RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/

Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Back

Scientism - Recent Articles

Kepler the murderer and mathigician?

Why Kepler’s 3rd ‘law’ is circular and why heliocentricity is just another model.


“I confess that when Tycho died, I quickly took advantage of the absence, or lack of circumspection, of the heirs, by taking the observations under my care.” (Kepler, 1609)

In 1601, the German Kepler stole from Tycho Brahe’s laboratory what would have been a treasure trove of information. Brahe was the most formidable force in astronomy since Ptolemy. There is ample evidence that Kepler, who worked with Brahe before Tycho’s mysterious death, murdered the Danish astronomer to get his bloody hands on inimitably pure observational data.

Here we will discuss what ‘The Science’ never will. Saint Kepler is always referenced as a giant amongst the Apostles of ‘The ‘Science’, who saved the phenomena of Copernican theory with his mathematical ‘proofs’ of elliptical orbits. Is this really true?

Was Saint Johannes really an Apostle saving ‘science’ and the ‘truth’ of the church of Scientism from the toothless and shoeless ‘anti-science’ heathens and pagans?

Was he really a divine light of reason in a world of unbelieving darkness and ignorance?

Or was Kepler just another Sunworshipping quack and worse, a conniving criminal murderer?  More here

Apollo 11 Fraud - searchable spreadsheet with details

Fanboys howl.

 

Below is a summary table of ~100 rows which summarise many posts and issues with Apollo 11 and the Apollo ‘moon landing’ narrative. Many more can be added, this is just a skeleton.

When confronted by the Fanboys it can be used (and searched) for answers. This is a first step to creating a proper database, cloudifying it, and sharing it. When that is done, I will post the real database as well. Looking forward to the Artemis-Orion ‘moon fly by’, promised now for about 10 years and analyse that ‘flight’ against the data details presented.

Embedded searchable

Euclid and the Sun, Part 2. Real observations don’t support the Standard Model

If the Sun is not 93 million miles away, the entire edifice and Standard Model comes crashing down.

 

In a previous post we discussed why Euclidean mathematics gives a completely different and far more ‘physical’ distance measurement. This post extends that view and includes the Moon. The distance to the Moon (~238.000 miles) is accurate in the author’s opinion (summary below).

Interestingly, this accurate Earth-Moon distance, shatters the Relativistic calculation used by the standard model to arrive at the Sun’s distance from this planet. We should acknowledge that the desire to place the Sun at 93 millions from this planet is a very recent and a rather incredible claim based on circular logic and Kepler’s ‘Laws’ which are debunked in the next post (Kepler’s manipulated maths eventually put the Sun at a distance of 52 million miles). Some historical calculations you are not told about:

 

The problem is obvious.  More here