Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, October 29, 2024

Copernicus the Confused (1473-1543). Copernicanism is Philosophy not 'Science'.

Part Two of Science as Philosophy. The Catholic mixes up ideas, models and provides no evidence for this theory. All hail.

by StFerdIII

 

 

There was just one alternative; the earth’s true velocity through space might happen to have been nil.” Henrick Lorentz (1886 paper, “On the Influence of the Earth’s Motion of Luminiferous Phenomena,” in A. Miller’s Albert Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity, p. 20.)

[Relativity arises from…] The failure of the many attempts to measure terrestrially any effects of the earth’s motion…” Arthur Eddington (Eddington, The Nature of the Physical World, 1929, pp. 11)

 

Creation myths

 

 

 

In the creation myth of Copernicanism, it is taught that the Catholic monk Copernicus, born in Poland and educated in Italy in the glare of the ‘enlightened’ late 15th century ‘Renaissance’, was a clear eyed, far-sighted seer and prophet, a man who knew the truth and through his jeremiads proclaimed the true gospel of mankind’s cosmic unimportance and utter irrelevancy.  This lion of noble scientism fought against the crude, savagery of the dark superstitions, dragging mankind into the light of reason, Sun worship and heliocentricity.  So the myth goes.

 

 

 

Without Copernicus, so we are told, we would still be in hairshirts, baying at full moons, convinced of a flat earth, and burning lonely widows on heaps of faggots.  Misery and darkness our companions.  Instead, the modern can rejoice in the gospel proclamations of Materialism and Rationalism; of mankind’s cosmological insignificance, of the uselessness of existence; and that our Earth is nothing in the great canvass of the universe.  A hairless ape, a less agreeably evolved virus, so is mankind described by Materialism and the Copernican ‘principle’.  More here