Bookmark and Share

Sunday, January 3, 2016

Design cannot arise by randomness

Code is not produced by chaos, or confused combinations.

by StFerdIII

 

 

 

Software code according to humanists-Atheists-naturalists, apparently self-creates, self-repairs, self-mutates, self-codes. This would surprise modern software engineers. It would be as if some philosopher clutching a Phd declared that Amazon's complex web business, developed from a far simpler website through randomness and self-creation; and this simple web-site had in turn arrived into existence by a random chance explosion of chaotic software code, with no design, which somehow and spectacularly, had arranged itself into a functioning web site. All code declared to be nothing but electrical chance encounters. Such an argument would be declared insane, not scientific. But when applied to the natural world, and to human existence, this dialectical materialsim is applauded as urbane, educated, proven, scientific and obvious.

 

The certainty of madmen.

 

"Even the simplest life requires a tremendous amount of genetic information, so the amount genetic information required for the diversity of life in our world is simply unfathomable. Is it reasonable to assume that this information arose through unguided naturalistic processes? Or does the evidence point to an intelligent designer? 

 

The Information Enigma is a fascinating 21-minute documentary that probes the mystery of biological information, the challenge it poses to orthodox Darwinian theory, and the reason it points to intelligent design. The video features molecular biologist Douglas Axe and Stephen Meyer, author of the books Signature in the Cell and Darwin’s Doubt.”


 

 

 

Your house did not self-assemble, its materials did not arrive in their utility by chaos. Why would the human body, mind, soul and brain be a combination of meaningless chaos ?