The amou  nt of information in human DNA is roughly equivalent to 48 feet of library shelf space.

Darwin's supposedly brilliant insight was premised on his observation of 14 different finch specimens with different beaks. He naturally concluded therefore that the human and the tulip have a common ancestor. This ridiculous supposition is now called 'science'

The Church or cult of the Holy Evolution is actually quite immune to science. The scientific method does not impress Evolutionists. They are hostile to discussion, reason, or evidence. Evolution offends the laws of thermodynamics and biochemistry. Yet they cannot accept this. Cell complexity, the geological record, the fact that as Bill Gates stated, DNA is an information code more complex than any software which can be dreamt of by man and which is entirely species specific; constrains not the cult. Evolution is not science but a belief system.

Gitt: “..basic flaw of all evolutionary views is the origin of the information in living beings-a coding system can't originate by itself.”

As with Marx, Hegel, Lenin and other dialecticians, power is the ultimate goal of the cult of evolution. Power to control, power to impose, power to feel empowered as a mini-god. In this vein science is secondary. More important to the cult of Darwin and the Church of Holy Evolution is rhetoric, nice illustrations of mythical evolving creatures, ignoring the geological and bio-chemical reality; and of course branding any critic as a 'creationist' a pejorative associated with toothless cavemen who bray that the earth is flat.

A duck has a duck bill and webbed feet, as does a platypus, but nobody believes that this proves that platypuses evolved from ducks.

Apparently if you are interested in real science, empirical evidence and proof you are an idiot. The cult ignores its own members who have apostasied and admitted that bio-chemistry and geology do not support evolution. These would include Hoyle, Crick, Hawking, and Flew along with countless of other evolutionary-lesser lights and once-former atheist-Darwinists.

Crick: “the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle, so many are the conditions..to have been satisfied to get it going.”

In essence evolutionists are praying to the gods of random chance and time. Whenever they are confronted this is their defensive position, 'Over 4.6 billion years, and in 3.8 billion years since life began on earth, anything can happen'. Indeed one supposes that almost anything can happen in the longue durée. But such a belief is not science. It is metaphysical. Nothing supports the idea that the gods of random chance and time created the 100 trillion cell organism named the human. Some problems that the Holy Church of Evolution must address within its liturgy if the cult wishes to practice science:

• The fossil record clearly evinces proof of natural and cosmic catastrophic processes wiping out species after which new species appear fully formed. This contradicts evolutionary dogma.

• Fossils are only created in a catastrophe in an admixture of water, minerals, and dirt, all being quickly compacted. This is contrary to what Darwin's cult preaches.

• 150 years after non-scientist Darwin, geology has not come up with any inter-species links to prove meta-evolution. He predicted millions.

• According to evolution since a rose bush has 56 chromosomes and the human only 23, the rose bush must be more advanced.

• What came first the chicken or the egg or say ribosome or RNA, which are interdependent ? DNA needs protein and protein is based on complicated amino acid sequences. All must be present for a cell to form. Darwinism has nothing intelligent to say about the micro-chemistry of cell formation and function.

• Bacteria to human? Only one or a few minor mistakes in the millions of letters in a bacterium's DNA can kill it. Yet Darwin's cult maintains that single celled e coli became Barack Obama ? The probability of this is less than zero.

• Darwin's cult must model and replicate how 100 Trillion cells can co-join and produce irreducible complexity in bodily systems. Random chance can't do this. Or, at the very least, no one has proved that random chance can create a 100 Trillion celled organism.

• Evolutions must prove that human consciousness and abstract thinking emanated from a rock, or from shared genetic material with say a worm.

• If evolution is true why hasn't the shark's DNA changed in 300 million years? Why did apes appear 37 million years ago and remain unchanged until today?

• We were taught that the flat worm made 'a great leap forward' to become an amphibian. How would a flat worm naturally select to become a frog? Where did the functional information and selection come from ? How would a species without an eye know that it had to evolve an eye ?

• Does a sensible person really believe that a mouse grew to become an antelope who then stretched his neck 9 feet to eat leaves off the top of trees ? The entire structure internal and external of a giraffe's neck and brain has nothing in common with either the mouse or an 'intermediary' species.

One can go on ad infinitum about the Holy Church of Evolution's problems.

Marx, Freud, Lenin and other apostles for the High Church of Dialecticism have been discredited and torn down. Darwin's destruction is only a matter of time and science. As Pasteur said in 1864"there is not a single known circumstance in which microscopic beings may be asserted to have entered the world without parents."

Pasteur disproved abiogenesis a belief still held by evolutionists though they deny it. Inanimate matter does not beget organic life. Yet this is what Darwin's cult proposes. Evolution must, but cannot explain the origins of life or the cell. For them some time long ago, in a mythical never-proven soupy mixture, the enormous complexity of the single cell was assembled by chance......