“The best explanation for the Moon is observational error—the Moon does not exist.” — Irwin Shapiro (Former Director of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics).

“The isotopic similarities between the Earth and the Moon have thrown the giant impact hypothesis into a crisis... The standard giant impact model cannot easily explain this isotopic likeness.” — H. Jay Melosh (Distinguished Professor of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, 2014 Royal Society publication)

The Joker

 

The mathematical and dynamic parameters required for the Moon to exist where it does, at the size it is, necessary for life on this planet, are statistically so improbable that it is mathematically easier to assume the Lunar node does not exist, than to try to explain how it was formed from the standard gravitational model.

You remember Newton’s God called ‘Gravity’. It assembles, it forms, it attracts, it repels, it explodes, it implodes, it organises, it disorganises, it aggregates, it destroys, it manufactures life but also scary singularities like Black Holes; and it keeps the lid on our atmosphere even as you use a $50 Walmart air pump (‘vacuum cleaner’) and clean your carpets overcoming this holy spirit of a force. Just the mere thought of this divine being brings you to your knees in supplication and mumbling. Don’t forget to transmute iron into gold.

The second quote above describes a very specific disproof of astrophysics’ explanation of Moon formation. They can’t avoid the obvious. Chemical fingerprints do not lie. But the ‘Standard Model’ does lie and if can’t outwardly lie, it will tie you up in layers of mathematical knots that can never be unravelled. Easier and more fun to chew off your right arm.

Here is the issue:

The Standard Model (SM) cannot explain the ‘Moon’. The SM cannot explain the Moon’s existence, creation, materiality, its precise distance from this planet, its lack of rotation, why it is pinned to the Earth, and the SM will never discuss its impact on the aetheric flows of energy and pressure within space, which impact this planet (see Allais). Other than that, the SM is ‘expert’ on all things Lunar - especially ‘landings’.

We discussed previously why the Moon has almost no impact on tidal flows and why the SM (as usual) is completely wrong on ascribing the complicated ‘heaving’ and ‘lifting’ of 370.000 Gigatonnes of water globally every day within large basins in patterns which have nothing to do with the Moon’s precession, to an orb 1/81 the mass of this planet.  More here