Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults - Recent Articles

The vacuum cleaner is not a vaccum. It is simply an air pump which disproves the Standard Model.

Sun, 14 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT

“There is no such thing as ‘suction’ in the sense of a pulling force created by a vacuum. Fluids are never pulled; they are always pushed by a region of higher pressure into a region of lower pressure.” — David Halliday, Robert Resnick, J. Walker (Fundamentals of Physics, 2013)

“In the free expansion of a gas... the gas expands into a vacuum. This process is inherently irreversible and results in an increase in entropy. The gas will continue to expand until it fills the entire available volume.” — Enrico Fermi (Thermodynamics, 1937, p. 50)

Ever wondered how the glider was invented ? Let me guess. Surely, you say, as part of the Science-cult, Copernicus the confused, Galileo the blowhard self-promoter (who like the Communist Popov invented everything), Apostle Newton, Messiah Einstotle, or the guy in the wheelchair, were the key contributors? Decisive interventions you state. How can any peasant invent a glider unless we apply 21 layers of abstract geometry and have it peer reviewed and approved? Indeed. What a conundrum.

Cayley in Yorkshire England (1849) figured out that the wings of a gliding vehicle must be curved to allow more air over the top of the wing. The pressure system would lift the object, depending on its weight, and allow it to glide. No need for flapping feathers. By analysing seagulls near his house, Cayley devised a practical design for a glider premised on basic physics which he intuited but did not mathematically render. His design was never ‘peer reviewed’. He saw, he designed, he built, he glided.

Cayley formally knew naught about physics, nor mathemagicianism. He was a practical engineer not a wizard. No magic, geometry or tortured tensor equations necessary. Again, back to pressure systems, observations, trials and prototypes. Cayley the engineer realised his paper design, through hard work and innate intelligence over a long period of time. He did not have an -ology degree. He simply understood how systems of pressure operated. Back to the aether which apparently, according to the smartest-people-evah, does not exist.

With Cayley in mind let’s walk over to an everyday appliance named the ‘vacuum cleaner’. They do love their propaganda. A vacuum cleaner is simply an air pump based on pressure dynamics (Halliday et al 2013).

An electric fan inside the machine rapidly blows air out the back. This forces the air pressure inside the machine to drop slightly below the atmospheric pressure of the room.
The higher-pressure air in your living room immediately rushes in through the hose to equalize the pressure, dragging dirt and dust along with it.

It is pure, basic fluid dynamics (Fermi, 1937). Yes air is a type of fluid. There is no magic. No vacuum. No Einstein. No Standard Model. Your cleaner is a mechanical pump, not Einstein’s magic gravitational suctioning (not to be confused with the fraud of gravitational ‘lensing’). More here

Stuff Happens and the Standard Model. What 'happens' when you marry 2 failed theologies ?

Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT

Mechanical engineering and real world innovation has nothing to do with ‘The Science’. In fact, in most cases, they are built in defiance of the same. We manufacture shoes, ergo we are ‘The Science’. Right on Fanboy. Your genius is unbounded. Just a gentle information-note, ‘electricity’ was discovered and put into use by aetherists and…oh no…even worse…’men who had faith’. Anything but that.

“Wait, hey you there at the medieval construction site, yes you, stop, hold on, put down the tools. It is 1140 A.D. You idiots are in a dark age; you even believe that male genitalia indicates maleness. Fools. You cannot build this Cathedral to your imaginary friends with an enormous spire, tower, massive columns, pointed arches, vaults, flying buttresses, stained glass windows, using wood, iron, stone masonry and complex engineering and mathematics to render perfect symmetry. You morons. Saints Kepler, Newton, Einstein and Hawking have not yet arrived to enlighten you with ‘science’ and ‘truth’.

How can you possibly innovate without maths, models, peer review and consensus! You don’t even bathe! Stop now, stop I say you deniers of science, you must wait 500 years for the ‘Enlightenment’!”

Who are the morons I wonder? Sorry mi ‘lord, tis only 900 A.D., we cannaught build the bridge, just cannaught, we don’t have ‘the science’ and peer review to do it mi majestick benevolence, beset as we are by flying viruses, whirling planets, terrifying seasoning changening, womenly men, bearded missus’, labour ant specie tis penurious mi grandly greatness… (ashamed, bowing, holding hat in hand)….Yes our age is certainly ‘the age of science’.

Let’s have a walk through the creation of our Solar System and this planet as granted to us the toothless, bent-over vassalised-mass by our superiors from, ‘The Science’.

“A Fairy Tale: The creation of our Solar System and the Earth, the People’s history.” Peer Reviewed. Consenus. Published by: The Science^TM

“Gather round children. Here we have a story explaining our existence, by ‘The Science’. It is fascinating, illuminating and frightening, but magically, it has a happy ending…Get close my lovelies, that’s it, here are your blue blankets, science plushies and warm milk, now listen to the People’s history, the ‘science’ children of how we came to be….

Billions of years ago children, from absolutely nothing, for no reason, and completely unexplained, an egg was built and contained all the material and matter for the universe….this small egg exploded children, yes it erupted little ones, and all matter was ‘created’ by this fantastic creation event. Yes you are right to express surprise and amazement children. Imagine the egg in our refrigerator being so omnipotent children! This little object also possessed magical skill my little ones, a fantastical power, where it could generate space itself, materials and variant light speed during and after the explosion….truly inspiring and multi-talented my little ones….

Magical stories. Get them into the religion while they are young. The exploding egg and the fighting cloud always amazes them. The mathemagician explains. We don’t want the little dears becoming deniers or conspiracy whackjobs. Yes, the People’s History of our planet can be scary, but children, it ends well. Listen, memorise, repeat. Good boys and girls. We will get to the rabbit-out-of-the-hat trick at the end, the mathemagician promises. Drink your milk.

Then children, after some time, almost 10 billion years in fact, in a lonely stretch of the self-generated, self-forming Milky Way galaxy, our own galaxy children, an unimportant, small, impoverished galaxy on the edge of nowhere….a giant molecular cloud, vast and ageless, drifted silently through space. Think of it children this cloud, alone, without direction and purpose, just drifting….how terribly depressing children…then….

As this insignificant cloud travelled it ingested swirling hydrogen gas and glittering cosmic dust. Gentle turbulence, magnetic fields, and internal pressure, all derived from an original nothingness, all created by an eternal nothingness, held the cloud together children. This cloud fought children, yes it fought, quietly and desperately, resisting the pull of gravity, a force generated by an unknown factor, contrived by other unknown powers but one capable of the most extraordinary feats of strength….Yes you are right to be afraid and tense for it was a monumental battle children, indeed a frightening and uncertain time, the balances of natural law, forces emanating from nothing and still ‘evolving’ arrayed, in combat, all was flux…..but then….

A cataclysmic moment arrived children when a nearby star reached its end of life. Yes children, over endless time a star had formed, manufactured from these same terrific forces created by nothing, it passed through life children, all the stages and as our cosmic cloud travelled nearby, this star, sadly, suddenly, died…Yes you are right to have sad faces and look down, no children it was not killed by a non-existing virus but died in a staggering, translucent blinding flash. As this poor, innocent star died children, an ancient George Floyd, yes, yes you are right to wail children, the material irrupted and within an instant it became a ‘supernova’, the iron core collapsed before exploding with incomprehensible ferocity. A violent shockwave raced across the darkness, slamming into the newly forming giant gas-dust cloud……it was frightening children, beyond our ken, a terrifying collision, but then it becomes even more distressing…..More here

The Moon: the absolute poverty of the 'Standard Model'

Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT

“The best explanation for the Moon is observational error—the Moon does not exist.” — Irwin Shapiro (Former Director of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics).

“The isotopic similarities between the Earth and the Moon have thrown the giant impact hypothesis into a crisis... The standard giant impact model cannot easily explain this isotopic likeness.” — H. Jay Melosh (Distinguished Professor of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, 2014 Royal Society publication)

The Joker

Shapiro was making a famous, cynical joke among astrophysicists, but it highlights the poverty of the propaganda.

The mathematical and dynamic parameters required for the Moon to exist where it does, at the size it is, necessary for life on this planet, are statistically so improbable that it is mathematically easier to assume the Lunar node does not exist, than to try to explain how it was formed from the standard gravitational model.

You remember Newton’s God called ‘Gravity’. It assembles, it forms, it attracts, it repels, it explodes, it implodes, it organises, it disorganises, it aggregates, it destroys, it manufactures life but also scary singularities like Black Holes; and it keeps the lid on our atmosphere even as you use a $50 Walmart air pump (‘vacuum cleaner’) and clean your carpets overcoming this holy spirit of a force. Just the mere thought of this divine being brings you to your knees in supplication and mumbling. Don’t forget to transmute iron into gold.

The second quote above describes a very specific disproof of astrophysics’ explanation of Moon formation. They can’t avoid the obvious. Chemical fingerprints do not lie. But the ‘Standard Model’ does lie and if can’t outwardly lie, it will tie you up in layers of mathematical knots that can never be unravelled. Easier and more fun to chew off your right arm.

Here is the issue:

The Standard Model (SM) cannot explain the ‘Moon’. The SM cannot explain the Moon’s existence, creation, materiality, its precise distance from this planet, its lack of rotation, why it is pinned to the Earth, and the SM will never discuss its impact on the aetheric flows of energy and pressure within space, which impact this planet (see Allais). Other than that, the SM is ‘expert’ on all things Lunar - especially ‘landings’.

We discussed previously why the Moon has almost no impact on tidal flows and why the SM (as usual) is completely wrong on ascribing the complicated ‘heaving’ and ‘lifting’ of 370.000 Gigatonnes of water globally every day within large basins in patterns which have nothing to do with the Moon’s precession, to an orb 1/81 the mass of this planet. More here

Tidal flows and more issues for the Standard Model. Newton, Laplace, Darwin - their maths are wrong.

Sat, 30 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT

Now let’s discuss tidal flows, another Fanboy ‘proof’ of the ‘rotating’ Earth and of the magical-druidic properties of that most famous of amen words - ‘gravity’.

We head back to the chapels of Apostle Newton and Messiah Al of the Einstein, the Lord, the giver of sentience. In summary, the standard Newtonian-heliocentric model, explicated through its divine professors, relies on a magical, invisible tether to explain the movement of our oceans. Canonical dogma demands that:

One part of the Standard Model states that the Moon, resting in a dead ‘vacuum’ 238,000 miles away, 1/81 the mass of this planet, uses the amen-word ‘gravity’ (now bow your heads and pray), to reach through the vast void and drag giga-tonnes of water around the Earth every single day. A second explanation, based on the prophecies of the Messiah A-Stone (Ein Stein); the Moon through its very limited mass ‘displaces’ space-time and drags the oceans on this planet.

The volumes involved are unimaginable and the movement, violent. Does the above pass the farmer’s common-sense test?

The gospel of the Standard Model does not make sense if we have a look at the physical mechanics of the oceans or the incredible volume of water being lifted and pushed (a tide is water being lifted and heaved, they are not ‘flows’ like a river current). If we consider the real nature of tidal flows, we will see the massive anomalies the establishment tries to hide with their arcane maths.

What Do We Mean By Tidal Flows?

In the simplest terms, according to oceanographic science, tidal flows are the cyclical rising and falling of the Earth’s oceanic baseline. There are many reasons why water will oscillate against its natural baseline within a container but as usual ‘The Science’ will only allow one answer, one model interpretation.

More here

The Wind and the Earth’s ‘Rotation’. Is the Earth a cosmic-ballerina spinning and generating ‘wind’?

Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT

“Whatever difficulties we may have in forming a consistent idea of the constitution of the aether, there can be no doubt that the interplanetary and interstellar spaces are not empty, but are occupied by a material substance or body, which is certainly the largest, and probably the most uniform body of which we have any knowledge.” — James Clerk Maxwell (a practical man who confirmed classical electromagnetism and that space is not a vacuum, but a fluid plenum).

“There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment... All perceptible matter comes from a primary substance, or tenuity beyond conception, filling all space, the akasha or luminiferous ether, which is acted upon by the life-giving Prana or creative force, calling into existence, in never-ending cycles all things and phenomena.” — Nikola Tesla (affirming that the environment, the aether and external thermal/kinetic forces drive all physical phenomena, perfectly aligning with the thermal pressure gradient model of wind. Tesla is one of the greatest - and most ignored - engineers in history).

You remember your high school or equivalent science teacher. Before ‘teaching science’ he taught Phys-Ed and was your track coach. Before that German. Before that English. Before that he dabbled in maths for a few years. He was trained in ‘science’ for a few weeks in the summer. When you arrived in class chewing gum and telling silly jokes, you were surprised. What is the Phys Ed guy doing here? Too early for track practice. Am I in trouble again?

As your track coach hurdled through the ‘science’ and ‘physics’ curriculum he went through the Standard Model and undoubtedly alighted on the ‘Wind’ concept. He related this to sports of course. Wind was now equated with competition, opposition, movement, spinning, ‘survival of the fittest’, ‘evolution’, things-happen and various sports phenomena. Truly inspiring. But then your common-sense-critical-thinking module was turned on. Does this guy actually know what he is on about?

Wind is an issue for the Standard Model (below), but the issues are never discussed because they are not in the standard state-narrative-textbooks. This is called propaganda.

The Narrative on ‘Wind’

Let’s run a quick audit on the science curriculum to understand exactly what is being taught and why. The claim that a rotation is necessary to create wind is physically inaccurate. To be fair this is not precisely what is taught in the ‘school’ systems but it is certainly implied and it is wrong.

More here

The Earth's 'Bulge'. Is there a 'Bulge'? Is there a spin?

Sat, 16 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT

The claim is that there is a middle-age-overweight-bulge, nicely sited around the Earth’s waist. You would think the spinning ballerina of the standard model would be in finer fettle. Scientism and its Fanboys always use the ‘bulge’ as a ‘proof’ of heliocentricity and their model. This is of course more than tendentious; it is tedious and wrong. The 2 quotes above indicate why. The post below elucidates. A bulge, if it even exists, does not need to be generated by rotational movement.

The modern scientific establishment expects you to believe the Earth is a spinning water balloon flying through a dead, empty vacuum. Descartes, Hook, Leibniz, Faraday, Maxwell, Lodge and the founding naturalists of classical physics knew better. They understood that the universe is a highly pressurized fluid machine.

In fluid dynamics, a non-rigid body (the Earth) subjected to the immense, rotating pressure gradients of Descartes and Lodge’s aether would settle into an oblate shape, more expansive at the equator, ever so slightly flattened at the poles. This fact can be replicated in a lab and in the classroom.

1. The Establishment’s claim & fraud

The heliocentric argument for the bulge and the oblate shape of the Earth, dates back to Saint Newton of Gravity and the Light Corpuscle. Both theories are wrong.

Using centrifugal dynamics Newton calculated that if the Earth were rotating (and he assumed, orbiting the Sun), the centrifugal force would push the mass outward at the equator. His ratio was 1:230 (the poles are 1 slice out of 230 flatter than at the equator), or a 17 miles bulge at the equator. There is nothing wrong with this idea. You can take a non rigid ball and confirm this for yourself as you spin it at a high speed.

To prove Newton right, the French Academy of Sciences launched two large surveying missions in the 1730s (Terrall, 2002). One team went to Lapland near the North Pole and another to the equator in South America in the appropriately named Ecuador. They physically measured the ground of one degree of latitude. There are issues with their work and calculations (I list a few problems at the end, in sum their measurements were fraudulent, contain your shock).

Maupertius, a devoted Newtonian who led the effort, claimed a large bulge with a 1:179 ratio, or 22.1 miles. This is what the cult of Newton wanted. Given these ‘proofs’, Newton’s idea of a centrifugal force, forcing an oblate shape onto the Earth seemed sensible. Game on for the Copernicans.

More here

Star Trails and Rotation. Pointing your phone at Polaris does not prove much of anything.

Sun, 10 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT

“The universe is not executed twice over, once as reality and once as a copy in the mind. Whether we say the Earth rotates on its axis, or the Earth is at rest and the whole universe rotates around it, the two statements describe the same physical facts.” Mach, E. (1883) The Science of Mechanics. (Reprinted 1919, Chicago: Open Court Publishing).

“We cannot say the Earth rotates ‘relative to space.’ We can only say it rotates relative to the fixed stars. If the stars were to rotate around the Earth, the centrifugal forces and the optical effects [star trails] would be identical.” Barbour, J. (1889) Absolute or Relative Motion? Vol. 1: The Discovery of Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cosmo boy comes over for a visit. It is night time. He takes your iPhone or Android. He sets it on your desk which has a view of the heavens. Energised by Youtube videos and with a magnificent arm wave and a confident voice Cosmo boy declares, “Chud, here is definitive proof that the Earth spins and rotates while singing Largo al Factotum. I am going to turn on your iPhone’s camera, point it Polaris and take time-stamped photos over the next 12 hours. You will see swirling moving stars Chuddy. Twirling and dancing. Case closed on the stationary Earth. It is the science Chud.” Grinning widely and showing imperfect teeth Cosmo boy launches himself into your wine and popcorn and turns on yet another Star Trek re-run.

In related ‘science’ I sat a child on a merry-go-round, took long exposure photos and with great conviction declared that the universe rotates around the ride.

Optical Tautology

Cosmo boy has committed a fallacy. His iPhone claim is the classic ‘Optical Misinterpretation’ with a pre-determined, tautological claim which of course, proves nothing (Assis 1999). What he has happily identified, surprising himself, is a ‘Star Trail’ photograph or pattern. He is right in that if you leave your iPhone camera on a long exposure (or use an app) pointed at Polaris, the resulting image will show the stars moving in perfect concentric circles around the North Star. Nice one. So, what? This tells Chud precisely nothing.

1. The Relative Motion Problem

The Standard Model preaches ‘Relativity’ and relative motion. They do this to avoid absolutes and the fact that light interference experiments do not find a motion of this planet, but they do find an aetheric wind. The aether is anathema to ‘The Science’, given it destroys modern physics and cosmology - especially its foundational and quite mutilated mathematics.

In any mechanical system involving two objects, in this case the Earth and the celestial sphere, if we have ‘relative motion’, it is simply impossible to determine which object is moving based on sight alone.

Cosmo Boy: “The Earth is spinning at 1,000 mph, making the stars look like they are moving.” This is tautological. Your iPhone photos have not proven that this planet is the object in motion.
Counter claim: “The aetheric deck which contains the stars, is rotating above a stationary Earth.” (Sungenis, Bennett, 2014). There is nothing illogical in this claim and this is what the evidence may support.
Evidence: The iPhone captures the exact same celestial image in both scenarios. Use Einstein’s ‘thought experiment’ analogy. Imagine a photo of a moving train taken from a platform which looks identical to a photo of what appears to be a moving platform taken from a train. It is obvious that an image is not a proof of cause. Remember the Corona plandemic cry when people died after being stabbinated, “Correlation is not Causation.” Sounds sciency.

But there is more to it for Cosmo Boy. In fact, his very ‘proof’ is most likely a disproof of his theory that the Earth is twirling around in tights and singing baritone. More here

The Poverty of the Big Bang and Gravity. A brief history of modern astrophysics-Scientism.

Sat, 02 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT

“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” (Arthur Schopenhauer)

“Scientists...are used to dealing with doubt and uncertainty. All scientific knowledge is uncertain….Science alone of all the subjects contains within itself the lesson of the danger of belief in the infallibility of the greatest teachers in the preceding generation….Learn from science that you must doubt the experts…Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.” (Richard Feynman, quantum physicist)

Feynman’s adjuration to understand and challenge the ignorance of ‘experts’ is rarely followed. The opposite exists in our world. Submission and compliance to any who profess scientistic divine powers is de facto. Mass deference and fear from Schopenhauer’s establishment ridicule and violence. On full display during the Corona Plandemic Medical Nazism. It should be noted that ‘Corona’ was the name of the US military surveillance and espionage project in the 1960s. They do like to have a laugh.

The Church of Science is full of pharisees, sadducees, wizards and sorcerers who will convince you that dead RNA or bacteria detritus from a bat will kill you; injected poisons are health; plant food has deranged climate; testes are ovaries; and bacteria became you; and the universe is infinite in age and size and ours is one of dozens of such universes. Never question the narratives. When you do, expect to be censored, debarred, ostracised, debanked, perhaps imprisoned, murdered or crucified. Thriving democracy, free speech and all that. This post follows on from an earlier one on issues with the Standard Cosmological Model.

What model?

There are many issues with the ‘Standard Model’ of astrophysics and cosmology as outlined on this substack. We will summarise some key areas in this post. Anyone with an open and curious mind, regardless of background or education, can understand that ‘The Science’ in many domains is unsettled, distorted, distended and discordant with reality. So too with physics and cosmology.

The ‘Standard Model’ is not standardised on ‘science’.

It is built on Copernican philosophy and Copernicus and Galileo offered nothing new, no evidence, no observational facts, just philosophy,
Unproven geometrical and ontological demands of Relativities (there are many),
Ad hoc theories with no proof (dark matter, dark energy, endless time) and,
Tautological apriori conclusions and assumptions when viewing and interpreting data to fit a ‘Big Bang’ event model, itself a theory promulgated by a Belgian Catholic priest and astrophysicist (Le Maitre, or ‘the master’).

Most of what is offered is unproven and guesswork. It is almost wholly mathematical.

In short physics, astro-physics and cosmology is a metaphysical-ontological mess, not a ‘model’ of anything. It resembles the cat’s breakfast, not a well-constructed temple or church.

The electric-plasma-aether universe, the aether, the variance of light speed and about 100 other issues outlined on this substack destroy the Relativities (plural) and Big Bang. The ‘Standard Model’ and its components simply do not hold up to scrutiny or common-sense analysis. More here

Newton and Gravitational theory is incomplete/wrong. It ignores the aether, fluid dynamics

Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT

Many are surprised to learn that Newton himself found the idea of ‘Action at a Distance’ or gravity traveling through a vacuum without a medium, to be a mechanical impossibility.

“That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else... is to me so great an absurdity, that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into it.” Newton, I. (1692) Letter to Richard Bentley, 25 February. Reprinted in: Turnbull, H.W. (ed.) (1961) The Correspondence of Isaac Newton. Vol 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 254.

Saint Isaac is saying that if you apply a ‘vacuum’ to space or our atmosphere you are irrational and anti-science. The author agrees.

In 1920 Eddington, Einstein’s English-speaking prophet and apostle who fraudulently helped ‘prove’ Einstein’s relativity in 1919 (an embarrassing and obvious deceit); admitted that ‘gravity’ is often just a name we give to the behaviour of the medium (the aether) rather than a property of the objects themselves.

“Force, energy, and momentum are not things that exist in the world... They are components of the curvature of the world. What we call the ‘force of gravitation’ is merely a name for the fact that a body does not move in a straight line when there is nothing to stop it.” Eddington, A.S. (1920) Space, Time and Gravitation: An Outline of the General Relativity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 95.

(Note: While Eddington used the term ‘curvature’, those of us still living in reality recognise this as a Pressure Gradient of the aetheric vortex. See below.)

More here

Lab and School Experiments proving Faraday, Maxwell and the Aether; disproving Scientism.

Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT

“The dielectric [the insulation] is the seat of the electrical action... The particles of the dielectric are in a state of polarised tension (spinning around), and the induction is an action of those contiguous particles upon each other. The conductor is merely the limit of that action.” Faraday, M. (1839) Experimental Researches in Electricity, Vol. 1, Series XI, Section 1295.

“The velocity of the electromagnetic disturbance in a cable depends on the magnetic and electric capacities of the material surrounding the wire... It is the same medium through which light is propagated. The wire is but the axis of the wave.” Maxwell, J. C. (1865) ‘A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 155, p. 491.

Few if any have read or heard of the two quotes above. They emanate from practical men who experimented and knew what they were talking about.

The proofs generated by such men are not taught, except by people like the author, who have a great deal of faith and belief in engineers and farmers and zero trust in the quackademic-Scientistic establishment. If you want to ‘reform’ politics or ‘science’, put real people with real practical skills in charge. Get rid of the degree holders and the grinning parasites often confused with comedians and actors.

The author has led simple experiments which confirm the last few posts on electromagnetic energy, how waves and electrical energy are formed and transmitted and why energy is in the medium not the wire. It does not take much effort to prove Faraday and Maxwell correct in an aetheric context. In fact, the 3 experiments cited below would take about 2 hours to perform.

The key and essential point of demonstration to be confirmed is that so-called ‘empty space’ between objects, called the ‘vacuum’ by Scientism, possesses physical properties like Tension, Elasticity, and Pressure.

If those 3 properties exist in ‘space’ the Standard Model is rubbished. It is very telling that few in ‘academia’ pursue this rather obvious experimental proof. The output would demonstrate the falsity of their religion.

Below are three high-impact and very simple classroom audits that move the conversation from the realm of what ‘The Science’ loves and orgiastically embraces namely abstract maths, to mechanical reality.

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults - Recent Articles

The vacuum cleaner is not a vaccum. It is simply an air pump which disproves the Standard Model.

Stuff Happens and the Standard Model. What 'happens' when you marry 2 failed theologies ?

“A Fairy Tale: The creation of our Solar System and the Earth, the People’s history.” Peer Reviewed. Consenus. Published by: The ScienceTM

The Moon: the absolute poverty of the 'Standard Model'

The Joker

Tidal flows and more issues for the Standard Model. Newton, Laplace, Darwin - their maths are wrong.

What Do We Mean By Tidal Flows?

The Wind and the Earth’s ‘Rotation’. Is the Earth a cosmic-ballerina spinning and generating ‘wind’?

The Narrative on ‘Wind’

The Earth's 'Bulge'. Is there a 'Bulge'? Is there a spin?

1. The Establishment’s claim & fraud

Star Trails and Rotation. Pointing your phone at Polaris does not prove much of anything.

Optical Tautology

1. The Relative Motion Problem

The Poverty of the Big Bang and Gravity. A brief history of modern astrophysics-Scientism.

What model?

Newton and Gravitational theory is incomplete/wrong. It ignores the aether, fluid dynamics

Lab and School Experiments proving Faraday, Maxwell and the Aether; disproving Scientism.

If those 3 properties exist in ‘space’ the Standard Model is rubbished. It is very telling that few in ‘academia’ pursue this rather obvious experimental proof. The output would demonstrate the falsity of their religion.

“A Fairy Tale: The creation of our Solar System and the Earth, the People’s history.” Peer Reviewed. Consenus. Published by: The Science^TM