Bookmark and Share

Monday, September 21, 2015

Homo Naledi and the missing science, and the missing proof, in the missing link claim

No science, just lots of Darwinian story telling and hyperbole.

by StFerdIII

 

 

Roughly 1600 human bone fragments were recently discovered, in what the secular 'science' media, calls a 'missing link' discovery. The only problem is that the bones are unlikely to be those of humans; and they are not missing links. Other than those two objections the media is spot on as usual. But as one would expect, the media, the 'science' industry, the evolution cult, put their propaganda into high gear, long before proof, analysis, or even common sense is applied to this or indeed any other 'discovery'. The list of evolutionary frauds regarding a missing link is running deep and long [see here]. You would think that the cult of Darwin might be more circumspect before mendacious claims are offered, and fools are again revealed to be charlatans and quacks.

 

Link

Berger’s team believes the bones paint a mosaic picture of a species mixing human-like “Homo” and australopithecine ape features. Composites constructed from four partial skulls in the assemblage have small brain capacities—560 cc and 465 cc—that overlap the usual brain capacities of australopithecines. Such braincases are much smaller than those seen in most archaic humans and less than half the average for modern humans. Nevertheless, despite a sloped lower face and—based on the published photographs—no visible evidence of the protruding nasal bones typical of all humans, Berger has identified the fossils as a new species of human ancestor, Homo naledi.”

 

Berger terms his bone find a 'mosaic'? A mosaic or composite accumulation of what ? Is he suggesting that these bones are half human, half ape ? We have seen that movie and lie before in the guise of various Australo frauds, including the mother of them all, Saint Lucy, she of the virgin birth circa 2 million years ago.

 

Likewise, while Homo naledis thumb is a little longer than that of Australopithecus afarensis, the authors make no claim that it matches that of humans, indicating instead that it differs from all known hominins.  Australopithecine finger-thumb proportions reveal diversity among apes, not evolutionary progress in grip engineering. Nothing about Homo naledis hand indicates it belonged to a human.”

 

So the cranium and appendages have nothing to do with hominids. Ergo this must be the missing link. So spaketh Darwinian theology. As one ardent cult devotee of Darwin stated in relation to the finds:

 

Stringer says, “What we are seeing is more and more species of creatures that suggests that nature was experimenting with how to evolve humans, thus giving rise to several different types of human-like creatures originating in parallel in different parts of Africa. Only one line eventually survived to give rise to us.”

 

What hyperbole. Nature experiments ? How ? Is there a Lab I can go to and see the experimentation in process ? Are apes doing the gene shuffle today to 'become' human ? Or is it all 'natural selection', 'competitive advantage', allele rearrangement over 'deep time', and other rhetoric. What exactly would I, as a primitive chimp, be selecting from and why? Why would chimps or apes 'need to evolve' ?

 

How would I know as a 3 foot high Bonobo chimp that one my future progeny would indeed want to be Barry Obama, a famous cricketer, or perhaps the first evolved chimp on the moon ? What cloud based software domain do I access for this mythical natural selection ? Are there menu options ? How in fact could I change my embryology to allow 'gene shuffling' and other Darwinian verbiage ? Or do these genetic software 'mutations' just magically appear ? And why are mutations destructive 99.99% of the time? How do I get from an ape or chimp to Barry Obama if mutations are negative ?

 

Conclusion. Naledi posing as a missing link is just another big fraud. It is an ape, or maybe a chimp. It is not a human.

 

Despite all the media articles and Berger’s implication that Homo naledi is a glorious mosaic of incipient humanity superimposed on an australopithecine base, the data presented in the study reveals what is most likely an ape.”

 

A discovery of ape bones paraded by the media as evolution, does not make Darwin's acolytes, smart or scientific. It just makes them look very desperate and irrational.