The non-science of Evolution and neo-Darwinian cant.  According to Atheists [yes most Atheists but not all, are ardent members of the Darwin cult]; Evolution is a ‘science’, even though it has never offered up a scientific and rational explication of the following:

-Abiogenesis is impossible, so how and why would dead matter give rise to life?

-Obvious design in all living creatures

-Obvious over-design of flora and fauna, far beyond the minimal requirements of ‘survival of the fittest’

-Perfect ratios in scientific laws, material formation and in chemical formation

-A microbe becoming man and adding 100 Trillion cells of complex information and complete processes, a process never observed nor replicated

-The formation by accident of a single cell, complete with DNA, RNA, cytoplasm, protoplasm, a nucleus, cellular wall etc

-Statistical impossibility of a cell or any of its components arising by natural chance, variation or magic processes 

-Protein formation from 20 amino acids, into average string lengths of 300, held together by peptide bonds, with specified information and structure, is by itself as process, impossible to occur through random chance.

Evolutionists fail basic math.  Your average protein has no chance whatsoever of being formed by random chaos.  NONE.

*300 amino acid long protein (say an enzyme like carboxypeptidase) randomly is (1/20) 300 or 1 chance in 2.04 x 10 to the power of 390

*You need to search for the right combination of the 300 amino acids to add the specified information necessary for it to function.  There is not enough time in the Darwinian universe for this to occur. 

Evolutionists always come up with some tortured math to justify the chance that 10 to the power of 390 is possible.  Even if they lie and flail the data enough to bring the chance down to 10 to the power of 40 it is still impossible.  There are only 10 to the power of 80 atoms in the universe.

Just based on simple math and bio-chemistry, Evolution is an epic fail.

Evolutionist Hubert P. Yockey in his seminal work; "A Calculation of the Probability of Spontaneous Bio-genesis by Information Theory," in the Journal of Theoretical Biology, V. 67, 1977, on p. 398 describes the absolute impossibility of complex information systems, which all beings contain, and which informs life; arising by chance.  He called this belief a ‘faith’:

“One must conclude that, contrary to the established and current wisdom, a scenario describing the genesis of life on earth by chance and natural causes which can be accepted on the basis of fact and not faith has not yet been written.”

Another evolutionist stated the obvious about the ridiculous notion that time acting on natural processes would account for the beginning, and then the complexity of life forms:

“I believed we developed this practice (i.e., of postulating prebiological natural selection) to avoid facing the conclusion that the probability of a self-replicating state is zero… When for practical purposes the concept of infinite time and matter has to be invoked, that concept of probability is annulled.” Peter T. Mora, "The Folly of Probability," in The Origins of Prebiological Systems (Sydney Fox, Editor, New York, Academic Press, 1965), p. 45. 

Atheists who strut around pronouncing their natural theology and eschatology as science, should maybe read about Pasteur’s experiments which destroyed abiogenesis:

Louis Pasteur delivered at the “Sorbonne Scientific Soiree” of April 7, 1864:

No, there is not a single known circumstance in which microscopic beings may be asserted to have entered the world without germs, without parents resembling them. Those who think otherwise have been deluded by their poorly conducted experiments, full of errors they neither knew how to perceive, nor how to avoid.

Pasteur – a devout Catholic – is one the greatest scientists and medical inventors in history.  And no, he did not have the Pretty Happy Dude Phd, and no he did not follow the establishment who calumnied, attacked, and violently opposed much of Pasteur’s work [as the ‘scientific’ establishment did to both Kepler and Copernicus].

By default, Evolution supports abiogenesis.  Even if the lying Atheist professes to abhor the idea that dead matter created himself, he or she still cannot explain how single cells formed, how DNA and RNA which are mutually necessary would have arrived by random chance to exist, full of information at precisely the same time, or on a meta level, how scales, bones, organs, the brain, sight and reproduction of one reptile would change into a bird, at precisely the same moment that a female reptile went through the same metamorphosis.

Instead of playing word games, and using fairy tales to sell their religion, maybe Atheists and Evolutionists need to do some real science.