Bookmark and Share

Friday, March 5, 2010

Media criminality in the Globaloney Warming scam.

Jail time.

by StFerdIII







The cult persists. Human-hating fantasy parading as 'science'. Globaloney Warming is the biggest scam in recent memory. The UN's Oil-for-Food-Scandal was a mere $100 billion theft. The Globaloney-Warming cartel has extracted at least $150 billion and counting from the pockets and treasuries of taxpayers and states. The facts are that Globaloney Warming never existed. Human induced climate change is the worst sort of Orwellian-Totalitarian-anti humanist fiction imaginable. It is eco-fascism and paleolithic irrationality. Any normal sentient person would reject it. Yet the media still tries to sell what should not be sold; and tries to defend what cannot be defended.

Digital media and real world facts make a mockery of the main-stream media. Their collective screaming that humans were generating Co2 which was causing the destruction of Mother Earth is criminal. Every single one of the media personalities that defended, or continues to forward the idea that Co2 causes any climate variation at all, should be in prison. The media has one job – that is to report facts. It does not have the function to act as shills and propagandists for L Ron Gore the eco-whore; lying politicians who view Mother Earth taxes as a convenient way to rule society and destroy any opposition to state power; or the UN which revels in the Marxist reverie of a one-World globalist government.

The media – collectively, individually, professionally – are utter failures.

They never reported some obvious facts around Globaloney-Warming such as:

-Mother Earth produces 95% of all Co2 emissions.

-Tectonic shifts and magma-volcanic activity release Co2 into the oceans – without human involvement.

-Co2 is a natural chemical for life, and the more of it the better.

-Co2 lags climate or temperature by hundreds of years.

-The level of Co2 is the 2nd lowest in the past 2 million years.

-The medieval period was far warmer than today.

-The poles are not melting - in fact the Arctic is at its mean average size, and the Southern Pole is expanding. [When they say the poles are melting they reference the summer season, but during the winter period the ice expands].

-From 1945 to 1975 the earth cooled just as Co2 increased rapidly.

-The UN has 26 models it uses to guess at climate fluctuations. If the science was settled there would be one.

-Anyone who has looked at the database coding or programs, and who is in the computer field, would tell the media that the coding is so bad, and the database design so incoherent, that nothing produced from such a set of models would be reliable.

So why didn't the media investigate the programs, the codes, the logic of the UN-CRU-IPCC's 'models'? How difficult is it to ask for a database review of the supposed settled-science ?

Why didn't the media investigate the hockey stick curve nonsense which flattened out the medieval warm period – done on purpose and with criminal intent by the CRU-IPCC hacks ?

How difficult is it for a professional to ascertain facts not fancy when reporting on something ? Why would the media just believe some buffoon like L Ron Gore or Phil Jones of the CRU without asking some hard questions, and confirming it with real world, historical and real scientific evidence ?

Why is it so hard to use non-urban temperature readings such as, satellite data, oceanic measurements, or rural-hinterland data collections ?  Why do most non-US; non-British national observatories and climate professionals state that the earth is cooling and an ice-age is more likely ?  Why would 1500 snow and ice records from December to February indicate 'warming' ?  What proof is there that the earth is a greenhouse ? [It isn't of course, and if it was, there would be no life here]. None of this was investigated by the main-stream media.

It is disgusting.

As John Robson of the Ottawa Citizen asked – when will the morons in the media admit they were wrong ?:

 

“.... Scientists are admitting error and apologizing. So what's with the rearguard action by journalists? ...Science, we are constantly told, relies on solid facts, not the rubbish scattered all over the blogosphere. So presumably climate scientists all knew there was no statistically significant warming in the last 15 years and just didn't tell us. As for the Medieval Warm Period, well, we've known for centuries that the Vikings farmed Greenland back then. So why didn't all these scientists object to the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) infamous 2001 "hockey stick" graph flat-lining temperature over the past 1,000 years?

...The New York Times admitted this Wednesday that "Grudgingly, many climate scientists are beginning to engage critics, admit mistakes and open up their data" and said scientists "are learning a little humility and trying to make sure they avoid crossing a line into policy advocacy."

....That same New York Times story promptly assured us the public "uproar threatens to undermine decades of work" and that "Some of the most serious allegations against Dr. Jones ... and other researchers have been debunked." And it described the IPCC's critics as "citing several relatively minor errors in its most recent report." ....

A week later John Baird, then federal environment minister, assured both David Suzuki and Elizabeth May "I'm not a member of the Flat Earth Society." I'm not so daft as to expect him to apologize for channelling goofy journalism. But what of my Citizen colleague who claimed on November 20, 2007 that the IPCC's "first three reports this year have demolished the credibility of the last of the climate-change skeptics"? Or Toronto talk show host John Moore last October in the National Post: "Time is running out for the global warming deniers"?

We've seen some very awful columns and news stories and I think those who wrote them owe all of us an apology. Then they can do an online search for "medieval warm period."
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Waiting+hear+sorry/2643549/story.html

 

The media is the Fifth Estate. Its job is not to expand government, help destroy the modern world, abet totalitarian eco-fascism, or engage in philosophies which openly espouse the killing of humans and coercive state funded abortion. The media's job is to fact check, provide analysis and be intelligent.

None of this has occurred during the Globaloney Warming scam. And most of these boors and ignoramuses still persist. The only remedy is for citizens to band together, pool money; hire lawyers and put these losers in jail where they belong.