DNA is software code. Period. There is no similarity between a Tulip's DNA code and a Human's – contrary to Darwinian, state-funded, academic-fuelled propaganda. Humans did not 'evolve' from bacteria. How utterly inane. Walking fish do not develop the software required, to form a human-head, or to breathe on land. Wings don't magically 'code' themselves within the genome to form on land creatures to allow flight.

The entire arrangement of DNA and its functional differences makes a mockery of the claim that Humans diverged from Apes 6 million years ago. I have built software for 20 years, functional programming and changes to syntax and structure do not occur given time, chance or bugs. Mutations or bugs kill and degrade the software. Time means nothing except that the law of entropy or decline and finally, destruction of the software and its system will set in. Chance is a buzz word which has no meaning in reality. Software code does not change by 'random chance'. Stupid.

The high priest of Atheist materialism, the psychosomatically ill Charles Darwin scribbled an incoherent sketch in his notebook in July 1837 that has come to be known as the Tree of Life. Darwin developed the Tree of Life theory, to explain that some species were lower in the branches of the tree and evolved into the upper branches. He selected species that looked similar to each other and placed them together, like placing the zebra below the horse. No science, no investigation, no experiments, no proof was offered for the true of life. This is why 'science' and 'academia' loved it. Notice the detail of Darwin's tree. Its elegance, its scientific veracity. Its compelling narrative.

The cult of Darwin in the mid-19^th century, knew nothing about DNA, which is the the true scientific key to life. Double-helix co-founder Crick left the cult of evolution and instead turned to the 'spaceman' theory, of why there are humans on earth. He knew that DNA destroys Darwinian naturalism. Darwin and his early cult devotees were entirely ignorant of the complexity of DNA. 'Molecules' as described by Darwin are not simple and there is no chance that life originated with the combination of a few molecules as Darwin taught. Darwin did not know that the key to a person's identity (DNA) is locked solid in every cell of the body. Had he known this, he never would have developed his savagely ignorant theorem.

As every grade 9 science student knows [but most professors and Phds do not], DNA does not change because of external adaptation to the environment as taught by Darwin. Software code including DNA can only change if the changes are made within the code itself and its attendant functional purpose. In the case of humans, your code is formed when an egg and sperm are joined to form a new DNA assemblage, with chromosomes coming from both the male and female donors. The DNA of the baby is strictly controlled by the parents' chromosomes. Human DNA has nothing to do with the environment, as taught by Darwin. Natural selection or environmental influence does not change the DNA in plants, animals or humans. Any scientist should know this.

Worse for the cult of evolution is the fact that scientists have now solidly proven that 80% of the life forms in Darwin's Tree of Life have DNA much different from the adjacent lower DNA and could not have evolved from the predecessor. Some animals have DNA sequences that are identical to sequences in plant DNA, but they obviously could not be related according to the Theory of Evolution. Even brainwashed evolutionists admit that the cheetah did not evolve from a mushroom and the Human did not evolve from the Tulip.

DNA makes Darwinism a project of madness. The only reason evolution survives as a science-fiction story is of course due to state funding. The state's religion is Darwinism. Most of Darwin's supporters scream that the state must be separate from the Church. They should follow their own advice and divorce the unscientific church of Darwin from state funding.