End of the World ! [again]

A nice article [here] from yet another scientist, you will never read or hear about in the MSM, who debunks the really, silly, nay stupid idea, that a natural trace chemical 400 parts per million, 95 % emitted by Gaia causes anything. My excerpt.

“The AGW community would have you believe that the science in favor of AGW is settled. As a professional scientist, a physicist with 40 years experience in aerospace and extensive knowledge of atmospheric physics, I can tell you that, indeed, the science is settled, but not the way the AGW extremists would have you believe. Atmospheric transmission measurements taken in the 1950s demonstrate conclusively that increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere cannot be the cause of global warming if global warming even exists.”

There is no warming. But imagine if there was. Could the equation .000004 x .05 [human emissions of Co2 as % of total] possibly cause weather ? Not if you are an erect biped who can think.

“A basic principle of science is that correlation does not prove causation.”

Indeed. But science is not the strong point of the cult of warm. Propaganda and lies are their strengths.

The professional scientist makes 3 points as to why Co2 does not cause warming. In sum the dogma that Co2 causes warming offends basic science:

1) “First, molecules in the atmosphere absorb lightwaves over what are called spectral bands. ...Spectral band absorption in the atmosphere can be quantified based on measurements over a certain distance through the atmosphere such as “90 per cent absorption in this spectral band over a distance of 300 meters at sea level through the atmosphere”.

2) “The second point ..Objects like the earth emit a spectrum, or wavelength continuum, of radiation that is completely described by “Planck’s Law” ..Planck’s curve has been validated by experimental data for over a hundred years”

3) “The third point is that there are two spectral bands in which the CO2 molecule absorbs infrared radiation. The first band is in what is called the Medium Wave InfraRed (MWIR) spectrum, and the second spectral band is in the LWIR spectrum...the LWIR band is the most important in the absorption of infrared radiation..In the LWIR absorption band of CO2 (center wavelength of 15 microns) the transmission measured is 0.0 due to CO2 absorption. That is, total 100% absorption over 300 meters at sea level in the spectral absorption band of CO2 that would capture the most energy, or “heat”, being radiated by the earth’s surface.”

What does the above mean? Co2 absorption of 'heat' is both a myth and unimportant in climatic variation.

“Increasing the concentration of CO2 in the atmospheric mixture of gasses present in the 1950s by burning fossil fuels or by bovine flatulence will not increase the measured absorption in the CO2 LWIR band above the 100% level that was measured and reported in The Infrared Handbook.  You cannot get more than 100% absorption. It is not physically possible. And yet that appears to be the basis of the theory of “man made” global warming.”

See as well, the US Infrared Handbook [link] which contains real science around Co2.

Co2 is both a positive and negative feedback variable. In grade 9 science you might recall that Co2 was named as a cooling agent, and so indeed it is [link]. In any event, I would offer the following:

1. We don't know much if anything about 'climate'

2. The climate is a million-variable convection system, and there cannot be a 'greenhouse' effect akin to Venus or Mars' climate, otherwise no life would exist on Earth

3. Climate always changes and is always in flux for reasons that have nothing to do with mankind

4. Co2 is a trace chemical necessary for life and any fool would want more of it, not less

5. The cult of warm is in the main: anti-human, totalitarian, intent on money and power; being used to expand government and erect a world-wide governance system

No thanks.