RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Gab@StFerdinandIII - Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from.  It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Archive - March 2021

Jabbed: How the Vaccine Industry, Medical Establishment, Government Stick It to You and Your Family

Brett Wilcox, 2018. The Church of Vaccinology.

Bookmark and Share


Read this book.  It was written in 2018 BC (Before Covid and the coming of our Lord and Saviour Bill Gates).  It outlines the history of the Criminal Pharmaceutical industry and the Church of Vaccinology and Drugs.  One cannot understand what is going on in the world of the Covid fascism, unless you understand the Medical Dictatorship that is being set up.  Good sites outside of the Fake News will provide valuable information on what is going on.  They are of course repudiated, calumnied and debased by the elites.  But they provide the critical information needed for people to make informed decisions about what is going on.  The Church of Vaccinology is ineffably evil, corrupt, socio-pathological and over 60 years, has killed millions of people, and maimed tens of millions more. 


Wilcox: ‘Vaccine believers believe in the commercialized vaccine paradigm (a religious-based belief system), the vaccine program (the delivery system from manufacturer to the public), and the vaccine schedule (past, present, and future) with a black-and-white kind of devotion. Vaccines are safe and effective. Period. Vaccines save lives. Period. Disease is bad, vaccines are good. Period. Believers adhere to these beliefs just as surely as cultists believe that only they possess the truth.’


Does the above not sound eerily predictive in the time of CV 19 and the religious observations around face diapers, distancing, staying at Home, being sufficiently terrified and expecting the Covid Reaper of Death to appear at any second?  The Church of Vaccinology, developed by Criminal Pharma is now a religion.


Wilcox: ‘The Unholy Trinity—the pharmaceutical industry, the medical establishment, and government—has successfully convinced the faithful that abstaining from vaccinations puts the entire flock at risk of damnation in the form of lethal disease outbreaks.'


What you will learn inter-alia from this book:


Vaccines never ‘cured’ infectious diseases.  They had all died out before the introduction of the drugs.


Vaccines are not safe, nor effective.  They are drug cocktails containing metals, mercury, aluminium, phosphates and other toxins. 


Pharma drugs are directly linked to autism, encephala, nervous disorders, behavioural disorders, brain damage, narcolepsy, down’s syndrome and yes even HIV (oral polio vaccine based on Simian cells), amongst many hundreds of conditions, killing and maiming millions.


Pharma has been found guilty of criminal misconduct including death and injury every single year for the past 20 years.  The lawsuits range in the hundreds of millions to billions and include every single large Pharma manufacturer.


Pharma long ago bought the Mainstream media (advertising revenue), Medical Schools (funding for programs, labs, published articles etc), Government Health Agencies (private-public partnerships), Medical Journals (Lancet, BMJ and all the rest are funded by Pharma) and Politicians.


Medical ‘professionals’ are trained in Pharma funded ‘schools’ which promote drugs, and are disbarred, de-licensed, de-platformed, vilified, threatened and in some cases killed if they defy the Church of Vaccinology.


The US CDC (Centre for Disease Control) and Pharma share profits and work together to push drugs (in alliance with Pharma funded American Medical Association).


No independent studies can confirm the efficacy of any of the 200 or so ‘vaccination’ drugs that Pharma sells.  None. 


Pharma has a long history of inventing diseases and markets based on data fraud, fake studies, propaganda, and government-initiated hysteria.  George Merck famously said ‘You do not sell the drug, sell the disease’.


Bill Gates is the largest financier of the WHO (10% of its budget) and funds GAVI the international Vaccine Institute.  Gates, WHO and GAVI are pushing drugs in Brazil, India and Africa and have killed or maimed literally millions of people.  An example is DPT (diptheria, tetanus, pertussis) in West Africa and autism-encephaly in Brazil in children whose pregnant mothers were forcibly injected with MMR (mumps, measles, rubella), where the damage was criminally ascribed to the Zika virus, for which of course, they had a drug.  Gates and others believe that human population must be reduced to 500 million or so, and the best method is with drug injection.


The Church of Vaccinology runs deep and is very religious:


Wilcox: “Vaccine believers are certain that vaccines protect them from infectious disease . . . except when they are exposed to unvaccinated individuals. The unvaccinated are tainted and should not be allowed to roam the streets or attend public schools spreading disease in their wake. Vaccine believers see themselves as enlightened, progressive, and scientifically minded. Most people today are vaccine believers, including most medical professionals: primary care physicians, pediatricians, nurses, etc. Of these professionals, Paul Thomas, MD, coauthor of The Vaccine-Friendly Plan, writes, “. . . most of my MD doctor colleagues somehow have lost the ability to think independently on the vaccine issue. If you read the journals they read on a daily basis, it could happen to you too. These are not bad people, like ‘weapons of mass destruction.’ It is just a case of when you hear something enough and you don’t have anywhere to get the other side of the story, the hidden truths, then you base your decisions on the information you have.”


CV 19 worship and fear are not based on Science.  It is Scientism, the worship of Medical Fascism which clothes itself with claims, data, R values, rates, transmission vectors and propaganda.  People need to understand how Big Pharma, Big Government, International Agencies and Scientism all conspire to erect the ‘Great Reset’ deployed through Medical and Green Fascism.


Darwin's House of Cards: A Journalist's Odyssey Through the Darwin Debates, by Tom Bethell #2

The Church of Darwin is a failure as Science.

Bookmark and Share


 First part here.

The religion of Darwin is malleable, extendable, flexible, but never scientific or commendable.  The military-industrial complex which funds the Darwinian religion and its various sects including ‘Evolution’, Neo-Darwinism, Synthesised-Darwinism, Natural-Selection and other tautologies and impossibilities, rewards good behaviour, cult indoctrination and punishes the heretical, the critical or even piety deemed too casual.  You won’t be hired in academia, or given a journal publication, if you don’t spread the Darwinian Gospel and support its Church.  Everything which happens in nature, is simply Darwinian.


Bethell, ‘Natural selection is enlisted to explain either the origin of a species or its extinction. Did the organism flourish? That’s natural selection for you. Did it die out? That’s the failure of natural selection. First it got the job done and but then it put the organism in a fix with no solution.’  ‘Harvard’s Richard Lewontin (an atheist, materialist) once wrote, “the theory becomes a vacuous exercise in formal logic that has no points of contact with the contingent world. The theory explains nothing because it explains everything.”’


As Popper and others have pointed out, a valid hypothesis can be tested and disproven.  This is impossible with the Darwin religion.  Any output, any observation, any fossil, any gap, any biological development or non-development, is supportive of its religious tenets.  If you ask a Darwinian “how did the human brain ‘evolve’?”, the answer from the religious acolyte will be something along these lines, ‘we don’t know exactly, but obviously the bacteria to human ‘evolution’ over time, occurred through simple, single functional accretions, driven by natural selection, genetic drift, and mutations which produced a random aggregation of atoms and material to make the brain possible.  The brain exists.  Therefore, evolution is true.’  None of these postulations is based on science, mathematical probability, logic, observation or common sense.  Therefore, it is simply stupid to state that bacteria became Bach.


Bacteria never change.  They are always bacteria.  They and all species always revert back to a mean.


Bethell: ‘The French zoologist Pierre-Paul Grasse (1895–1985) spent a lot of time studying bacteria. A Lamarckian, Grasse remarked: What is the use of their unceasing mutations if they do not change? In sum, the mutations of bacteria and viruses are merely hereditary fluctuations around a median position; a swing to the right, a swing to the left, but no final evolutionary effect.’


The largest experiment for the religion of Evolution is Lenski’s e-coli laboratory at Michigan State University, with over 60.000 generations of e-coli bacteria being ‘evolved’ and compared.  This is regularly hailed by the ‘Science’ media as a resounding proof of evolution’s ‘power’ in ‘action’.  The e-coli after 60.000 generations, equivalent to 2 million human years, are still however, bacterial microbes.  The only functionality difference is a loss of function, not a gain.  Lenski’s 35-year experiment has disproved evolutionary theory in-toto.  Yet, you will hear nothing about it.


‘…..when trillions of bacteria replicate over 60,000 generations, numerous mutations are to be expected. Yet the most important “evolutionary” changes observed so far have involved the loss of old genetic functions rather than the acquisition of new ones.’


And what of DNA, RNA and proteins?  What is the mathematical chance that an organism is going to evolve (the human), with 50 trillion cells, 200 different types of cells and 1 trillion atoms per cell, 2 million or more proteins, replete with a programming code language (amino acids, nucleotides), software, an operating system, a self-repair and maintenance system and an ability to self-replicate at the cellular level, but also the miracle of embryology at the individual level?


‘This is an easy exercise in combinatorials. Suppose the chain is about two hundred amino acids long; this is, if anything, rather less than the average length of proteins of all types. Since we have just twenty possibilities at each place, the number of possibilities is twenty multiplied by itself some two hundred times. This is conveniently written 20200 and is approximately equal to 10260, that is, a one followed by 260 zeros! This number is quite beyond our everyday comprehension. Richard Lewontin then pointed out the chicken-and-egg problem. “The proteins of the cell are made from other proteins, and without that protein-forming machinery, nothing can be made. There is an appearance here of infinite regress (What makes the proteins that are necessary to make the protein?)”’


‘Crick (DNA, double helix co-founder) understood that something as complex as a protein evolving by chance was highly improbable. So he became interested in “directed panspermia.” Once self-replicating bacteria originated somewhere in the universe, they could be spread by intelligent life-forms using spaceships to propel the minute critters through interstellar space. Crick used the word “directed” to imply that someone had deliberately sent bacteria to other planets. His theory was “obviously very speculative,” he allowed.’


So Darwinists now look to Chewbaca and aliens to save their theory.


Bethell’s conclusion is the only obvious one that can be made about the Church of Darwin: ‘the science of Darwinism amounts to little more than the “wedding” of materialism and Progress. We have seen that if materialism is true, then Darwinism—or something very much like it—must also be true. But materialism is highly implausible and has been widely challenged. At the same time, it only takes one partner to break up a marriage, and as we now know, Progress has wandered off the straight and narrow. As a result, the break-up of Darwinism seems likely in the years ahead.’


Darwinism is not a science and as an endeavour to improve science it is a failure and yes Bethell is right.  Someday it will be thrown into the trash where it belongs.


Darwin's House of Cards: A Journalist's Odyssey Through the Darwin Debates, by Tom Bethell

Evolution is falsified by the reversion to the mean.

Bookmark and Share


Bethell summarises the issues with Darwinism quite well.  As with Covid-19 the fanatical advocacy of ‘evolution’ has more in common with a cult or a Religion (the 2 are different), than with ‘Science’.  Indeed, Darwinism is a part of ‘Scientism’, the conflating and corruption of metaphysics with scientific facts and empirical evidence.  Darwin was of course a racist and a man of his time.  These cultural mores shape his ‘Malthusian’ and very primitive if not ignorant view of biology.  The title of his first edition of the Origin of Species indicates the racism: “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life” (1859).


The current culture of woke seems rather curiously silent on this.  It may not matter given that ‘evolution’ is unsupported as a ‘science’ and will soon be discarded. As Bethell points out, ‘evolution as the concept today is understood, was not used by Darwin, ‘The word “evolution” does not occur once in The Origin. (“Evolved” appears once—it is the last word in the book.)  Instead, Darwin referred to improvement, which does convey the idea of progress. Either improved or improvement appears dozens of times.’


For Darwin, ‘improving’ structures and functionality take the fish to the fisherman.  Given the advances in micro-biology, genomic understanding, cellular complexity and the lack of metamorphological proof, the absence of fossil proofs, or the ability to generate even a semblance of functional proteins in a laboratory from contrived chemical and electrical interactions, the theory of Darwinism is in grave danger of disappearing as a science.


Bethell: ‘For a decade or two, Darwinism’s promoters and beneficiaries, most of them lodged within universities, will pretend that nothing much is happening. But the auguries are not good. Those who claim to live by science will eventually die by science……Bertrand Russell was a little more careful: “Darwin’s theory was essentially an extension to the animal and vegetable world of laissez-faire economics.’


Darwin took Malthusian theory – itself a failure – and applied it to flora and fauna.  Why this is considered to be scientific has yet to be answered: ‘Darwin relentlessly pursued his insight. Organisms live by the Malthusian “struggle.” Lighten the pressure, “mitigate the destruction ever so little, and the number of the species will almost instantaneously increase to any amount” (Bethell quoting Darwin)….At its heart, Darwin’s theory was a theory of competition, with free market insights applied to “struggling” animals.’


Karl Marx, like Darwin a fanatical materialist, was delighted by the ‘theory of survival of the fittest’, the very theme of which is saturated in mid-19th century economic theory and ideals.  ‘One who saw what was going on was Karl Marx. Writing to Engels in 1862, he said that for Darwin, “the animal kingdom figures as civil society”: It is remarkable how Darwin recognizes among the beasts and plants his English society with its division of labour, competition, opening up of new markets, ‘invention,’ and the Malthusian ‘struggle for existence’.


It is thus very odd that most left-wing, Communist or Globalist supporting Atheists are confirmed members of Darwin’s Church.  In essence, and quite ironically, they support a free-market philosophy and metaphysis applied to flora and fauna, offered in terms of ‘natural selection’, as the great God of searching, filtering and improving.  But what does ‘natural selection’ even mean? 



Bethell summarises the current definition of what natural selection means in Darwinian terms: ‘What do we really know about natural selection? To summarize the current view: As a source of innovation, mutations in the DNA molecule generate random variations, and natural selection then acts as a filtering device. “Unfit” variants rarely survive even the early stages of development. As a matter of observation, then, what we find when organisms reproduce is that descendants incorporate small changes. Offspring differ a little from their parents, and their offspring differ even more from their grandparents. And so on. So the reproduction that we see is imperfect. All die in the end, but some variant forms contrive to leave more offspring than others.’


In essence, some force named ‘natural selection’ will ‘select’ or ‘force’ changes to the genomic structure of animals and species, giving them a ‘competitive advantage’ over their peers and ‘rivals’, and over long periods of time, these changes will form new animals and species, ‘adapted’ to their environment.  This theory is of course utter nonsense, one could rightly ask for example, where are these new species?  You are bound by your software, or genomic structure and by reproduction.  Cats mate with cats.  Dogs mate with dogs or other canines.  Bears with those of the same kind.  A cat cannot mate with a pigeon and will not add pigeon software to his own software, in his striving, or in the ‘natural selection process’ of acquiring wings, which he would have no need of, but which according to Darwinism would confer a significant ‘competitive advantage’ in hunting birds.


Bethell (bold is mine): ‘But such a transformation has never been observed. No species has ever been seen to evolve into another. What scientists do observe is something quite different: reversion to a mean. Such reversion can be analogized to commuting, or going back and forth. To alter the metaphor, reversion to the mean implies that species inhabit “plateaus” of limited space upon which variants are free to roam. Artificial selection can “push” varieties to the edge of the plateau, but they cannot be pushed off it or be made to invade the terrain of adjacent species. No experiment has shown us otherwise.’


Natural selection simply does not exist.  Nature does not have a mind.  Nature does not care if you live, die, ‘evolve’, ‘devolve’, or disappear into nothing.  There is no filtering. 


Bethell: ‘But can “nature” make choices in the same way that a farmer can when he is deciding which variants to select? That it could was one of the main arguments in The Origin. In response to Darwin, the philosopher Jerry Fodor, the author of What Darwin Got Wrong (with Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, 2010) said that natural selection can’t make decisions. Fodor also wrote that natural selection “can’t run experiments,” and it “can’t consult the intentions of the builder.” Doing any of those requires having a mind, and, by general consensus, natural selection doesn’t have one. Fodor’s point was that whole organisms leave offspring, and they include numerous traits that are inevitably conflated. So when they leave offspring, it is impossible to say which of the conflated traits has been selected for. Fodor’s criticism has never been rebutted.’


The failure of Darwinism and Evolution is quite apparent.  DNA, RNA, proteins, amino acids, a trillion atoms per cell, a trillion cells per human, cannot ‘self form’, from naturalistic processes and ‘selection’.  No proof of this exists.  Neither does any proof exist of common descent, metamorphological changes, or new species through naturalistic adaptations.  A polar bear is still a bear.  A brown bear is still a bear.  A finch with a large beak is still a bird.  A finch with a small beak is still a bird.  Nothing has ‘evolved’.  All of these animals, as Bethell points out, revert to a mean.  They may oscillate within the confines of their software, they may improve or degrade, but they always revert back to the mean.


Bethell quotes the Atheist Karl Popper who nicely summarises the non-science of Darwinism, ‘In his autobiography, Karl Popper said he had come to the conclusion that “Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research program.”’ And so it is.  If a theory cannot be falsified, if every event or happenstance supports the theory, if every outcome confirms its thesis, if every occurrence reinforces the hypothesis, then it is not a science, but a philosophical and metaphysical program.

Covid Fascism. Fake Data. The Sheeple. Cult of 'Science'.

The modern world has been obsessed with Fascism in the name of Science.

Bookmark and Share


Nazism and Communism, both Atheist and premised on different aspects of Evolution, used ‘Science’ to organise the masses and affirm their theologies.  For Nazis, Evolution made it obvious that the Teuton was the biological pinnacle of nature or even God’s development.  Blacks, Jews, Christians, Slavs, Gypsies, Homosexuals were Untermensch, unfit to propel mankind forward and safeguard civilisation’s progress.  The Nazis used ‘science’ to prove that the Untermensch were inferior in physique, intelligence, creativity, and genius.


Likewise, the Atheist Communists professed their dialectical ‘science’, in which via Marxian-Hegelian and Leninist theory couched in mathematical and scientific parlance, socialism either within one country, or trans-national, would ‘naturally’ supplant and replace ‘decadent capitalism’, with social dialectical processes, based on proletariat will and economics propelling ‘forces’ interacting and then amending and changing the existing order in a logical-rational manner.  It was inevitable, so declared Soviet science, that the will of the proletariat, housed in Communist totality, would erase the chaotic, illogical, and undirected capitalist ‘system’.


Since the 19th century, totalitarianism is a recurring and frightening aspect of the ‘modern’ world, worsened by technology and digital applications.  The entire edifice of Western Civilisation seems intent on replacing a system which has benefitted mankind more than any other concept in world history, with a Fascism premised on health and the environment.  Given the unscientific and ridiculous claims of Green Fascism, the route to dismantling the current quasi-market, corporate-capitalist system, lies through the management of health and, infectious respiratory diseases.  This is the whole point of the Covid totalitarianism.  Fake data, fake models and a 99.7% survival rate, do not justify what is transpiring and what is clearly an attempt to remodel the current political-economy into a system of collective-tyranny, supported by technology and anti-science, with the Sheeple apparently more than willing to comply and support.


The evidence of the data fraud is overwhelming.  A large majority of the Covid dead did not die of Covid but of something else.  We can see this through the disappearance of death rates for flu, pneumonia, respiratory, heart disease and even dementia.  No more than ¼ of the reported Covid dead would have died from Covid.  Then we have the dead from the Lock-downs, some 45.000 in the UK alone and the associated long-term mental physical and health suffering from the totalitarian and utterly useless response to the flu through the use of Face nappies, Lockdowns and shuttering of businesses.  The social-economic carnage is unbelievable.  There is and was no science to any of it.


31 reasons not to take their experimental drugs (they are not a vaccine, the trials don’t even end until 2023). reveals the enormous data fraud which is terrorising the Sheeple.

"But we’re really not seeing very many “Covid” deaths in anybody aged between 60 and 80. What we are seeing is a much higher amount of “Covid” deaths in people aged over 85. But what’s so strange about that?

The average life expectancy in the UK is 81 years. Yet the UK has enforced dictatorial tyranny, destroyed the economy, decimated businesses and people’s livelihoods and created a flood of mental health issues because people who have lived longer than the average life expectancy of 81 are dying."


The US CDC Data Fraud

Abstract According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on August 23, 2020, “For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19 , on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.”[1] For a nation tormented by restrictive public health policies mandated for healthy individuals and small businesses, this is the most important statistical revelation of this crisis. This revelation significantly impacts the published fatalities count due to COVID-19.


Experimental Drug application married to your money.  Welcome to your future.

“This program was to be first launched in late 2018. Trust Stamp’s advanced digital identification technology will be integrated into the GAVI-Mastercard initiative “Wellness Pass” – a digital vaccination record and identity system which is to be also linked to Mastercard’s click-to-play system powered by Mastercard’s AI and Machine Learning technology. MasterCard made a commitment that it will create a “centralized record keeping of childhood immunization”. It also describes itself as a leader towards a “World Beyond Cash”.


Pfizer seeks enormous profits by telling the Sheeple you will need yearly, maybe bi-annual experimental-drug therapy (jabs).


Replicated around the world.  Thousands of dead, thousands more injured from the experimental drug named ‘vaccine’.  Israel is an example.

“A re-analysis of published data from the Israeli Health Ministry by Dr. Hervé Seligmann, a member of the faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases at Aix-Marseille University, and engineer Haim Yativ reveal,  in short, that the mRNA experimental vaccine from Pfizer killed “about 40 times more (elderly) people than the disease itself would have killed” during a recent five-week vaccination period. Among the younger class, these numbers are compounded to death rates at 260 times what the COVID-19 virus would have claimed in the given time frame.”

those vaccinated and above 65, 0.2 percent … died during the three-week period between doses, hence about 200 among 100,000 vaccinated. This is to be compared to the 4.91 dead among 100,000 dying from COVID-19 without vaccination.”


Build Back Better.  Great Reset.  World Economic Forum.  Bill Gates Foundation.  Vaccination Credential Institute. 


All there for the Sheeple to investigate and to apply ‘critical thinking’.