(Alfred Wallace: Darwinist apologist and source for much of Darwin’s plagiarised metaphysics on ‘natural selection’ whatever that might mean)

Alfred Russel Wallace (1823-1913) was a noted English ‘anti-vaxxer’ unfortunately remembered for his unscientific theory of ‘natural selection’, long since discredited.  His real fame should rest on his outspoken and analytically premised objections to the Small-pox vaccination programs in the 19^th century, which like today, killed and injured on a vast scale whilst providing no benefits whatsoever, unless you count profit-mongering and elite enrichment as benefices.  He is thus a link to the past which confirms that the criminal nature of modern medical $cientism has a very long pedigree ('Spanish flu', 1976 'swine flu' and other government-pharma created frauds).  

Who was Wallace?

Born in humble surroundings in England, Wallace was a 19^th century self-taught philosopher, or scientist to some, who provided many of the proofs for Darwin’s ‘Origin of the Species’ philosophical tract, rebranded as ‘science’ by Atheists and naturalists.  Wallace was born into a poor family, went to school for a period until money ran out, left, apprenticed with a firm until it went bankrupt; became a teacher specialising in geography; and leaving that occupation he travelled as a ‘botanist’ to South America, and Asia during the 1840s and 1850s.  He was never trained in science, naturalism, botany, math or much of anything.  Yet he reached wide fame and still generates genuflection from adoring acolytes – mostly for the wrong reasons.

Magic selections

Based on his adventures overseas in the 1850s Wallace wrote about ‘natural selection’ an idea in the common zeitgeist and pursed by many.  He made the mistake of sending his notes to Darwin (in 1858), who pilfered them and sprinkled them into his own materialist-naturalist gospel without citation or sourcing.  Darwin was an expert in plagiarism (though his religious order today violently denies such allegations as any online search attests).  These ‘Darwinian proofs’ based on his botanical collection of some 120.000 specimens obtained from his extensive travels, made Wallace famous, though infamously no science supports his ideas.  His natural-selection apologia appeared in his large volume ‘Darwinism’ in 1889.  His work on ‘natural selection’ is slightly different in emphasis than Darwin’s but like the pigeon-breeder’s, it is riddled with errors and is simply junk science.  Wallace’s philosophies on natural selection were destroyed in the 1870s and 1880s though few know this. 

Spiritualist

Wallace was also a well-known spiritualist who believed in life after death and the attainment of spiritual perfection.  Unlike many 19^th century philosophers, he was not anti-Christian but might be classified as a spiritual-hermetic, someone with a teleological view of life, God and spirit.  Wallace differed from Darwin et al, in that he was not a devoted materialist and did not belong to the nascent church of ‘science’ or $cientism as it has now become.  

Why Wallace?

So, why waste time with Wallace?  Chiefly this:  Wallace’s main contribution to science and society as a self-taught man, was his strident critique based on government data, of the lack of vaccine efficacy and their mortal and injurious nature.  Yet few associate the pre-Darwinist Darwinian with this important role.  Wallace wrote about the quackcine industry in Vaccination a Delusion and in a letter to parliament in 1885, using 45 years of data both of which destroy the vaccine myth.  It is this historical link back to 1845 using real data and analysis, which makes Wallace important. 

No Efficacy

In fact, as Wallace illustrates, many of the claims used by government in the 19^th century were the same as those used today.  The disavowal and denial of death and injury post stabbination during the 19^th century, used the same techniques and verbiage we heard during the Korona plandemic.  Even the pattern of dead and injured post stabbination programs is remarkably akin to what has transpired in the 20^th and 21^rst centuries.

In his 1885 letter to Parliament, Wallace calls out the fraud of vaccination:

“…there is no evidence to show that the slight decrease of Small-pox mortality is due to vaccination.”

“That several inoculable diseases have increased to an alarming extent coincidently with enforced vaccination.” (eg cancer, syphillis)

No efficacy and lots of harm – the same we experienced with the mRNA fraud during the recent plandemic. 

As Wallace states in his letter to parliament (or pharma-ment as it should be called), the greatest smallpox epidemic in England’s history occurred in 1871, some 70 years after the mass stabbing began, and 18 years after compulsory injections were decreed by law, enforced by imprisonment and fines.  Other epidemics post jabbing also raged during Wallace’s life:

“..on three separate occasions a considerable increase in vaccinations was followed by an increase in of Small-pox….1863 there was a great deal of vaccinations, followed in 1864 by an increase in Small-pox mortality.  Again the number of vaccinations steadily rose from 1866 to 1869, yet in 1870-71 Small-pox mortality increased; and yet again, in 1876 an increase in vaccinations was followed by an increase of Small-pox deaths…”

18^th vs 19^th century death rates

Wallace further empathises the failure of the drugs-for-profit industry, by looking at 18^th century data.  No improvement can be discerned.

“…(18^th century death rates from small pox) varying from 16.5 to 25.3 as the percentage of mortality among Small-pox patients in hospitals; the average of the whole being 18.8 per cent….(in Small-pox hospitals) between 1870 and 1880, give numbers varying from 14.26 to 21.7 as the deaths per centage of Small-pox patients, the average being 18.5….”

Wallace looks at control groups in the Army and Navy who are the most re-vaccinated and the fittest and healthiest members of society.  However, the Small-pox infection and death rates within the military, with all the advantages of constant care, exercise, good food and sanitation, are similar to the civilian population who largely live in unhygienic, dirty, filthy slums, in ‘houses or one two rooms only…insufficient food, overworked, and bad air...’  No demonstrable benefit from the military’s incessant stabbination campaign can be offered.

The poisoned lancet did not confer ‘protection’ for the jab-recipient and in many cases killed them outright or gave them another disease.  Wallace presents to Parliament a table showing the increase in inoculated diseases from 1850 to 1880.  In deaths per million, cancer rises from 302/million to 510; syphilis from 37 to 84; and pyaemia or blood poisoning and other diseases doubling. 

The spread of disease through the needle and enforced vaccinations has been a common theme from 1800 until today.  More here