Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
“The historical interpretation of the Michelson-Morley experiment as a ‘null result’ is the product of a systemic oversight. When one audits the raw data without the bias of the vacuum-script, a persistent, small-scale anisotropy emerges. We have not been measuring ‘nothing’; we have been measuring a medium that is partially entrained by the Earth’s own bulk.” Consoli, M. & Pluchino, A. (2019). Michelson-Morley Experiments: An Alternative for the 21st Century. World Scientific, p. 54.
“Modern physics treats the vacuum as a ‘superfluid’ in its mathematical formulations of the Higgs Field and the Standard Model, yet it denies the physical reality of that very substrate. We are in the absurd position of an engineer who uses the equations of hydrodynamics to describe a pipe but insists that no water exists within it.” Consoli, M. (2009). “The Vacuum of the Standard Model as a Relativistic Superfluid.” Physical Review D, 80(8).
Author’s note: Higgs particle is a fraud, future post on this.
The aether of space exists.
A vacuum is anti-science and a fiction. All of modern physics, astrophysics and cosmology is based on a lie – ‘space is a vacuum’. In reality space operates within the reality of fluid dynamics and apparently in reality, a viscous substance needs a medium. However, without the ‘vacuum’ the maths of Newton, Einstein, Relativity (there are many, pick the one you like), and the Banging of the Biggest all fail. Every single component of the current ‘cosmological worldview’ is based on the fraud of the ‘vacuum’.
Into this debate enters another personality that no one has heard of – the effervescent Italian Maurice Consoli. Born in the 1950s Consoli is still active. He is a trained physicist from Catania University in Sicily and is a highly accomplished physics researcher for the Institute for Nuclear Physics or INFN. The authour has worked with Consoli (the author also highly recommends a visit to Catania including its wonderful open-air sea-food market and marvellous ecclesiastical buildings and of course Etna, beware the crazy driving).
Consoli audited both Michelson-Morley and Miller. He confirmed that Miller, who reproduced the results of MM performing over 300.000 mechanics. More here
In the last post we discussed how French engineers and naturalists recovered and proved the wave theory of light within an aether. This is not an accident. Using the power and soapbox of the Royal Society Saint Newton of the Light Corpuscle and Gravity in the early 18th century, used his position as President of this body to crush opposition. He imposed the non-science of a ‘vacuum’ with light as billiard ball particles which resembled his view of the universe.
Newton’s models took precedence in all scientific domains. Anyone proposing an aether which annihilated Newton’s maths, or a wave theory of light which destroyed his billiard-ball prototype, was buried and professionally erased.
The modus operandi of using institutional authority to eviscerate dissent was replicated and has been imitated in every society since that time. It is with Newton that ‘Science’ becomes cojoined with ‘the State’. Today to criticise ‘The Science’ is to be a disloyal subject, a wayward Sheeple. In Newton’s reign, to criticise the ‘vacuum’, or ‘light corpuscles’ was to be ‘anti-science’. This might ring familiar to critics of government and ‘The Science’.
From the time of Newton onwards, it has not been uncommon for dissenters to be ‘de-lifed’, many have not only been financially and professionally destroyed, deregistered or censored, but physically attacked and killed. Newton personally sought to erase any physical legacy of his rivals including Robert Hooke, Christian Huygens and Gottfried Leibniz. He built the playbook to silence the malcontents.
We therefore witness a long history of Scientism. Cults which are as religious as ‘The Science’ do not engage in debate, transparency, mercy or tolerance. They don’t suffer heretics.
The proofs for an aether are quite obvious. We can start with taking a walk outside our door in the open air. Allais’ achievement is overwhelming and virtually unknown (see Munier 2010, on the suppression of Allais). It does not comport with Scientism or its underlying philosophy.
Maurice Allais (1911–2010) was a practical French physicist-engineer of the mid-20th century. An independent, critical thinker, Allais the mechanical savant, devised a proof of the aether that the cult of Scientism has never been able to explain away. His skill and capability match those of Georges Sagnac, Dayton Miller, Carl Anderson, Herbert Ives and many others who demonstrated the existence of an aether, practical engineers who are unknown to most PhD’s in Physics.
In 1954 the Nobel laureate and polymath Allais observed that during a solar eclipse his ‘paraconical pendulum’ would change its behaviour. This is important and we will get to why this observation is so paradigm-shattering. The ‘paraconical pendulum’ was a specialized version of the Foucault pendulum in Paris. More here
Saint Newton of the Corpuscles violently insisted that light was a stream of physical ‘bullet-ball’ particles. The theory is wrong (more below), but the most significant part of this story is that Saint Newton used his immense political power as Pope and President of the Royal Society to crush the ‘Wave Theory’ proposed by his rivals, Robert Hooke, and Christiaan Huygens (Shapin, Schaffer, 1985). Why is this important?
By crushing the ‘anti-corpuscularists’, Saint Isaac delayed the understanding of electromagnetism and ‘wave mechanics’ by 150 years. This delayed the creation of modern technology by generations. Thanks Apostle Isaac. In fact, the author would maintain that Saint Isaac permanently destroyed real physical science by denying the aether and using abstract and rather ridiculous geometry to justify his worldviews (heliocentricity, gravity at a distance).
Saint Isaac applied this historically important misdirection through his abuse of political power as President of the elitist, corrupt Royal Society, simply because a ‘particle’ was better aligned to fit his Newtonian-‘billiard ball’-universe better than a medium-based wave. This was a colossal and destructive act that still reverberates.
But of course, you know all of this! State education and the ‘science media’ discuss some criticisms. Or maybe not.
More here
