hy·poc·ri·sy

n. pl. hy·poc·ri·sies

1. The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness.

2. An act or instance of such falseness.

Middle English ipocrisie, from Old French, from Late Latin hypocrisis, play-acting, pretense, from Greek hupokrisis, from hupokrnesthai, to play a part, pretend : hupo-, hypo- + krnesthai, to explain, middle voice of krnein, to decide, judge; see krei- in Indo-European roots.]

It is to be expected. When a deranged fanatic who fantasizes that he is the neo-Medieval leader of an intra-European crusade against Socialist-Marxism and Islam destroys 70+ lives the media of course does not waste its time trying to find 'root causes' or 'explanations' which divorce this White man from Christianity. The media don't agonize over 'why did he do it?' Was there something in Western society or in the mores of political discourse which drove Breivik into insanity? Maybe he was denied a mortage? Maybe he was bullied as a child ? Perhaps he was left off of the Norwegian Olympic speed skating team? No the media wasted none of its incomparable uselessness in self-remonstration and social-psycholigical examination. The links were immediately made and remade into a fence of steel. Breivik was White. He was Christian. He was 'right wing'. He was demented. This is the media's favourite story line. Evil White men equal Christianity which equals blood, superstition and stupidity. Thank Allah we have cultural Marxism and state socialism to save us from the devil of White supremacism. In this vein soon we will learn from Harvard trained PhDs, that Hitler was actually a 'right wing' closet-Christian, along with Mussolini and Castro who were both openly Catholic. Soon the leftist bastards of National-Socialism and Communism will cease to exist. The 20^th century's tragedy of total war will be blamed on right-wing Christians. Or so the big brains will offer.

The hypocrisy of the media in regards to Breivik is fantastically illuminating. Breivik and Christianity stand condemned even though Breivik was not a Christian and not much of a conservative. A very good analysis of Breivik's motives is here:

“The butcher of Oslo, Breivik or Andrew Brewer of London as his Manifesto cover states, spent years accumulating the material for this long 1600 page dissertation....Some of the material is actually well-researched and detailed – even if plagiarized. The dichotomous brain of the insane – at one time lucid, at the next psychotic. Breivik was right about cultural Marxism, the benefices of Judeo-Christian culture, the millions killed by the Moslem Jihad over 1400 years; the destruction of higher purpose within Western society by the political-elite and their multi-cult programs, not to mention the corrosive effects of state socialism and welfare. A large part of his Manifesto is thus correct and full of facts. But to go from facts to murdering innocents is a step that only a psychopath can take.

But the point is this; detailing the benefits of J-C civilization is not the same as being a Christian. There is no proof that Breivik attended church or even believed in the New Testament. No Biblical passages are quoted in his Manifesto giving him impulse to murder Moslems. The same of course cannot be said about Moslem Jihadists who regularly quote the Koran. There are no long dissertations about why 'Christians' have to kill cultural Marxists or Moslems, based on scriptural illogic or mis-reading. Nor is there any evidence within the Manifesto that Breivik was motivated by Christian theology – something again that Moslems cannot claim since the Koran in over 700 phrases advances the idea of terror, war, and sending the Infidel to hellfire.”

When Moslems blow up, dis-honor kill, mutilate or attack non-Moslems, the cultural Marxists search for root causes, and spend an inordinate amount of time justifying the actions. They cleanly divorce the Moslem perpetrating the crime from Islam. They broadcast through the lame-brain media and various political channels that Islam in no way is connected with the 17.500 Moslem attacks since 9-11. Whether it is the Black Juba Christians being attacked and slaughtered in the Sudan, or Black Nigerian non-Moslems being gang-raped in Nigeria; or Jews set upon by Arabs and slaughtered in their beds; or downtown Mumbai being bombed by Pak 'rebels'; or White women being raped in Oslo by Moslems, it matters not. The great brains of the world whine, shriek, cry and pull their hair declaiming that Islam has absolutely nothing to do with the crimes thus committed. Terror is after all 'independent' of 'faith' they claim. Of course in the case of Islam they are wrong.

There are over 800 verses in the Koran advocating violence against non-Moslems and stating that those who don't follow Muhammad's cult are kindling for hellfire. 30% of the Koran is openly anti-semitic – a comparable level to Mein Kampf. Exactly none of the New Testament demands that Christians kill non-Christians. Exactly none of the New Testament describes in lurid detail, the suffering of non-Christians in Hell-fire, as they crackle and burn – kindling for the great Satan's pleasure. And exactly none of Christ's life is comparable to Muhammad's. Christ did not possess sex slaves, he did not lead 80 odd military expeditions, he did not order the murders of others, he did not kill Jews with his own hands, he did not have sex with a 9 year old, and he did not demand that the Christian cult go out and conquer the world, and expunge the homeland of non-Christians.

But besides all that Islam and Christianity are the same. So deformed minds tell us.

Breivik joined or formed [no one knows right now], a group called the PCCTS Knights Templar, dedicated to European liberation from both cultural Marxism and Islamic Sharia Law. Both are laudable objectives. Murdering innocents is not and Breivik needs to receive the death penalty – something that will never happen in the Euroland of happy socialism. This sorry association with the Knights Templar, and Breivik's insistence that Christian culture is the only means to repulse both of his hated enemies, is the only link that the media have to claim that Breivik is a Christian. The man himself never makes that claim. He does declare in his manifesto that he believes that Christian culture is the only antidote to the corrosion of cultural Marxism and Islamist ethos, now dominating Europe. He is right. But Norway is a spectacularly socialist-atheist country, with empty churches and an open hatred for Christian ideals. I don't see how Breivik intended to gain 'popular support' to use his own words, by appealing to the non-existent, and long-ago dismissed Christian religiosity of the Norwegian populace. It is weird.

The fact is this. Breivik viewed himself as the Pan-Euro saviour. A man cut in the mold of Charles Martel or Richard the I, sallying forth on his knightly steed to rid Europe of political pestilence and cultural sin. Nowhere in his 'manifesto' does he quote from the Bible using it as an excuse to murder and rain down carnage. Nowhere does he use phrases from the New Testament to justify the slaughter of the children of the cultural Marxist leaders of Norway. To link Breivik to 'White society' and Christianity is not only unfair but a process of demonization. This is the media hypocrisy that so many are tired of. Grand patience and explanatory sermons for Moslems. Hatred and contempt for White men and Christian culture.