.
Atoms, even hydrogen and helium, have complex structures. There is no way that outward shooting particles, continually separating farther from each other as they travel, could arrange themselves into atomic structures.
Neither hydrogen nor helium in outer space would clump together. In fact, there is no gas on earth that clumps together either. Gas pushes apart; it does not push together. Separated atoms of hydrogen and/or helium would be even less likely to clump together in outer space.
The idea of gas pushing itself together in outer space to form stars is more scienceless fiction. Fog, whether on earth or in space, cannot push itself into balls. Once together, a star maintains its gravity quite well, but there is no way for nature to produce one. Getting it together in the first place is the problem. Gas floating in a vacuum cannot form itself into stars.
atoms from the supposed Big Bang should just keep rushing outward forever. Linear motion would have to mysteriously change to angular momentum.
It is a physical law that gas in a vacuum expands instead of contracts; therefore it cannot form itself into stars, planets, etc. That which cannot happen, cannot happen given any amount of time.
if the universe were as old as Big Bang theorists contend, there should be little hydrogen in it. It would all have been transformed into helium by now. Yet stellar spectra reveal an abundance of hydrogen in the stars, therefore the universe must be youthful.”
The smartest people in history did not, nor do have, Phds. They had or have, brains. How can order result from chaos ? If a Moslem blows up a public square, will 'random chance' magically clean up said public square and restore order ? Of course not. How can molecules and particles discharged from the greatest explosion of energy imaginable, transmogrify into constellations, suns, planets, orbits, and creatures ? Stupid.
“Angular momentum is another serious problem. Why do stars turn? Why do galaxies rotate? Why do planets orbit stars? Why do binary stars circle one another? How could the super-fast linear (straight line) motion, started by the supposed Big Bang, have changed into rotation (spinning or revolving motion) and revolutions (orbiting motion)?
If the Big Bang theory were true, all stars would move in the same direction; but stars, clusters, and galaxies are moving in various directions opposite to one another.”
These and other objections to the Big Bang theory make a mockery of the idea that it is 'settled science'. How could all of the mass and energy of the incomprehensibly large universe be condensed into a small dot as the theory claims and then 'explode'. What power condensed the energy and mass? How was it released ? Why ? And why would order result from chaos ? Where is this observed in the natural world, or even in the labs of the quackademics ?
If the 'Big Bang' did occur 14-15 billion years ago, and magically through the creative god of random chance, the earth was formed 4.6 billion years ago – why is our planet still spinning ? Don't spinning objects slow down and eventually arrest their movement after some time ?
“...[the] spin of the earth—which is now about 1,000 miles [1609 km] an hour—is gradually slowing down. Gravitational drag forces of the sun, moon, and other factors cause this. If the earth were really billions of years old, as claimed, it would already have stopped turning on its axis! This is yet another evidence that our world is not very old. Lord Kelvin (the 19th-century physicist who introduced the Kelvin temperature scale) used this slowing rotation as a reason why the earth could not be very old. The decline in rotation rate is now known to be greater than previously thought (Thomas G. Barnes, “Physics: A Challenge to ‘Geologic Times,’ ” Impact 16, July 1974).”
It only makes sense that spinning, rotating objects slow down over time. Friction, gravitation, entropy all conspire against it. The Big Bang or Bust, theorists ignore this and many other issues with their theory. This is not science, but dogma.