Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
To sell the scam, you need to market the panic.
As the 1990s rolled toward 2000 the global public was told that human civilisation was held together by the most tenuous of algorithmic threads. It was close to ending. Forget the Black Death of the 14th century. The presage to the parousia was the “Year 2000 problem” (Y2K), premised on a two-digit year convention utilised in legacy COBOL date fields.
The COBOL date field issue was marketed not as a routine software deprecation and maintenance task, but as an impending systemic apocalypse. Governments and enterprises poured hundreds of billions of dollars into consultancy contracts, vendor remediation, and crisis planning amid warnings of crashing airliners, dark power grids, and collapsing financial systems. The media did a Viking beserker. The money for the media was in the apocalyptic narrative. You remember.
Yet, when midnight struck on 1 January 2000, nations that spent virtually nothing on remediation, such as Russia and Italy, experienced the exact same uneventful transition as nations that depleted public treasuries. The author knows this being located in Russia on January 1 2000. Nothing happened. Not. A. Damn. Thing.
So, back to critical thinking. What happened? Why did the world buy into yet another scam? What were and are the technical realities of legacy COBOL architectures? What really transpired from the industrial mechanics of the panic, and the lucrative commercial nexus that transformed routine string-handling routines into an unprecedented IT consultancy windfall? More here.
Cosmic Background Radiation movement measured using different tools and vectors which alight on the same general velocity, roughly 370-400 km / second disproves Relativity, the Big Bang and the ‘void’ or ‘vacuum’ of space. This is why you will never hear of it and why it is never discussed. This is one disproof out of dozens of the Standard Model, but it is worth having a trot through the details and what it means.
Modern theoretical physics rests on a single foundational dogma: the universe is an isotropic (homogenous), directionless void with no preferred rest frame.
This postulated canonical script is 100% rubbish.
If you can measure a velocity of an absolute background than Relativity does not exist.
According to Messiah Einstein’s Special Relativity (don’t confuse this with ‘General’ Relativity which is different), all motion is strictly ‘Relative’ (another buzzword with no value). In this model there is no absolute background or physical medium against which true velocity can be measured. We know that this postulate is unscientific and unworthy even of being used as a bad joke. A CMB velocity just confirms what 100 other data points have already plainly stated - ‘Relativity’ is junk $cience.
Further, as this substack has painfully elucidated, according to standard Big Bang cosmology space is homogeneous and isotropic on large scales. In essence the thin armed wizards zoom out the universe to create the fable of an even ‘void’, punctuated only by a cosmic similarity. To achieve this they use the fraudulent FLRW equation or the Friedman, Lemaitre, Robertson, Walker metric which is just another geometric toy based on General Relativity which should not be confused with the entirely different ‘Special Relativity’ (“Which ‘Relativity’ would you like to balance the equations Sir?”), which proposes that the cosmos are expanding at ~2 million km/hour. But you know this already. More here
Peter Higgs (Nobel Laureate in Physics)
“It is very difficult to engage him in discussion, and so he has got away with pronouncements in a way that other people would not... His celebrity status gives him instant credibility that others do not have.” (Peter is famous for his own fraud - the ‘Higgs’ particle, future post on that nonsense)
Leonard Susskind (Theoretical Physicist, Stanford University)
“Stephen claimed that ‘information is lost in black hole evaporation’ and, worse, he seemed to prove it. If that was true, Gerard [’t Hooft] and I realized, the foundations of our subject were destroyed.” (Susskind’s ‘subject’ is thoroughly destroyed. Read this substack for more info.)
John Lennox (Professor of Mathematics, University of Oxford)
“Nonsense remains nonsense, even when it’s talked about by world-famous scientists... To presuppose the existence of the universe to account for the existence of the universe sounds like something out of Alice in Wonderland, not science.“
Christopher Norris (Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, Cardiff University)
“Hawking’s dismissive claim that philosophy is dead demonstrates an unreflective reliance on the very speculative, philosophical, and unexamined assumptions that underpin his own theoretical models.”
Ouch.
Not everyone fell to their knees and worshipped Apostle Saint Stephen of the Hawking. The critics above are from within ‘The Science’ and respectable academia. They are not ‘fringe theorists’ and skulking losers on the ‘conspiracy edges’ chewing on their lips, naked in a raincoat, denying the true religion of ‘The Science’. They had contact with the angelic Apostle Saint Stephen of the Black Hole and saw through the divine-light charade and thought he was more devil than saint. Hawking is one of the most obvious examples of marketing a religion - a false one.
Why was the little Englishman in a wheelchair rolled out over 30 years and shoved into your face as the acme of scientific celebrity even though he was a fantasist and false prophet? Let’s summarise:
· Hawking (1942-2018): Theoretical physicist impacted by Parkinson’s disease (neurological disorders) from the 1960s onwards. The author wonders if Hawking was exposed to DDT or other chemical poisons which accelerated from the 1930s onwards. Are these perhaps the genesis of his physical and neurological issues? Did these also impact his grasp on reality? Neurological problems by definition impact your cognition…..see ‘Long Rona’ for more information. Anyone suffering from ‘Long Rona’ suffers from a longer, and lower IQ.
· Mandate from heaven: Declared in the 1980s to be the Apostolic successor to the Papal chair of the Messiah Einstein and the Pope of Modern Physics. Usually attributed to be at the same level of genius as Newton and the Messiah, both of whom are wrong. Yawn.
· Philosophy: Moved from a cosmic design and ‘natural laws’ in physics, to random stochastic chance and ‘evolutionary-entity-emergence’ (whatever that means), over 50 years. Fictionist.
· Insights: Manufactured a law of entropy in Black Holes, which he later said cannot exist. This was his main claim to fame, and salon-women the world over swooned and fainted at the mere utterance, ‘Black Hole entropy’. A sure way to get a date and impress the ladies. ‘Excuse me lovely, can I amaze you with my Super Massive Black Hole and its entropic attributes?’
· Importance: He marketed the Big Bang and its attendant General Relativity (GTR) maths as science using arcane, unproven and quite theoretical formulae to ‘confirm’ that Black Holes result from GTR geometry (before having second thoughts in 2014; he died in 2018). Someone forgot to tell the Saint that 4 D geometry and other play-things are not physical forces and don’t exist.
But of course you believe in Saint Stephen. He is consensus. Everyone knows. The smartest of the smart even though communications were a bit of an issue. Click Clack. More here