RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Gab@StFerdinandIII - Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from.  It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Archive - January 2020

Darwin's religion: how would an organ 'evolve' slowly over millions of years?

Biologically impossible. So what science supports evolution?

Bookmark and Share

 

According to Darwin’s cult everything just ‘evolves’.  The word ‘evolve’ is meaningless.  Usually it is associated with slow improvements over time.  But how?  Chance, stuff happens, we-don’t-know-but-it did are the usual answers whilst invoking the God of ‘Natural Selection’, another meaningless term.  Selecting what from which options?  Who selects?  Is it nature- based?  Why such a wide variety within a species – big, thin, slow, fat, smart, stupid – seems that the God of selection is rather inaccurate?  Does it mean survival?  Survival of what exactly?  The fastest, luckiest, slowest, strongest, most immoral?  The cult of Darwin is suffused with meaningless terms.

 

What are the conditional statements applied to ‘naturally select’ from the God of selection?  Who selected sloths and fish without eyes for example against what criteria?  Why don’t I have wings (surely that would impress the females and lead to my preference in sexual selection)?  Why don’t wolves or large cats talk, surely that is a competitive advantage when hunting?  Why are snakes akin to legless reptiles, losing leg function is surely a sign of devolution not evolution? 

 

A huge problem for Darwin’s cult is organ complexity.  The cult maintains that all organs form by single cells, ‘evolving’ over ‘time’, into tissues and these tissues than form the organ.  Such a process has never been observed in reality.  If you can’t observe a process, any related theory is not science, but conjecture looking for proof.  Does it really make sense that a heart would ‘evolve’?  How would organs ‘evolve’ through a selecting process over time?  Half a heart, a quarter of an arm, one-third of an ear?  What use are they? How would such incredible complexity as the eye, which needs a nervous system connection to the brain (more complexity) ‘evolve’, ‘slowly’, over ‘millions or billions’ of years?  Is half an eye a credible story?

 

Did blood, blood vessels, glucose, cell mitochondira likewise ‘evolve’ at the same rate as the heart?  What came first the blood or heart?  No heart, what is the use of blood?  No blood what is the use of the heart?  Darwinists have no answer.  The obvious response is that all must be present or the system fails, the organism will die.

 

Deep fossils also belie the ‘evolution’ story since they show fully developed organs similar to present-day organs.  Where is the evolution?  If you read any story about a ‘discovery’ in ‘deep time’ of a preserved fossil (70 millions etc), the evolutionists always proclaim surprise that soft tissue can survive so long. Their heads would explode if they admitted the reality of what they were looking at is not millions of years old. 

 

Consider sexual selection a major issue for the cult of Darwin.  X, Y chromosomes and related genetic material must all be present.  It is all or nothing. How would that system ‘evolve’ over ‘millions of years’?

 

"life must simultaneously have both systems of cell division to reproduce sexually. Otherwise it could not reproduce, which would end that gene line. Thus, functional mitosis must not mutate in the somatic cell line, but mitosis genes must mutate into meiosis in the gonadic cell line in order to evolve. The organism cannot reproduce until it has a fully functional meiosis system. Mitosis and meiosis or very different. Mitosis is a glorified straight forward copy machine. In contrast, meiosis is a functional ‘creator’ that produces the potential for the enormous variety of individuals, as seen everywhere in most all forms of life today – including humans."




 

The cult of Darwin has no explanation for the appearance, at the same time, of both processes necessary for cell division to allow for procreation.  If both types of cells don’t exist, the species is extinct.  Period.

Zimmer and Emlen have authored a popular pro-Evolution text-book and fully admit it cannot happen by ‘chance’ or through the Holy Spirit of ‘deep time’ (p. 320):  “Given the functional uniqueness of sexual reproduction at even the most primitive level, what we will see over and over throughout this book is that such an assumed gradual process could not, in actual scientific fact, have happened.”

Why would a stomach ‘evolve’?  How would a hand slowly develop over millions of years?  The genetic processes are unaccounted for, along with utility.  Why would half a hand be a naturally selected advantage?  Where in nature has that process been observed, or did it stop, or does it take so long that it cannot be observed, and is it reasonable to believe that such a process would actually ‘survive’ in its entirety for millions of years to produce the organ?  How would that work exactly?

With Darwin’s cult (or religion), there is precious little real science.  The conclusion is already made – ‘we are right, it is true, we evolved!’, but the details, the logic, the science, the facts, the observations, the common-sense do not support such a conclusion.  One can therefore conclude that without facts, Darwin’s cult is not a science, but largely a fiction, promoted for other reasons, which have nothing to do with science. 

Globaloney-Warming: 43 Failed Green Fascist Predictions - Zero correct, every single one wrong

Stupid is not Science

Bookmark and Share

 

 





 

43 failed predictions.  In 2004, the Green Tards forecast an end to civilisation in 2020.  Yawn.  Hussein Obama recently purchased a seaside property worth $15 million.  Apparently, he does not really believe in the Globaloney-Warming nonsense either.

So a cult that:  creates data fraud; rewrites temperature history; engages in corrupt and mindless propaganda; feeds off the $ 1 Trillion a year in funding available for its hysteria; rebrands plant food as a toxin; religiously believes that plant food which is .0004 gas by weight and only 5 % emitted by humans is somehow the control knob for climate; situates thermometers at airports, highways and urban heat sinks then proudly declares ‘hottest days evah’….has been wrong on every single prediction; yet still calls itself ‘science’.

 

Religiously believing that Plant food causes Globaloney-Warming is Stupid.  And Stupid is not Science.

 

Failed Green Fascist Predictions:

 

  1. 2004 study; by 2020 widespread global anarchy, Siberian climate in Britain, European cities under water (that good-old standby – ‘under water’)
  2. 1967: Dire Famine Forecast By 1975
  3. 1969: Everyone Will Disappear In a Cloud Of Blue Steam By 1989 (1969)
  4. 1970: Ice Age By 2000
  5. 1970: America Subject to Water Rationing By 1974 and Food Rationing By 1980
  6. 1971: New Ice Age Coming By 2020 or 2030
  7. 1972: New Ice Age By 2070
  8. 1974: Space Satellites Show New Ice Age Coming Fast
  9. 1974: Another Ice Age?
  10. 1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life
  11. 1976: Scientific Consensus Planet Cooling, Famines imminent
  12. 1980: Acid Rain Kills Life In Lakes
  13. 1978: No End in Sight to 30-Year Cooling Trend
  14. 1988: Regional Droughts (that never happened) in 1990s
  15. 1988: Temperatures in DC Will Hit Record Highs
  16. 1988: Maldive Islands will Be Underwater by 2018 (they’re not), in fact 5 new airports were recently built
  17. 1989: Rising Sea Levels will Obliterate Nations if Nothing Done by 2000
  18. 1989: New York City’s West Side Highway Underwater by 2019 (it’s not) (in fact in 1970, this prediction was to occur by 1995, then was extended of course)
  19. 2000: Children Won’t Know what Snow Is
  20. 2000s: Ebola, SARS would eliminate millions of people (Mommy Earth’s ‘attack’ against the ‘virus’ of humanity)
  21. 2002: Famine In 10 Years If We Don’t Give Up Eating Fish, Meat, and Dairy
  22. 2004: Britain will Be Siberia by 2024
  23. 2008: Arctic will Be Ice Free by 2018 (was originally 2013, and every year there-after)
  24. 2008: Climate Genius Al Gore Predicts Ice-Free Arctic by 2013
  25. 2009: Climate Genius Al Gore Moves 2013 Prediction of Ice-Free Arctic to 2014
  26. 2009: Climate Genius Prince Charles Says we Have 96 Months to Save World
  27. 2009: UK Prime Minister Says 50 Days to ‘Save The Planet From Catastrophe’
  28. 2013: Arctic Ice-Free by 2015
  29. 2014: Only 500 Days Before ‘Climate Chaos’
  30. 1968: Overpopulation Will Spread Worldwide
  31. 1970: World Will Use Up All its Natural Resources by mid 1990s (inducing famines etc)
  32. 1966: Oil Gone in Ten Years
  33. 1972: Oil Depleted in 20 Years
  34. 1977: Department of Energy Says Oil will Peak in 90s
  35. 1980: Peak Oil In 2000
  36. 1996: Peak Oil in 2020
  37. 2002: Peak Oil in 2010
  38. 2006: Super Hurricanes!
  39. 2005: Manhattan Underwater by 2015
  40. 1970: Urban Citizens Will Require Gas Masks by 1985
  41. 1970: Nitrogen buildup Will Make All Land Unusable
  42. 1970: Decaying Pollution Will Kill all the Fish
  43. 1970s: Killer Bees will ravage most of North America (Gaia’s fightback against the human ‘virus’)

 

All of the above is taught in schools as ‘science’ and fact.  A Low Information society.