'Scientism' or the cult of science regards, state-force and coercion as the new 'standard' of scientific truth. If you 'deny' their scientism theology, you will not receive government money, university jobs, nor be published. Trillions of dollars have flowed into 'green', 'climate-change', 'warming' and other physical and metaphysical projects of failure. There is no science when fraud, corruption, untested-unproven theories, and inane abstractions are taking place. There is certainly no science, when force, the threat of job loss, or the inability to find work or get published becomes the norm. I do recall that Nazi and Communist societies were also inclined towards the physical eradication of their enemies.

The earth is not warming, it might be cooling, it might be doing a whole lot of nothing special, in regards to climate. There certainly is not a catastrophic linear linkage between Co2 which is plant food, and 'weather'. We can't model what we do not understand.

Professor and Climate cult skeptic Richard Lindzen in a WSJ op-ed wrote:

“In addition, there is experimental support for the increased importance of variations in solar radiation on climate and a renewed awareness of the importance of natural unforced climate variability that is largely absent in current climate models. There also is observational evidence from several independent studies that the so-called “water vapor feedback,” essential to amplifying the relatively weak impact of carbon dioxide alone on Earth temperatures, is canceled by cloud processes.

There are also claims that extreme weather—hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, floods, you name it—may be due to global warming. The data show no increase in the number or intensity of such events. The IPCC itself acknowledges the lack of any evident relation between extreme weather and climate, though allowing that with sufficient effort some relation might be uncovered.

World leaders proclaim that climate change is our greatest problem, demonizing carbon dioxide. Yet atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide have been vastly higher through most of Earth’s history. Climates both warmer and colder than the present have coexisted with these higher levels.”

No one can dispute the above. Co2 is 4/100 of 1 % of atmospheric gas by weight and has been higher in % content in eons past.  We are Co2 poor, not rich.  Climate is obviously a complexity of convection variables that are poorly understood and which cannot be modeled.  Humans only emit 5% of the plant food trace chemical.  Gaia 95%.  Apparently in order to stop winters from being warmer/colder/wetter/drier/longer/shorter/sunnier/cloudier, we should kill Gaia.  Such is the reason of 'science'.