RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/

Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Back

Scientism - Recent Articles

Gödel’s 'Incompleteness Theory' and why it undermines Relativity and mathematically-based 'science'.

Maths is not science. Equations are out of context, framework-less models, which often cannot be verified and are often syntactically and semantically unproven.

 

 

In 1931 a 25-year-old Austrian mathematician, Kurt Gödel, developed the ‘Incompleteness Theorem’ as he analysed mathematical formulae and their relevancy. The theory is still valid today and has never been refuted, based as it is on simple common sense and demonstrable logic which parametrises the limits of provability in formal axiomatic and mathematical theories.

 

The theory basically states:

Principle 1: in a consistent and formal system named F, within which mathematical operations are carried out, there are statements of the language within F, which can be neither proven nor disproven (unless one uses an outside framework reference, or context, see the simple examples given above) and,

Principle 2: in this formal system named F, we cannot prove that the system itself is consistent, we must assume that it is intern

ally consistent. The internal consistency of the system has a great impact on the mathematical operations but cannot be verified without the use of an external frame of reference.

More here

Relativity's tautological maths, and issues with Mercury's perihelion and Einstein's gravity.

Relativity does not explain nor prove anything. There are many different explanations for the precession of Mercury and Relativity adds an unknown push-source dimension to gravitational force.

 

 

Relativity was ushered into being to explain the thousands of experiments that can find no motion of our planet. In the last post we looked at the error in the tensor calculus maths in Relativity. By itself this disproves the theory and all its many hydra-headed claims.

 

We also discussed the illogical nature of Relativity, both Special and General, given that neither theory can explain heliocentricity, or the thousands of experiments which failed to find the movement of the Earth. This short post has a look at Mercury’s perhelion and gravity and why Relativity is unnecessary in both cases as an explanatory model.  More here

Relativity's maths are circular and in error? Was this deliberate?

Why did Einstein add Riemannian geometry, and invent the space-time dimension, if not to save his equations?


Einstein’s Relativity yields results which are in conflict with the postulates upon which it is based namely:

1. Space time curvature is the basis of General Relativity (a demonstrably false and unproven concept),

2. Physical laws are the same in all frames of reference (equivalency). This is also false (see below) (Bertschinger, 1999).

The above are tautological as summarised below. In order to produce his equivalency through mathematical models only, namely tensor calculus equations, Einstein had to invent the curvature of space time. Logically, this means that his postulates are circular and incorrect. You see this in the maths.

There is at least one significant error in Einsteinian maths which impact the derivations. This error must have been known by Einstotle and those within the discipleship of Relativity. Intelligent undergraduates in physics have no doubt uncovered the error and raised objections, only to be beaten down by dogmatic high priests who demand bended knees and subservience to Relativity.

 

More here