Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
Peter Higgs (Nobel Laureate in Physics)
“It is very difficult to engage him in discussion, and so he has got away with pronouncements in a way that other people would not... His celebrity status gives him instant credibility that others do not have.” (Peter is famous for his own fraud - the ‘Higgs’ particle, future post on that nonsense)
Leonard Susskind (Theoretical Physicist, Stanford University)
“Stephen claimed that ‘information is lost in black hole evaporation’ and, worse, he seemed to prove it. If that was true, Gerard [’t Hooft] and I realized, the foundations of our subject were destroyed.” (Susskind’s ‘subject’ is thoroughly destroyed. Read this substack for more info.)
John Lennox (Professor of Mathematics, University of Oxford)
“Nonsense remains nonsense, even when it’s talked about by world-famous scientists... To presuppose the existence of the universe to account for the existence of the universe sounds like something out of Alice in Wonderland, not science.“
Christopher Norris (Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, Cardiff University)
“Hawking’s dismissive claim that philosophy is dead demonstrates an unreflective reliance on the very speculative, philosophical, and unexamined assumptions that underpin his own theoretical models.”
Ouch.
Not everyone fell to their knees and worshipped Apostle Saint Stephen of the Hawking. The critics above are from within ‘The Science’ and respectable academia. They are not ‘fringe theorists’ and skulking losers on the ‘conspiracy edges’ chewing on their lips, naked in a raincoat, denying the true religion of ‘The Science’. They had contact with the angelic Apostle Saint Stephen of the Black Hole and saw through the divine-light charade and thought he was more devil than saint. Hawking is one of the most obvious examples of marketing a religion - a false one.
Why was the little Englishman in a wheelchair rolled out over 30 years and shoved into your face as the acme of scientific celebrity even though he was a fantasist and false prophet? Let’s summarise:
· Hawking (1942-2018): Theoretical physicist impacted by Parkinson’s disease (neurological disorders) from the 1960s onwards. The author wonders if Hawking was exposed to DDT or other chemical poisons which accelerated from the 1930s onwards. Are these perhaps the genesis of his physical and neurological issues? Did these also impact his grasp on reality? Neurological problems by definition impact your cognition…..see ‘Long Rona’ for more information. Anyone suffering from ‘Long Rona’ suffers from a longer, and lower IQ.
· Mandate from heaven: Declared in the 1980s to be the Apostolic successor to the Papal chair of the Messiah Einstein and the Pope of Modern Physics. Usually attributed to be at the same level of genius as Newton and the Messiah, both of whom are wrong. Yawn.
· Philosophy: Moved from a cosmic design and ‘natural laws’ in physics, to random stochastic chance and ‘evolutionary-entity-emergence’ (whatever that means), over 50 years. Fictionist.
· Insights: Manufactured a law of entropy in Black Holes, which he later said cannot exist. This was his main claim to fame, and salon-women the world over swooned and fainted at the mere utterance, ‘Black Hole entropy’. A sure way to get a date and impress the ladies. ‘Excuse me lovely, can I amaze you with my Super Massive Black Hole and its entropic attributes?’
· Importance: He marketed the Big Bang and its attendant General Relativity (GTR) maths as science using arcane, unproven and quite theoretical formulae to ‘confirm’ that Black Holes result from GTR geometry (before having second thoughts in 2014; he died in 2018). Someone forgot to tell the Saint that 4 D geometry and other play-things are not physical forces and don’t exist.
But of course you believe in Saint Stephen. He is consensus. Everyone knows. The smartest of the smart even though communications were a bit of an issue. Click Clack. More here
Not a single University or ‘education system’ will teach anything which calls into question the fantasy world of the ‘Big Bang’, ‘Relativity’ or its inevitable, illogical computer generated fraud of ‘Black Holes’. The propaganda promoting Black Holes is limitless, energised by an infinity of funding and confident propagandists on their village soap boxes selling the snake oil.
Saint Stephen who was Hawking this story, spent most of his life extracting money from making up stories about the cosmos and deep dark ‘Black Holes’. Apostle Stephen’s specialisation was ‘entropy in Black Holes’ (woah Steve, slow down, easy on the factual relevancy); only to apostasy near the end of his existence and admit it was all a scam. Thanks Steve. Even the discredited comedian Einstein knew that Black Holes cannot exist. Let’s explain why the Messiah was right (for once!). Round of applause for the Einstotle.
On this substack we have disproven the General Theory of Relativity. This means that the Big Bang is rendered false. We can persist with an elucidation around another misdirection which is also impossible – the ‘Black Hole’. These only exist if General Theory of Relativity is true (it is false); and if matter can be ‘crushed’ into a ‘singularity’ (it can’t). Computer models and arrows against a black backdrop are not ‘science’.
More here
Why the size of the Universe is enormous but not nearly as large as we are told
https://unstabbinated.substack.com/p/video-on-why-the-size-of-the-universe
Problem statement: Why is the universe so large and how big is it really?
Answer: The size is dictated by physics and reality - no other design choice. But how big is it? Good question. Does anyone really know? Who amongst the Scientific elite is God?
Granular details: The physical universe is between 90 Million and 10 Billion light-years (LY) across based on JWST (James Web Space Telescope) and other data. A fraction of what we are told.
Standard Model Bayesian: 30 Trillion LY across
Standard Model FLRW (Friedman, Lemaitre, Robertson, Walker algorithm) metric: 93 Billion LY across
Standard Model JWST evidence: 30 Billion LY across
Resonator Model: 2-10 Billion LY across
Fluid Dynamics, JWST evidence: 93 Million LY across
Our Milky Way: ~200.000 LY
Our Solar System to the Oort Cloud: 1.5-3.2 LY
Note: LY = 5.9~Trillion human miles, still quite a jaunt and this is based on the incorrect constant of light speed. Light speed is variant. It is likely close to infinite in ‘space’ or far greater than the purported 186K per second constant demanded by the Standard Model, disproven many times and discussed at length on this substack. This means that the ‘5.9 Trillion miles’ per LY is quite probably vastly overstated by a 1000x time or more.
You know this because of your own common sense. If I measure light speed in Paris using assumptions and maths this calculation will not hold if I am standing on Pluto or floating out near Alpha Centauri. In both cases the speed of light will be different and the further away from dense high pressure zones and mass you are; the higher the speed.
It has long been understood that the Standard Model, GTR (general theory of Relativity) and FLRW do not comport with reality. But you need to give the Fanboys some time to catch up. Worldviews being shattered and all that. FLRW means the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker algorithm the little wizards use to calculate the speed of the ‘infinitely expanding universe’ based on the magic of ‘Dark Energy’. Just make things up and construct equations. We will deconstruct and demise the FLRW in the next post.
The universe as Einstein originally thought, is not expandin and in violation of Einstein’s philosophy, the universe is not warped and massively curved; it is a mostly flat disc which oscillates. This is what the evidence states. Further, humans do not see ‘all of the cosmos’, we can only observe a part of it. A real phenomena in physics and cosmology is the ‘hall of mirrors’ effect, where the arrangment of the galaxies and stars will produce a hallucination of expansion and recession. A smaller space can well look massive and imply motion away from the observer. Have a stroll through Versailles Hall of Mirrors.