RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from.  It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Recent Articles

Evolution's Fantasy world. A pagan religion, not a science.

Contradicting all known science does not make the cult scientific.

Bookmark and Share


Scientists Henry Morris and Martin E Clark, provide trenchant and rather frightening critiques of the Evolutionary theological fraud. Evolution is no more science, than its related claim that dead matter, or nothing, gave rise to everything. Yet the virign birth of matter, energy, the universe itself, is scientifically impossible. It contradicts the first law of thermodynamics. Mutations and the mythical natural selection [from what, why and how?] contradicts the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, as does the fable that mutations enhance, change and improve. 99.9% of mutations are either negative [disease, entropy] or at best neutral.


As a philosophy Evolution is an amoral evil, leading directly to Atheist-Fascist concepts embedded in Nazism, Communism, or moral relativism. Indeed the Nazis gassed 5 million Catholics, and wiped out the Evangelical church by 1937, and the Catholic by 1942 [neither Church has ever recovered in Germany]. In Russia, 10.000 Churches were pulled down, Christianity outlawed, hundreds of thousands of Christians or 'dissenters and traitors', were sent to the Gulags to die.


'Evolution teaches that “creation” is continually being accomplished by nature’s evolutionary processes, but the most basic law of science, the law of energy conservation, states that nothing is now being created of destroyed. Evolution teaches that there is a universal process of development and increasing order and complexity in the universe, but the second law of thermodynamics (which is a basic law of nature, with no exceptions known) states that all systems tend to become disordered and simpler. All things tend to grow old, wear out, run down, and die. Evolution involves universal change “upward,” whereas the real processes of nature involve a universal change “downward.” The concept of special creation of all the basic “kinds” of plants and animals, with provision for ample variation within the kinds, is much more in accord with the actual facts and laws of science than is the speculative philosophy of universal evolutionary development. Thus, evolution is not really a science but a religious philosophy....'


'….that practically all mutations (even leading evolutionists acknowledge this to be true of at least 99.9 percent of all known mutations) are harmful, rather than helpful, in the supposed struggle for existence. Mutant varieties thus almost always die out if left to themselves, or else revert back to the ancestral types.'


'….evolution is actually a complete worldview, an explanation of origins and meanings without the necessity of a personal God who created and upholds all things.'


'..evolutionary philosophy is the intellectual basis of all the anti-Christian and anti-God systems that have plagued mankind for centuries. It served Hitler as the rationale for Nazism and Marx as the supposed scientific basis for communism. It is the basis of the various modern methods of psychology and sociology that treat man merely as a higher animal and which have led to the mis-named “new morality” and ethical relativism.'


Convincing yourself that virgin births of the universe, energy and matter, leads ineluctably to DNA and RNA being formed in a soupy pond, which then starts a process of 'change', leading from pond scum to Moslems cutting the head off a priest in Rouen France, is to put it diplomatically, idiotic. It might serve as a pagan touchstone of belief. It might fill the great void of materialist dialectics that so enthralls the 'intellectual'. It does not address scientific reality and in fact, it contradicts the most basic laws of thermodynamics and bio-chemistry.


'Scientists' cannot even change one enzyme into another – not one single experiment has ever changed one enzyme into another functioning string of amino acids. Not one. Yet we are told, that the virgin birth of everything from nothing is 'science', and that algae, 'mutated' into tulips and then teachers. How utterly ridiculous and embarrassing.

Evolution offends the basic laws of Physics and Thermodynamics

No science, just lots of rhetoric and hand waving.

Bookmark and Share

Evolution offends the following laws of science math and common sense. Take thermodynamics.


2nd Law of Thermodynamics

This states that all systems descend into entropy and disorder. ALL. Science fiction cult of Evolution celebrity Isaac Asimov admitted this:

"Another way of stating the second law then is: 'The universe is constantly getting more disorderly!'" Viewed that way we can see the second law all about us. We have to work hard to straighten a room, but left to itself it becomes a mess again very quickly and very easily. Even if we never enter it, it becomes dusty and musty. How difficult to maintain houses, and machinery, and our own bodies in perfect working order: how easy to let them deteriorate. In fact, all we have to do is nothing, and everything deteriorates, collapses, breaks down, wears out, all by itself - and that is what the second law is all about." [In the Game of Energy and Thermodynamics You Can't Even Break Even, Isaac Asimov, Smithsonian Institute Journal, June 1970, page 6.]


Lord Kelvin who formulated this fact based on very good scientific reasons said about the cult of Atheism;

"Overwhelming strong proofs of intelligent and benevolent design lie around us ... the atheistic idea is so non-sensical that I cannot put it into words."


Indeed. Today ignorance is science.


Evolution cult members will counter by stating that the Earth is an 'Open System' [more rhetoric, the peasants should be amazed they exclaim!], but so what. An open system for the cult means that magical 'energy' will somehow arrest entropy and restructure everything by random chance !  There is no science whatsoever, to this idea. Pouring sunlight onto my dead cat, who already possesses the cells and body plan and intricate machinery of a once living cat, does not bring the pet back to life.


Adding sunlight or energy does nothing and it certainly does not negate the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. Your house, your body, your car, your cat, your eyes, your life, your pegonias, all will succumb to the law of entropy. In fact if you add energy to dead material it will simply make the decomposition occur more quickly – try it yourself, and leave meat rotting in a hot sun.


Dr. John Ross of Harvard, says:

"… there are no known violations of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Ordinarily the second law is stated for isolated systems, but the second law applies equally well to open systems. …" [Chemical and Engineering News, John Ross, July 7, 1980, p40; cited in Duane Gish, Creation Scientists Answer their Critics Institute for Creation Research, 1993.]


Do evolutionary-cult member text books mention this law in connection with their theology ?


First Law of Thermodynamics:

Maybe Evolutionists need to meet Louis Pasteur whose experiments in 1862 disproved abiogenesis. Being 150 years behind science is a mental deformation. Living matter cannot arise from dead matter. Period. This is the first Law of Thermodynamics – matter and energy will only come from matter and energy. This Law also makes a mockery of Evolution's inane theory, captured in the science fiction writing of Stephen Hawking [does he actually say or write anything?], that the universe, self-created. This is ridiculous. My car did not self create and it is a micro-nano fraction of the complexity of the universe. 


Even a biology textbook admits this fact, though many just avoid the topic:

    "As we have seen, the life of every organism comes from its parents or parent. Does life ever spring from non-living matter? We can find no evidence of this happening. So far as we can tell, life comes only from life. Biologists call this the principal of biogenesis." [Modern Biology Teacher's Edition, Holt, Rinehardt and Winston Publishers, USA, 1977, page 19.]


Darwin cult members will moan that they are not abiogenesis believers. But they have to be. Their theology is naturalism. Everything arose from accidents, luck and mutations which only degrade [see 2nd Law of Thermodynamics]. The universe self-created, all life magically self-formed, and the complexity of the 2 million existing species [and the 98 million extinct], was due to random variations in mutated genetic code, along with ancient myths such as 'survival of the fittest' [whatever that means], or 'natural selection' [from what, why and how?].


Maybe it was survival of the luckiest, fastest or smartest, who had the best software, programmed into their embryonic development from the beginning. You can't change the software genomic material in an embryo. Evolutionists apparently don't understand the basic process of cell division and embryological development.


Evolution's magic friend mutations does not support its theology

Basic genetics disproves the cult of Darwin

Bookmark and Share


Francois Jacob who won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1965, wrote, "Evolution does not produce novelties from scratch. It works on what already exists, either transforming a system to give it new functions or combining several systems to produce a more elaborate one."
DNA is software. Claiming, as the cult of evolution does, that software somehow magically changes or 'mutates' into new forms is crass ignorance. The only change in state for software is degradation – unless you apply maintenance to the code base [as indeed DNA does, in autopoesis, or self-repair]. Changes to the existing state of software or DNA degrade, they do not add value. Further, there is no known mechanism to change DNA software during the embryological process. This means that humans will mate with, and produce, only humans. There are no 'hybrid' varieties or mixtures. Apes for example, cannot by magic, be turned into humans. Basic software and embryological knowledge makes this clear.
Evolution's magic trick: mythical mutations
Evolution states the following as science:
On rare occasions a mutation in DNA can improve a single creature's ability to survive, or be more 'competitive', thereby granting it more opportunity to reproduce. This is called natural selection.
This is scientific hokum. Every creature's body plan is made up of a complexity of intricate parts, software and technology. Imagine your computer which has 'mutations' in its operating system. None of the other components would work if the OS was impacted and they certainly would not become fitter. Your machine would be inoperable. The exception is when you patch it, using your own [or an online] design pattern, a created piece of software code which upgrades the OS or patches security. This is however, the exact opposite of random chance mutations.
According to Evolution's mythical natural selection, a whole series of beneficial mutations must occur by random chance, at the same time, in order to effect a complete change in the part of the body plan in question. For example the entire eye must appear, in some form, in order to be of any use and garner 'competitive advantage'. It is simply ridiculous to state that a creature would magically produce half an eye, or a retina and cornea which were not connected to the nervous system. This change would not be beneficial and would not help the creature. The mathematical chance that all of the complexity of just the eye, arose by chaos and luck is of course, less than zero. Thousands of chance mutations would need to be involved.
Lysenko theology:
Some Darwin cult members still believe that you 'respond to the environment' and that these changes get passed on. This is more bunk. Certainly humans do respond to the environment, through the epi-genetic layer within genome for example. However, this means little. Only changes to the software within the reproductive (germ) cells of an animal or plant would be passed on to next generations of course. If my skin or eye changes shape or color [I become blind, my skin is burnt in a fire], these changes to my cellular software will not be passed on into my reproductive cells. If I were to imitate an ape for 50 years, hunched over, dragging knuckles on the ground, and letting my hair grow, this would not mean that my progeny would be 'ape like'. It would mean I suffer from acute mental illnesses and any progeny would still be fully human.



Evolution-denying the decomposition of DNA with magic hand-waving

They have no idea how Dinosaur DNA could survive 76 million years.

Bookmark and Share


DNA decomposes. It is organic. It has to. But not if you are an evolution cult member. Than by pure magic, random chance, and 'mutations' perhaps, DNA stays alive for 75 million years ! Just trust the scientists. They know everything !


'An open-access paper in Geology documents the existence of DNA in ocean sediments up to 1.4 million years old in their dating scheme. The DNA appears to be from chloroplasts from algae, such as diatoms (abbreviated cpDNA). There’s less of it in the deeper sediments from two cores drilled into the seafloor in the Bering Sea, but it never disappears, even in the deepest sections. [Note: Ma = million years, ka or k.y. = thousand years.] ….


The Allentoft paper is open access and measured the DNA half-life in Moa bones to be 521 years. That these earlier finds were “at odds with the current understanding of DNA preservation” motivated their own work. Yet from measuring cpDNA from these cores, they had to conclude that “the preservation of fossil cpDNA over geological time” must be reconsidered. The fact that the DNA does decrease with depth shows that decay does occur. Why, then, would the decay basically stop at some “inflection point”? “At our sites, this inflection occurs at ca. 100–200 ka [ka = thousand years], suggesting that after this point, fossil DNA does not appear to interact at an appreciable rate with enzymes or cells found in this sediment.” Why? They have no idea. In conclusion, they say:


Plankton DNA in marine sediment decays over geologic time (e.g., Boere et al., 2011b). At our Bering Sea sites, the majority of cpDNA sequences disappear within the first 100–200 k.y., but traces are present in sediment of every age sampled (as old as 1.4 Ma). Some of these cpDNA reads match siliceous microfossil taxa previously identified in the same sedimentary sequences, suggesting that microfossils may help to preserve DNA. This persistence of a small relative fraction beyond 1 Ma suggests that residual cpDNA becomes increasingly recalcitrant with increasing sediment age. These results highlight both (1) the potential of fossil DNA for paleoecology studies, and (2) its relative isolation from the biogeochemical processes driven by active subseafloor microbiota.


They know DNA decays. Even if it is relatively isolated from biogeochemical processes, it should still decay. References to some unknown process of “recalcitrance” amounts to mere hand-waving. Here is an anomaly calling for explanation.'


Coming up with the rhetoric of 'recalcitrance' to preserve organic material is not science. The so -called proof that the magicians of evolution use, namely, plankton DNA do not lend themselves to Dino DNA for example, nor are they even sensible and repeatable observations or experiments. And in any event, they clearly state themselves that almost all of the DNA disappears within 200.000 years. So tell us again how soft Dino tissue and DNA lasts 76 million years ?



Great French Mathematician Schützenberger, knew Darwinism was a false idol

He used math, logic and technological sophistication to batter the myths of Evolution.

Bookmark and Share


One of the most influential French mathematicians in the past 100 years was Marcel-Paul Schützenberger [1920-1996], and he was a Darwin Doubter. In fact he was publicly quite antagonistic to the cult of evergreens-became-the-screaming-mad climate 'expert'. He also specialized in complex nano-technology and mathematical computer simulations, merged together into something termed 'Combinatorics'. He knew that neither math nor technology could possibly support the outrageous tales made by the cult of Darwin.

For example, Schützenberger, stated that his use of mathematics “in the overall assessment of evolutionary thought has been encouraged by the biologists themselves, if only because they presented such an irresistible target”. [Interview with Schützenberger, M.P., Marcel-Paul Schützenberger: the miracles of Darwinism, Origins & Design 17(2):10–15, 1996; p. 10. See also Eden, M., Heresy in the Halls of Biology—Mathematicians Question Darwinism, Scientific Research, November 1967, p. 59]

Schützenberger's work supported the now obvious and confirmed conclusion that random mutations consistently produce degeneration, not progress. In fact not one single positive mutation can be named by the Darwinists. In an online catalogue of mutations, no entry exists for positive mutations, cited by Darwinists as changes in the genomic code to take a flat worm, to a fat man. In the 1966 Wistar Symposium held at the University of Pennsylvania the Darwin Doubters:

“ … brought together a collection of renowned … scientists … . At that meeting Marco became one of the first distinguished scientists in the world to point out that a theory of evolution that depends on uniformly randomly occurring mutations cannot be the truth because the number of mutations needed to create the speciation that we observe, and the time that would be needed for those mutations to have happened by chance, exceed by thousands of orders of magnitude the time that has been available.” [Wilf, H., In Memoriam: Marcel-Paul Schützenberger (1920–1996), Electronic J. Combinatorics 3(1):1, 1996]

During this conference Schützenberger alongside MIT professor Murray Eden, gave a cogent presentation of evidence explaining that mathematical probabilities against neo-Darwinism are not only enormous, but rather impossible. He concluded that, as a result of the discovery of genetic coding, scientists have realized that genes are:

“ … like a word composed in the DNA alphabet; such words form the genomic text. It is that word that tells the cell to make this or that protein. Either a given protein is structural, or a protein itself works in combination with other signals given by the genome to fabricate yet another protein.” [interview quoted above]


In spite of academic inertia and submission to Darwinism, Schützenberger asked the obvious questions such as:

“ … with so few elementary instructions, … fabricate objects that are so marvelously complicated and efficient? This property with which they are endowed—just what is its nature? Nothing within our actual knowledge of physics and chemistry allows us intellectually to grasp.' [Schützenberger, M., Algorithms and the neo-Darwinian theory of evolution; in: Moorehead, P.S. and Kaplan, M.M. (Eds.), Mathematical Challenge to the Neodarwinian Theory of Evolution, Wistar Institute Symposium, Philadelphia, PA, p. 73, 1967]

“ … explain how to match blueprints viewed as typographic objects and the things they are supposed to control. The only example we have of such a situation (apart from the evolution of life itself) is the attempt to build self-adapting programs by workers in the field of artificial intelligence. Their experience is quite conclusive … without some built-in matching, nothing interesting can occur. Thus … there is a considerable gap in the neo-Darwinian theory of evolution, and we believe this gap to be of such a nature that it cannot be bridged within the current conception of biology.' [ibid]


Genomic or gene products must transmit signals that affect how individual cells differentiate and act. Such signals also must interact with each other during embryological development. Why would a human embryo, going from 1 cell to 100 Trillion, 'pass through' reptilian and fish 'stages. Human DNA code is completely unlike that of fish or reptiles. Embryonic code cannot be changed during the cell division and genomic gestation process.


Within human development as Schützenberger pointed out, the cell’s many types of signaling molecules, such as hormones and cytokines, influence each other to form networks of coordinated systems that interact in ways similar to how circuit boards are designed to achieve complex integrated circuits.

Research on gene regularity networks has determined that to build a new animal design from a pre-existing one by mutation and selection requires altering the pre-existing developmental gene regulatory network. This requires hundreds of coordinated mutations, and Davidson’s work has shown that this much alteration inevitably causes catastrophic consequences. In other words mutations kill, they don't add value. Davidson, following on from Schützenberger, writes that since mutations in early development:

“ … are always catastrophically bad, flexibility is minimal, and since the subcircuits are all interconnected, the whole network partakes of the quality that there is only one way for things to work. And indeed the embryos of each species develop in only one way.” [Erwin, D. and Davidson, E., The evolution of hierarchical gene regulatory networks, Nature Reviews: Genetics 10:141–148, 2009]

Schützenberger used math, logic, common sense and software to destroy Evolution. The only conclusion one can reasonably have about Darwin's cult, is that its cult adherents are completely ignorant of the same.


Evolution, Embryos and Cult of Science fraud

Science again committing fraud and deceit, plus ca change...

Bookmark and Share


The cult of science.


In every science textbook since the late 1800s has been the iconic and fraudulent, embryo drawings – crude, false, purposefully misleading – by Darwinian zealot Ernst Haeckel, yet another scientist who committed fraud [a shocking surprise]. In 1997 embryologists reluctantly published real photographs comparing various animal embryological developments with that of the human, and of course, they look nothing alike. However, the 'cult of science' and those mandarins of education, supreme, omniscient, benign, and worthy, continue to push the Haeckel fraud. Just another example of corrupt science, forcing a theology – evolution – onto the gullible and young.


The cult of 'science' and Darwin are still pushing the embryo fraud today, a direct violation of both real science, and the purpose of education. Education is meant to teach and challenge, not indoctrinate.


In his 2000 book Icons of Evolution, Jonathan Wells reviewed ten then-current biology textbooks for their treatment of what Dr. Wells calls the "icons" of evolution, well-known lines of evidence commonly used to support evolution...Now, in 2011, we present an updated 2011 textbook review that applies Wells's evaluation criteria to 22 recent biology textbooks, all published since 2005... 

This 2011 textbook evaluation also adds two new icons that have grown in popularity over the past decade. A series of fossils purportedly showing the evolution of whales from land mammals is now presented uncritically in many biology textbooks as an alleged "poster child" for macroevolution. Another new icon is "junk" DNA, with some textbooks claiming that noncoding DNA is functionless junk.

Read “(Not) Making the Grade: An Evaluation of 22 Recent Biology Textbooks and their Use of Selected Icons of Evolution”, in its entirety, here.


Junk science is not science, but fiction and propaganda.



Human embryology disproves the Cut of Evolution

No, you don't recapitulate your fish-to-reptile ancestors in the womb.....

Bookmark and Share



In the Evolution fairy tale, DNA software code magically changes. Species and kinds within species, somehow due to fairy dust and the Gods of time, chance and those magical mutations, extend, change, or customize their software code, during the embryonic process to transform the unborn into another kind, or at least, a missing link in the drift toward another kind. This has never been observed in the real world and it defies common sense.


Consider a human female who is pregnant. The child has 46 chromosomes, 23 each from both parents. During the embryonic process, this software template, which miraculously takes a zygote to 100 trillion cells of complexity, is never changed or injected with new code. Never. It matters not if the 'environment' is cold, warm, wet, hot, freezing, mild or unpleasant. It matters not if the parent deeply wishes wings, fins, 4 eyes, or 6 ears for the newborn.


The code is the code, and it does not change within the embryonic process. Further, species in kind, only mate with their own kind. There is no evidence at all, that dogs will mate with cats, birds with squirrels, or bears with fish. Grolars or grizzly polar bear combinations are simply bears mating within their kind. This is true of coyote-wolf mixtures, or wild dogs mating with domesticated dogs. Far from proving evolution, these in-kind 'species' actually disprove it.


And no, Haeckel's fraud of 'Recapitulation', proven as fraud in 1874, which purports to map out the embryological development of the human fetus replicating its fish to reptile ancestry, is again not proof of evolution, but certainly proof against it. 'Science' lying? Perish the thought...


"To support his case he [Haeckel] began to fake evidence. Charged with fraud by five professors and convicted by a university court at Jena, he agreed that a small percentage of his embryonic drawings were forgeries; he was merely filling in and reconstructing the missing links when the evidence was thin, and he claimed unblushingly that hundreds of the best observers and biologists lie under the same charge."—*Michael Pitman, Adam and Evolution (1984), p. 120.


". . ontogeny recaptitulates phylogeny, meaning that in the course of its development [ontogeny] an embryo recapitulates [repeats] the evolutionary history of its species. This idea was fathered by Ernst Haeckel, a German biologist who was so convinced that he had solved the riddle of life's unfolding that he doctored and faked his drawings of embryonic stages to prove his point."—*William R. Fix, The Bone Peddlers: Selling Evolution (1984), p. 285.


"[The German scientist, Wilhelm His] accused Haeckel of shocking dishonesty in repeating the same picture several times to show the similarity among vertebrates at early embryonic stages in several plates of [Haeckel's book]."—*Stephen Jay Gould, Ontogeny and Phylogeny (1977), p. 430.


Basic human embryology disproves Evolution:

Top of the picture, is Haeckel's fraud. At the bottom is what a real embryo looks science here for the Evolution cult, just lots of rhetoric....



Political Science and the cut of Scientism

No science but metaphysics and story telling.

Bookmark and Share



Scientism and the cult of 'peer review' and money seeking [you approve mine and I will approve yours!]


Drummond Rennie a peer review expert knows that peer review is a joke, writing in Nature, he pleads to “make peer review scientific”. Peer review is corrupt and all about getting published and accessing money.


Peer review is touted as a demonstration of the self-critical nature of science. But it is a human system. Everybody involved brings prejudices, misunderstandings and gaps in knowledge, so no one should be surprised that peer review is often biased and inefficient. It is occasionally corrupt, sometimes a charade, an open temptation to plagiarists. Even with the best of intentions, how and whether peer review identifies high-quality science is unknown. It is, in short, unscientific.

A long time ago, scientists moved from alchemy to chemistry, from astrology to astronomy. But our reverence for peer review still often borders on mysticism. For the past three decades, I have advocated for research to improve peer review and thus the quality of the scientific literature. Here are some reflections on that winding, rocky path, and some thoughts about the road ahead.


Rennie is right about alchemyAlchemy discovered many elements, led directly to chemistry and improved experimentation around the manipulation of chemical substances. It was a necessary precursor to modern chemistry. As he states however, one cannot say the same about the modern cult of science and the nonsense around peer review.


Corrupt models yet again [see globaloneywarming]:


...neuroscientists have relied on functional MRI imaging (fMRI) to draw inferences about the brain. Patients have been asked questions and told to engage in mental activities while scientists watched areas light up on their brain scans. Too bad researchers didn’t know the software was buggy when they wrote up their results. A new study published on PNAS finds that possibly 70% of the research published in the last quarter century is flawed. “These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies and may have a large impact on the interpretation of neuroimaging results,” they say. Science Daily reports, “Common statistical methods used to analyse brain activity through images taken with MRI scanners cannot be trusted.


So again software models and code are corrupt. Be thankful your DNA is not as bad as what the 'scientists' use.


Here again we can see the ignorance of the of Evolution. Evolution screams that 'bugs' or mutations are positive. They take the pond scum to the screaming-mad, globalist-poster-waving, climate professor. In reality they destroy. In software these 'bugs' will make the system inoperable over time, which is why firms spend so much time and money doing 'security patches'. You might have noticed this when windows shuts down your system for maintenance. Be thankful your body does not shut down when DNA repairs itself. Self repair does not occur by random chance. It has never been observed to occur randomly, nor can 'scientists' induce such processes, even in a lab.


Science, scientism, evolution, and the cult of death.


Conservatives are appalled at the rise of the “culture of death” in western countries (see articles by Wesley J. Smith at Evolution News & Views), but secular liberals—the same ones who love Darwinare all for it. True, Medical Xpress worried about the ethics of killing psychiatric patients, who might be vulnerable, but not about the policy itself. Here’s the shocking conclusion of a recent study published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal: “Perhaps those who advocate for extending access to people with psychiatric disorders may be willing to tolerate a number of potentially avoidable premature deaths as acceptable because access to assisted dying is felt to be so important in principle. However, that argument must be made explicit and debated publicly.” Just tell the public, in other words, that you have to break some eggs to make an omelette.


The Nazis said the same.


The cult of science which purports to be rational is anything but. Today big science, funded by big government supports the following cult doctrines:


-Killing babies [murder of babies is called 'abortion', a meaningless term].


-Exterminating the old, the weak, the sick [called euthanasia, which sounds so benign, the Nazis and Communists did the same].


-Support sexual confusion and psychologically distressed sexual deviancies as homosexuality and transgendered theology.


-Plant food a trace chemical which falls out of climatic processes causing the same [follow the trillions of printed dollars which are at stake].


-A big bang which started the universe from nothing [it is impossible that nothing creates something and order does not erupt from chaos].


-DNA software code arising by chance in a soupy pond.


-Pond scum magically becoming a Moslem raping a white girl in Sweden.


-Soft Dino tissue lasting 78 million years due to 'iron' preservation.


-The perfect placement and size of the moon, due to a big rock chaotically hitting the earth and the resulting debris coalescing into the perfect spherical shape and size just the right distance from the earth.


-and one million other myths.....


Scientism is a cult that was used by the National Socialists [Nazis, were Atheist, Evolutionist, Socialist]; and their brethren the Communists [ibid]; to 'sell' their theologies. One of the reasons the Germans were such enthusiastic supporters of the Nazis was the general belief that science, reason and progress supported the Nazi claims of Evolutionary progress [survival of the fittest, genetic perfection]; and that the Germans were somehow the champions of science [read Evolution]. As Hitler said, Catholics must be killed for opposing science [he meant of course Darwinism, of which he was a devoted cult member].


It does appear that humans are truly ignorant of history.




Evolution cannot explain the formation of amino acids, DNA or RNA

And no, molecules don't magically 'self create and replicate' like Darwinian rhetoric assumes.

Bookmark and Share



Evolution is not scientific. It is science fiction, hailed as the epitome of rationalism. Basic biology, biochemistry and a crude understanding of nano-technology, would make it quite clear to an independent observer, that evolution is impossible.


In an opus Evidence for Creation, which attracts ad-hominems [creationist, Bible believer etc], but never attracts contrarian proof [observations, experiments, reality]; Henry Morris III identifies a long list of biological facts, that destroy evolution.


Evolution cannot, and never has really bothered to explain the following:


-Atmosphere is 21 % molecular oxygen, yet evolutionists maintain that the early earth had no oxygen [they need to do this to jump start protein formations]; however, without oxygen there is no ozone layer and thus no life on this plant [UV radiation from the Sun would annihilate all traces of life].


-Oxygen is necessary for life but 'free oxygen' would oxidize and destroy organic molecules required for the origins of life.  When coupled with the above fact, this presents quite a problem for Evolution origin of life true believers. 


-Even if the mythical and quite inane 'soupy pond' existed, and it was actually a soupy ocean, full of organic compounds, chemical thermodynamics and kinetics eliminates the possibility of lifeless, suspended particles forming anything.


-For example, in a soupy ocean teaming with organic compounds, you would have chaos, not structure, with literally hundreds of different kinds of amino acids randomly forming [which has never been observed and would not happen anyways]. There are 20 main amino acids in the creation of proteins. Biologically useless material would have swamped the useful.


-Amino acids in proteins are exclusively left-handed. This is the chirality problem for evolutionists and they have no answer [but lots of stories]. In a primitve soupy ocean, mathematics tells us that about half of all amino acids would not have been left-handed. If just one right handed amino acid is in a protein, all biological activity is destroyed.


-In the Darwin's cult 'soupy pond or ocean' of teeming organic compounds, there is no mathematical, scientific way to justify how only left-handed amino acids would have formed the first proteins. In fact a great variety of different compounds would have emerged and evolutionists cannot explain this dilemma.


-Molecular formation requires the input of a certain type of energy and a steady input of building blocks to form it. To make a protein, you need amino acids. If amino acids are dissolved in water, they do not spontaneously join to make a protein. That requires energy. If you dissolve a protein in water, the chemical bonds break, which releases energy – the opposite of what is needed.


-For an evolutionist in a lab to form proteins 'from nothing', he has to manufacture a made-up world. He must dissolve the amino acids in a solvent, then add a chemical which contains high energy bonds. This energy is transferred to the amino acids and forms the chemical bonds between the amino acids which releases hydrogen and oxygen to form water. This process is completely contrived and is impossible to occur in nature.


-A basic knowledge of biochemistry reveals that 'self replicating' DNA [software] or RNA [translation of software blueprints] is impossible. No molecule 'self replicates'. DNA and RNA are reliant on precise sugar molecule formations which have the same problems identified with amino acids. In other words, the nucleotides which make up DNA and RNA, would all suffer from the same issues presented with amino acids 'self replication' [in the case of DNA and RNA the sugar molecules must be right handed only].


-DNA, RNA, transfer RNA, and ribosomes are all destroyed by UV, reactive oxygen, alkylating agents, and water. Thus 'self replicating' DNA or RNA in Darwin's fantasy world of the soupy pond or ocean is impossible.


The cult of Evolution has no explanation for the above. It is therefore not a science, but a program of fantasy and rhetoric.


EUtopia's quite easy to predict collapse is finally starting to occur

Trans-national Socialism and Tyranny does not work.

Bookmark and Share




The failure of the European Socialist Experiment is obvious and it manifests itself in some shocking numbers:


-It is a completely unnatural union with very little real economic, business or trade pattern rationale stretching across 28 very different countries.


-Overall real unemployment is about 30%, and even higher amongst youth in many countries [Spain, Greece, Portugal, likely Italy].


-There has been no austerity aka budget cutting [just very marginal cuts in total spending, some billions out of collective budgets in the trillions]. No labor, market or capital reforms have been enacted to counteract tepid economic growth and high unemployment. This is a travesty.


-Average net wealth per head is far lower than in North America, about 30-50% lower.


-EU per capital debt is now 21.000 Euros per person and going quickly to 25.000, with Greece and some countries at 31.000 per person. It is essentially bankrupt.


-Living standards are far lower when compared to North America, along with GDP per capita [about 25% lower].


-Due to trade distortions and keeping out non EU products and services, the cost of foodstuffs and consumables is 20-30% higher than it should be.


-Common Agriculture Policy which protects French and German farmers, has resulted in prices for all agro-products being much higher than they should be.


-When you add in quotas on fishing, farming and restrictive regulations on the same, you have a food price crisis, with the average food bill some 2x higher than in North America.


-The Euro has gone from 1.68 to the US$ in 2008, to 1.10 now and will fall far below, 1$. This means that the real cost of living in the Eutopia will skyrocket yet again.


-Open borders and the Moslem invasion. By 2050 many German prognosticators predict that Turks and Moslems will be a majority in the Germany. This will be replicated across the Continent. What sentient person in the UK wants to be a part of a future Fascist Islamic Caliphate ?


Add in further doses of reality. Entire industries in the UK have been wiped out including; shipping, steel, farming, fishing and refining of many raw materials. EU regulations, quotas and taxes, have conspired to either limit British involvement [farming, fishing], or so completely distort trade and material flows as to make the industry uncompetitive [steel, ship building, refining]. Hundreds of thousands of UK jobs have been lost due to EU policy.


Layer on the socialist tyranny from Brussels, where unknown, unaccountable EU Commission members make 65% of national laws [Euro Parliament does not make the Laws]; and where the gross violations of trade and commerce are dictated from; and it is a wonder that the UK did not separate sooner than 2016. Not one single 'Remainer' in the UK can identify their MEP, nor how the EU works, its budget, or what CAP is. Voting to remain in a socialist tyranny, in a system you can't describe, nor even bother to understand, and which is being eviscerated by cultural Marxist and Islam, is simply an expression of ignorance, not 'internationalism'.


Exit the EUrinal - a socialist tyranny and immoral project

The EU destroys, it does not create.

Bookmark and Share



  • No one can name their MEP or how the EU works,
  • 4 Commission Presidents,
  • 50.000+ EuroCrats,
  • 10.000 Eurocats earning £200.000 or more;
  • 65% of laws in member states passed by the Eurocracy;
  • EU Parliament does not pass any legislation [it is passed through the Commission];
  • no accountability, no transparency;
  • regulations which kill the economy [fishing, agriculture, tariffs against non EU member trade flows];
  • for every £ 1 the EU spends locally [to buy very shrill and loud support], you pay them £2.30;
  • no democracy and certainly no freedom.

People who support the EU have no clue whatsoever how it works, nor can they name any part of the process that is transparent, understandable or even reasonable.

It is a top-down elitist socialist tyranny, designed very specifically to destroy national cultures, borders, and rights.

Brexit the Movie.

Brexit, Dismantle the EU beast, get back to basics and real progress

Socialist-Multi culti Marxist tyranny is alas, not freedom.......

Bookmark and Share



The corruption of the EU[rinal]. Transnationalism is as morbid a disease as National Socialism, or Communism in one country. Myths and lies abound about how felicitous and necessary bureaucratic tyranny must be, for groups and nations with little in common, most avowedly secular and militantly hostile to their own history and true cultures. European socialism and top-down elitist control is as immoral and counter-productive as the Divine Right of Kings, which emanated from Protestant theology, or 19th century militarism, itself a by-product of secular naturalism and irrationality [called rationalism].

The modern EUtopia is a disaster in many ways. Media and political propaganda as to its merits include:

-EU has kept the peace and prevented another Euro-civil war
-It has fostered trade
-It has made cross-border business and tourism easier
-Southern Europe has developed faster than normal business cycles would allow
-Rights and laws have improved or been more quickly implemented
-Economic cycles have been smoothed out
-Poverty has been reduced

All lies. For example:

-The US military and NATO with their bases and integration of military commands have kept the peace.
-Trade has been completely distorted thanks to the EU. German exports through a devalued DM [called the Euro], has impaired normal trade relationships and caused massive frictions within the EU.
-Prices have gone up by 30% across the EU for most member states, making trade and tourism more difficult, not easier.
-Southern Europe has indeed received about $1 Trillion in 'help' from the EU, in the form of printed money and debt spending. The Euro has dropped 40% due to debt and financial woes since 2008.
-Rights in the UK and elsewhere long pre-date the same laws emanating out of Brussels.
-Economic cycles have worsened with the advent of the Euro and EU debt spending, leading to the inevitable negative interest rates and easy money policies of today, which at some point in the future, will herald a gigantic economic collapse.
-Poverty across the EU has not changed since 2000, but the cost of living has gone up and living standards down.
-EU protectionism keeps out African produce and meats from North America and Russia; and has thus ensured sky-high food prices, and massive subsidies and riches for French, German and Spanish farmers – much to the detriment of its citizens.

Then there is the Moslem invasion.

10 million Moslems over 5 years will enter Europe. Germany by 2050 will be majority Moslem it is estimated. This is all part of the EU's plan.

This invasion force are not refugees, but from a broad Moslem swathe from North Africa to Afghanistan. Most are young men, not the babies and crying mothers of media lore with their fraudulent photos and pious genuflection to their beloved moon cult. EU politicians view Moslems as cheap labour and a salve for nations that no longer have children. MSM, quackademics, the Church and Marxists view the cult of Submission as the great moral fascism, manly, militant, devout and superior to the dark age mentality of Christians, their feminine theology of love, and their ridiculous ideas that they created the modern world.

For the Church it is an imperative to rebrand the invasion as a flood of refugees who must be fed and clothed – even if it means its own destruction. This curious addiction to suicide and ignorance about Islam, is one reason why many leave the Church.

Culture is King.

The Western European elite and their education-media minions believe they are evolved pond scum, nothing matters, 2+2 might be 9, sexual confusion is now genius, and that Islamic fascism is just another variant of cultural expression and superiority. In their view the real threat is from Christianity and its vile simplicity, its supernaturality and despite its creation of modern science, mathematics, agriculture, industry and morality, its loathsome, antiquated, anti-science world-view. For the Euro-elite and their devoted knaves and slaves, the path to the future is through socialist tyranny, with no free speech, complete citizen control and of course a mosque on every corner. The merging of Marxism and the Mosque is a main tenet of Euro-theology.

Looking at the facts and reality of life, any person with a brain would not only vote to exit such a bloc, they would run screaming for help from such an organization.

Why stop at Brexit ? Frexit, Hollexit, Spexit, Italexit....Reclaim freedom, culture and progress. Reject the EUrinal's pretensions to power.


The Nitrogen cycle and the processes of Life are not explained by the cult of Evolution

No science to Evolution, just lots of story telling.

Bookmark and Share



An Atheist who apostasied from his cult and left the dogma of Darwin ascribes his investigation of real science, as the main impetus. Meaning he could find precious little within raging Atheism and Naturalism, that was either factually premised, or scientifically literate. Trained in biology he offered up the Nitrogen cycle, which is one of many complex cycles necessary for life, as one example amongst many, that Darwinism has no hope of explaining [Transformed by the Evidence, p. 78].


'Nitrogen is important for all organisms, and is used for protein building, DNA/RNA production, and other crucial chemicals needed for life. This nitrogen cycle is a highly complex system that requires a minimum number of parts, mostly creatures, in the right place at the right time, with the right equipment.....


  1. Nitrogen gas (N2) makes up 78 percent of the atmosphere, but is in a form that plants can't use. The first step of the cycle requires that N2 be changed into ammonia (NH2)...this has to take place in oxygen-less environment...plants like clover, provide oxygen-free chambers on their roots called root nodules. A special protein is also needed in order to help carry excess oxygen away, so that it will not interfere with the reaction. What is incredible is that plant and bacteria cooperatively manufacture this protein and coordinate production rates and amounts by communicating with each other.

  2. A different group of bacteria, and sometimes fungi, carry it to the next step and change ammonia into nitrate (NO2) and then nitrate (NO3).....

  3. A new group of microbes change nitrate back into nitrogen gas that can be released in the atmosphere....without these organisms, nitrate could build up in the soil and make it toxic for life.

  4. Nitrates made in step 2 are easily absorbed into plants where they convert it back to ammonia in order to make other important compounds, such as those required to make proteins.

  5. There exist huge numbers of bacteria, fungi, and others that break down waste products of life and, in so doing, nitrogen is continually recycled.'


This is just one cycle within the vast complexity of life, which in total must reside, as a matter of logic, millions of variables necessary for life to exist. The development and usage of nitrogen just by itself as a never ending cycle and program, is simply astounding. Hundreds of millions of bacteria are involved, along with plants, in an intricate manufacturing process, reliant on transforming a gas into life giving nitrates. Within this industrial process, advanced chemistry is deployed by both flora and fauna to transform nitrogen gas into something useful, and even to recycle faeces and waste from fauna.


The mathematical probability of this one process, arising from chaos, emerging from a soupy pond, undirected, without purpose, over time and through 'mutations', impelled by 'natural selection', into this cycle of affirmed inter-dependence and industrial production which is mandatory for life to exist, is less than zero.


No wonder this Atheist biologist left his cult. Evolution explains next to nothing. It does produce pretty pictures and engaging fairy tales. The Evolutionist cult member cannot explain this process, other than by saying, 'it exists, therefore it evolved'. This is the standard church dogma trotted out by the High Priests of Naturalism. Of course to publish their 'science', they add a lot of impressive words in a 3000 word monograph outlining how nitrogen is turned into gas. An example is here from Britannica:


'Nitrogen is one of the elements most likely to be limiting to plant growth. Like carbon, nitrogen has its own biogeochemical cycle, circulating through the atmosphere, lithosphere, and hydrosphere (Figure 5). Unlike carbon, which is stored primarily in sedimentary rock, most nitrogen occurs in the atmosphere as an inorganic compound (N2). It is the predominant atmospheric gas, making up about 79 percent of the volume of the atmosphere. Plants, however, cannot use nitrogen in its gaseous form and are able to assimilate it only after it has been converted to ammonia (NH3) and nitrates (NO3). This reductive process, called nitrogen fixation, is a chemical reaction in which electrons are picked up from anothermolecule. A small amount of nitrogen is fixed by lightning, but most of the nitrogen harvested from the atmosphere is removed by nitrogen-fixing bacteria and cyanobacteria (formerly called blue-green algae).'


The entire Britannica piece is about evolution. But nothing is mentioned in the Naturalist theology about how carbon or nitrogen cycles arose.


  • What created the process ?

  • What created the chemical transformation technology used by plants and bacteria ? How did that 'evolve'?

  • Why would 'selection' favour such processes, or bacteria which communicate with plants for example ?

  • How did this communication develop from nothing ?

  • For plants and bacteria to exist wouldn't other complex processes need to be in place for them to originate ? Where did they evolve from ?

  • How did plants know to grow root nodules to remove oxygen which would destroy the entire nitrogen gas transformation process ?

  • Etc


Britannica, as with all things Naturalist, has no idea.


Dr. D Russell Humphreys Phd Physics on why he left Darwin's cult and did some real science

Evolution does not enlighten, it retards and degrades.

Bookmark and Share



Dr. D Russell Humphreys Phd Physics

[from p. 33, in Transformed by the Evidence]


Humphreys was a teenage 'science' prodigy, one of the top 40 young scientists in 1959, picked to compete in the USA National Westinghouse challenge. A son of an Atheist father and fallen-away Baptist mother he recalls being drenched with evolutionary theology, from Disney productions, to school text books, to 'collegial' world-view systems. He never seriously doubted the long-ages of the Darwinian universe; nor that pond scum became man by luck, chaos and those magical mutations. That is, until he started looking for evidence. Even endless brain-washing it appears, does not distort every mind.


'In three decades of study, I have only a few hundred physical processes that one could use to estimate the age of the earth. I have been continually astounded by the fact that over ninety percent of the processes favor an age much less than billions of years. Here are a dozen examples of the 90 percent majority of evidence pointing to a young world along with brief explanations:


  1. The rapid accumulation of mud on the ocean floor, versus the slow removal of it by plate tectonic subduction.

  2. The presence of carbon 14 well above the detection limit in all fossils......the decay half-life of carbon 14 is 5,730 years old, is so short that no carbon 14 atoms would be left in any fossil that was more than a million years old.

  3. The great excess of helium still retained in tiny radioactive zircon crystals in the granite of the earth's crust...The helium diffusion age of deep-core samples of these zircons turned out to be 6000 (+-2000) years.

  4. The rapid accumulation of sodium in the sea, versus its slow removal by various processes, such as the evaporation of shallow seas.

  5. The rapid decay of energy stored in the earth's magnetic field, especially during the periods of very rapid direction reversals recorded in geological strata.

  6. Evidence throughout the geologic strata of very rapid deposition of continent-scale sedimentary rocks by waters moving at meters per second – the events of a worldwide catastrophic flood.

  7. Many multiple-layer fossils world-wide, such as fossil trees projecting through two or more strata. Conventional geology says a tree should rot away long before a second layer buries it.

  8. Fossil 'graveyards' of billions of creatures buried in the sedimentary geologic strata throughout the world.

  9. Evidence for tight folding and bending of large geologic strata while they were still wet and soft.

  10. The presence of DNA and soft tissue, even in fossils, that are allegedly hundreds of millions of years old.

  11. The extreme scarcity (thousands) of stone-age burial sites compared to the abundance (billions) of sites that should exist if the Stone Age had lasted 100,000 years or more.

  12. The recentness of agriculture and recorded history, and the dispersion of people, civilization, and languages from a small region in the Middle East.'


When Humphreys began thinking for himself and doing his own research, he realized that his Atheist-Darwinian world view was a fraud. There was precious little science, and as he says, plenty of denial and non-science. The above list is a small fraction of what can be enumerated. Every item is passionately attacked by Darwinists, with their rhetoric and story telling. A personal favourite is that 'iron' acts on soft tissue to keep it supple and the DNA existent, for 70 million years. No proof of that claim is offered, just a few lab tests and plenty of hyperbole along with the usual sneering that if you deny the fable, you are anti-science.


The cult of science, and its Atheopathic world-view, including the myths of Darwinian evolution, have retarded, not enhanced, human understanding.


2 billion dead babies since 1966 - declared to be moral, right, 'scientific', justified...

The Dark Ages.

Bookmark and Share


Abortion is the greatest crime against humanity [along with Islam]; in history. One quarter of the human race has been murdered since 1966 – 2 billion human babies. This is where the mindless cult of Atheism, Darwinism and equating human life with pond scum leads to: Atheistic Hitlerism, Atheistic Communism, Atheistic Secularism. The Atheist cult of Hitler gassed 5 million Catholics and 6 million Jews. The Atheist cult of Communism in Russia killed 35-50 million people. Both wiped out the Christian churches. The Atheist cult of Mao Communism in China dispatched some 50 million and the Atheist cult of Pol Pot some 5 million souls.


The leaders of Atheist Fascisms believed that magically processes, chance, luck and mutations [which are only deleterious or neutral] allowed pond scum to become the apogee of evolutionary development [namely rhetoric and science fiction], embodied of course in themselves.


If you add up the stack of dead bodies murdered by Atheist Fascism in the past century we have this list:


-Abortion: 2 billion [the right to choose, is just a euphemism for the right to murder]

-Hitlerism: 70 million [total dead for WW2]

-Maoism: 50 million

-Stalinism: 35-50 million


In North America alone; some 65 million babies have been murdered since 1970.


'….what do we call the murder of two billion babies worldwide since 1966? John Smeaton, the Chief Executive of the Society for the Protection of the Unborn Child, gave this statistic during a recent lecture in Rome. He describes the figure of two billion abortions as a "conservative estimate" compiled by "leading researchers from both the pro-abortion and pro-life lobbies." John Smeaton added two caveats to this appalling statistic: "The number of human embryos destroyed in the past 50 years by abortifacient birth control drugs and devices worldwide is simply incalculable" and the worldwide total number of babies killed as a consequence of IVF is unknown, though we know “in the UK alone, 2 million embryonic babies have been killed as a result of in vitro fertilisation procedures since 1990.



A Dark Age when Death cults reign. Euthanasia, Abortion, Islam is Peace, kill those who deny that Plant Food causes climate.....even an ardent Darwinian must admit this state of affairs smacks more of devolution than positive change.