Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, August 27, 2024

Darwin's God of Time is a chimera.

$cientism and the religion of deep time. Some basic analysis reveals the poverty of the claim of 'billions of years'.

by StFerdIII

 

 

Darwinism and the religio-poli-cracy of Evolution relies on having faith in the God of Time to take nothing to everything.  Microbiology, irreducible complexity, mathematical probability and real science destroy the facile Victorian theology that random chance can generate species transmutation and metamorphosis.  No evidence for this exists.  Evolution also has nothing to say about the origins of life, or arrival of life forms including the arrival of the ‘fittest’. 

 

Given that real science and maths destroy the simplistic mechanical-materialistic view of Darwinians, they fall back on the God of time.  If the universe is 13 billion years old, and the Earth some 4 billion, perhaps the Darwinian faithful intone, given various ‘quantum fluctuations’ merged with electromagnetic energy, suffused with chance and experimentation, the variegated life forms on Earth could have formed.

 

Is the Darwinian belief in long ages really supported by ‘The Science’?  The evidence is certainly unkind to the religion of Evolution. 

Even if you believe the cosmos is 4 Trillion-Brazilian years old, there is no mathematical probability that your ~70 trillion cells, with circa 6 feet of DNA coding per cell, or 67 billion miles of DNA per person, formed by chance within even that limitless amount of time. Time is a chimera when it comes to the secular religion of materialism. ‘Time’ can never create the conditions to allow the building of functional and coded design that runs for 67 billion miles in the case of a single human’s DNA, not to mention the endless complexities of flora and fauna species. Yet the ‘long ages’ is all Darwinians have when it comes to their holy Trinity of time, mutations, and chance and even those claims are more propaganda than scientific.

Let’s have a look at long-age ‘dating techniques’.  More here