Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from. It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
43 failed predictions. In 2004, the Green Tards forecast an end to civilisation in 2020. Yawn. Hussein Obama recently purchased a seaside property worth $15 million. Apparently, he does not really believe in the Globaloney-Warming nonsense either.
So a cult that: creates data fraud; rewrites temperature history; engages in corrupt and mindless propaganda; feeds off the $ 1 Trillion a year in funding available for its hysteria; rebrands plant food as a toxin; religiously believes that plant food which is .0004 gas by weight and only 5 % emitted by humans is somehow the control knob for climate; situates thermometers at airports, highways and urban heat sinks then proudly declares ‘hottest days evah’….has been wrong on every single prediction; yet still calls itself ‘science’.
Religiously believing that Plant food causes Globaloney-Warming is Stupid. And Stupid is not Science.
Failed Green Fascist Predictions:
All of the above is taught in schools as ‘science’ and fact. A Low Information society.
An example of Fake Science, and the cult of Science, or 'Scientism', is the current hysteria by the Green Fascists, over rather normal hot weather and associated fires in Australia. Scientism and the Climate Cult maintain that Australia is experiencing the warmest week on ‘record’, with the warmest day on ‘record’ being December 17th 2019. In reality of course, these claims are completely false.
Fake Media weather channels in Australia will always have the ‘meteorologist’ standing next to a photo of the country, which is of course, saturated with orange and red (denoting burning up due to plant food, .0004% gas by weight). State funded channels (and education systems) repeat the Goebbelesque lie that the current warmth is an all-time record and that humans are the causal agents. None of this is true of course.
The embedded video by Tony Heller outlines why this story is simply Fake Science. People need to be more discriminating, for example:
-February 5th 1851 Melbourne was 115 F in the shade much hotter than the current week in the shade, with vast quantities of dead livestock and bushfires.
-The real record dates from Bourke NSW in 1909 – 125 F which is 21F above the current temperatures.
-The ‘Records’ used by the Fake News and State funded meteorology only go back to 1910, however 1909, the 1880s and 1890s were also much hotter than this week, so why is this data ignored?
-January 1923 in NSW recorded 120 to 123 degrees over a long period of time yet the Fake News and Fake Science have flattened these out and ignored them.
-Marble Bar NSW had 160 days of continuous 100+F heat from 1923 – 24.
-Likewise, the ‘Records’ presented lie about the 1930s temperatures as well, which in many places were much hotter than today.
-Only about 25 weather stations in Australia – most of them in the South East – have temperature records dating back 100 years. What about the rest of the country? How can anyone make the claim that ‘this is the hottest week on record’, if most of the country is left out of the analysis?
In summary, Australia is nowhere close to its highest temperature. Long lived temperature records which are scarce, indicate that the 1880s, 1890s, 1923-24, the 1930s were much hotter than today, which would show a long-term cooling, not warming trend. Based on the above, claims that this year is the hottest ‘evah’ in Australia is mindless propaganda and Fake Science.
Green Nazism, Green Fascism. This is what ‘environmentalism’ truly is at its core. The cult of Gaia, of climate changing, of blaming plant food for all the ills of natural variations, including seasons, storms, cold, warm, hot, dry, temperate and intemperate has nothing to do with science, intelligence or a commitment to Gaia preservation. Green-anything is a political-religious construct designed to control mankind and modern society, and over time eliminate mankind and modern society. It is a Global Fascism.
Just follow the money. The Globaloneywarming/ClimateChanging cult, is about money and power. $1 Trillion a year in government subsidies, programs, funding and grants, worldwide. Power over people, energy, carbon-based systems, industry, transportation, society at large, with an attendant rise in taxes. A reason to exist for the useless United Nations and other greedy, hungry, socialist-globalist agencies. Green Fascism and One World Government.
(Godefridi) These suggestions, which date back to 1968, prefigure the “Green Fund” institutionalized by the Paris Agreement (2015), which brings in the annual transfer, under the aegis of the United Nations, of $100 billion from the west to the rest of the world.
The $100 Billion for ‘Green funds’ (ah who can argue with ‘Green’, the children’s future, and Mommy Earth?), will double, triple, octuple in the next few years. Green Fascism. As with their Nazi counterparts and progenitors, a form of coerced socialism, Atheist, pagan, violent, bloody.
Fascism was essentially a nationalist form of socialism. Mussolini abolished the elections but left scattered elements of pluralism, including the monarchy. In the twisted workings of Hitlerian pathology, the German was but a cog. The National Socialist theory endeavoured to conceptually destroy the “bourgeois individualism” of the Anglo-Saxon.
Based on Fiction strutting around as Science.
The problem with the IPCC is that it claims to be scientific; “The IPCC is a scientific body” (see IPCC.ch); this is a false claim because, in every way—composition, authority, functioning—it is political and even diplomatic. However, the IPCC claims to derive the “recommended measures”—the third part of its reports—from a scientific summary of the first part, which is, at best, a naive and rationally primitive process. It is rationally impossible to derive a standard from a fact. For this reason, the rational value of the IPCC reports is zero. Not debatable, nor amendable: just zero. This notwithstanding, the IPCC reports have been celebrated for 30 years by most western governments—with the notable exception of the White House, since 2016—as the voice of science.
Admittedly, according to the IPCC, humans emit only 4% of global CO2 emissions: 96% are natural. But by a so-called “radiative forcing” effect, this slight surplus of human CO2 upsets the natural balance and causes global warming.
Green Fascism is worse than Nazism. The Nazis or their Brethren the Communists, did not view man or modernity as the problem. They viewed inequality, a lack of state power, and the need to ‘form’ man and woman into the ‘right’ sort of image and human as the challenge.
To eliminate (“by 95%”) human CO2 emissions, it is necessary to abolish individual freedom. In this way, the totalizing analytic of environmentalism induces a totalitarian algorithm: If human CO2 is the problem, then humans must be restrained, controlled, and conditioned in each of their activities.
Green Fascism however, views man, his industry, society and technology as the problem and since the trace chemical rounding error emitted by man is apparently, producing a radiative imbalance leading to catastrophe, then ineluctable logic leads to the conclusion that most of mankind must be killed.
The divergence of environmentalism from previous examples of totalitarianism is not marginal: it marks an ontological turning point. If human CO2 is the problem, then Man is the problem.
Since mankind is just an ‘animal’ pace the Atheists, the self-proclaimed ‘Rationalists’ and other worthies, killing humans is akin to the slaughter of say bats in a Wind-Turbine, or shrews dying from chemical leakage from a solar panel farm. It is unimportant and inconsequential.
In the twentieth century, the works of authors such as Arne Næss, Ludwig Klages, Aldo Leopold, Hans Jonas, and Dave Foreman built the first specific theoretical structure of environmentalism, pleading terrestrial ethics, the recognition of the ‘human’ rights of animals and the ecosystem, the halting of progress, and the renunciation of technology. According to this un-anthropocentric ethical framework, Man is but one creature amongst others. The prodigal primate re-joins nature, often designated since 1970 under the name of the goddess Gaia (à la James Lovelock), personifying the Earth as being alive. This ontological degradation of Man is a key aspect of contemporary environmentalism.
As with the Nazis and Soviets, the Green Fascists indoctrinate children. Green ‘Youth’ Corps will soon appear, children are already being coerced to ‘protest climate change’ by propagandists posing as ‘Teachers’, and icons such as St. Greta the stupid of Sweden, are demanding a ‘revolution’ by the young against the ‘oppression’ and ‘destruction’ of Climate and Gaia, from the rounding error plant food, 96% emitted by Gaia herself.
Now we see that environmentalists no longer hesitate at having teenagers and even children take to the street “for the climate.” In Flanders, in January 2019, there was a demonstration “for the climate” of children from nursery school—from 3 to 5 years old—taking up, in chorus, the political slogans of their elders. Comparisons naturally come to mind. For example, the Komsomol— those Soviet communist youth organizations—although the Soviets wouldn’t allow kindergarten children to enroll; or the Children’s Crusade, the lunacy of children fanaticized by adults who ended up being slaughtered by the opposing forces; or consider the enlisting of German youth by the National Socialist regime, the Hitlerjugend. In these three cases, we find the identical stratagem of the ideological subjugation of childhood.
Can we imagine schoolteachers forcing four-year-old schoolchildren to demonstrate for capitalism, socialism, or Christianity? Why does what is absolutely unthinkable become legitimate when it comes to environmentalist ideology? The legitimacy of contemporary environmentalism rests on moral considerations, like any ideology and doctrine, but that this ideology mesmerizes with the alleged endorsement of science radically distinguishes it from its rivals.
Green Fascism preaches abortion, euthanasia, killing the old over a certain age (usually 70 is mentioned, the Nazis called the old ‘consumers’ or ‘eaters’ and had no problem in killing the sick elderly); the end of families, the end of child-birth and the end of most populations. All to reduce the human output of plant food.
Birth phobia is probably the subject which best demonstrates the soul of environmentalism—‘deep ecology’—and its real nature.
Totalitarian proposals, which suggest, recommend, and demand that Man be restrained in each and every activity: travel by car, travel by plane, meat consumption, energy, pet ownership,[2] euthanasia, (un)caring for the elderly, and even not giving birth and forced sterilization.
In essence, Green Fascism, akin to Marxism, Nazism, Communism and Muhammadism is a death cult. There is no respect for mankind or life. No amazement at creation, human ingenuity and compassion, or technology and social development. No appreciation of created nature, the wonders of bodily, spiritual design and structure, the gratitude for modern appliances, conveniences, energy, jobs and food. Nothing. Just a hate of the human.
Green Fascism is a mental illness, a sickness, a heavy pathology of ignorance and paganism. Far from being ‘progressive’, it is entirely regressive, debased and psychotic.