Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
According to Darwin’s cult everything just ‘evolves’. The word ‘evolve’ is meaningless. Usually it is associated with slow improvements over time. But how? Chance, stuff happens, we-don’t-know-but-it did are the usual answers whilst invoking the God of ‘Natural Selection’, another meaningless term. Selecting what from which options? Who selects? Is it nature- based? Why such a wide variety within a species – big, thin, slow, fat, smart, stupid – seems that the God of selection is rather inaccurate? Does it mean survival? Survival of what exactly? The fastest, luckiest, slowest, strongest, most immoral? The cult of Darwin is suffused with meaningless terms.
What are the conditional statements applied to ‘naturally select’ from the God of selection? Who selected sloths and fish without eyes for example against what criteria? Why don’t I have wings (surely that would impress the females and lead to my preference in sexual selection)? Why don’t wolves or large cats talk, surely that is a competitive advantage when hunting? Why are snakes akin to legless reptiles, losing leg function is surely a sign of devolution not evolution?
A huge problem for Darwin’s cult is organ complexity. The cult maintains that all organs form by single cells, ‘evolving’ over ‘time’, into tissues and these tissues than form the organ. Such a process has never been observed in reality. If you can’t observe a process, any related theory is not science, but conjecture looking for proof. Does it really make sense that a heart would ‘evolve’? How would organs ‘evolve’ through a selecting process over time? Half a heart, a quarter of an arm, one-third of an ear? What use are they? How would such incredible complexity as the eye, which needs a nervous system connection to the brain (more complexity) ‘evolve’, ‘slowly’, over ‘millions or billions’ of years? Is half an eye a credible story?
Did blood, blood vessels, glucose, cell mitochondira likewise ‘evolve’ at the same rate as the heart? What came first the blood or heart? No heart, what is the use of blood? No blood what is the use of the heart? Darwinists have no answer. The obvious response is that all must be present or the system fails, the organism will die.
Deep fossils also belie the ‘evolution’ story since they show fully developed organs similar to present-day organs. Where is the evolution? If you read any story about a ‘discovery’ in ‘deep time’ of a preserved fossil (70 millions etc), the evolutionists always proclaim surprise that soft tissue can survive so long. Their heads would explode if they admitted the reality of what they were looking at is not millions of years old.
Consider sexual selection a major issue for the cult of Darwin. X, Y chromosomes and related genetic material must all be present. It is all or nothing. How would that system ‘evolve’ over ‘millions of years’?
"life must simultaneously have both systems of cell division to reproduce sexually. Otherwise it could not reproduce, which would end that gene line. Thus, functional mitosis must not mutate in the somatic cell line, but mitosis genes must mutate into meiosis in the gonadic cell line in order to evolve. The organism cannot reproduce until it has a fully functional meiosis system. Mitosis and meiosis or very different. Mitosis is a glorified straight forward copy machine. In contrast, meiosis is a functional ‘creator’ that produces the potential for the enormous variety of individuals, as seen everywhere in most all forms of life today – including humans."
The cult of Darwin has no explanation for the appearance, at the same time, of both processes necessary for cell division to allow for procreation. If both types of cells don’t exist, the species is extinct. Period.
Zimmer and Emlen have authored a popular pro-Evolution text-book and fully admit it cannot happen by ‘chance’ or through the Holy Spirit of ‘deep time’ (p. 320): “Given the functional uniqueness of sexual reproduction at even the most primitive level, what we will see over and over throughout this book is that such an assumed gradual process could not, in actual scientific fact, have happened.”
Why would a stomach ‘evolve’? How would a hand slowly develop over millions of years? The genetic processes are unaccounted for, along with utility. Why would half a hand be a naturally selected advantage? Where in nature has that process been observed, or did it stop, or does it take so long that it cannot be observed, and is it reasonable to believe that such a process would actually ‘survive’ in its entirety for millions of years to produce the organ? How would that work exactly?
With Darwin’s cult (or religion), there is precious little real science. The conclusion is already made – ‘we are right, it is true, we evolved!’, but the details, the logic, the science, the facts, the observations, the common-sense do not support such a conclusion. One can therefore conclude that without facts, Darwin’s cult is not a science, but largely a fiction, promoted for other reasons, which have nothing to do with science.
43 failed predictions. In 2004, the Green Tards forecast an end to civilisation in 2020. Yawn. Hussein Obama recently purchased a seaside property worth $15 million. Apparently, he does not really believe in the Globaloney-Warming nonsense either.
So a cult that: creates data fraud; rewrites temperature history; engages in corrupt and mindless propaganda; feeds off the $ 1 Trillion a year in funding available for its hysteria; rebrands plant food as a toxin; religiously believes that plant food which is .0004 gas by weight and only 5 % emitted by humans is somehow the control knob for climate; situates thermometers at airports, highways and urban heat sinks then proudly declares ‘hottest days evah’….has been wrong on every single prediction; yet still calls itself ‘science’.
Religiously believing that Plant food causes Globaloney-Warming is Stupid. And Stupid is not Science.
Failed Green Fascist Predictions:
All of the above is taught in schools as ‘science’ and fact. A Low Information society.