Bookmark and Share

Sunday, May 10, 2015

Dr. J. F. Ashton, 'Evolution Impossible'.

It most certainly is, unless you drink the Kook aid.

by StFerdIII

 

Evolution Impossible. It most certainly is. Evolution offends the first law of thermodynamics, that is, matter and energy can only be derived from the same – not dead material and not from 'nothing'. It also contradicts the 2nd law of thermodynamics, which states that all systems fail [the law of entropy]. Anyone with a modicum of association with any systems knows this to be true. It matters not if the system is open, closed, or a hybrid, it will fail, degrade and decompose. Your computer, your house, your software code, your body, your mind, your eyesight, your car; all will fall and become debased.

 

Ashton was an evolutionist cult member until the 1970s when he saw that mutations kill genomic material, they don't enhance it. In a survey of scientific literature he could not find one single artifact which proved, or even strongly hinted, that software-DNA genomic information could be altered positively, from a mutation. Not one single experiment then or now, has ever shown that mutations over time, will produce new genes, new information, and new code. None.

 

When Darwin wrote his book over 150 years ago, scientists at that time knew very little about the extremely complex biochemistry machinery within living organisms. In fact, living cells had not yet been discovered. In took nearly a century of further scientific study before DNA – a chemical molecule that encodes the structure and the millions of different organisms that inhabit our planet – was discovered....I could not find a single published scientific paper reporting the evidence that supports the fundamental requirement of evolution that new meaningful genetic information arrives by chance.”

 

According to the non-science, and fantasy of evolution:

 

1) dead matter created all living matter.

2) the roughly 2 million fauna and flora on earth today are all related to a single universal ancestor.

3) this single ancestor 'mutated' by 'random chance', impelled by 'enviornmental conditions' and 'striving' or 'natural selection' to produce for example, a 100 Trillion cell human.

4) humans are thus related to algae, grass, mice, tulips, dinosaurs and scum.

5) in this world-view, humans are more correctly viewed as parasites, consuming nature's resources, and killing off 'the noble savagery' of nature.

 

Indeed in the Darwinian world view, the complexity of Amazon could certainly arise in structured, ordered brilliance and cogency, from random mutations of the abacus. No design, no information, no software, no architecture is needed. Just deep time and luck. This view is unlikely to impress current stock holders, or informed consumers.

 

Ashton: “This failure of evolution theory to be able to explain the source of biological information [makes it]....a 'wish' of science, a fanciful hope if the light of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that some a mechanical process to describe how life arose will be discovered.”

 

Evolution is not science. It is a myth looking for facts. A fairy tale looking for the wicked witch of creation or the ugly frog of naturalism to kiss the princess and reveal himself as the prince of life. It is funded by the state which has every incentive imaginable to elevate the mechanistic, devalue the human, and impose its own theology – conformity – upon the bewildered mass. Take away the $40 billion in annual state funding of this cult, and the real science would absolutely demolish it .