Bookmark and Share

Thursday, March 18, 2010

The new Hate Speech – repeat what the Koran and Hadiths say !

Infidel know your place. Don't quote Islamic sources Kafir.

by StFerdIII






The not so new intolerance of the elite, the Liberals, the state cultists has many dimensions and hypocrisies. Vilify and prosecute Geert Wilders in Holland, or basement dwelling bloggers, for discussing the racist and supremacist intolerance embedded in Koranic and Muslim culture. Don't however, bother to enter Mosques and hear hate speech first hand. Punish writers who declaim against Muslim and Arab culture which produces slavery; honor killings; the drinking of camel urine [a big hit in Yemen and elsewhere]; child brides; Jew-hate; terrorism; and illiteracy – but don't prosecute Islamic clerics or Muslim bloggers who openly call for the destruction of the West or their host nation state. But the madness of hate speech laws goes even further. According the UN, the EU, and Canadian Human Rights Commissions, just quoting from the Koran, the Hadiths or sayings of Mohammed, or what a Muslim leader says, is enough to be criminally tried for hate speech ! Less freedom means more !

The immorality and imbecility of the entire 'rights' movement and 'hate speech' legislation is boundless. Unelected tribunals and anti-constitutional and anti-free speech laws are legion. The bastardized corruption of this disease finds its apogee in the 2009 non-binding UN declaration that any criticism of Islam – an Arabian pagan fascism which has devastated and retarded man's development wherever it has been implemented – should be criminally liable:

“The non-binding U.N. resolution was first introduced by Pakistan and the Organization of the Islamic Conference at the U.N. Human Rights Council in 1999. It was amended to include religions other than Islam, and has since passed every year.

In 2005, Yemen proposed a similar resolution before the General Assembly and now the 192-nation Assembly is set to vote on it again.

Resolution 62/145, which was adopted in 2007, says it “notes with deep concern the intensification of the campaign of defamation of religions and the ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities in the aftermath of September 11, 2001.”

It “stresses the need to effectively combat defamation of all religions and incitement to religious hatred, against Islam and Muslims in particular.”

Despite good intentions, Moeller said, “The reality is that wherever Christianity and Islam come into relationship with each other in the culture, the net effect has been for Christian evangelism to be silence or to be intimidated through this act.”

Islam has a 1400 year history of little else but terror, violence and backwardness. There never was tolerance within Islam for Jews or Christians – that is a post modern, academic myth. Some 270 millions have died at the hands of Muslim warriors and fanatics since 610 A.D. The violence never stops.

The UN is of course in large part, controlled by the 57 Muslim-Islamic bloc of states. It is no surprise that this Western hating organization would pass such an inanity as trying to control what people think or say about Islam. But what are the excuses at the national level ? With the exception of the US, most states have hate-speech laws which are designed to protect Jews, Gays, and Muslims. Post-Holocaust the defense of Jews is obviously desirable. But Islam ?

An author like Mark Steyn who simply quotes the Koran, and the raving madness of current Islamic leaders is sued by 'concerned' Muslims using the state and its free, non-paying process of hate-speech prosecution to silence him. It costs him $100.000 before being acquitted of any charge. Geert Wilders quotes from the Koran and local Mosque leaders in Holland and is constantly being sued by Muslim and state-sponsored groups for a hate-crime – even though he is ironically, kept under a permanent security surveillance to protect his life from Muslims who desire to kill him. When Danish-created cartoons of the mad man Mohammed are produced, the Muslim world riots, kills hundreds of people and threatens a jihad against Denmark. Needless to say various lawsuits were launched against the cartoonists and their newspaper attempting to silence criticism of Islam. The Euro elite also quickly distanced itself from the cartoon publications. Muslim sensitivity to any criticism now finds its outlets in the court system in which any criticism of Islam is to be silenced – usually at tax payers and defendants expenses.

How did the 'West' sink to such a sorry level ?

Since when is such infantile intolerance to be defended or even tolerated ?

When are Muslims going to grow up and mature en-masse and individually and begin to reform their Arab theology or at the very least, possess the intelligence to debate, ignore or even laugh at criticism ?

Because Muslims as a collectivity are adolescents we must now we have the sick perversity of state power being used to 'protect' the sensibilities of these immature intolerants, who believe that a moon deity is God, and that everything the psychosomatically ill Mohammed – who went mad at age 40 – said or did is holy. When will the state protect Scientology, or Wiccans, or Nudists for a Better World ? Why protect just one cult ?

Islam is not a religion of course. But even to say that is now a crime. Apparently the state is now going to 'manage' what is discoursed, stated and even believed – but only along 'multi-cultural' uni-directional lines. Thus a Muslim can quote the following and not be sentenced to appear before a Human Rights-Hate Speech Tribunal:

 “Christians and Jews are perverts. Allah himself fights against them.” [9:30]

“Jews and Christians are evil transgressors.” [5:59]

“Christians and Jews must believe what Allah has revealed to Muhammed; if not, Allah will turn them into apes, as He did to the Sabbath-breakers.” [4:47]

“Fight against the Christian and Jews until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low into humiliation.” [9:29]

Fight, kill, rule and humiliate. Are these not 'hurtful' words? Do these sentiments not 'damage the sensibilities' of the thin-skinned, caring and compassionate Jew or Christian ? Is there not psychological abuse inflicted upon the innocent reader ? Why aren't Koranic spouting Muslims selling hate, war and world domination imprisoned ?  Isn't the Koran just one long incitement to aggression against non-Muslims ?

Muslims are never persecuted for hate crimes, though the entire Koran is little more than a long hateful, racist, supremacist rant of Hitlerian type illiteracy and grandeur.

If someone says that Muslims must drink Camel piss by quoting the Hadiths is that hurtful, hate speech? Or is it just repeating what many Muslims read, believe and do since Camel piss is apparently a big seller in Yemen and other Arab locales ? Is quoting from another Hadith about the deluded cult members of Mohammed drinking his piss and sweat hate speech ? Or is it just an illustration of the utter madness of the cult membership and its theology ?

Umm Ayman drank the urine of the Prophet, and the prophet told her:‘This stomach will not be dragged through the fire of Hell, because it contains something of our Lord the Messenger of Allah...’

”This blessing,“ Al-Gum’a added,”[can also] be done with the honorable saliva, sweat, hair, urine or blood of the Prophet. This is because anyone who knows the love of the Messenger of Allah is not repulsed [by these]; just as a mother is not repulsed by the feces of her son, this is even more so [in the case of] our Lord the Messenger of Allah, whom we love more than our fathers, sons, and wives. Anyone who was or is repulsed by the Messenger of Allah must recant his faith.“

....Hence, the ulema, including Ibn Hajar Al-Askalani, Al-Baihaqi, Al-Daraqutni and Al-Haythami, determined that the Prophet’s entire body was pure.”

Should a blogger posting the above be in jail ? He is just quoting Islamic sources. Can we infer from the above Hadith that there is something terribly wrong about a cult when its members are told that drinking camel urine or the warm sweat or piss of a 'prophet' is medicinal or approved by a 'god' ?  Are these not clear examples of illiterate savagery? One would assume that they are.

But to say the truth is becoming optional. March along. Swing the right arm whilst goose-stepping, grin, and nod your head to the mandarins in the grandstands as you march by like a good little slave, as the state and Muslim orthodoxy, manage your every thought, move, and utterance.

Cultural Marxism morphing into state fascism.

 Jubilee.