Co2 is a trace chemical 400 ppm or 400/1.000.000 equalling .00004% of all atmospheric gases by weight. Gaia emits 95% of this natural chemical necessary for life. Thus we have the mathematical impact of human created Co2 as; .00004 x .05 equalling, a whole lot of nothing. This application of higher mathematics against the claims of the cult of warming would seem to indicate to the objective observer, the following about the advocates who scream that Co2 causes weather:
They are mentally ill but call themselves scientists.
Phd stands for a Pretty happy dude, Piling on the corrupt and fraudulent models high and deep because they can't find a real job or develop real-world skills.
Propaganda is now science and the scientific method now means lies, fraud, data manipulation and getting grant or tax money.
The Sun and cosmic influences are deemed unimportant and like Galileo they believe that the earth's rotation causes tidal waves.
They also believe that the earth is flat, that Aristotle's theory of geo-centricity is still valid; and that life arises from dead matter. All 'settled consensus science' from times past.
They believe that natural chemicals necessary for life are now toxins and that slavery is freedom.
They believe that polar bears are falling off the edges of the flat earth, since the white bear population has doubled in the past 20 years.
They failed grade 9 math and science in which you learn the following; trace chemicals fall out of greater processes; rounding errors do not cause destruction; the earth's climate is a convection system of grand complexity, not a greenhouse.
They failed grade 8 science which taught the scientific method.
They failed basic history in which natural climactic cycles of warm and cool have occurred without human intervention.
The cult of warm is an anti-human, watermelon society. Green fascist on the outside [control, corruption, tax]; Red Marxist on the inside [control, corruption, tax].