RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Gab@StFerdinandIII - Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from.  It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 


Cult of Darwin - Recent Articles

Spacecraft Earth: A Guide for Passengers, Dr Henry Richter and David Coppedge

Perfect Design is due to Random chance, luck, things happen? This is modern science?

Bookmark and Share


According to Evolutionists and ‘Scientists’, there are billions of galaxies and there ‘must be’ many life forms in our Universe.  This is based on probability theory without analysis or understanding variables and is a rather puerile way of viewing reality.  If we use our intelligence and apply real probability theory, based on what we know, and the many (thousands) of ‘coincidences’, variables and exact patterns that need to be available to just create the conditions for Life, then it is clear that the Earth is unique and Life on this planet a singular creative event.  Real science tells us this.

In the real world it is clear that our atmosphere is designed:

“The mixture of roughly 20% reactive oxygen and 80% neutral nitrogen seems ideal for life as we know it.

Our atmosphere shields us from the high-energy subatomic particles that could disrupt cells. So, of all the atmospheres possible on other worlds, the composition and ratios of elements are critical.

Our magnetic field deflects the streams of solar electrons and protons, so that most of them do not penetrate the atmosphere. It’s clear that any planet must have a magnetic field to support complex life, and, moreover, a field that is not too strong and not too weak. If too strong, it might disrupt the planet’s crust. If too weak, it could not deflect charged particles.”

The magnetic shield has lost 5 % of its strength in the past 150 years.  This indicates that the Earth cannot possible be billions of years old.  If we work back in time the strength of the shield would make life impossible some 15.000 years ago.  If we work forward and do some basic math, it is clear that within about 1.600 years the shield will fail and life will cease.  There is no known mechanism to generate electrical-magnetic energy within the Earth’s core.  None.  This is obvious proof that Darwinian theology is absolutely wrong (and corrupt).  Magnetic energy cannot self-create.

Using real Science we can also consider just some basis probability mathematics on a few (not a complete list) of cosmological conditions necessary for life with chance applied (10% is far too high, it should be 1%).  Probability theory confirms that life on Earth is unique:

“Located within the galaxy habitable zone 10%

·       A stable star with constant energy output 10%

·       A planet formed within the habitable zone around the star 10%

·       A planet in a stable orbit maintaining a steady distance from the star 10%

·       Protected by gas giant planets in the solar system 10%

·       A rotation speed of about 24 hours 10%

·       A planet with a suitable atmosphere: oxygen rich, depth, circulation 10%

·       A planet with the appropriate mass 10%

·       A planet with abundant water 10%

·       A reasonable ratio of water to land mass 10%

·       A crust capable of plate tectonics 10%

·       A magnetic field within the proper strength range 10%

·       A moon of the proper size, distance, and orbit around the planet 10%

·       A readily available source of abundant carbon compounds 10%

·       Trace elements of the right type and quantity 10%


One could go on and on, adding more factors, but these are a few of the essential features to consider.


So let’s multiply that out: 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 = 10-15.


This probability times 1014 candidate planets leaves 10-1 planets, less than one!”

It is absurd and sad that people are saturated with the indoctrinated cult belief that the cosmological position of the Earth and its mineral composition (forgetting for a second the absolute complexity of all living beings), arose by happenstance.  This is anti-science and delays knowledge and progress.

Consider the design of Astro-biology:

“From the literature of astrobiology, we can identify ten or more other ‘zones’ required for habitability, in addition to circumstellar distance:

• Galactic Habitable Zone: the solar system must occupy a narrow band within the galaxy.

• Continuously Habitable Zone: the habitable zone must not vary significantly.

• Temporal Habitable Zone: the habitable zone must last long enough for life to persist.

• Chemical and Thermodynamic Habitable Zone: the planet’s chemistry and heat transfer mechanisms must permit liquid water to persist.

• Ultraviolet Habitable Zone: the planet must filter out ionizing radiation from its star.

• Tidal Habitable Zone: the star must not tidally ‘lock’ its habitable planet to force one hemisphere to always face the star (this rules out most planets).

• Obliquity Habitable Zone: the star must not ‘erase’ its habitable planet’s tilt through tidal forces. (While not eliminating the possibility of life, a planet without a tilt would have no seasons, drastically reducing its habitable surface area.)

• Eccentricity Habitable Zone: the planet must have a nearly circular orbit so that it stays in the zone.

• Stellar Chemistry Habitable Zone: the star must have the right chemical composition to remain quiet and well-behaved. A G2 main-sequence star like our sun is ideal.

• Stellar Wind Habitable Zone: the star must not be given to extreme ‘space weather’ that might strip off a habitable planet’s atmosphere.

• Inhabited Zone: recently, two astrobiologists suggested that to be habitable, a planet needs inhabitants! “…there is a growing amount of evidence supporting the idea that our Planet will not be the same if we remove every single form of life from its surface,” a news report said.”

This is an obvious design.  How would 10 zones form and line up in perfect unison by random chance from a ‘big bang’ explosion?  Or to promote life the planet must also have life (so what came first or did both arrive at the same time?).  These are observable scientific facts, not story-telling.  The chances of the above zones being in place for any other planet in the Universe is zero. 

The Sun and its perfect design:

“Our sun emits a ‘solar constant’ (energy received at earth’s surface) of 1.361 kilowatts per square meter. At solar maximum (the period in the sun’s 11-year cycle when its activity increases to its highest level), the heat received at the earth increases by just one tenth of one percent—an extremely slight difference. One of the longest running scientific observations ever made of the sun measured only 0.06% variation from the solar constant over a 32year period. Earth’s distance from the sun—ranging from 91.4 million to 94.5 million miles (average about 92.9 million miles or 150 million kilometers)—keeps it always within the habitable zone. That zone is pretty narrow. Venus is well outside the inner edge and Mars is outside the outer edge.

The sun must have an energy output and size as to give the right amount of heat to a planet in the habitable zone, and that means a main sequence G2 dwarf star. Only about 1% of all stars fall into this class, and many are not as quiet as our sun. The associated star, furthermore, must be stable in its energy output. Any significant temporal variation of the heat output would cause catastrophic swings in the temperature of the planet which would be destructive of life forms.”

The Moon and its perfect design:

As moons go, ours is extraordinarily large in relation to its planet’s diameter. This is another unique feature of Spacecraft Earth that is quite remarkable. Our moon is an enormous object with significant gravity, roughly one-sixth of that of the earth, as you may recall from watching videos of Apollo astronauts cheerfully leaping high from the surface. No other planet in the solar system (with the exception of Pluto, a ‘dwarf planet’) has a moon so large relative to its size. Mercury and Venus have no moon; Mars has two tiny satellites. The gas giants have some moons larger than ours, but they are very small relative to the planets themselves.

The orbital choreography between sun, moon and earth also pumps energy into the oceans independent of solar heating, creating a huge engine that provides several benefits for life. It cleanses the coastlines, it circulates nutrients between latitudes, and it forces some of the deep water to the surface and back again. All this energy input contributes to the weather, too, by increasing evaporation and cloud formation. Although the tides are not anything spectacular toward the equator, or even along the coasts of North America, we find that in the higher latitudes such as Anchorage the diurnal tidal action can amount to 20, 30 or 40 feet of rise and fall.

The Earth’s Rotation:

“The rate of rotation is important to have a reasonable length of night and day. A rotation rate of one hour would be too short for life cycles to get rest and activity. A rotation rate of once a month would be too long for night-to-day changes. A rotation rate of 24 hours seems just about right—how about that? The mass of the planet needs to be in the proper range to produce gravity large enough to keep an atmosphere, but not too much atmosphere which would have high pressures.”

Almost any physical characteristic of the earth, its structure and composition, and position in the solar system is the way it is to permit the existence of life. From the properties of atoms, the elements, compounds, to the exact composition and placement of the earth, everything seems to be the way it is to allow life to flourish here.”

Ignoring the glories and wonders of Life and forgetting basic science has devalued the Human in the modern world, and will breed conflict, hate and death.

Darwin's Religion: Big Rocks, The Moon, The Magnetic Shield

Darwinian Miracles cannot explain how a Magnetic Shield or the Moon is formed.

Bookmark and Share



Evolution’s religious dogma.

1-Billions if not Trillions of years ago, by random chance, big rock hits the Earth

2-Random collision magically produces a moon

3-Moon miraculously finds an orbit in the perfect location from the Earth

4-The random collision generates a magnetic shield, necessary for life

5-Other miraculous events regenerate said magnetic shield for Billions, if not Trillions of years…..

This sci-fi fantasy is called Science.


Darwinist and the cult of ‘things happen’, often invoke the ‘big rock did it’ theorem when they have no explanation or observable-rational science.  An example is the moon.  Apparently, a big rock collided with the Earth, creating a moon out of the resulting chaos, with the impact carefully placing the moon 239.000 miles from the Earth, in a perfect position.  Move the moon from its current orbit more than a fraction and life ceases on this planet. 


The chance of a big rock colliding with the earth, forming a perfectly sized-moon through a random collision, with the 'big rock' being of sufficient size to create a large object such as the moon, but not large enough, or with enough velocity to destroy the Earth, and yet providing the right level of force and energy to place the new sphere at the perfect orbiting position, is of course, zero. 


Try replicating the ‘big rock’ created the moon theorem in a contrived lab.  Take 2 objects, have them collide and see what happens.  Nothing except destruction and debris.  Only the Darwinian god of miracles could have intervened to put the debris into a large orb, or allowed for a massive chunk of the Earth’s surface to be conveniently cut off in the form of a sphere and ejected, ever so gently and purposely, in the form of the moon, into its present location.  But this is Science of course.


Even better, the Darwinian Theologians with hands on their Evolutionary Holy Book, proclaim that the ‘big rock’ not only created the moon, but also the magnetic field.  Two miracles in one event!  Praise Charles.  The chance of both the moon and the magnetic field – necessary for life – being created through a large inter-stellar collision is according to the Darwinian religion, a complete certainty.  Back in reality, the mathematical probability of either is zero.  Colliding objects don’t generate magnetism.


In reality, the cult of Science has no clue about the origins of magnetism.  They posture that complex currents above the Earth’s iron core as it cools generate a dynamo to create the magnetic field.  Maybe.  No proof is offered, but even if true, how do the ‘Scientists’ explain that in the past 150 years the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field has decreased by 10%?


Back in the real world there is the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.  Everything tends to entropy.  This means that the magnetic field like everything else, will simply disappear one day. Darwinian theorist Stephanie Pappas at Live Science (30 April 2018) assumes that the some magical restoration of the magnetic shield occurs with ‘polarity reversals’.  According to the 2nd law of Thermodynamics a reversal will not increase the intensity or strength of the shield.  Energy is lost to space.  Without a new source there must be a net loss of energy.  This is why the magnetic shield strength is declining 5% every 100 years or less.  This means that in 1600 years it is gone.  Life will cease.


Using real science, Dr. Henry Richter explains this problem in his book Spacecraft Earth: A Guide for Passengers (2017).  He clearly explains that the Earth’s magnetic field is not a perpetual motion machine: it is doomed to decay, and will continue to decay at the rate measured for 188 years – the longest-running continuous measurement in geophysics.  At the current rate, life will stop, not in trillions, billions, or millions of years – but in just over a thousand.




Human and Ape DNA is quite different

Unless you believe the Religion of Evolution's Data Fraud

Bookmark and Share


The scientific silliness of proposing that an ape, or an ape-like ancestor, or a ‘common ancestor’ to both Apes and Humans, became Human; or that Humans are just hairless examples of such primitives, is quite astounding.  There are billions of software coded differences (in DNA), between Apes and Humans.  And, of course, the Religion of Evolution has committed data-fraud, to propose that 99% of DNA material is the same, between Humans and Apes, thus ‘confirming’ the Evolutionary march from Bacteria, to Monkey, to Man.  


In reality, there is a great gulf – unbridgeable by the Church of Random Chance, Luck, ‘Mutations’, or ‘Genetic Drift’ – between Simians and Humans. I would guess in reality, no more than 60% of genetic material is similar, which considering the basic mechanisms which make up living creatures, is what I would expect.  A similar amount would be found if we compared a Volkswagen to a Jet Airliner.  Did the car mutate into the plane?



More detailed research has determined that the best genetic-comparison estimate is not 99, 95 or even 90 percent but 84 percent similarity. That 16 percent difference represents 3/4 of a billion base pair differences.  The length of the 23 human chromosomes is about six feet, and the only way this molecular length can be sequenced at present if to break up the strands into lengths that can be worked with, then reassemble the sections. In the early DNA-sequencing work scientists were able to sequence only very short DNA segments.


Thus, researchers focused on DNA segments that they knew would be highly similar between animals, such as blood globin proteins. Even in those genes there was a problem. The chimp genome is much longer than the human genome: there are 3,096,649,726 base pairs in the human genome and 3,309,577,922 base pairs in the chimpanzee genome – a 6.4% difference.


Furthermore, humans have forty-six chromosomes, chimps forty-eight. It is difficult to compare gene sections that are not even slightly comparable…


Evolutionists tend to ignore these large sections lacking congruence in their quest to focus on similarities. Non-coding regions used to be called ‘junk DNA’ back in the days before they were recognized as important segments with critical regulatory functions.


…one cannot glean meaningful comparisons between the common occurrence of DNA sequences existing only in humans, but not in chimps. Thus, the comparisons made are largely within the genic regions DNA, such as those that code for blood cell proteins like hemoglobin. One would expect they would have very similar genes because, for hemoglobin to function, the protein must be a very specific shape. Consequently, a good deal of sequence similarity exists between species that need the same functional similarity. But non-coding regions—which are just as important—show more variations, thus skewing the claimed similarities.



The ‘science’ of Data Fraud.  Evolution has always been a Religion in search of meaning.  Equating yourself with a Simian based on fraudulently data and self-loathing anti-Humanistic theology and philosophy, is emblematic of deep psychological trauma.



Bergman, Jerry. 2020. Apes as Ancestors: Examining the Claims About Human Evolution. Tulsa, OK: Bartlett Publishing. Co-Authored with Peter Line, Ph.D., and Jeffrey Tomkins, Ph.D. Chapter 5: “Are Humans and Chimps 98% Similar?” Jeffrey Tomkins, Ph.D. & Jerry Bergman, Ph.D.