The ‘science’ screams in consensus unison, that Dinosaurs died 65 million years ago in a cataclysmic and quite short-lived event.  They invoke the Big rock eradication.  When in doubt always invoke a Big Rock theory which quickly ‘mutates’ into scientific fact.  Find a big hole somewhere to justify the claim.  Not a single shred of evidence exists however for the rapid destruction of Dinosaurs.  It is theoretical conjecture based on a ‘nuclear winter’ concept, in which the Big Rock smashed into Yucatan, Siberia, northern Quebec? and within a very short period of time the Dinosaurs succumbed to ‘climate change’. 

However, most species of Dinosaurs were small, not gargantuan, so why would a Big Rock kill the gargantua but also the small and insignificant Dinosaurs, whilst not harming, ‘mammals’ who were the same size as most Dinosaurs.  Tortured theories ‘suggest’ the ‘changing climate’ impacted the Dinos ‘food supply’, arrested their ‘evolution’ and supported the ‘rise’ of mammals….etc etc.  As if they know anything.

Every single human culture worldwide has written, drawn and orally transmitted stories about Dinosaurs, some in the shape of Dragons.  American Indians told the hated White man about their fathers and grandfathers killing what would be called 4 legged Sauropods, winged Pteradactyls and perhaps the 2-legged Rex.  You see this in every culture world-wide.  How then did these ancient and not-so-ancient people know about Dinosaurs?  Were there museums circa 1850 in America with Dino relics, in Northern Europe in the 6^th century, South America in the 11^th century, or in Han China circa 200 BC, or in the Levant circa 1800 BC as given in the book of Job?  You can only transmit, draw and write about what you see, and the reality is that across the world, different people have described similar beasts during different epochs.  These are dismissed by ‘science’ as the ravings of the primitive, the superstitious, the ridiculous and dumb. 

 Soft tissue decay is rapid.  How then can anyone find DNA, collagen and soft tissue from Dinosaurs and declare that evidence to be 65 million years old?  It is just absurd.

 “Stunningly preserved ‘Cretaceous Pompeii’ fossils may not be what they seem” (Live Science).

Source:  “We’ve been told for years that the beds of dinosaurs called psittocosaurs were buried in volcanic ash, similar to the bodies buried in Pompeii. Mindy Waisberger relays new research that calls that scenario into question. Elaine Chen of Columbia University found that the minerals encasing the dinosaur bed were much older (in Darwin Years) than the supposed pyroclastic flow. The new theory sounds somewhat Noahic:

However, flowing rivers would be more likely to carry a range of older sediments. And if the dinosaurs were in a burrow that suddenly collapsed around them after flooding, that would have preserved the articulated skeletons in exquisite 3D, Chen said.

So, they were buried in mud from a flood.”

There is far more science and evidence for a Great Flood than there ever will be for Evolution.  What magic preserves tissue for 65 million Darwinian years?  Where is the proof and scientific method and experimentation which grants that story credibility?