Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
A cult of life, civilisation and Christian faith, would never sanction the murdering of children.
by StFerdIII
Muslims get one thing right. The protection of the unborn. In liberal North America, 3 million fetuses are killed each year. This genocide against the powerless is appalling, yet unsurprising. The slaughter of millions of young humans is forgotten. Elevated instead are mindless creeds about globaloney warming; cult worship; or pop-culture stupidity. Abortion and the killing of infants is just so, pre-feminist, isn't it?
The original claim for abortion resides in a massive fraud. The 1973 US court decision in Roe v Wade, which guaranteed a woman's right to abortion impacted the entire Western world. Every other modern country followed suit. The decision was based on the lie that 100.000 women each year in the US, were in peril from the birthing process. Without adequate facilities to abort fetuses which imperiled a woman's life; the woman had lost the right to her own body. Or so the feminist 'logic' went. It was of course a gigantic fallacy - one promoted by rabid and highly militarised feminist-marxist elements.
Studies done during and after the Roe v Wade decision revealed that about 1.000 women per year were in physical danger from the birthing process – not the hysterical 100.000 that the Feminist-Marxist alliance had claimed. No one would argue that these women should not have the ability to protect their own lives and health from a potentially disastrous birth. But is abortion – state sanctioned and in many countries state funded – the only answer?
Of course not. In Canada pre-1969 a woman could get an abortion but only after consulting with 3 doctors. The doctors would provide pre-abortion surgery counseling and post-operation counseling. This concept was effective. The woman would be medically examined for risk and if the risk to her health from a pregnancy were apparent, then an operation to remove the fetus would be allowed. It would be paid entirely by the woman or someone in her immediate family. No state funding.
During the flower-power revolution of the 1960s and 70s, the ideas around female 'rights' and female sexual liberation changed society's perception about sex and freedom. Sexual license was portrayed as a right and a method to assert one's self-esteem and self-worth. Getting pregnant was viewed as an inconvenience, not a responsibility.
Mad theories were then created about fetuses not being human and ergo having no rights. If a fetus is not a human what is it then, a dog? The Feminist-Marxist revolution was about female convenience, sexual license and a focus on egotistical selfish desires. Women were told, berated, brain-washed and re-educated, that their pleasures, careers, self-importance and personal vanity were more important than bringing a baby into the world. Men, relationships, sex and ultimately personal responsibility were to be jettisoned for sexual liberation.
Whilst the state sanctioned easy abortion, it abolished pre- and post- operation counseling. Perhaps the biggest decision a woman would ever make – the destruction of a small human – was made in a solitary, uninformed and rushed manner. Where before pre-op counseling frankly told the woman about the development of a fetus and the fact that it was a human egg in vitro and that life was present; there now existed nothing but a factory of fetus removal. No pictures, no videos, no interaction with the man or her family; no counseling with experts; no 'other side of the story' about keeping the small human – just a lonely individual decision made for the most part without debate, counseling or moral-intellectual aid.
As the abortion-feminist rights industry grew, so too did judicial action against the necessity of men. Cheap and easy divorce proceedings where the man usually lost half his assets and was forced to pay large amounts of his meager income to the woman, made the man-in-marriage, an obsolete or optional concept. Women could now marry, have children with one man, and happily and profitably, leave that man for one or more other men who struck their sexual or financial fancy. Judicial activism in making the man irrelevant has forced apart families; degraded the man in society and spawned a general attitude that men are at best useless, or at worst nothing more than sexual predators and abusers.
In this world-view, where a man is nothing more than a sexually abusive neanderthal, the case for abortion is strengthened. Why should a woman be a baby-producing slave to a man who fetters her and engages in oppression? Abort and be free!
The costs to society from liberalised abortion are enormous. Babies are murdered en masse. Unborn rights are ignored. Families are ridiculed and fractured. Men are deemed little better than apes. Morality is vilified as repressive. Sexual license and pop-culture soft and hard porn are embraced. Feminist and judicial activism rampant. None of this is a positive.
The sexual-Feminist revolution of the 1960s and 70s were momentous and most people still don't understand their import. It is certainly not a progressive change – that word so loved by chattering Marxists and socialists. There is nothing progressive about state sanctioned and funded fetus murder. There is nothing progressive about the degradation of the male. And there is certainly nothing progressive about destroying the basic unit of society – the family. There are now 3 million abortions a year in North America, and fully 67% of black women who become pregnant do so out of marriage and without a stable male partner. That is liberation?
Unfettered abortion is not only the murdering of an innocent human, it is also one of the most destructive ideas ever unleashed on a modern society. It is an immoral crime, a crime against life, a crime that is barbaric.
