Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
Saturday, July 11, 2026
by StFerdIII
Full Article

The background and inspiration for the invention of the telephone is a largely unknown story. Alexander Graham Bell was born in 1847 in Edinburgh, Scotland, his family moved to Canada and he ended up in the Excitable States where he conducted most of his experimentation. Bell did not approach the problem of electricity from the perspective of an abstract academic physicist or a mathemagician. Bell was a practical man, largely self-taught and was, fundamentally, a subject matter expert in acoustic mechanics and also human physiology.
You want complexity? Study the ear. You want to know if your ‘doctor’ actually knows anything about your body? Ask Dr Quack about the ear (a dumb look will greet the question, followed by ‘are you quackcinated against the latest scariant?’).
Bell’s grandfather and father (Alexander Melville Bell) happened to be world-renowned authorities on phonetics and elocution. His father invented what is called ‘visible speech’, a written universal phonetic alphabet that mechanically illustrated exactly how the human throat, tongue, and lips must position themselves to create any given sound (evolution Fanboys tell us that such complexity arose uniformly and gradually as monkey-man hopped off the branch and became you, sure thing). Bell’s mother and his later wife, Mabel Hubbard, were both deaf. Bell therefore swam in the world of phonetics and sound. This was the decisive factor in his creation of a unit to transmit sound. This is rarely cited or remarked upon.
For Alexander sound was not an abstract concept, but a physical, mechanical displacement of matter. Could sound be harnessed? Could it be transmitted? How does it work? How does our ear actually function and process sound? Bell’s curious mind explored. More here
Sunday, July 5, 2026
by StFerdIII
Full Article

Benjamin Franklin is sometimes taught in the ‘education’ system, usually now with disdain. The propaganda often centres on Ben flying a kite in a storm and getting electrified. This is as silly and irrelevant as Newton’s fictitious apple which never fell on his head and was invented as part of his mythos some 100 years after he died. The details of Franklin’s physics is of course never discussed. If ‘space’ between particles existed or if there was a ‘vacuum’, Franklin’s experiments would have failed. They succeeded but no one is taught why.
The simple reason Franklin is ignored is that he proved the aether existed and knew that energy in the aether could be harvested. Franklin anticipates Tesla. More here
Sunday, June 28, 2026
by StFerdIII
Full Article
In the framework of mechanical reality, Sir Edmund Taylor Whittaker (1873–1956) is one of the most significant figures in the history of science. Unlike the Relativist-Priesthood tying its religious fanaticism to Einstein, the Rothschilds, money and power; Whittaker was a subject-matter-expert of both abstract mathematics and the physical mechanics of the aether. He wasn’t just a thin armed metaphysician-comedian with chalk and a blackboard.
Why is Whittaker important? Whittaker is the greatest historian of physics after Pierre Duhem (future post on this unknown and quite remarkable physicist and historian). Like Duhem, Whittaker is crucial because he recorded the heuristic or narrative movement in ‘Science’ from reality to maths; and he proved that Maxwell’s equations weren’t just maths, they were descriptions of Fluid Stress in a real, pressurised medium.
Another important reason to enjoy Whittaker is that he called out the clown-show called Einstein (1951). He references the fraud of Relativity to be the maths (and maths only) of Lorentz and Poincaré. Lorentz’s maths, that Einstein ‘borrowed’ without attribution, are based on the aether. Few know this.
