Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
Saturday, August 15, 2026
by StFerdIII
Full Article
Did you know that in 1920 Einstein admitted that the aether must exist? He admitted that light cannot be transferred in a nothingness. This was the year before he was asked ‘what is the speed of sound’ in Boston by a reporter and had no idea. Einstein’s PhD was in fluid dynamics (sugar molecule decomposition); he fully understood why ‘something’ needs a container for transmission or state change activity involving energy and kinetics.
Even Einstein knew an aether existed. So ask yourself why do the self-annointed scientistic-elite prattle on about a ‘vacuum’? Is it because an aether destroys most of the models used in ‘The Science’ and would eradicate many world-views and force a complete change in philosophical outlook?
Tesla, unlike Einstein, a real scientist and engineer, proved the aether existed and harnessed its energy. Tesla called this ‘free wireless’. The US government - your best friend of course - has his designs and experimental outputs. That should work out well. See 9-11.
Telsa consciously or unconsciously followed the experiments of Benjamin Franklin (1748-1752) and ascribed divine energy and inspiration - the holy spirit - to the aether. He was not wrong. He also rightly described how the aether, within the context of the vastness of our cosmos (though the universe is much smaller than we are led to believe) is a factory for material and element creation.
If we were to make a visual representation of the aether based on classical electrodynamics and physical mechanics, it wouldn’t look like empty space, nor would it look like a collection of billiard-ball particles floating in a vacuum. Instead, it would be depicted as a dense, continuous, elastic dielectric substrate; an energetic plenum rather than a void. Yes you can and do chew on it.
More here
Tuesday, August 11, 2026
by StFerdIII
Full Article
When Einstein developed his Relativity theories which are mutually exclusive he completely ignored the reality of waves, energy, light and a medium (in 1905 he dropped the aether and gravity, spacetime was flat & uncurved; in 1915 he added back an amorphous aether and curved spacetime to account for gravitational waves; the speed of ‘science’, it is agile). The image below is a visual breakdown of electromagnetic wave propagation and antenna polarisation, illustrating how radio waves travel through space (an aether) and how their physical orientation is tied to the transmitter emitting them. This is rarely taught but puts the lie to much of ‘The Science’ not to mention NASA’s movies. We will tie this into the aether near the end of the post.
We have discussed this elsewhere in a few posts. More here
Sunday, August 2, 2026
by StFerdIII
Full Article
Based on real world data, the fraud called Einstein was forced back to at least some concept of an aether, but one that was amorphous enough to satisfy his pet ideologies, namely the flat-merged-space time of Special Relativity (1905); and the curved-space-time of General Theory of Relativity (1915). Notice that the ‘4D’ universe goes from flat to curved in 10 years. JWST observational data confirms it is flat and not expanding (future post on the hysterical-tortured maths they use to claim expansion).
Einstein’s philosophy, now the platform for modern physics and cosmology, meant that the aether was largely massless without particles, and immobile. This entailed it could not be a transmission or transduction agent - as false as a fighting sword made from paper and just as useless.
In 1923, Arthur Eddington, one of Einstein’s disciples, summarised the incoherency of the Relativity cult and its approach:
“If a substantial aether analogous to a material ocean exists, it must rigidify, as it were, a definite space; and whether the observer or whether nature pays any attention to that space or not, a fundamental separation of space and time must be there. Some would cut the knot by denying the aether altogether. We do not consider that desirable, or, so far as we can see, possible; but we do deny that the aether need have such properties as to separate space and time in the way supposed.”
Thanks Arthur. As a Relativist he admitted that space and time are not merged and the aether is real but for the sake of theory, let’s ignore it. The aether exists as an immobile or rigid medium (as Descartes believed), yet the leader of the Relativity cult (Einstotle) admitted that the aether might indeed be mobile and might indeed possess physical properties.
So, this is what passes for ‘The Science’. A melange of mish-mash, half baked ideas, endless changes, opinions, open-ended malleable equations, mutilated maths driven and shaped by philosophical need and imperative. Packaged and marketed as divine truth. No need for mechanical engineering or common sense. Try pouring water into a nothingness.
More here