Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
Every second is the warmest second in the 4 billion life of dear Mother Earth. So say the activists who brand themselves as scientists and count on 'consensus' to support their fantasies. Science by the way is about truth, not a popularity contest. One scientist can be right, and thousands wrong.
The cult of the globaloneywarming produces endless and quite insipid propaganda. A cold summer in northern Europe and expanding Arctic ice sheets are juxtaposed against a mid-west US drought [which happens every generation a few times] and bingo – globaloneywarming, human-induced, manufactured Co2 'poison'. Co2 is natural, necessary for life and more of it would be a boon to Mother Gaia, not a toxin disrupting her climate. Consider for a moment that the earth's crust is 3-10 miles deep. The most ambitious human mine is not even ½ mile deep. Simply put we are scratching at the earth mother's surface, and are of no consequence in the scale and scope of 'climate' patterns and natural biomass events. A large volcanic eruption contains 100-200 years of human 'activity' in its disruptive influence.
But reality is not the point of the cult of Warmongering - a cult as brutally dishonest, intolerant and devoid of 'science' as any Amer-Indian society. Pagan fascisms [fasces meaning the reduction of the individual into a communal, to be ordered, managed and used]; are masters of lies, deceits, conceits and propaganda. Anyone who thinks that reality, and real science has, or will, triumph over the cult of Warm is delusional.
Objective truth is not the goal of the Warmists. They have money, control the media and most governmental apparati and appeal to a primitive child-like fascination humans have with cataclysms, end of the world, and self-loathing hatred. I brushed my teeth and inflicted pain on Gaia. Control, power, regulation, more taxes and perhaps even a world government [only the UN can save us from Co2!], are the animating features of the cult of Warm. As is a detestation of the human. [Abort the human, save the mud turtle].
Wattsupwiththat.com, icecap.us and iceagenow.info, are good sites which debunk the Warmongers. UN models via the Climate-Gate[s] scarred IPCC, are the basis of the rather moronic claim that a trace chemical 3-4 of a hundredth of one percent, necessary for life, 95% emitted by the natural biomass is 'changing' the climate. Co2 is a derivative of climate processes and by definition follows climate.
Co2's mass on earth is a piffle compared to levels of 70% or so on Mars or Venus [the former dead cold, the latter searing hot]. Simply put you can increase Co2 by 100 times on earth and little would happen, certainly nothing negative and probably a lot positive [longer growing seasons, farming in the north-lands, more trade etc.]. If the earth was a 'model' mimicking a 'greenhouse' there would be no life on the planet. Feedback loops in the million-variables which make up climate are negative as well as positive – a fact ignored by the cult of globaloneywarming, along with oceanic currents, solar radiation, and thermodynamic physics.
How 'scientific' is a cult which does not do the following:
-Account for solar radiation in its 'models'
-Account for oceanic movements and impacts in its 'models'
-Release of all its data models, informational sources, algorithms, and calculations for peer and public review ? [Surely something as dangerous as Co2 ending Gaia's life is worth a few looks?]
-Reproduce in a lab, the impact of Co2 on weather patterns [surely this is a part of 'science' and reminds one of the cult of science's claim that life started when molecules magically coagulated forming single and then multi-celled organisms....]
-UN models do not account for real world temperatures even ignoring and falsifying the medieval warming and cooling periods [the criminal Mann's famous hockey stick hooey]
-Explain to us how the last major ice age ended twice [due to Co2 ?] or why temperatures cooled between 1945 and 1975 [hence the 'Cooling' fear-mongering of the 70s and 80s], or why global temps as measured by weather balloons and satellite data covering the globe [not thermometers near urban heat sources]; state clearly that global mean temps are declining?
There is no science in the cult of warm and globaloneywarming. Unless you call activism science.
For example - stating as the Globalists and cult of Warm constantly do, that Co2 'traps heat' is ridiculous. Such a supposition goes against the laws of thermodynamics. It ignores negative loops and feedback cycles. Co2 might indeed 'trap' heat a little faster than nitrogen and oxygen. But so what. Co2 molecules will not become 'hotter' because they do not absorb more heat than there is available to the other gases. All gases share their heat with other gases. Gas molecules are constantly colliding with other molecules and they immediately lose any excess heat during these collisions. The assumption ignores negative feedback loops [consequence of a heat increase], as well.
Scientists – real ones, not the activists from the cult of warm – know the above is true because if you tested a limited amount of air volume it is one temperature. Thermodynamics also makes it clear that weather patterns are local – affected by global variables such as oceanic movements and the Sun – which is obvious given the thousands of cold records set, which outpace the 'warm' records set [unless you count IPCC and NASA selective data sets which count only thermometers placed near urban heat vents]. The media however will never report for instance the record low temps in Eastern Europe during the winter of 2012, when the Danube froze over [it hasn't in 50 years]; and thousands died. Or if they did such a 'cold spell' was due to globaloneywarming....[how logical].
The cult of warm is inimical to progress. It is, in its entirely a sultanate of little minds and power-mongering freaks who desire control and the plunder of other people's money. Like all cults, the elite would benefit, and the little guy would receive nothing except some bumper stickers, t-shirts and the certainty of an after-life sanctioned by Gaia, all for his efforts in combating that evil natural chemical, 95% emitted by Gaia and necessary for life – the hated Co2.
A cult is not science.
1/3/2011 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Conclusion (continued)
1/1/2011 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Conclusion
12/31/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Government Control
12/30/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Domestic Support and media approval (continued)
12/29/2010 America vs. Europe – Competing with The USA
12/29/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto – Domestic Support and media approval
12/28/2010 America vs. Europe –CDM (Clean Development Mechanism)
12/28/2010 America vs. Europe –The Politics of Kyoto (continued)
12/27/2010 America vs. Europe –The Politics of Kyoto
12/26/2010 America vs. Europe –WTO vs. Kyoto in Practice (continued)
12/25/2010 America vs. Europe –WTO vs. Kyoto in Practice
12/24/2010 America vs. Europe – Sources of Conflict between the Environment and Trade (continued)
12/22/2010 America vs. Europe – Sources of Conflict between the Environment and Trade
12/20/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto, The Environment and the WTO
12/19/2010 America vs. Europe – IPCC
12/18/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto
12/17/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto: Science and Models (continued)
12/16/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto: Science and Models
12/15/2010 America vs. Europe – Criticisms of Kyoto and the IPCC
12/14/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto: History and Theory (continued)
12/12/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto: History and Theory (continued)
12/11/2010 America vs. Europe – Kyoto: History and Theory
12/10/2010 America vs. Europe – Statism, The Kyoto Protocol and The Environment