RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/

Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Back

Scientism - Recent Articles

The fraud of 1919 and 'bending Starlight which proved Relativity'

The Relativity cult supposedly performs an experiment, which (shock news), confirms that the Relativity cult is right! Never saw that coming. Follow that Science.

 

Einstein and his gravitational ‘theorem’ do not explain anything. For Relativists, gravity is a wave oscillation found within the non-existent (unproven) ‘continous field’ of a merged space-time curvature. This theory has never explained why you are glued to your chair and not floating off somewhere.

Pace ‘The Science’, there are 3 ‘claims’ which ‘prove’ Relativity.

1. Bending of starlight around the Sun (absurd, this was known to medieval natural philosophers). See below.

2. Connected to #1, ‘gravitational redshifts’, sometimes called ‘gravitational lensing’. Redshifts are discussed on this substack, given they actually disprove Relativity. There is no factual evidence that a ‘redshift’ means a recessionary movement nor long ages.

3. Mercury’s perihelion (easily explained by both Newtonian maths (Gerber 1887) and the cosmic aether.

Let’s focus on #1 – the ‘bending of starlight’.

More here

Bell's Theorem which disproves Relativity and causes issues for Quantum Mechanics.

Electron and particle communication at a distance cannot be explained by Relativity. Relativity is a local-only phenomenon. It does not allow actions at a distance.

 

Einstein received a Nobel prize in 1921, for his earlier work on photons and ‘Brownian motion’. He should probably have surmised that it was unlikely that space is ‘empty’ and equally unlikely that particles are not connected, even over a great distance. His own gravitational theorem, which is wrong, posits that gravity is a wave, generated by unknown forces (mass gravitational attraction), through the non-existent 4th dimension of space and time.

GTR by default must support some ‘gravitational spooky action at a distance’.

  • A Nobel winner for a discovery related to photons and light should have known about the many experiments in the 19th and early 20th centuries which demonstrated a spatial connection between particles.

  • One would expect that a Nobel winner in the area of photonic energy would have been cognisant of such physical experimental evidence and keen to reproduce such mechanical proofs or at least work with others to try to explain them.

However, as usual, there is no evidence that Einstotle or the cult of Relativity ever interacted with 20th century scientists and engineers who were engaged with electron and photon experimentation. Relativity is always a maths game.

More here

Einstein’s own apostasy. Einstein admitted we live in a 3 dimensional universe.

Like so much of 'The Science', Relativity is a theory looking for proof, and when proof is not found; it creates its own reality and dogma, despite its founder's theologically confusion.


Einstein, or Einstotle, was a philosopher. He was not a scientist. He was not an engineer. He was not a practical builder of anything. You can’t even call him a physicist, given he never worked on ‘physical matter’ or mechanical projects. He was an abstract, abstruse Jewish-cosmological philosopher, who had some skills with calculus, and as the quote above states, ‘rigged’ his maths to prove his philosophy.

Einstotle’s math skills were pretty advanced but probably no more refined than the skills that many a university graduate in maths today possesses. If they were curious enough, current graduates could find the tautological errors in Einstein’s tensor calculus models. I can help them, working with tensor calculus as I do in building AI models. Most of these clever students never bother to inquire and just assume that the Einstotle was ‘right’. He was wrong on just about everything.

More here