Contessa Brewer and most of her mainstream friends were dismayed and perplexed that the attempt to yet again blow up Times Square was the work of Muslims. The media and the politicians put in an excessive amount of time and effort, denouncing Whites, White-racism, White-bigotry and forwarding bizarre theories that yet another attempt to destroy part of New York was a vicious plot by Whites connected with Christian or Tea Party movements. As usual, the mainstream media and the politicians were wrong.

Those who say that 'Islam is not the enemy' are perverse and mendacious. No where is this mendacity and mental psychosis more evident than in the media, in political remarks, and in academia. The individual Muslim might be pious and redoubtably tolerant. But his cult certainly is not and it is the theology of the over-arching philosophy which is important, not the pieties, real, imagined, acted or effected, by the cult member. You don't know what goes on in the mind and spirit of Muslims, much like the commentators during the Cold War who informed the world that all Russians were moderates; or the media and academic bores, who fell over themselves during the 1930s, paying homage to German and Italian greatness and of course, moderation.

So it goes with Islam. When an attack on New York City is defused what do we hear from the media and politicians ? First the Obama-cult informs us that the potential bomb – the 11^th since 9-11 – is probably the work of angry White racists, who logically of course, are going to bomb central New York to retaliate against socialized and soon-to-be-bankrupt Obama-care. Isn't that logical ? Don't Whites, all of whom are racists, always resort to bombing public squares, to show their dissatisfaction ? The mayor of New York, himself a White Jew, certainly suspected Whites:

Bloomberg later told CBS Evening News Anchor Katie Couric that the suspect behind the bombing attempt could be a domestic terrorist angry at the government who acted alone. "If I had to guess 25 cents, this would be exactly that. Homegrown, or maybe a mentally deranged person, or somebody with a political agenda that doesn't like the health care bill or something. It could be anything," he said.

Bloomberg is not a dumb man. But he sure sounds stupid.

We hoi-polloi peasants are cautioned that terror attacks can emanate from a wide variety of extremists – Jews, loners, psychotics, or Christian militia. We can't jump to conclusions say the really smart people, because there are so many obvious examples of home-grown fascism and terror, [Timothy McVeigh, the Michigan Christian militia; Lady Gaga]; that it is impossible to say who could be behind a plot to blow up a public space.

Thus we are regaled by the media 'experts' such as Robert Dreyfuss writing in 'The Nation' who believes that the Pakistani terrorist threat is a chimera – the real problem is the White, racist, Tea Party movement:

"It may be that the Pakistan-based Taliban, the Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP), has quietly established a Connecticut franchise while we weren't looking. That's possible. But it seems far more likely to me that the perpetrator of the bungled Times Square bomb plot was either a lone wolf or a member of some squirrely branch of the Tea Party, anti-government far right. Which actually exists in Connecticut, where, it seems, the car's license plates were stolen."

Don't blame Islam. But let's concoct weird theories linking all Whites to racism, fascism and terror. No evidence exists but that is fine. In place of reality, we have politicians and the media, and their fantasies.

Ezra Klein in the Washington Post blames a house foreclosure – not Islam – for the attempted attack:

"foreclosures generate an enormous amount of misery and anxiety and depression that can tip people into all sorts of dangerous behaviors that don't make headlines but do ruin lives. And for all that we've done to save the financial sector, we've not done nearly enough to help struggling homeowners."

So it is not Islam, but the rapacity of White American economic existence, and the inability of Jew-bank lenders to show compassion and flexibility, which foreclosed the Muslim's house and forced him to try to blow up dozens of innocents in central New York. How logical.

The Pakistani has admitted to the plot, confessed to having accomplices and said the attack was a reprisal for Viacom's 'South Park' comedy show, making fun of Mohammed - a deranged pervert, who married a 6 year old; led 80 odd military expeditions; murdered Jews; engaged in plunder, pillage, unbridled war and terror; and who traded slaves.  What is not to make fun of ?  But it does seem rather simple. Faisal Shahzad is a Pakistani terrorist who is inspired by Islam. He is not as the media keeps stating an American citizen except in formality only. When the US government rechecks his application it will become clear that Shahzad lied about who he is; lied about his ties to terror; and lied when he took his oath as a citizen to obey US laws and respect US society. His 'American' citizenship is going to disappear very quickly.

So Shahzad is a Muslim fanatic and part of a network within the US, connected with overseas terror, which intends to blow up US targets. That is clear, obvious and black and white. Yet the media in the US go out of their way to find White racists to blame; or to link the attacks to economic poverty; social dislocation or White racism and 'backlashs' against poor, vulnerable, helpless, earnest, honest, Muslims.

The media is mendacious and collectively quite psychotic.

Written more than 5 years ago, the following is even more accurate today. Our media, our educational systems, and our politicians are committing cultural suicide. When you can't pronounce a pagan fascism, with absurd theological gibberish and infantile ritualization a threat to our civilization what can you say ? Yet another bomb is defused for the 11^th time, in central New York, but one should not say the words 'Islam' or 'Muslim' ? When the obvious is ignored and replaced by the fantastical the road to ruin lies completely open:

“It must be hard being a Muslim in the West. The embrace of rational Western thought immediately demands the rejection of a fascist political theology. This must be the torment of the average Western educated Muslim. How much stock should an educated Muslim put into a moon cult theology with fascist overtones built in the 7th century pagan Arabian desert ? Unless Islam radically transforms itself and proves itself worthy as a political-social construct and organizing principle in the modern world, it must be viewed for what it is – an ideology of fascism. After all Lenin, Stalin and Hitler used the same religious fervor to justify their domination and evil creeds. To say that Islam is responsible for terror is politically incorrect – but entirely accurate.”

Islam is terror and terror is Islam. Any cursory reading of Islamic imperialism makes that obvious - except for those in the media and politics.