Data fraud is a central tenet of $cientism.  Blind the masses with ‘science’.  Corrupt data sources to present a narrative.  Don’t allow audits or access to the source data (Globaloney-warming, Evolution, and other religions are famous for this).  Hide the declines, inclines or any data which challenges or worse disproves the narrative.  The smallpox quackcination story is no different.

Was smallpox as ‘destructive’ as we are told?  Was it the raging malady, which would kill 30, 40, 50% of children?  Or was the actual death rate like the modern flu, less than 1% even for those most at risk?  Was the actual smallpox death rate far less than 1 in 1000?  And if it was, why is that an ‘epidemic’?  What does that word even mean? Or is ‘epidemic’ used to frighten, cajole, inject and profit? Smallpox affected mostly slums and areas of poverty reeking with filth and unclean water. That might have been a clue about how to stop the disease.

Most of the data sources related to smallpox mortality from the 19^th century, with those wonderful and quite fraudulent graphs showing a marked decline as soon as Jenner rolled out his profitable cowpus injection beginning in 1796, emanate from one single source:  Edwardes (1902) A concise history of small-pox and vaccination in Europe. H.K. Lewis. Available online here. 

All online artefacts (world in data etc) and school textbooks will have their nicely coloured graphs using this source and only this source.  It is curious that one source controls them all, yet few bother to read this source and critique it. 

If you read through Edwardes’ book, there is no proof whatsoever that the data from 1796 to 1838 is accurate (more on this in another post).  In fact, the sources used in most cases cannot be verified and the claims made using that data would fail a statistical analysis.  Yet this book is the foundation for everything you have been taught about smallpox and how the stabbination reduced mortality!  An example is below. But let’s assume Edwardes’ data is valid. If we simply accept Edwardes’ analysis, we see that the UK government’s shrill and livid pronoucements of vaccine efficacy, based on their very own data, which are trumpeted ad infinitum from 1820 onwards, are false, misleading, mendacious and absurd.

https://ourworldindata.org/smallpox  The sources at the end list Edwardes as the reference material for the 19^th century. By 1840 ~80% of the UK population has been stabbed yet epidemics occur in the 1840s, 1850s, 1870s and into the 20th century.

Quackcines did not reduce mortality

The first country to stab for smallpox was England, starting in 1796, with quackcines made mandatory in 1853, though regulations and laws before 1853 (example 1840 given below) were in place to force parents to quackcinate their new-borns.  There is little proof that the smallpox quackcines resulted in decreased mortality, indeed it appears the mortality rate actually increased. 

Sanitation projects and slum clearances starting in the 1840s had a far greater role in disease reduction, than cowpus injections.  Epidemics still raged post 1838.  The quacked died as well as the unquacked.  Many variables would have been in play, none of them acknowledged by the vaccine religious.  The actual death rate from smallpox was small in any event, never more than 1/1000 or 0.1% and often 0.02% or below.  This was true before 1838 as it was after.  Why is a death rate of 0.1% an epidemic?

Before his ascension to Vaxx-heaven in 1823, Jenner was inundated with complaints about death and injury from the cowpus injection or ‘lymph’ node juice and intervention into a human shoulder.  Jenner lamented the problems, but his professionalism was so crude and impoverished that he cared little about data which contradicted his milk-maid fantasy that cowpus or cowpox prevented smallpox.  Jenner never did post stab analysis with control groups or over a longer period of time.  The UK government was never interested in adding up the dead and injured post cowpox intervention.

Dead and injured unreported?

Jenner had no idea about immunology and could not fathom that injecting festering cow pus or lymph liquid from an infected cow might cause injury and harm in the recipient.  There is no proof that either Jenner or his government enablers cared much about accurate and auditable record keeping.  Any death or injury post-stabbination was ignored, a lie imitated by the Corona-jab cult.  They were good at ‘cherry picking’ their cases, as the Corona Vaxx cult would imitate some 200 years later.

In 1818 Thomas Brown a Scottish doctor, a vaxx-religious and surgeon with 30 years of experience, described how no one in the medical profession “could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice.” But after vaccinating 1,200 people and discovering that many still contracted and even died from smallpox, he wrote the following to a journal as a warning and mea-maxima-culpa.

Experience has also shewn [shown], that the natural smallpox have made their appearance, when the vaccine puncture had previously existed, surrounded with the areola of the most perfect appearance for more than two days, and not in the least modified, but in the highest degree confluent, and followed by death. Smallpox pustules, too, existed within the very areola of the vaccine puncture… The accounts from all quarters of the world, wherever vaccination has been introduced… the cases of failures are now increased to an alarming proportion; and from a fair and impartial examination appears, where the smallpox contagion has access to operate upon vaccinated cases of upwards of six years standing, and the contagion applied in a concentrated and lasting form, nearly the whole of such cases will yield to the influence of the smallpox contagion.

Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, “On the Present State of Vaccination,” The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. 15, 1819, p67.

As with Corona, the dead and injured from smallpox injections were ignored by the establishment and those making money from the predation. 

UK Government data, smallpox mortality goes up with the stabbing?

According to the UK Government figures in 1820, 85.000 children were ‘inoculated’ or stabbinated with Jenner’s cocktail of cowpus or lymph node-based injections.  By 1821 the vaccination-cult was in full roar over its benefits – mostly because there was government income to be obtained, some £2 million p.a. in today’s money, rising to £10 million by the mid-1820s.  An example of the propaganda is below.  More here