Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
Euclidean Distance: Euclidean distance treats space as a three-dimensional physical extension. It is based on the rigid geometry of the spatial medium itself and uses Pythagorean equations to calculate linear distances.
Standard Candle, Standard Model Distance: This is an inferential secondary calculation that relies on assumptions that the vacuum is real, and the speed of light is a universal constant. It is an estimation of distance based on the observed brightness (luminosity) of a celestial object, assuming its ‘true’ brightness is known.
Our quite ‘flat’ universe comports with the Euclidean 3-dimensional reality most of us outside of ‘The Science’ inhabit. In the philosophical science fiction of Relativity and the Biggest Bangers, they inhabit the Reimann-Minkowski-Einstotle-curved universe.
The data is clear. The cosmos is not curved. Taken as a whole, the universe is strictly Euclidean. This means that if we pull out our grade 9 maths set, we could inscribe a giant triangle in a circle in outer space, and the calculated value would be π (3.14). You remember Pi. More here
This post is for any who are interested in the claims by NASA that Artemis II, which will be launched on February 6 2026, (though some sources say February 5th), will do a ‘fly by’ of the Moon. This has been promised every year for a decade. We can play with probability numbers and derive different results but in essence, if we apply ‘success probability’ to historical antecedents and the detailed components within the proposed Artemis II flight, we end up with a statistically insignificant probability of success. NASA’s own study from 2025, confirms this.
This admittedly facile analysis is rarely if ever discussed. No one, and no organisation, will deploy into ‘production’ until they are 99%-100% certain that everything has been tested in a simulation environment which imitates the production environment.
Not so with the space-games apparently. The first time these guys try something in the ‘go live’ environment, end-to-end, it succeeds. NASA has never had a manned journey above 400 miles in altitude. Yet they are going to send 4 ‘astronauts’ on a 500.000 mile journey. Sure if you say so.
In 1971 Shepard was playing golf on the moon and just 3 years later in 1974, NASA demised the most powerful rocket yet created – the Saturn V. 1974 is thereby the true and official end of the Apollo program. This is when the rocketry is retired and supposedly, by the 1990s, the plans and designs are lost or destroyed. The core principles of polymorphism and reuse violated.
But now there is ‘Artemis’, a new rocket, new systems, a new capsule (Orion), new fuel, digital technology and a new flight path. Who cares about Apollo Chud? Old news, older technology. So what if NASA destroyed or lost everything? Irrelevant Chud old boy. Move on to Orion and the Moon-bus.
You are told that light speed invariance in a ‘vacuum’ is 186,000 miles per second. No proof of this claim exists. There is no such thing as invariant light speed in a ‘vacuum’.
Vacuums in space, or in nature simply do not exist.
A vacuum is absolute nothingness. No energy, radiation, rays, particles, waves, light or sound would be transferred. In a true medium-based physics, using proper experimentation, different frequencies will return different speeds. The medium or an aether exists, notwithstanding the howls of the ‘science’ Fanboys.
In the real world, in the real universe, there can be no constancy of a light speed within different media of transmissions. Ascribing to space the concept of ‘nothingness’ to make equations balance and to satisfy philosophical-Copernican requirements is anti-science and a fraud. The aether as a medium of transfer obviously exists.
The only debate, never enjoined, is what is the aether’s impact on the Earth’s translational or rotational velocities, and if such impacts can be mechanically and physically proven, and if so, what does that mean in our understanding of this planet and its position within the solar system and universe at large.
The invariance speed of light (along with the Earth’s translational velocity), was comprehensively destroyed in the 19th century from Arago in 1810, to Airy in 1871. It was further eviscerated by Michelson-Morley from 1887-1923, Sagnac in 1913, Dayton Miller from 1920-1935 and many other physicists in the past 100 years. More here
