RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/

Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Archive - March 2016

Evolutionists admit single cell is too complicated to develop from 'nothing'.

Nothing creates exactly nothing. Chaos does not produce software, structure and design.

Bookmark and Share

 

A central dogmatic chant in Evolution and naturalism, is that at one time nothing exploded into everything and somehow the chaos of the exploded nothing, 'evolved' into the singular complexity of a single cell.

 

Some of Darwin's cult disavow abio-genesis, or life from non-life, or basically, something from nothing. But they are liars. Evolution preaches naturalism from beginning to end. It is disingenuous and malignant for a Darwinian-naturalist to scream that pond scum became the hysterical climate professor, than emphatically state that he does not believe in abiogenesis. Of course he does.

 

All of Evolution clearly states that life came from non – life which is in direct violation of the first Law of Thermodynamics.

 

Since the time of Crick and Watson and the discovery of DNA, it is clear that Evolution was about metaphysics and not real science. DNA can't form in nature by chaotic chance. Neither can RNA, Proteins, Peptide bonds, Ribosomes, or even a cell wall. Not one single experiment has replicated the formation of a single cell by chance, in a Lab. None.

 

Evolutionist's are getting depressed by it all:

 

Craig Venter’s team has published results of their latest attempt to strip down a living cell to bare essentials (the organism must be free-living, not parasitic). They’re calling it “Syn 3.0.” After years determining what a version of Mycoplasma mycoides bacterium could do without, they came up with a “synthetic” cell containing 473 genes deemed essential. They could not determine the function for 149 of the genes.

 

They failed of course to do anything intelligent. It was an epic bust. If they had a rudimentary understanding of software they would know that they can't artificially reproduce this complexity, and certainly not by 'evolving' stages. Either this bacteria has the code, or it doesn't. It is all or nothing.

 

The big news is we failed,” Venter says. “I was surprised.” Neither chromosome produced a living microbe. It’s clear, Venter says, that “our current knowledge of biology is not sufficient to sit down and design a living organism and build it.”

 

How much money has been spent on this same issue in the past 50 years? How many failures, yet the peasant is hectored that Evolution is a 'fact'. Science fiction is not factual.

 

Ann Gauger explains in Evolution News & Views why this organism (and any protocell) is irreducibly complex:

All of this leads to an obvious question. This little bacterium has to be able to copy its DNA, transcribe and translate it into protein, plus be able to coordinate all the steps involved in cell division. It has to be able to make all the things it can’t get from its environment. That’s a lot of information to be stored and used appropriately. Hence 473 genes.


 

Until Darwin's cult starts producing real science, with proof, that nothing creates everything, it should be confined to the department of metaphysics where it most certainly belongs. It is not science.

 


 

 

Jerry Bergman and the nexus of Darwinist and Marxist evil

Evil Atheism and Communism or National Socialism, is built on Darwinism

Bookmark and Share

 

Any book by Jerry Bergman is a must read. He is an expert on the linkages, indeed the bedrock foundation, given by Darwinism, to such creeds as Nazism and its kin, Communism. An example of the clarity of his writing is here. Books by Bergman, that one must read are given here and here.


 

Darwinism is the foundation stone of Communism and Atheism. It gives a fraudulent 'scientific' gloss to materialist theology and communal fascism, be it the Hitlerian, Stalinist, Mao or uber-state variety.


 

The state as God, replacing a creator, uses Darwinist theology as a 'scientific' rationale for its omnipotence. Murdering humans who are just pond-scum, is thus a moral duty if they are inferior, defective, naturally 'unfit', 'eaters' [as the Nazis called the old], drunk, drug addicted, Jewish, Catholic, or sexually confused. Hitler's Jihad against Jews [6 million dead], Catholics [5 million gassed], gypsy's, Slavs, and non Aryans was based on Darwinian selection.


 

Bergman:

Darwinism as a worldview was a critical factor, not only in influencing the development of Nazism, but also in the rise of communism and the communist holocaust that, by one estimate, took the lives of more than 100 million persons [Courtois, S., Werth, N., Panne, J-L., Paczkowski, A., Bartosek, K. and Margolin, J-L., The Black Book of Communism; Crimes, Terror, Repression, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p. 4, 1999]. Marx, together with his forebears, associates and successors, was a doctrinaire evolutionist who tried to build his society on evolutionary premises. There is abundant documentation of this assessment and, few would even question it. [Morris, H., That Their Words May be Used Against Them, Master Books, Forrest, p. 417, 1997]”

Beate Wilder-Smith suggested that evolution is

a central plank in Marxist doctrine today. The Nazis were convinced, as are communists today, that evolution had taken place, that all biology had evolved spontaneously upward, and that in between links (or less evolved types) should be actively eradicated. They believed that natural selection could and should be actively aided, and therefore instituted political measures to eradicate the handicapped, the Jews, and the blacks, whom they considered as ‘underdeveloped’.” [Wilder-Smith, B., The Day Nazi Germany Died, Master Books, San Diego, p. 27, 1982]


 

The State uber alles and as God. Control, manage, kill the human if necessary. The state always seeks to destroy or totally control its opposition; the family, business, money, banks, the Church.....When a creator God is part of the cultural milieu it is a direct threat to state power. Rome evinced this basic principle, trying for 250 years to crush the Church through persecution – a sporadic effort but also at times concerted and steeped in blood. The power of the state today is no different and certainly no less corrupt and immoral than in the Roman era. Today the state funds Darwinist theology and cant as 'science'. Even opposing Evolution will result in your being branded a 'creationist', a 'denier', an unscientific lunatic. The state has every interest to saturate its citizen-knaves with the belief that humans are animals, and the state is the only power of civilization, protection, security, reason and science.


 

Bergman:

Darwin, however, opened the door to Marxism by providing what Marx believed was a ‘scientific’ rationale to deny Creation and, by extension, to deny God. [Perloff, [J., Tornado in a Junkyard, Refuge Books, Arlington, p. 244, 1999]. His denial of God, and his knowledge of Darwin, inspired Marx to develop his new godless worldview now known as communism. And like other Darwinists, Marx stressed that his communistic worldview was ‘scientific’ and, as such, employed a ‘scientific methodology and scientific outlook’. [Kolman, E., Marx and Darwin, The Labour Monthly 13(11):702-705, p. 705, 1931]. Bethell notes that Marx admired Darwin’s book,

not for economic reasons but for the more fundamental one that Darwin’s universe was purely materialistic, and the explication of it no longer involved any reference to unobservable, nonmaterial causes outside or ‘beyond’ it. In that important respect, Darwin and Marx were truly comrades … ” [Bethell, T., Burning Darwin to save Marx, Harpers Magazine, p. 37, December 1978]


 

 

Darwin and Marx inextricably linked and joined in their communal assault on the human, on reason, on faith and on civilization. See here for JS Conway's excellent book on the destruction of the Churches in Nazi Germany by the Hitlerian Atheists and Evolutionists.  

Evolution: an epic fail in probability and common sense

Biochemistry, laws of probability, reason and sense disprove Evolution.

Bookmark and Share

 

 
Werner Gitt, 'In the Beginning Was Information', p. 79. 
There is no known natural law through which matter can give rise to information, neither is any physical process or material phenomenon known that can do this.”
 
Evolutionists fail basic math. Fraudulent computer models do not 'prove' that life arose from nothing, or that random chance produces DNA software. A designed computer program, fraudulently coded to give the answer you want; is not 'natural selection' at work; nor 'random events' in the natural world. It does not prove that out of nothing, there arose everything, or that a warm pond produced the complexity of a single cell, by magic, lightning or pixie dust. Or that complex DNA software code was programmed by 'nature', or by some interaction of mutations and chaos. This is rhetoric, not science.
 
Basic math destroys the evolutionary theology around the origins of life. Nothing will give rise to precisely nothing. Try it out for yourself. Perform your own nothing-creates everything experiments. Warm up a pond and add some chemicals and see what happens. Fire up the Lab and try to replicate the beginning of life and software systems encoded in living matter. Go ahead. You will see nothing.
 
Information in perfect working code and sequence is not created ex-nihilo. Not only does evolution fail math, it apparently in-toto, has never bothered to study software.
 
Former Evolutionist and Apostate, Cambridge Univ. Scientist Fred Hoyle, in 'The Intelligent Universe' (New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1983)
  • The odds in favor of the chance formation of a functional simple cell are acknowledged to be worse than 1 in 1040,000
  • This is mathematically equivalent to less than zero.
  • Hoyle calculated the odds of the accidental formation of a simple living cell to be roughly comparable to the odds of rolling double-sixes 50,000 times in a row with unloaded dice.
  • As another comparison, Hoyle asks, what are the chances that a tornado might blow through a junkyard containing all the parts of a 747 and just accidentally assemble it so as to leave it sitting there all set for take-off? “So small as to be negligible,” Hoyle says, “even if a tornado were to blow through enough junkyards to fill the whole universe.”
 
Evolutionists and 'science' cannot explain our own world or universe. Yet they write long books on pregnant black holes and multi-verses. Why would 'star dust' turn into you ? Why would planets form and how is the structure of the earth from its center to its crust, containing millions of elements, ores, materials and surface flora and fauna formed by chaos ? The million variables necessary for life including the placements of the moon, the Sun, the axial tilt, the rotational speed, the type of atmosphere, water, and so on; cannot mathematically be supported by chance, randomness or chaos. There are simply too many 'convenient coincidences'. Mathematically this disproves Evolution.
 
Crick, Nobel Prize winner and Evolutionist, who 'mutated' to the Spacemen created Life on Earth cult; after deciding that yes indeed, DNA is very complicated and can't be created by 'chance', admitted that DNA destroys Evolution [Francis Crick & L.E. Orgel, “Directed Panspermia,” Icarus journal, 19, p. 341–346, 1981]. He gave up on Evolution and supported the idea that alien races seeded life on Earth, though how the alien races came into being and why is never explained.
 
Crick apostasied from Evolution because he knew that information is not produced by chaos, or chance. This concept defies physics, math, science and common-sense.
 
Werner Gitt, 'In the Beginning Was Information', p. 79. 
There is no known natural law through which matter can give rise to information, neither is any physical process or material phenomenon known that can do this.”
 
Information can only be designed, formed in syntax, imbued with meaning by a purposeful intelligence. There is no proof, from nature or the lab, that information or intelligence can arise by meaningless processes.
 
Atheism is the opium of non science and narcissistic theology [I think therefore I am God]. John Lennox, a professor of mathematics at the University of Oxford, wrote that according to atheism, "the mind that does science ... is the end product of a mindless unguided process. Now, if you knew your computer was the product of a mindless unguided process, you wouldn't trust it. So, to me atheism undermines the rationality I need to do science."
 
Atheist-Evolutionary theology thus destroys itself. You can't think according to Evolution because all processes are mindless -without a mind – devoid of structure and reason. There is no need for thinking therefore, just 'surviving' and being 'naturally selected' as the 'fittest'. How a process of 'natural selection' would work in the environment of chaos is never explained by Evolutionists. In a mindless world, what is there to select from, why and how ? Whether by math or by philosophy, or whether by science or by reality, Evolution is an epic fail.

 

 

Feathers disprove the cult of Evolution [as do 1 million other facts]

Scales don't magically grow into complex technology

Bookmark and Share

 


Feathers are unique structures found only in birds. Feathers are considerably different from scales and skin, whether the skin is thin and hairy or thick and hairless. Feathers are not only “strikingly different from scales in their structure” but also in their development.Feathers are well-designed complex structures, which are effective insulators, yet extremely light so the bird can fly. For strength and efficiency, man’s finest planes contain no part that can compare with them. Wing feathers are “one of the most beautifully designed structures in the world
Compton’s Pictorial Encyclopedia, F.E. Compton Co., Chicago, Vol. 5, p. 57, 1957
 
Conjecture and pretty pictures are not science. Neither are missing link frauds like the Archaeopteryx from China [sited from a well known area of forgery and hoaxes in north-east China]. There are no transitional fossils, or even species within the natural world, which exhibit scales or skin, 'mutating' [which kills software]; into a complex technology, like a feather. Feathers are unique, efficient, resplendent.
Questions to ask an Evolutionist theologian:
 
  • Why would skin 'evolve' into something as singularly complex as a feather ?
  • How would the body change its complete structure, bone density, reproduction system, brain, breathing, hearing, seeing and morphology to receive such technology ?
  • Why would it do so ? Isn't a reptile happy just being a reptile or did it read the evolution text book and decide that yes indeed, it was time to evolve ?
  • Why no fossil or natural world evidence ?
  • Can you produce a feather in a lab from skin, or scales ? If not why would the chaos of the natural world induce such a massive dislocation in an animal's body covering ? Wouldn't it cause death ?
Evolution offers no clues about feathers. It rarely offers anything scientific about the sheer baffling intricacy of species and their systems.
 
The origin of feathers is still a real problem. The feather cannot correspond to a whole scale but only to the outer half of the scale. The inner half or vascular core is believed to have atrophied. Any theory of the origin of feathers is hypothetical and can only be characterized as judicious speculation.”
Klotz, J., Genes, Genesis and Evolution, Concordia Publishing House, St Louis, p. 460, 1970.
 
No clues of feather evolution have ever been found in the fossil record—thus no physical evidence exists of any change—which must exist if they evolved. For this reason, feather origin is considered an enigma.”
Turner, C.E.A. , ‘Archaeopteryx, A Bird: No Link’ Evolution Protest Movement, (Pamphlet) September 1973.
 
Fossil record: “The scales of dinosaurs and reptiles, feathers of birds, leaves of plants, and even the wings of insects trapped in amber are clearly detailed in the record of the rocks. Consistently found are scales that are fully scales, feathers that are fully feathers, and skin that is clearly skin. No transitional forms of a part feather/part scale have been uncovered.”
 
The feather is a marvel of natural engineering. It is at once extremely light and structurally strong, much more versatile than stretched skin on which a bat supports itself in flight, or the rigid structure of an aircraft’s wings — and far more readily repaired or replaced when damaged … Though nearly weightless it has strength. The stiff shaft of the quill provides rigidity when support is needed, yet it is supple towards its tip, when flexibility is required for split second aerial maneuvering. Feel the sleekness of the web, soft yet firm. Separate the barbs; zipper them together again by running them through the fingertips as a bird would preen with its bill. The intricacy of the design that allows this can be appreciated by putting the feather under a microscope.”
Peterson, R.T., The Birds, Time Inc., New York, p. 33, 1963.

 


Evolution lacks proof. That is why it is a metaphysical enterprise reliant on rhetoric, story telling and propaganda.  

Eugenics, Nazi theology and Evolution

Plenty of direct links. Prediction, Eugenics like Abortion and Euthanasia will be mainstreamed.

Bookmark and Share

 

Hitler's National Socialism cult was not a parade of militarist-nationalist 'right wing' fascism. The entire state was socialized, owned and controlled by government and its reigning cult. No free trade, no foreign investments from untermensch, no freedom of the press or speech, no religion [John Lennon's paradise], and no individuality. It was a left wing fascism akin to Communism, racially based, where the state controlled all, funded all, directed all, and socialized all. By 1939 the Nazi state was quite bankrupt. But long before then it was dedicated to wiping out genetic inferiors such as Jews, Slavs, Catholics, cripples, the drunk, the insane, the weak, and the sick. Survival of the fittest. That was the Nazi dogma. It was a variation of Evolution.

 

Darwinist 'science' imbued much of Nazi theology. Nietzsche's Superman was the Nazi genetic idol, the perfect man, untouched by religion, Jewish DNA, Catholic ideals of charity and forgiveness, immune to the charms of morality and proper conduct. Hitler famously raved that Catholics need to be killed since they opposed science – ie. Evolution and were part of a cult of Jews. Jesus and Paul were after all Jews and as Hitler spewed, they were diseased, effeminate and inferior. For the Nazis's the Darwin-Haeckel Evolutionary fairy tale was not just a bad Grimm story. The mud-to-men dogma was central to the concept of the Aryan-Nazi Superman of Nietzsche's sick mind.

 

You can't understand World War II if you don't know how suffused Hitlerism was with Darwinism. Eugenics for example was rife throughout the Western world and is today quite in vogue. The Nazis were dedicated through various projects, to the genetic organization of their Aryan Super race. A fact long forgotten it appears.

 

A book review in Nature contains sober reminders that ideas have consequences. In “When eugenics became law,” Victoria Nourse reports on a new study Adam Cohen on the historic misuse of biology in the US: Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck. We must never forget:

 

Eugenics is a well-known low point in the modern history of science. In the United States, from the late nineteenth century to the 1940s, credence was given to this pseudoscience focused on the notional ‘improvement’ of human populations by halting the reproduction of supposedly lesser genes. Less well known is the story of how US law rendered eugenics intellectually respectable across the world, supporting programmes from Canada to Sweden. 

Ultimately, this egregious failing led to the enforced sterilization of at least 60,000 US citizens, and was used by the Nazi regime to justify its own programme of sterilization and, later, extermination.

 

Americans tend to blame Hitler alone; how many realize the guilt of American scientists in what happened? Eugenics was alive and well in the United States long before Hitler took it to extremes. Nourse says that America bears guilt for making it “intellectually respectable” around the world. John West documents that as well in his book Darwin Day in America. (See also video The War on Humans).

 

 

It was Darwin's 'Descent of Man' which not only declaimed that Whites must kill all Blacks for Evolution to proceed; but also justified Eugenics and killing the unfit. His half cousin Galton crusaded in the UK for Eugenics, particularly to eliminate the weak, sick, deformed, and half-wit. Perhaps the cult of Evolution needs to apply their own standards to themselves.

 

The Brits exported it into America, where it took root and grew like a toxic weed among the leading scientists (not “pseudoscientists”) and intelligentsia:

By 1928, a total of 375 US universities and colleges were teaching eugenics, and 70% of high-school biology textbooks endorsed the pseudoscience in some form. 

Eugenics was also endorsed by presidents including Theodore Roosevelt, funded by philanthropic organizations including the Carnegie Institution, and touted by award-winning scientists such as biologist Edwin Grant Conklin and the Nobel laureate Hermann Muller, discoverer of X-ray mutagenesis, as well as prominent inventors such as Alexander Graham Bell. Eugenics came to be seen as the solution to everything from hearing loss to criminality. In Britain, advocates tended to focus on segregation and voluntary sterilization.

Major British eugenicists included left-leaning scientists J. B. S. Haldane and Havelock Ellis, and supporters included the economist John Maynard Keynes, social reformers Sidney and Beatrice Webb, and writer H. G. Wells.

 

'Left wing' politicians and 'scientists' have always supported playing God. Of course they firmly endorse Eugenics. All a part of the totalitarian theology they pray to.

 

Prediction. Eugenics will be mainstream 'science' within 15 years. Advocates calling for the removal of genetically inferior and lesser evolved humans will be met with applause and lauded as rational, scientific and deeply intelligent people. As with Euthanasia, Abortion and other cultural Marxist death dogmas, Eugenics will proceed to destroy tens of millions of innocents.