Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
“…it is permissible to assume that the Earth is a nonrotating frame of reference. From this point of view, the stars will have a circular velocity around the Earth that is much greater than the speed of light. A star only ten light-years away has a relative velocity around the Earth of twenty thousand times the speed of light (Martin Gardner, Relativity Explosion, 1976, p. 68)
Martin is right but wrong. He assumes, like most Relativists, that the stars would need to move at faster than light speed around an immobile Earth. This is incorrect and is dealt with below. He is right in that it is physically and scientifically possible for a geocentric model to be valid. He is also right that light speed is variant, again destroying the dogma of Einstein’s cult. If light speed is variant - and it is - Relativity is rubbished and the Bang of the Biggest invalidated.
We have discussed in previous posts how the universe could move around an immobile Earth, or Newton’s central point of inertia. There are common sense questions and objections to the idea of a rotating universe, but nothing in mainstream science, including the tortured, flayed maths of Einstein’s cult, can deny the possibility. This is rarely discussed. Paradigms, money, degrees, prestige and all that. More here
“...Meanwhile, NASA scientists calculated that the redistribution of mass by the earthquake might have shortened the day by a couple of millionths of a second and tilted the Earth’s axis slightly.
On a larger scale, the unbuckling and shifting moved the planet’s mass, on average, closer to its center, and just as a figure skater who spins faster when drawing the arms closer, the Earth’s rotation speeds up. Richard S. Gross, a scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, calculated that the length of the day was shortened by 1.8 millionths of a second.” (Quake Moves Japan Closer to U.S. and Alters Earth’s Spin,” Kenneth Chang, March 13, 2011, in NYT)
The above story is repeated every year. Rinse, repeat. Invariably, when major earthquakes or tsunamis occur we are inundated with mainstream ‘science’ articles declaring that the Earth, as a result of the force coming from these catastrophes, was slowed in its rotation rate and/or its axis moved (Gross, Chao, 2006). The rotation rate is said to change by microseconds and the axial tilt by inches after significant earthquakes or colossal tsunamis are experienced (Fodor, 2019).
If the land masses are moved toward the centre there is an increase in rotation. If they are dispersed there would be a decrease in rotational rate (the figure skater analogy).
In general, ‘the science’ believes that given the Earth’s rotation any terrestrial event will affect the velocity of the rotation, impact the gravitational field and shift the poles (Dahlen, 1971 and ‘Dahlen’s theory’). This is very curious indeed, given the supposed 4 billion (soon trillion?) years of this planets existence. Such dislocations would lead to catastrophe.
If the above is true, just based on what we know about earthquakes and other seismic-terrestrial impacts, there would be no life on this planet given the massive shifts and catastrophic changes which would ensue.
We discussed previously why Copernicanism has a problem with planetary rotations over endless ages. In the past decade, Venus’ rotation, which spins the wrong way, has supposedly slowed down by 6-10 minutes just in the past decade. Mars for some reason is rotating faster. If the same was applied to our Earth, all life here would end.
What has caused Venus’ ice-skater-pirouette to slow down, or Mars to perhaps speed up? Does Mars suffer from Mars-quakes? No one knows. ‘The science’ maintains that space is simply a void and absent of energy or material (of course not, the aether exists, though it is denied by the standard model). So what causes rotational speed variation?
Let’s break out the calculators and move the IQ needle back to common sense. Let’s put away the models and word salads. We can add up all the earthquakes occurring on an annual basis and go back in time to assess the overall impact. More here
Saint Albert of the Relativity:
“To begin with it followed from observations of the Sun that the apparent path of the Sun against the background of the fixed stars differed in speed at different times of the year.” (Albert Einstein, Ideas and Opinions, p. 263)
Saint Albert writes about a fixed absolute background and space which is anathema to Relativity where no absolutes exist. He also mentions variations in the Sun’s speed and movement. What causes these? Saint Albert declined to provide answers. The explanations for both will depend on your world-view.
We are told the Sun imitates the angry, one legged man, jumping ‘up and down’ within our solar system and taking 230 million years to orbit the centre of the milky way. To say that this is conjecture proferred as ‘fact’ is only to refer to the usual array of scientistic propaganda. If the Sun can gyrate up and down, and move around the milky way centre (which is of course a ‘massive black hole’ called Sagittarius A), could it orbit the Earth?
Or to frame it differently; does the Earth’s apparent elliptical movement around the Sun prove heliocentricity? Or can the same apparent elliptical orbit be applied to the Sun around the Earth?
It depends on how you view the distance traveled and velocity of the planets. Let’s consider the geocentric model and the Tychonic framework (the mixed Copernican-geocentric model). More here
“The dogma of a single cause for disease was decisively shaped by microbiology, which became predominant at the end of the 19th century, declaring specific microorganisms (viruses, bacteria, fungi) to be the causes of very definite diseases; including mass epidemics such as cholera and tuberculosis. The founders of microbe theory, researchers Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch, ascended in their lifetimes to the heights of medicine’s Mount Olympus.” (p. 27, Dr Sam Bailey in ‘Virus Mania’, reviewed here)”
The above digram is the standard influenza story and is just another example of scientism. We can eviscerate this fantasy and its ‘authoritative narrator’ Artificial Intelligence (AI, or maybe it is Artful Idiot). The quote above aptly describes the fraud of virology, a criminal industry which has killed and maimed countless millions since the days of the quacks Pasteur and Koch, not to mention that insufferable country charlatan Saint Jenner.
The very name ‘influenza’ came from the belief that the alignment of stars caused an annual ‘disease’ or ‘influenced’ the body to become ill. That ancient theory possesses more science than the current dogma. More here
There are a few philosophical assertions which make the bien pensant’s head explode. One is the idea that the universe could rotate around the Earth. Wailing and gnashing of teeth. You can’t be that stupid they exclaim. You have desecrated our temple with your filth they will moan. Off with your head they will tolerantly declare.
But, what if the Sadduccees and Pharisees of establishment ‘science’ are wrong? In a previous post we discussed the law of inertial mass and geo-centricity. Let’s persist.
The law of Newtonian inertia identifies a barycenter or mass-point around which objects will move. There is mounting evidence that our solar system is that barycenter (the axis of evil). Further, not only does Einstein’s maths allow for geocentricity but so do Newton’s.
When we view Newton’s Proposition 43 and its related mathematical-mechanics, it shows that the Earth has no inclination to rotate. When the gravitational and inertial forces are balanced around the center of mass (or inertial point), they cannot generate a torque, and thus the Earth will remain absolutely motionless.
This means that once the universe begins rotating, its angular momentum (object movement and velocity) will keep it turning ad infinitum. This system will be the most stable of all rotating systems since the universe is so big and its momentum is so great and per force, immutable.
This model is counter-intuitive, given that it would be much more stable than a small Earth rotating in a fixed universe. This is because we need to consider all the internal and external forces that could act on a rotating Earth to slow it down (earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanoes, asteroids, planetary perturbations, solar forces, etc.) More here.
