Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
What Covid-calypse? From https://lockdownsceptics.org/ the real numbers indicate that Covid peaked in late April 2020 and there is no 2nd wave and won’t be. Hysterical ‘case’ claims do not translate into death, nor are many ‘positive cases’ valid with a large percentage being either incorrect or fraudulent.
25.000 have apparently died at home, since the empty-Hospital system will only receive Covid-related cases, with procedures, emergencies and surgeries being cancelled. Daily Mail UK October 29th 2020 article:
“The latest NHS update published yesterday showed that just one person under the age of 20, and another 13 under 40, have died with coronavirus in English hospitals since the start of September.
By contrast, 1,425 patients over 80 have died over the same period, along with another 1,093 aged between 60 and 79.
It means the elderly account for a staggering 94 per cent of hospital deaths this time round.
Wider figures from the Office for National Statistics covering all deaths across the UK tell the same story, with just 247 deaths among working-age people since the end of summer compared with 2,026 among pensioners.
They cover a slightly shorter period than the NHS figures.
It will put fresh pressure on ministers to avoid a new nationwide lockdown that could lead to other deadly diseases such as cancer and heart disease going untreated, and further damage young people’s mental health and job prospects.”
Covid-19(84) is more religion than science. Fiction, hysteria, totalitarian control is not scientific, not concerned with health and unrelated to morality. It is a dystopian nightmare of Communal Fascism.
It might take one hour at the bio-chemical level to disprove this religion.
The ‘Enlightenment’ promoted by its creators – Atheists and Protestants – has led to a lot of anti-science:
The Enlightenment separation of science and purpose seemed like a good idea at the time, but it wasn’t. Reason is a unity, and arbitrary divisions of reason can lead to cognitive disaster..
Darwinism has long been dead as a science.
past few decades as supplements to neo-Darwinism: neutral theory, the effects of a multiverse, complexity theory, and self-organization theories. None of them work.
Evolution is a hypothesis, more aptly described as a religious belief, a theory desperately looking for material, experimental, even logical proof.
When one starts to treat Darwinism as a hypothesis about the biochemical level of life rather than as an assumption, it takes about ten minutes to conclude it’s radically inadequate. It takes perhaps another ten minutes to realize that the molecular foundation of life was designed, and for effectively the same reason that Anaxagoras, Galen, and Paley reached the same conclusion for visible levels of biology (although, because of progress in science and philosophy, the argument is now necessarily much more detailed and nuanced than their versions):
DNA cannot self-form. Neither can RNA. These Evolutionary assumptions have never been proven. They are just taken as ‘factual’.
To understand the profound inadequacy of Darwinism, we must first understand evolution’s foundation. Molecules are the basis of physical life. DNA, the carrier of genetic information, is itself a molecule.
In turn DNA encodes another class of very complex molecules, proteins, which can join together to form literal machines—molecular trucks, pumps, scanners, and more—that carry out the work of the cell. Among other duties, those machines build the structural materials of everyday life, such as shells, wood, flesh, and bones, which also are all made of particular molecules carefully arranged in particular ways.
DNA by itself, in structure and function disproves Evolution. Such complexity cannot arise by chance. It is mathematically impossible.
The DNA regulatory sequences of bacteria are relatively small and almost always found right next to the genes they control. Eukaryotic genes have those too, but they also can be controlled by DNA sequences called “enhancers” that can be either close (even within the gene itself) or very far away—tens or hundreds of thousands of bases up or down the double helix.
The DNA of a single cell is quite lengthy—several feet for humans—yet is condensed into a microscopic area.
…identified genes as sequences of DNA, and Watson and Crick’s discovery of the double helix showed the elegant way that genetic information could be passed down through the generations.
Genetic control cannot occur by chance.
An additional way that information may be passed down to offspring is by “epigenetic” tags. During the lifetime of an organism DNA can be modified by a process called methylation (think of it as like adding diacritical marks to letters of the alphabet), and the modification can affect whether a gene is turned on or off. For example, a flowering plant called toadflax comes in two forms—one with the petals arranged in a circle and one with petals set off to the sides. The two differ in one particular gene that controls flower symmetry, but the difference is not in the nucleotide sequence of the genes, which are the same.5 Rather, the radially symmetric variant gene is highly methylated.
How did amino acids and proteins form? Why? Why would ‘random natural processes’ produce 20 amino acid bases, who recombine to form complex protein strands of 50-150 amino acids, each one with a defined function and the body (every cell) contains such functionality which has a purpose and reason. How long would such a ‘random chance process’ take to work out the illimitable number of possible combinations before finding the ‘right one’. The organism would be long dead and extinct before this happened.
DNA does not occur in splendid isolation. It’s always associated with proteins, and the strength of the association can determine whether a gene is active.
The modern receptor could not give rise to a protein like the ancestral one by a Darwinian process, because the route is blocked by multiple small barriers that no one had any idea existed until now. It’s hard to overstate the importance of the conclusion. As the authors write, it very likely applies to the great majority of proteins, which perform complex tasks by dint of their complex structures. The reason of course is that natural selection will fit all proteins—not just steroid receptors—to their current tasks without regard to whether a selected mutation hinders some potential alternative use or not. Neutral mutations will accumulate with the same utter disregard for distant utility. Drift plus selection will mire a protein in its functional place.
Mutations degrade, they don’t add value.
With surpassing irony it turns out that, as with the polar bear, Darwinian evolution proceeds mainly by damaging or breaking genes, which, counterintuitively, sometimes helps survival. In other words, the mechanism is powerfully devolutionary. It promotes the rapid loss of genetic information. Laboratory experiments, field research, and theoretical studies all forcefully indicate that, as a result, random mutation and natural selection make evolution self-limiting.
Evolution has retarded and blocked real science. In their zeal to promote their religion, secular ‘science’ has negated actual scientific discovery and foisted a philosophy that is based on chance, randomness and connects humans to bacteria and apes. It is an anti-human, anti-reality program of illiteracy and fraud.
.jpg)
Modern secular religion and its various religious cults posit that random chance created everything. The design complexity, operating systems, molecular machinery, intricate engineering, the fantastically absurd balancing of elements and systems, the earth’s perfect position in the perfect galaxy to support life, the roughly 1 million complex variables arranged in perfect harmony to allow life to exist….all of this and much more is just a function of chance. So claims the secular religion of chance.
To get around the mathematical impossibility of life beginning from nothing and design complexity forming by random acts, ‘scientific’ language is used to cloak to obfuscate and impress. No experiments are performed. Natural selection (from what by whom?), nature finds a way (nature is impersonal and does not care about your selection), mutations (few if any positive mutations exist), genetic drift (drifting genes won’t form functional complexity), or a mixture of all the buzzwords together. The evolution religion believes that a small wolf became the whale (Darwin thought it was the brown bear which turned into the whale). Not a single shred of proof, laboratory experimentation, or replicable processes outlining how this could occur, have ever been offered. Just words and pictures. So, it is with the entire corpus of philosophical thought from the religion of evolution. No proof, just big words.
Darwin knew that complexity of the ear or eye destroyed his religious writings. He also knew that the fossil evidence did not support it. Fossil fraud has always been a common occurrence with the Evolution religion (Piltdown man and the missing links), with the latest frauds coming out of China (feathered dinosaurs, with money no doubt changing hands). No one has ever viewed a reptile running up a hill trying to change scales to feathers. No one has ever seen a reptile jump from a tree countless times trying to ‘evolve’ into a bird. Not even in captivity or a lab can one get a reptile to do either. Yet we are confidently told, that reptiles became birds. The two systems have nothing in common, and a reptile would never ‘mutate’ into a bird (or 2 reptiles in fact at the same time so they would be able to procreate).
Common sense tells you that a cat will always be a cat (they don’t mate with non-cat species); and that your DNA or operating system will determine who and what you are. It is unlikely a reptile is going to mate with a bird or a species which has wings, given that the wing structure is completely unlike that of a scale, and that DNA software is needed to enable flight (along with a complete change of the body, respiratory systems, eyes, mind etc). Chance in-toto would simply lead to nothing, since DNA has never been proven to self-assemble in warm-ponds out of nothing.
.jpg)
Consider your own body and its marvellous design.
Complexity has to be designed.
The system only works when all the parts are present, functioning as a unit. When we breathe through the nose, the valve operates automatically to allow air to enter and leave the lungs. We can also breathe through the mouth. The valve anticipates both actions correctly. We can quickly swallow saliva between breaths, and again the valve functions automatically to direct the right connection to the right tube, very rapidly, without our conscious thought. This dual function system is but one of several in the human body.
Saliva, why and how did this form by chance?
….we see that one of the most ordinary things about our body, saliva (sometimes denigrated as ‘spit’) is anything but simple. It contains complex molecules. It breaks down food and acts as a disinfectant. It is produced by glands that are arranged precisely in the mouth. It moistens the lips, the palate, and the upper digestive tract. And it is tied into other systems that are even more complex. Today, many are taught that saliva, with all its functions and interconnections, originated by blind, unguided processes of evolution. Does it seem reasonable that these systems began as small mistakes in pre-existing systems? All those systems would also have originated by mistake. It would be mistakes all the way down!
In addition, the salivary glands are controlled by special nerves out of the brain. (These command the increased flow and change in composition of saliva, for instance, when you see a juicy steak.) How could imaginary precursor glands improve the fitness of an organism before they had blood vessels and nerves? How did the new information get passed on into the gametes so that the next generation would benefit?
How many of thousands upon thousands of generations would be required for enough random mistakes to occur before the system worked? Would ‘sheer dumb luck’ create glands in matched symmetrical pairs, with their discharge tubes aimed into the mouth, their nerve activators extending to the precise part of the brain that delicately controls their every action twenty four hours a day, every day from the moment of birth?
The windpipe:
The throat, however, is also our windpipe. It’s possible (but not polite) to talk and eat at almost the same time. By design, there is a valve (the epiglottis) that can switch rapidly between the two pipes. This valve works well most of the time, except every now and then when we are careless. If food or drink gets into the windpipe, though, there is safety response: the coughing reflex. It is usually effective, except in severe cases of choking… Now, how did this dual function tube and valve process develop?
No, you did not ‘evolve’ from Apes or the mythical common ancestor:
… if we came from apes, how did this set of changes occur simultaneously with all of the other supposed upgrades, such as the brain structure and functionality, the jaw conversion, or the development of a skin with just a minor amount of fine hair instead of the hairy ape look, a throat and mouth structure that allows speech, and so on. These are not ‘upgrade’ level changes that occurred in a variety of different individuals but major redesigns, which all have to have happened in concert in a common ancestor.
Humans have small canines that do not project beyond the level of the other teeth—thus, in humans alone, among the primates, rotary chewing action is possible. In humans there are four canines, one on each side of each jaw. Here is another significant departure between the human species and non-human primates. In apes, further, the jaw is U-shaped, rather than the curved V-shape of humans. Fossil hunters can tell the difference easily.
If enamel developed as part of an evolutionary process, how did unprotected teeth survive beforehand?
Why would an elbow evolve?
Consider just one elbow. How could it develop without forethought, having to simultaneously produce a bone ball and matching socket, the cartilage just right to cushion movement, and the lubricating fluid to maintain the cartilage? Each is necessary for the proper working of the whole. If any one of these elements was missing or improperly shaped, that early organism would have had a very difficult time of movement and survival waiting for random chance, again through countless generations, to supply the missing cartilage, fluid or exact matching shape of the ball and socket. That lubricating fluid, by the way, has been called ‘nature’s most effective grease.’
Mutations kill (see radiation):
Genetic defects are overwhelmingly deleterious. Even if a beneficial mutation did arise, it would not add novel genetic information which is required for organisms to progress from simple to complex. Most likely, it would be useless (and quickly removed) if the matching parts had not arrived by another mistake in the same individual in a population.
You can take any part of your body and go through the same analysis. The human body has a perfect symmetry and organ design. There are no useless parts (another evolution-religion lie). No vestigial organs. Everything is used and has a purpose. Ignorance of our bodies is not science, but just ignorance. ‘Junk’ DNA is not junk and is vital for life. Naming it junk just denotes an absence of science and understanding, along with a desire to prove the evolution-religion and cult dogma to be correct.
One can make an easy conclusion: Evolution is anti-science.
No experiments or proof exists. Too many fake fossils, frauds and ridiculous claims proliferate. ‘Nature’ or ‘natural selection’ is the evolution-religion’s god. But how would either form 2 elbows (why not 1, 3, or 5)? How would ‘nature’ form the heart, blood, circulatory system and glucose all at the same time? Why would a creature need a heart if there is no blood? How did the ear ‘evolve’ then construct the neurological wiring to the brain? Or did the brain ‘evolve’ to construct the wiring then the ear formed? Why would this happen? Why would a creature know that it ‘needed’ an ear to be ‘competitive’ or to attract the ladies and be preferred in ‘sexual selection’?
Common sense tells you that Evolution is a circus of nothing, where philosophers play at being God.
Covid Fascism. Call it what it really is. Extreme Left Wing government of Canada under the self-appointed Leader-For-Life Justin Trudeau is building Covid-isolation camps for ‘Travellers’. These camps will house those who test ‘positive’ for the flu virus. Supposedly. Given that few if any travellers are crossing Canadian borders given the 14 day tracked-quarantine and the promise of a $750.000 fine and 6 months in jail for breaking the sundry rules list around ‘Covid’ exposure, it begs the question of why a government would build 11 Covid-camps. For dissenters? For Jews and Christians? For Conservatives?
Perhaps 9.600 people out of 35 million have died in Canada from Covid if you believe the various levels of government. Maybe. The death rate is a rounding error, all respect to those affected by the flu. The total death rate is equal to a normal flu season, so a logical, sane person would say it has been a very bad flu season and we should take some measures to protect those who could be affected.
Given that the average death rate from respiratory issues caused by Covid is around 80, one could argue for protective measures for the older age groups and react appropriately. Lock-downs, face-diapers and destroying the economy and civil society is completely unnecessary. Now there are isolation camps? For whom exactly? The government says ‘travellers’ but given the exigencies and extremities limiting travel, this does not make sense. The government of Canada tracks entry and imposes a fine of $750.000 and, or 6 months in jail for non-compliance. So why the camps? Are they for enemies of the state? When did Canada vote to become a Covid-dictatorship? Where is the public debate on the Covid-camps?
“….potential new sites under consideration Saskatoon, Windsor, Niagara, Ottawa, Winnipeg/Thunder Bay, Quebec City, Charlottetown, Iqaluit, and Yellowknife.
LifeSiteNews reached out to Toronto Constitutional lawyer, Rocco Galati to ask him about the GoC’s RFI for “Federal Quarantine/Isolation sites.”
Galati told LifeSiteNews that “straight out of the gate” he predicted “in one twitter paragraph” what was to come because of COVID-19.
Galati referred LifeSiteNews to a March 17, 2020 tweet he wrote shortly after the Ontario provincial government enacted COVID-19 emergency orders.
“Covid19 frenzy. A waltz in the global totalitarian tip-toe to new world order. Parliament closures, Court shutdowns, soldiers out. Banking/Corporate bailouts. Facts/science do not add up. Death toll, elderly and immunocompromised victims, marginally no diff than any other flus,”wrote Galati on March 17 on his Twitter page.”
(CDC data on Covid vs Pneumonia deaths; this is medically imposbile)
Covid 19 and making up data.
There are clear similarities between the cult of Warming and the cult of Covid. The most ardent, adamant admirers of Covid Totalitarianism are the same cult members who believe that a .04% gas by weight, 95% emitted by Gaia controls temperature, climate and weather. This same group declaims that it is a ‘scientific fact’ that the 5% of human emitted plant food causes just about every conceivable climate pattern, societal event, war, migration and species depletion. The level of ignorance matched by this cult’s totalitarian mindset which demands that anyone even questioning the fraudulent models, data, projections and past-history temperature re-writing should be liquidated.
Covid 19 a flu strain, albeit a serious one if you are over 70, likewise enjoys unconditional support from the cult of Warming and other acolytes of ‘science’. The core premise of this group is that the ‘data’ and the ‘scientific’ establishment have ‘confirmed’ that the virus is the most lethal biological enemy since the 1918 Spanish flu (where many people wore face diapers and still died), which eradicated 50 million people. To data the ‘establishment’ roars that 1 million worldwide have died. The cult of Covid states that this threat is so dire, that lock-downs, face-nappies, the destruction of normal civil society, the erasure of jobs and businesses is mandatory to keep everyone ‘safe’. The fascism of the flu is built on ‘safety’ and fear.
What if the Covid data was false? What if the ‘scientific establishment’ has no real idea what it is talking about? What if the numbers of dead and cases were inflated to stoke fear and loathing? What if the connection between cases and the low actual death rates were known and broadcast? The cult of Covid would simply collapse. Like its counterpart the cult of Warming, it is a lie built on fake numbers, no science, and no common sense.
Consider death rates and the lies around Covid:
“….true COVID-19 deaths would likely require “clinical or radiographic evidence” of pneumonia or ARDS. (A necessary side note: a diagnosis of pneumonia or ARDS cannot be made on “clinical evidence” alone; according to the medical literature, radiographic imaging is necessary for a diagnosis of both pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Thus, the CDC’s use of “clinical evidence” as a criterion could result in wrongly inflated pneumonia or ARDS statistics.)”
In other words there is a pattern to death by Covid which involves pneumonia. Where is the evidence that this is how governments are measuring the death rates? When someone dies from pneumonia there is always ‘clinical evidence’ as to the cause of death.
In the US, using CDC’s own data the data fraud becomes quite obvious (CDC data maps and tables).
“That is, non-COVID-19 causes of pneumonia have typically accounted for about 3,000 to 5,000 pneumonia deaths every week in the past; it is scientifically and medically implausible, then, for counts of deaths with COVID-19 listed as the underlying cause of death to be more than or equal to weekly deaths involving pneumonia because of the expected 3,000 to 5,000 weekly deaths involving pneumonia not caused by COVID-19.
Because of the expected number of approximately 3,000 to 5,000 deaths involving pneumonia per week not caused by COVID-19, deaths involving pneumonia would be expected to be higher than deaths with COVID-19 listed as the underlying cause. But the CDC’s data provided above claims the opposite, which indicates the data is unlikely to be true: from the week ending 4/4/2020 to the week ending 6/13/2020, the CDC reports that there were about 20,000 more deaths with COVID-19 listed as the underlying cause of death then there were deaths involving pneumonia.”
The above is impossible. Given that pneumonia is the main reason for death, the CDC’s own numbers are clearly a fraud.
“The CDC defines the “underlying cause of death” on the death certificate as “the disease or injury that initiated the chain of morbid events that led directly and inevitably to death” (emphasis added). COVID-19 is a respiratory disease that, when it causes death “directly and inevitably,” is expected to do so usually by resulting in viral pneumonia.”
No government anywhere has presented any data or clinical evidence of the death numbers. In the UK they simply proclaim that today ’66 died’ from Covid. Or was it 66 with Covid? Or, if we use ‘clinical evidence’ was the number really 6? Where does the 66 come from? No source data, methodology or proof of the number is ever given. As with the USA, the numbers of dead from pneumonia and Covid do not make sense. Why would anyone trust an establishment so married to the Covid fearmongering with data and truth?
Then there is the putrefaction of monetary corruption. In every single country, the medical systems, private and public, are paid if a case, or death is connected to Covid. There is thus a huge spend at stake to partake in. Every institution is now incentivised to over-count Covid cases and deaths.