Without tax money and the support of the Atheists who run the media, education and most of the bureaucracy, the cult of Darwin would be declared as scientific as say Scientology, Alice in Wonderland, or Islam-is-peace. The great streams of other people's money – some $30 billion per annum – which flows to the worthies, the 'institutes' of 'science' and the large cadre of the inevitable group of 'researchers', keeps the fraud afloat. Pull the plug of public provenance and the dirty water of Darwinism, with all its amoral, fascistic attributes, swirls down the drain.

As this handbook by Ferrell so well documents, there is no science to evolution. Not a scrap of it. If rationality informed the thesis of evolution I would support it. Any objective analysis of this cult's dogma reveals it to be baseless, fraudulent, corrupt and anti-rational. Stupid is not science.

Witness DNA. How exactly did 48 feet of library book shelf code embedded in each of 100 trillion cells, become created in each distinct human by 'chance', mutations [which kill] or time ?

“The human body has about 100 trillion cells. In the nucleus of each cell are 46 chromosomes. In the chromosomes of each cell are about 10 billion of those DNA ladders. Sci­entists call each spiral ladder a DNA molecule; they also call them base pairs. It is the sequence of chemicals within these base pairs that provides the instructional code for your body. That instruc­tional code oversees all your heredity and many of your metabolic processes.

DNA is the total of all the genetic possibilities for a given species. This is called the gene pool of genetic traits. It is also called the genome. That is all the traits your species can have; in contrast, the specific sub-code for YOU is the genotype, which is the code for all the possible inherited features you could have. The genotype is the individual’s code; the genome applies to populations, the entire species.”

Your DNA software code is so complicated, it is verily a huge data repository and as with any database, you need to find the information, through indexing and proper storage procedures. This occurred by random chance ? Software is an accident ? Indexing and data retrieval are developed merely from time ?

“DNA is a data bank of massive proportions, but indexes are also needed. These are different from the translators. There are non-DNA chemicals, which work as indexes to specifically locate needed information. The DNA and the in­dexes reciprocate; information is cycled around a feedback loop. The index triggers the production of materials by DNA. The presence of these ma­terials, in turn, triggers indexing to additional pro­ductions. On a higher level of systems (nervous, muscular, hormonal, circulatory, etc.), additional indexes are to be found. The utter complication of all this is astounding. The next time you cut your finger, think of all the complex operations re­quired for the body to patch it up.”

And then we have system maintenance and repair. How would 'natural selection' or mutations explain complex system and code repair ?

“This process of division can occur at the amazing rate of 1000 base pairs per second! If DNA did not divide this quickly, it could take 10,000 years for you to grow from that first cell to a newborn infant. Human cells can divide more than 50 times before dying. When they do die, they are immed­iately replaced. Every minute 3 billion cells die in your body and are immediately replaced.”

Amino acid creation [20 amino acids exist] and their sequencing is simple is it ?

“possible arrangements of the 20 different amino acids are 2,500,000,000,000,000,000. If evolutionary theory be true, every protein ar­rangement in a life form had to be worked out by chance until it worked right—first one com­bination and then another until one was found that worked right. But by then the organism would have been long dead, if it ever had been alive!”

“proba­bility of forming 124 specifically sequenced proteins of 400 amino acids each by chance is 1 x 10 to the power of 64489. THAT is a BIG number! If we put a thousand zeros on each page, it would take a 64-page booklet just to write the number!”

Those pesky enzymes – it is all or nothing. How does a complete system such as an enzyme 'evolve' ? Pray tell and give us all your 'experimental proof', and 'peer-reviewed' sign-offs.

“Enzyme systems do not work at all in the body—until they are all there. “Dixon [a leading enzymologist] confesses that he cannot see how such a system could ever have originated spontaneously. The main diffi­culty is that an enzyme system does not work at all until it is complete, or nearly so. Another prob­lem is the question of how enzymes appear with­out pre-existing enzymes to make them. ‘The association between enzymes and life,’ Dixon writes, ‘is so intimate that the problem of the or­igin of life itself is largely that of the origin of en­zymes.’ ”—*Michael Pitman, Adam and Evolution (1984), pp. 144-145.”

How about that goddess of mutation ? Didn't she waive her magic mutation-wand and create new species from say 'walking fish', or was it 'flying lizards', or maybe the talking shrew ? Didn't Hiroshima produce super-men ?

“Natural selection has consistently failed, so mutations are the last hope of a majority of the evolutionists today.”

“There is a one in 1/10x1000 chance that just one mutation could be beneficial and improve DNA. Now 1/10x1000is one with a thousand zeros after it! In contrast, one chance in a million only in­volves six zeros!”

“Their very rarity dooms the possibility of mutational evolution to oblivion. “It is probably fair to estimate the frequency of a majority of mutations in higher organisms be­tween one in ten thousand and one in a million per gene per generation.”—*F.J. Ayala, “Teleological Explanations in Evolutionary Bio­logy,” in Philosophy of Science, March 1970, p. 3.”

“A mutation is damage to a single DNA unit (a gene). If it occurs in a somatic (body) gene, it only injures the individual; but if to a gametic (reproductive) gene, it will be passed on to his descendants.”

“great majority of mutations, cer­tainly well over 99%, are harmful in some way, as is to be “expected of the effects of accidental occurrences.”—*H.J. Muller, “Radiation Damage to the Genetic Material,” in American Scientist, January 1950, p. 35”

“Mathematical probabilities render mutational species changes impossible of attainment. “Based on probability factors . . any viable DNA strand having over 84 nucleotides cannot be the result of haphazard mutations. At that stage, the probabilities are 1 in 480 x 1050. Such a number, if written out, would read 480,000,000,000,000,000,000,- 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.”

Obviously a mathematically impossible process is now 'science' and 'assuredly correct'. 'Consensus' says that magic created DNA, Amino Acids, Proteins, and Enzymes. All that code and all that complexity – just by chance and randomness. In reality you would have more of a chance winning the lottery every day for 10 years, than in seeing magical mutations, changing DNA and the genomic makeup of one species into another.

Other than that evolution is 'science'. Or maybe it is a publicly funded fraud to erect state-theology in which 'humanism' [formerly called Atheism], along with Statism [variations in Marxist-Socialism], as the religion of the state and the poison or is it the opium, of its loyal, brainwashed, none-too-bright subjects.