The rhetoric of Green Fascism is anything but benign, Gaia-friendly, reasonable, scientific, or even intelligible.  It is anti-human, anti-science gibberish and totalitarianism, driven by money, power, evil and even ignorance, an absolutism driven by the age-old banalities and sins of human nature and broken souls.

The ‘renewable energy’ scam, with the terminology itself an oxymoron (emphasis on moron), is demanding a ‘net zero’ by 2050, which means an end to all hydro-carbon usage within 30 years.  This goal means the end of civilisation.  The Green Fascist expectation, nay objective, of ending our world will indeed pass, completed not by the plant food trace chemical, 95% emitted by Gaia herself, but by Green Fascists themselves, who have always had the intention on ending people’s very lives.

The anti-human cult of ‘green’ bounces and capers like baboons on every possible media channel and forum, proclaiming their net-zero fantasy.  The end objective is to deracinate the sources of energy and power which build a modern civilisation.  Their claims mimic and imitate the purveyors of quacksines, including all governments, the fake news and faker science, who still demand that you ingest chemicals which are unsafe and ineffective, to protect health and ‘those around you’ against a non-event.  The rather tawdry connection between the great unwashed mass with reality and basic science, allows Green Fascist proclamations to be positioned as arguments of reason and even morality, whilst any analysis of this corrupt $1 Trillion per annum industry reveals the opposite.  The Green Fascist, net-zero scam is anti-human, anti-science based on ‘scientism’ or the obeisance to the demands of whoever controls the narrative, money and political processes.

The endless campaigns of carpet-bombing propaganda, over 40 years if not 150 years, has convinced the public to accept the rather idiotic claim that hydrocarbons which are clean and affordable, are in fact a Gaia-destroying excess.  Further, they proffer the lie that there exists technology to replace the same which is ‘friendly’ to Gaia, non-intrusive, non-polluting, and renewable.  Like mad carnival barkers and quacks at the circus, the net-zero fanatics say renewable energy is affordable, sustainable, scalable, and will not destroy nor even impede or inconvenience your life, but make it richer, even moral.

The Green Fascist agenda proposes to create a ‘first-generation green power grid’ relying on wind turbine farms, solar array farms, and power storage battery banks replacing hydrocarbon fuel and nuclear power plants. In addition, the new power grid would somehow sustain the gigantic and varied global fleet of electric vehicles which would replace the internal combustion engine. 

There is of course no possibility of a wind or solar panel powered grid supporting millions of EV batteries in a country.  None.  EV batteries are not Gaia-friendly, relying on lithium and other rare metals in their construction, each involving large extraction mines and open sores on Gaia’s tender skin.  Mining, transport, assembly and maintenance is only feasible with hydro-carbon transport and systems.  Each battery would need to be replaced every 6 years and since they cannot be reused, they will be thrown into landfill sites, leeching toxins into the soil and water supplies.  Given their costs, many families will simply have to do without a car. 

How an electric battery is going to power huge land transports, trucks, container ships, or airplanes over medium and long distances is not explained.   Maybe we go back to ocean going sailing ships? The impact on supply, distribution and modern life will be enormous.  Of course, taxes will be imposed by governments to replace ‘lost’ hydrocarbon tax revenues, further marginalising those on average or lower incomes, with extensive plundering of the ‘rich’ (those with above average incomes) to subsidise the entire process from mineral mining to wind and solar panel grid-based usage.  The subsidies are always ignored in the ‘analysis’ of MW output and efficiency.  For the record, a coal plant is 20 x more effective per MW output than a solar farm.

Another ‘inconvenient truth’ is that in every single country, the immature current estate of solar and wind ‘power’ production of total energy needs ranges from 3% to 25%.  It is lunacy to expect that within 30 years, this estate can be scaled-up by a factor between 33x and 4 x to replace our hydrocarbon output.  It took our civilisation 150 years or more, to build the current complex, efficient and largely ‘clean’ energy infrastructure.  There is no possibility of replacing this system in 30 years by other ‘technology’ green or not.  Never. 

There are not enough rare earth metals, lithium, and other materials including copper, to build-out the EV fleets, and the solar and wind farms.  The laws of thermodynamics have been ignored.  You can’t create lithium and other metals from nothing. Simon P. Michaux of the Geological Survey of Finland has compiled an exhaustive study dismantling the objective of phasing out hydrocarbon fuels.  His comprehensive analysis focuses on the required physical material resources and the extraction timeframe to create renewable energy generation systems.  A PowerPoint summary of his thousand-page study can be downloaded here.

This comprehensive study found that the current estimated metal reserves are woefully deficient in almost every category.  The table below lists base and rare earth metals requirements to build the new grid and E.V.s.  Deficits are yellow highlighted.  For example, copper is an integral part of a high-voltage grid system, coming up short by a shocking 3.7 billion tons.  Can we dig enough open mile-deep ore pits to meet that shortfall?  Are open pit copper mines Gaia-friendly, are they renewable?

Table 1 Below is the study’s table estimating the years to produce the required metals at the current production rates.  For example, lithium would take almost 10 millennia to achieve.  In addition, these scarce minerals must be mined, transported, and processed, relying exclusively on hydrocarbon fuels, which would create more ‘carbon emissions’ and deplete hydrocarbon reserves.

Petrochemicals from oil and natural gas make over 6,000 everyday products indispensable to modern society.  There are no known alternative substitutes for hydrocarbons. Yet the climate change fanboys catastrophically ignore petrochemicals that provide many indispensable goods.

Europe’s embargo of Russian oil and natural gas, along with the terroristic sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines, is exposing the myth of green energy.  As a result, Germany, the poster girl for ‘Green’, has resorted to heresy by reactivating coal-fired power plants.  Unfortunately, importing high-cost natural gas, petroleum, and distillates to compensate for lost Russian imports is insufficient to meet demand.  Germany needs a substantial volume of hydrocarbons to produce petroleum-based products (i.e., BASF Chemicals) and sufficient electrical generation; otherwise, it will have to de-industrialize.

Nothing supports Green-Fascist, net zero activist claims.  Math, morality, science, the current estate, and reality itself are missing from their objectives.  Eliminating indispensable carbon fuels, as the EU-topia is experiencing currently, at an accelerating rate, will quickly collapse modern society.