RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from.  It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Archive - October 2016

Big Bang theology and Virgin Births. Evolution and Scientific, Cosmological Dogma.

The High Church of Chance crucifies the Heretics.

Bookmark and Share

 

Evolutionists and Atheists [usually the same cult]; believe that there was a virgin birth of the Universe. Apparently, there was nothing, then for some reason, all the matter and energy of the universe appeared in a dimensional object the size of a pinhead, which for unknown reasons exploded. The resulting chaos from the emission led somehow to a staggering array of order, precision and construction; including 'natural laws', complex chemical combinations, constellations, planets and life. Further, the life forms then 'evolved' by more magic through mutations which 99% of the time degrade or are neutral, into more complex life forms, contradicting the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

 

The above fairy tale is called science.

 

The virgin birth of the Universe within the Church of Evolution, is called the 'Big Bang'. Ironically it was a Catholic [very liberal] priest named Le Maitre who first proposed this general idea. There is not much science within the fairy tale and contrary to propaganda, it is a theory in crisis.

 

Some issues with the Universe's virgin birth miracle:

 

-Gravity waves do not disprove, nor prove, any theory about the origins of the universe contrary to propaganda.

 

-Gravity waves and 'cosmic inflation' are also based on human designed models. This means that you change the models, the inputs and the assumptions, and you will change the output. Cosmological 'science' has a long track record of 'astonishing news', faithfully reported by the news propaganda outlets, only to be destroyed later. Bicep2 is a case in point [http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5083].

 

-More than 30 years ago, a theoretical physicist named Alan Guth suggested cosmic inflation to solve the horizon problem [the flatness problem with the Big Bang virgin birth model]. The theory of cosmic inflation proposes that 1034 seconds after the universe's virgin birth, there was a brief and rapid inflation of all matter, leading to a greater size and velocity much faster than the speed of light [invoking Star Trek]. This meant that the entire universe was in thermal contact because it needed to be into the thermal equilibrium before being pulled out of thermal equilibrium by inflation.

 

There is no evidence for inflation of course.

 

-Inflation is a theory in crisis. Mike Wall from Space.com recently whined:  "We really need to understand what this substance - this inflation - is. And until we do that, it's just like dark matter or dark energy - we give it a name, but we don't know what it is." – see http://www.space.com/25078-universe-inflation-gravitational-waves-discovery.html.

 

-Evolution cult members mostly believe that the expanding universe is accelerating, but this theory does not conform to observations, so they invent 'dark energy' to balance out their equations. No one knows what dark energy is, nor has any been observed. But the media and general public believe in dark energy, because the cult of science told them they had to. When theories start inventing magic friends to explain reality, you know that the cult dogma is long past its prime.

 

-An expanding universe – central for virgin birth believers – is in serious doubt based on objective scientific cosmology [see http://johnhartnett.org/2014/01/01/galaxy-quasar-associations/].

 

 

An objective 'scientist' would be rather skeptical of Big Bang theology based on the thin evidence and even thinner probability of it being true. At the very least he would want a lot more facts before converting to the High Church of Chance. However, that is not where the money is. The money, the grants, the tenure, the access to billions in R&D equipment and leading edge technology is in the Big Bang theology. If you question the Church of Evolution and the virgin birth of the universe, you will not graduate, you will not be hired by a university or government institution, you will not be tenured and you will not be given grants for research. This bribery and system of ransom is called 'science'. 

Evolution's absurdity is revealed when you look at DNA

4-dimensional software code and operating systems do not arise by chaos.

Bookmark and Share

 

Source

 

The human body contains 1 Trillion cells, 300.000 different proteins, some 2-10 million total proteins, billions of transactions a day, and replaces billions of cells each day. The human system is the most complex operating system and set of software applications in the universe. Nothing compares. In fact human-created operating systems such as Windows or Linux, are architectural backwards, or literally the opposite of our body's operating system. One would expect that better operating systems in the future, will use the genome as their template.

 

Imagine if someone, an evolution-true believer for example, stated that Amazon.com, the world's most comprehensive e-Commerce and software-as-a-service implementation, with millions of lines of code, built on 1000s of servers hosted in data centres across the world, with such complexity as load-balancing, caching, security and notifications, simply arose from a 2 page html web template, whose code 'mutated' into java, java script and html 5, all due to competitive advantage, striving and survival-of-the-fittest. This is stupid and you would not believe the person. Amazon is designed, built, maintained, monitored, enhanced and improved by human intelligence.

 

What then of your own body? Is it reasonable and scientific to believe that the human body, which is infinitely more complicated than Amazon.com, simply appeared due to random chance, chaos and mutations which only degrade software ?

 

The human DNA software operating system is 4-D. Would human 4-D software appear magically from single cell cyanobacteria 'evolving' into the screaming mad climate 'professor' ? This assertion is insane and probably at some level deeply psychopathic.

 

Human software contains instruction sets – just like a computer operating system. Genes or functions are turned on and off across the genome by 'transcription' or functional sets within the genome. These bind to the DNA around the genes and allows the functionality to be turned on or off. However, we don't know what instantiates the transcriptors. How would an operating set of instructions, which generates software or DNA action, arise by random chaos ?

 

Evolutionists have usually focused on trying to find patterns in this process, focusing on the DNA sequences and the binding with certain transcription factors. There is no set pattern however. DNA binding is quite tissue specific and highly regulated within the operating system. No one understands how the transcriptors interact with DNA or how they interact with different parts of the DNA structure.

 

Current research has added to the mystery by identifying 2 activities which influence how DNA is read by transcription factors: 1) the sequence of the DNA and 2) the shape of the DNA as it is being read. Since DNA is now thought to be 4-dimensional [not 3], this second factor is indeed a puzzle. But few ponder the reality of what they are investigating. How would a 4D encoded software system, 'evolve' by chance, from cyanobacteria to you ? Even cyanobacteria's genome is infinitely more complicated than previously hypothesized by Darwinists. Is it scientific and reasonable to adjure that operating systems arose from nothing, or dead matter, and then assumed a 4 D shape whose intricacy we do not understand ?

 

Stating the above as science, is more dogmatic than rational.

 

Zhou, T., et al. 2015. Quantitative modeling of transcription factor binding specificities using DNA shape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112 (15): 4654–4659.

Rohs, R., et al. 2009. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 461 (7268): 1248–1253.

Tomkins, J. 2014. Duons: Parallel Gene Code Defies EvolutionCreation Science Update. Posted on icr.org January 6, 2014, accessed April 14, 2015.

Tomkins, J. 2014. Dual-Gene Codes Defy Evolution...AgainCreation Science Update. Posted on icr.org September 12, 2014, accessed April 14, 2015.

 

 

4-D Genomic software code disproves Evolution

Operating Systems, Software and Functionality in 4 D shapes do not arise by chance

Bookmark and Share

 

DNA and the genome are operating systems and software applications. The DNA code is more complicated than any human engineered operating system. It is vastly superior to either Linux or Microsoft Operating Systems; with a better architecture, higher throughput, and more complicated system commands. In fact human engineered operating systems are so inferior to DNA and the genome, that they could be considered almost the opposite architecture to what an operating system, should look like.

 

'A team made up of computer scientists, biophysicists, and experts in bioinformatics (in other words, really smart people) compared the genome of the lowly E. coli bacterium to the Linux operating system... and have discovered that our man-made operating systems are much less efficient because they are much more “top heavy”.1 It turns out that the bacterial genome has a few high-level instructions that control a few middle-level processes, that in turn control a massive number of protein-coding genes. Linux is the opposite. It is much more top heavy and thus much less efficient at getting things done. The bacterium can do a lot more with fewer controls. I predict that the study of genomics will influence the future development of computers.' Source 


Scientific American, a bastion of Evolutionary mythology, presents 4-dimensional genomic software as an irreducible puzzle.

'The increasingly detailed hierarchical picture of the genome that researchers like Dekker, Misteli, Aiden and their colleagues have been building goes something like this: Nucleotides assemble into the famous DNA double helix. The helix winds onto nucleosomes to form chromatin, which winds and winds in its turn into formations similar to what you get when you keep twisting the two ends of a string. Amid all of this, the chromatin pinches off here and there into thousands of loops. These loops, both on the same chromosome and on different ones, engage one another in subcompartments.'

 

Darwin prophesied in his non-scientific ignorance, that cells were just 'globules'. The nano-technology of the genome and 'simple cell', is far beyond anything that humans can engineer. This complexity destroys evolution.

 

How can software as complicated as the human genome arrive from nothing ? How would blue-green algae, 'mutate' over time, to produce 30.000 genes and at least 300.000 separate functional proteins which are folded into 3 D shapes; which in aggregate comprise some 2 million or more total proteins within the human operating system ?

 

Is it reasonable to suppose that 4 D code was assembled by random chance ? Did Linus Torvalds the inventor of Linux not invent his operating system ? Or did it just self – assemble out of some 'random' functions he had programmed and left lying around in a computer, which in the name of 'competitive advantage' self-assembled into complex functionality ?

 

Researchers use design, human intervention a Lab to demonstrate how DNA folds......obviously this happened by random chance.