Bookmark and Share

Monday, March 14, 2016

Evolution: an epic fail in probability and common sense

Biochemistry, laws of probability, reason and sense disprove Evolution.

by StFerdIII

 

 
Werner Gitt, 'In the Beginning Was Information', p. 79. 
There is no known natural law through which matter can give rise to information, neither is any physical process or material phenomenon known that can do this.”
 
Evolutionists fail basic math. Fraudulent computer models do not 'prove' that life arose from nothing, or that random chance produces DNA software. A designed computer program, fraudulently coded to give the answer you want; is not 'natural selection' at work; nor 'random events' in the natural world. It does not prove that out of nothing, there arose everything, or that a warm pond produced the complexity of a single cell, by magic, lightning or pixie dust. Or that complex DNA software code was programmed by 'nature', or by some interaction of mutations and chaos. This is rhetoric, not science.
 
Basic math destroys the evolutionary theology around the origins of life. Nothing will give rise to precisely nothing. Try it out for yourself. Perform your own nothing-creates everything experiments. Warm up a pond and add some chemicals and see what happens. Fire up the Lab and try to replicate the beginning of life and software systems encoded in living matter. Go ahead. You will see nothing.
 
Information in perfect working code and sequence is not created ex-nihilo. Not only does evolution fail math, it apparently in-toto, has never bothered to study software.
 
Former Evolutionist and Apostate, Cambridge Univ. Scientist Fred Hoyle, in 'The Intelligent Universe' (New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1983)
  • The odds in favor of the chance formation of a functional simple cell are acknowledged to be worse than 1 in 1040,000
  • This is mathematically equivalent to less than zero.
  • Hoyle calculated the odds of the accidental formation of a simple living cell to be roughly comparable to the odds of rolling double-sixes 50,000 times in a row with unloaded dice.
  • As another comparison, Hoyle asks, what are the chances that a tornado might blow through a junkyard containing all the parts of a 747 and just accidentally assemble it so as to leave it sitting there all set for take-off? “So small as to be negligible,” Hoyle says, “even if a tornado were to blow through enough junkyards to fill the whole universe.”
 
Evolutionists and 'science' cannot explain our own world or universe. Yet they write long books on pregnant black holes and multi-verses. Why would 'star dust' turn into you ? Why would planets form and how is the structure of the earth from its center to its crust, containing millions of elements, ores, materials and surface flora and fauna formed by chaos ? The million variables necessary for life including the placements of the moon, the Sun, the axial tilt, the rotational speed, the type of atmosphere, water, and so on; cannot mathematically be supported by chance, randomness or chaos. There are simply too many 'convenient coincidences'. Mathematically this disproves Evolution.
 
Crick, Nobel Prize winner and Evolutionist, who 'mutated' to the Spacemen created Life on Earth cult; after deciding that yes indeed, DNA is very complicated and can't be created by 'chance', admitted that DNA destroys Evolution [Francis Crick & L.E. Orgel, “Directed Panspermia,” Icarus journal, 19, p. 341–346, 1981]. He gave up on Evolution and supported the idea that alien races seeded life on Earth, though how the alien races came into being and why is never explained.
 
Crick apostasied from Evolution because he knew that information is not produced by chaos, or chance. This concept defies physics, math, science and common-sense.
 
Werner Gitt, 'In the Beginning Was Information', p. 79. 
There is no known natural law through which matter can give rise to information, neither is any physical process or material phenomenon known that can do this.”
 
Information can only be designed, formed in syntax, imbued with meaning by a purposeful intelligence. There is no proof, from nature or the lab, that information or intelligence can arise by meaningless processes.
 
Atheism is the opium of non science and narcissistic theology [I think therefore I am God]. John Lennox, a professor of mathematics at the University of Oxford, wrote that according to atheism, "the mind that does science ... is the end product of a mindless unguided process. Now, if you knew your computer was the product of a mindless unguided process, you wouldn't trust it. So, to me atheism undermines the rationality I need to do science."
 
Atheist-Evolutionary theology thus destroys itself. You can't think according to Evolution because all processes are mindless -without a mind – devoid of structure and reason. There is no need for thinking therefore, just 'surviving' and being 'naturally selected' as the 'fittest'. How a process of 'natural selection' would work in the environment of chaos is never explained by Evolutionists. In a mindless world, what is there to select from, why and how ? Whether by math or by philosophy, or whether by science or by reality, Evolution is an epic fail.