Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
Not a single University or ‘education system’ will teach anything which calls into question the fantasy world of the ‘Big Bang’, ‘Relativity’ or its inevitable, illogical computer generated fraud of ‘Black Holes’. The propaganda promoting Black Holes is limitless, energised by an infinity of funding and confident propagandists on their village soap boxes selling the snake oil.
Saint Stephen who was Hawking this story, spent most of his life extracting money from making up stories about the cosmos and deep dark ‘Black Holes’. Apostle Stephen’s specialisation was ‘entropy in Black Holes’ (woah Steve, slow down, easy on the factual relevancy); only to apostasy near the end of his existence and admit it was all a scam. Thanks Steve. Even the discredited comedian Einstein knew that Black Holes cannot exist. Let’s explain why the Messiah was right (for once!). Round of applause for the Einstotle.
On this substack we have disproven the General Theory of Relativity. This means that the Big Bang is rendered false. We can persist with an elucidation around another misdirection which is also impossible – the ‘Black Hole’. These only exist if General Theory of Relativity is true (it is false); and if matter can be ‘crushed’ into a ‘singularity’ (it can’t). Computer models and arrows against a black backdrop are not ‘science’.
More here
Why the size of the Universe is enormous but not nearly as large as we are told
https://unstabbinated.substack.com/p/video-on-why-the-size-of-the-universe
Problem statement: Why is the universe so large and how big is it really?
Answer: The size is dictated by physics and reality - no other design choice. But how big is it? Good question. Does anyone really know? Who amongst the Scientific elite is God?
Granular details: The physical universe is between 90 Million and 10 Billion light-years (LY) across based on JWST (James Web Space Telescope) and other data. A fraction of what we are told.
Standard Model Bayesian: 30 Trillion LY across
Standard Model FLRW (Friedman, Lemaitre, Robertson, Walker algorithm) metric: 93 Billion LY across
Standard Model JWST evidence: 30 Billion LY across
Resonator Model: 2-10 Billion LY across
Fluid Dynamics, JWST evidence: 93 Million LY across
Our Milky Way: ~200.000 LY
Our Solar System to the Oort Cloud: 1.5-3.2 LY
Note: LY = 5.9~Trillion human miles, still quite a jaunt and this is based on the incorrect constant of light speed. Light speed is variant. It is likely close to infinite in ‘space’ or far greater than the purported 186K per second constant demanded by the Standard Model, disproven many times and discussed at length on this substack. This means that the ‘5.9 Trillion miles’ per LY is quite probably vastly overstated by a 1000x time or more.
You know this because of your own common sense. If I measure light speed in Paris using assumptions and maths this calculation will not hold if I am standing on Pluto or floating out near Alpha Centauri. In both cases the speed of light will be different and the further away from dense high pressure zones and mass you are; the higher the speed.
It has long been understood that the Standard Model, GTR (general theory of Relativity) and FLRW do not comport with reality. But you need to give the Fanboys some time to catch up. Worldviews being shattered and all that. FLRW means the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker algorithm the little wizards use to calculate the speed of the ‘infinitely expanding universe’ based on the magic of ‘Dark Energy’. Just make things up and construct equations. We will deconstruct and demise the FLRW in the next post.
The universe as Einstein originally thought, is not expandin and in violation of Einstein’s philosophy, the universe is not warped and massively curved; it is a mostly flat disc which oscillates. This is what the evidence states. Further, humans do not see ‘all of the cosmos’, we can only observe a part of it. A real phenomena in physics and cosmology is the ‘hall of mirrors’ effect, where the arrangment of the galaxies and stars will produce a hallucination of expansion and recession. A smaller space can well look massive and imply motion away from the observer. Have a stroll through Versailles Hall of Mirrors.
Did you know that in 1920 Einstein admitted that the aether must exist? He admitted that light cannot be transferred in a nothingness. This was the year before he was asked ‘what is the speed of sound’ in Boston by a reporter and had no idea. Einstein’s PhD was in fluid dynamics (sugar molecule decomposition); he fully understood why ‘something’ needs a container for transmission or state change activity involving energy and kinetics.
Even Einstein knew an aether existed. So ask yourself why do the self-annointed scientistic-elite prattle on about a ‘vacuum’? Is it because an aether destroys most of the models used in ‘The Science’ and would eradicate many world-views and force a complete change in philosophical outlook?
Tesla, unlike Einstein, a real scientist and engineer, proved the aether existed and harnessed its energy. Tesla called this ‘free wireless’. The US government - your best friend of course - has his designs and experimental outputs. That should work out well. See 9-11.
Telsa consciously or unconsciously followed the experiments of Benjamin Franklin (1748-1752) and ascribed divine energy and inspiration - the holy spirit - to the aether. He was not wrong. He also rightly described how the aether, within the context of the vastness of our cosmos (though the universe is much smaller than we are led to believe) is a factory for material and element creation.
If we were to make a visual representation of the aether based on classical electrodynamics and physical mechanics, it wouldn’t look like empty space, nor would it look like a collection of billiard-ball particles floating in a vacuum. Instead, it would be depicted as a dense, continuous, elastic dielectric substrate; an energetic plenum rather than a void. Yes you can and do chew on it.
More here