The Green Reich

Green Nazism, Green Fascism.  This is what ‘environmentalism’ truly is at its core.  The cult of Gaia, of climate changing, of blaming plant food for all the ills of natural variations, including seasons, storms, cold, warm, hot, dry, temperate and intemperate has nothing to do with science, intelligence or a commitment to Gaia preservation.  Green-anything is a political-religious construct designed to control mankind and modern society, and over time eliminate mankind and modern society.  It is a Global Fascism.

Just follow the money.  The Globaloneywarming/ClimateChanging cult, is about money and power.  $1 Trillion a year in government subsidies, programs, funding and grants, worldwide.  Power over people, energy, carbon-based systems, industry, transportation, society at large, with an attendant rise in taxes.  A reason to exist for the useless United Nations and other greedy, hungry, socialist-globalist agencies.  Green Fascism and One World Government.

(Godefridi) These suggestions, which date back to 1968, prefigure the “Green Fund” institutionalized by the Paris Agreement (2015), which brings in the annual transfer, under the aegis of the United Nations, of $100 billion from the west to the rest of the world.

The $100 Billion for ‘Green funds’ (ah who can argue with ‘Green’, the children’s future, and Mommy Earth?), will double, triple, octuple in the next few years.  Green Fascism.  As with their Nazi counterparts and progenitors, a form of coerced socialism, Atheist, pagan, violent, bloody.

Fascism was essentially a nationalist form of socialism. Mussolini abolished the elections but left scattered elements of pluralism, including the monarchy. In the twisted workings of Hitlerian pathology, the German was but a cog. The National Socialist theory endeavoured to conceptually destroy the “bourgeois individualism” of the Anglo-Saxon.

Based on Fiction strutting around as Science.

The problem with the IPCC is that it claims to be scientific; “The IPCC is a scientific body” (see IPCC.ch); this is a false claim because, in every way—composition, authority, functioning—it is political and even diplomatic. However, the IPCC claims to derive the “recommended measures”—the third part of its reports—from a scientific summary of the first part, which is, at best, a naive and rationally primitive process. It is rationally impossible to derive a standard from a fact. For this reason, the rational value of the IPCC reports is zero. Not debatable, nor amendable: just zero. This notwithstanding, the IPCC reports have been celebrated for 30 years by most western governments—with the notable exception of the White House, since 2016—as the voice of science.

Admittedly, according to the IPCC, humans emit only 4% of global CO2 emissions: 96% are natural. But by a so-called “radiative forcing” effect, this slight surplus of human CO2 upsets the natural balance and causes global warming.

Green Fascism is worse than Nazism.  The Nazis or their Brethren the Communists, did not view man or modernity as the problem.  They viewed inequality, a lack of state power, and the need to ‘form’ man and woman into the ‘right’ sort of image and human as the challenge.  

To eliminate (“by 95%”) human CO2 emissions, it is necessary to abolish individual freedom. In this way, the totalizing analytic of environmentalism induces a totalitarian algorithm: If human CO2 is the problem, then humans must be restrained, controlled, and conditioned in each of their activities.

Green Fascism however, views man, his industry, society and technology as the problem and since the trace chemical rounding error emitted by man is apparently, producing a radiative imbalance leading to catastrophe, then ineluctable logic leads to the conclusion that most of mankind must be killed.

The divergence of environmentalism from previous examples of totalitarianism is not marginal: it marks an ontological turning point. If human CO2 is the problem, then Man is the problem.

Since mankind is just an ‘animal’ pace the Atheists, the self-proclaimed ‘Rationalists’ and other worthies, killing humans is akin to the slaughter of say bats in a Wind-Turbine, or shrews dying from chemical leakage from a solar panel farm.  It is unimportant and inconsequential.

In the twentieth century, the works of authors such as Arne Næss, Ludwig Klages, Aldo Leopold, Hans Jonas, and Dave Foreman built the first specific theoretical structure of environmentalism, pleading terrestrial ethics, the recognition of the ‘human’ rights of animals and the ecosystem, the halting of progress, and the renunciation of technology. According to this un-anthropocentric ethical framework, Man is but one creature amongst others. The prodigal primate re-joins nature, often designated since 1970 under the name of the goddess Gaia (à la James Lovelock), personifying the Earth as being alive. This ontological degradation of Man is a key aspect of contemporary environmentalism.

As with the Nazis and Soviets, the Green Fascists indoctrinate children.  Green ‘Youth’ Corps will soon appear, children are already being coerced to ‘protest climate change’ by propagandists posing as ‘Teachers’, and icons such as St. Greta the stupid of Sweden, are demanding a ‘revolution’ by the young against the ‘oppression’ and ‘destruction’ of Climate and Gaia, from the rounding error plant food, 96% emitted by Gaia herself.

Now we see that environmentalists no longer hesitate at having teenagers and even children take to the street “for the climate.” In Flanders, in January 2019, there was a demonstration “for the climate” of children from nursery school—from 3 to 5 years old—taking up, in chorus, the political slogans of their elders.  Comparisons naturally come to mind. For example, the Komsomol— those Soviet communist youth organizations—although the Soviets wouldn’t allow kindergarten children to enroll; or the Children’s Crusade, the lunacy of children fanaticized by adults who ended up being slaughtered by the opposing forces; or consider the enlisting of German youth by the National Socialist regime, the Hitlerjugend. In these three cases, we find the identical stratagem of the ideological subjugation of childhood.

Can we imagine schoolteachers forcing four-year-old schoolchildren to demonstrate for capitalism, socialism, or Christianity? Why does what is absolutely unthinkable become legitimate when it comes to environmentalist ideology? The legitimacy of contemporary environmentalism rests on moral considerations, like any ideology and doctrine, but that this ideology mesmerizes with the alleged endorsement of science radically distinguishes it from its rivals.

Green Fascism preaches abortion, euthanasia, killing the old over a certain age (usually 70 is mentioned, the Nazis called the old ‘consumers’ or ‘eaters’ and had no problem in killing the sick elderly); the end of families, the end of child-birth and the end of most populations.  All to reduce the human output of plant food.

Birth phobia is probably the subject which best demonstrates the soul of environmentalism—‘deep ecology’—and its real nature.

Totalitarian proposals, which suggest, recommend, and demand that Man be restrained in each and every activity: travel by car, travel by plane, meat consumption, energy, pet ownership,[2] euthanasia, (un)caring for the elderly, and even not giving birth and forced sterilization.

In essence, Green Fascism, akin to Marxism, Nazism, Communism and Muhammadism is a death cult.  There is no respect for mankind or life.  No amazement at creation, human ingenuity and compassion, or technology and social development.  No appreciation of created nature, the wonders of bodily, spiritual design and structure, the gratitude for modern appliances, conveniences, energy, jobs and food.  Nothing.  Just a hate of the human. 

Green Fascism is a mental illness, a sickness, a heavy pathology of ignorance and paganism.  Far from being ‘progressive’, it is entirely regressive, debased and psychotic.