RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Gab@StFerdinandIII - Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from.  It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Back     Printer Friendly Version  

Bookmark and Share

Monday, May 02, 2016

The cult and unholy church of 'Science'. Lies, fraud, propaganda, and of course money and power.

A dark age.

by StFerdIII

 

 

William Wilson on the fraud which has destroyed the credibility of 'science'.

 

Wilson on a huge Open Science collaboration project which investigated the claims of 'science'. It found massive fraud. Globaloneywarming [trace chemical called plant food causes a non existing greenhouse effect and the end of the world], is just one example of this cult's mendacity and ignorance. All funded by the State.

 

Data Fraud is not science.

Of the studies that had originally reported positive results, an astonishing 65 percent failed to show statistical significance on replication, and many of the remainder showed greatly reduced effect sizes.

 

And it is not just in psychology, or 'social sciences' [what is a science of society anyways?]:

But the problem isn’t just with psychology. There’s an ­unspoken rule in the pharmaceutical industry that half of all academic biomedical research will ultimately prove false, and in 2011 a group of researchers at Bayer decided to test it. Looking at sixty-seven recent drug discovery projects based on preclinical cancer biology research, they found that in more than 75 percent of cases the published data did not match up with their in-house attempts to replicate.

 

Most hypotheses and studies are falsified:

Since the majority of all investigated hypotheses are false, if positive and negative evidence were written up and accepted for publication in equal proportions, then the majority of articles in scientific journals should report no findings. When tallies are actually made, though, the precise opposite turns out to be true: Nearly every published scientific article reports the presence of an association. There must be massive bias at work.

 

Data fraud abounds:

Many forms of statistical falsification are devilishly difficult to catch, or close enough to a genuine judgment call to provide plausible deniability. Data analysis is very much an art, and one that affords even its most scrupulous practitioners a wide degree of latitude. Which of these two statistical tests, both applicable to this situation, should be used? Should a subpopulation of the research sample with some common criterion be picked out and reanalyzed as if it were the totality? Which of the hundreds of coincident factors measured should be controlled for, and how? The same freedom that empowers a statistician to pick a true signal out of the noise also enables a dishonest scientist to manufacture nearly any result he or she wishes.

 

Fraud in Physics, remember BICEP and 'gravitational waves' ?

Far more common is the delicate and subtle art of scouring inconceivably vast volumes of noise with advanced software and mathematical tools in search of the faintest signal of some hypothesized but never before observed phenomenon, whether an astrophysical event or the decay of a subatomic particle. This sort of work is difficult and beautiful in its own way, but it is not at all self-evident in the manner of a falling apple or an elliptical planetary orbit, and it is very sensitive to the same sorts of accidental contamination, deliberate fraud, and unconscious bias as the medical and social-scientific studies we have discussed. Two of the most vaunted physics results of the past few years—the announced discovery of both cosmic inflation and gravitational waves at the BICEP2 experiment in Antarctica, and the supposed discovery of superluminal neutrinos at the Swiss-Italian border—have now been retracted, with far less fanfare than when they were first published.

 

What peer review ? You mean peer passing [you pass mine, I pass yours....]

 

prestigious British Medical Journal. The experimenters deliberately modified a paper to include eight different major errors in study design, methodology, data analysis, and interpretation of results, and not a single one of the 221 reviewers who participated caught all of the errors. On average, they caught fewer than two—and, unbelievably, these results held up even in the subset of reviewers who had been specifically warned that they were participating in a study and that there might be something a little odd in the paper that they were reviewing. In all, only 30 percent of reviewers recommended that the intentionally flawed paper be rejected.

 

Reigning cultural paradigms reign, including fraud:

 

 Older scientists control access to scientific prestige by serving on the editorial boards of major journals and on university tenure-review committees. Finally, the government bodies that award the vast majority of scientific funding are either staffed or advised by distinguished practitioners in the field.

 

The cult of science:

At the same time as an ever more bloated scientific bureaucracy churns out masses of research results, the majority of which are likely outright false, scientists themselves are lauded as heroes and science is upheld as the only legitimate basis for policy-making. There’s reason to believe that these phenomena are linked. When a formerly ascetic discipline suddenly attains a measure of influence, it is bound to be flooded by opportunists and charlatans, whether it’s the National Academy of Science or the monastery of Cluny.

 

A cult devoid of real science:

If science was unprepared for the influx of careerists, it was even less prepared for the blossoming of the Cult of Science. The Cult is related to the phenomenon described as “scientism”; both have a tendency to treat the body of scientific knowledge as a holy book or an a-religious revelation that offers simple and decisive resolutions to deep questions. But it adds to this a pinch of glib frivolity and a dash of unembarrassed ignorance.

 

What science ?

 

 

There is no modern period of 'enlightenment', but an era of charlatans, quacks, frauds and metaphysicians all after money, power and the establishment of their liturgical church uber alles.  


Article Comments:

Related Articles:

Scientism

9/20/2020:  Flu Fascism and Fake Science

9/8/2020:  GlobaloneyWarming Science Fiction

8/15/2020:  Michael Crichton and the Age of Ignorance parading as Science

8/5/2020:  C.S. Lewis and 'The Abolition of Man' by Steve Turley

7/4/2020:  Rome, Greece, Islam - primitive philosophies with primitive ideals - unlike Christianity

4/21/2020:  Corona Madness and Burning down the Village (to save it)

4/4/2020:  Corona and the cult of Scientism and fake models

3/10/2020:  Atheists have destroyed the credibility of science

1/4/2020:  Globaloney-Warming: 43 Failed Green Fascist Predictions - Zero correct, every single one wrong

12/19/2019:  Fake Climate Science and made up numbers: Australia

12/11/2019:  The Green Reich: Global Warming to the Green Tyranny, Drieu Godefridi

11/26/2019:  The Age of Stupid, the Cult of Stupid: GlobaloneyWarming, Climate-Change, Climate-Emergency

11/19/2019:  The Climate cult of Stupid, Corruption, Fiction

11/7/2016:  Church of Evolution and the impossibility of chance forming anything

10/23/2016:  Big Bang theology and Virgin Births. Evolution and Scientific, Cosmological Dogma.

9/21/2016:  'Undeniable: How Biology Confirms Our Intuition That Life Is Designed' by Douglas Axe

7/20/2016:  Evolution, Embryos and Cult of Science fraud

7/12/2016:  Political Science and the cut of Scientism

5/2/2016:  The cult and unholy church of 'Science'. Lies, fraud, propaganda, and of course money and power.

2/25/2016:  Cult of science; magical formation of life, planets and trillions of Earths!

2/5/2016:  Alan Fensin, '13 facts that humans do not cause global warming'.

1/14/2016:  John Hudson Tiner’s 'History of Medicine and Founder of Modern Medicine: Louis Pasteur'

7/29/2015:  Maxwell, Morley and Einstein. No conflict between faith and reason.

4/23/2015:  There is no science, within a cult of science.

1/23/2015:  2014 one of the coldest years in the real record. Globaloneywarming. A cult of fraud.

1/14/2015:  What is Science? It is not Scientism or the cult of Science.

1/2/2015:  Watermelons: How Environmentalists are Killing the Planet, James Delingpole

12/27/2014:  Benjamin Wiker, '10 Books that Screwed up the World' [and 5 others that did not help]

12/27/2014:  Benjamin Wiker, '10 Books that Screwed up the World' [and 5 others that did not help]

12/18/2014:  Bruno Latour and the cult of science. Fetishes in place of facts.

11/23/2014:  Consensus Science. There is life on the Moon, the Sun, Mercury, Venus, Mars....

11/10/2014:  Cults of Scientism; no science, lots of dogma, cant, theology and miracles

10/14/2014:  Scientism and the cult of Fraud er Globaloneywarming

10/9/2014:  Keynesian-Central Bank 'Scientism'. Central Bank 'models' vs reality

10/6/2014:  The Quackery of Lysenko, Globaloneywarming, Darwinism.

8/15/2014:  'Literalists' and Scientism, and the cults of pseudo-science

7/13/2014:  Darwinism and the cult of scientific materialism

6/30/2014:  Aristotle's non-science cult of scientism. Hand-waving and conjecture is not science

6/30/2014:  Scientism and the scientific mafia of establishment non-science

6/26/2014:  Velikovsky's importance - he challenged the dogmatic cult of Darwin