Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
It is obvious to anyone who has a functioning cortex, that the Corona plandemic used the mythical scariants of ‘viruses’ as the casus belli for what is rightly termed a poisonous and often lethal injection marketed as health care, designed to accrue profits and power. As the founder of Merck said, create the disease, sell the cure. Since the days of the quack and fraud Jenner, ‘germs’ and ‘viruses’ have invaded the imaginations of the ‘science’ and its ‘experts’ and our daily lexicon, much to the detriment of health and freedom. As Antoine Béchamp noted in his book ‘Les Microzymas’ p. 819 (1878), on the incoherence of ‘germ’ theory:
‘In all the experiments of recent years, it has been the microzyma proper to an animal and not a germ of the air that has been found to be the seat of the virulence. No one has even been able to produce with germs obtained from the atmosphere any of the so-called parasitic diseases. Whenever, by inoculation, a typical known malady has been reproduced, it has been necessary to go and take the supposed parasite from a sick animal; thus to inoculate tuberculosis, the tubercle has to be taken from the subject affected.’
No germ or virus carrying disease or infection has ever been isolated in the atmosphere or even in a human cell. Germ theory wrongly conflates external ‘germs’ with internal bacteria and microzymas which do produce disease as explained below. The implications of this fraud and incoherence is staggering.
Bacteria exist in their billions inside each human body. What Béchamp discovered was that these ‘microbes’ or microzymas as he named them, can develop into bacteria and are not only vital to clean out the human body and cell detritus, but they can change shape, form and function if the ‘terrain’ or environment of the body is assaulted with poisons and becomes toxic. This completely upends Pasteurian myth and our entire modern medical and healthy systems.
Inside each human cell, there is a nucleus which contains DNA genetic material (deoxyribonucleic acid). The nucleus has a membrane which is similar to the cell membrane. There is also a pathway to the nucleus of each human cell called the endoplasmic reticulum. This has ribosome's connected to it which also contain genetic material called RNA (ribonucleic acid), or the ‘logic’ that transcribes the ‘plans’ from DNA to produce functionality. This endoplasmic reticulum is also made of cellular membrane material.
Each human cell is therefore a very complicated ecosystem with ‘organelles’ floating in a watery mixture called a cytoplasm which also harbours RNA.
In a case of toxaemia poisoning, a cell, containing the complexity mentioned above, will burst, providing an abundance of cellular membrane material containing the sticky proteins of DNA and RNA which are now floating in the fluid between the other living cells. This is called the interstitial fluid. ‘Germs’ are simply bacteria which normally do waste management but have now changed their shape and function to feed on the cellular destruction, spreading the toxicity and detritus. As with any living organism these pleomorphic (many forms) bacterium emit waste, fluids and if the cell is damaged and toxic, poisons. In simple terms this process is what causes an illness.
The important point is that if the host’s toxicity is pervasive, the bacterial effluence and invasion can damage cells. This is not from an external barbarian-germ or virus invasion, but due entirely to the detritus and cellular debris now building up and furthering the toxicity of the host.
Immunity is a defence system the body uses to eliminate toxic matter that has built up over a period of time. The immune system is wonderfully complex and starts when the ‘front lines’ of the body’s defence have not been able to eliminate toxic matter effectively, and the toxicity has breached the circulatory system and organs. Our immune systems will then issue white blood cells which are designed to remove dead organic matter, or garbage, from the body.
Within the immune system antibodies are also produced. These are specially synthesized body proteins which aid the white blood cells when toxicity reaches more extreme levels and when the body is trying to eject a surfeit of poison. For the record injecting antibodies in the form of jabs and stabs is not only useless but dangerous, given that the immune system will not recognise the foreign antibodies as anything other than a foreign toxic agent and the compound proteins they contain cannot be broken down and will directly damage organs and tissues.
F. Harrison, a Professor of Bacteriology at McGill University, wrote a book, ‘Historical Review of Microbiology, published in Microbiology’, in which he says: “Geronimo Fracastorio (an Italian poet and physician, 1483 – 1553) of Verona, published a work (De Contagionibus et Contagiosis Morbis, et eorum Curatione) in Venice in 1546 which contained the first statement of the true nature of contagion, infection, or disease organisms, and of the modes of transmission of infectious disease.” This predates Pasteur by 300 years.
Fracastorio divided diseases into different groups, one of which infected the host by either immediate contact, through intermediate agents, or at a distance through the air. Organisms which cause disease were in his view, composed of viscous or glutinous matter. These particles, too small to be seen, were also capable of reproduction in appropriate media, and became pathogenic through the action of animal heat. These concepts anticipate Pasteur’s ideas. Fracastorio did not possess a microscope and could not know that these substances might be individual living organisms.
According to Harrison the first compound microscope was made in 1590 in Holland, but it was not until about 1683 that anything was built of sufficient power to show up bacteria. Harrison relates: “In the year 1683, Antonius van Leenwenhoek, a Dutch naturalist and a maker of lenses, communicated to the English Royal Society the results of observations which he had made with a simple microscope of his own construction, magnifying from 100 to 150 times. He found in water, saliva, dental tartar, etc., entities he named animalcula.” More here