RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/

Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Back

Scientism - Recent Articles

The Aether exists: is it immobile, mobile, a partial or full entrainment?

Aether denialism is negating real science. Doesn't the aether explain much of cosmic phenomena? Aether-denialism due to philosophical worldviews, not science.


Einstein must have known by 1920 that the aether, and the aether drift, had been proven by the Americans Michelson, Morley in 1887; Morley and Miller from 1900-1905; and Miller from 1905-1913 with hundreds of thousands of light interference readings. Einstein took the aether out of science in 1905 with his ‘Special Theory’ of Relativity but as any good magician is wont to do, the great philosopher reinserted the aether into his 1915 ‘General Theory’. Given the aforementioned light experiments and mechancial proofs, he had no choice.

 

This aether ‘resurrection’ (Einstein’s word) was an ‘imponderable’, largely mass-less, pseudo-gaseous entity, not of any great materiality or mobility (see quote above). He used it to explain ‘gravity’ within his 4th dimension of the unproven spacetime merger. This conjuring was of course a philosophical trick, it was not based on experimental evidence.  More here

Einstein, reimagining Maxwell, ignoring physical evidence, denying the Aether

Physical evidence, including magnetism, nullifies Relativity. Einstein never deployed physical experimentation. Everything was a philosophical thought experiment and mathematical sophistry.

 

Fizeau’s water experiment found no movement of the Earth. Neither did the Michelson-Morley effort of 1887. For Einstein, Relativity became an imperative premised on the supposed anomaly he found between Maxwell’s electromagnetism and mechanical motion, namely the lack of the Earth’s mechanical motion.

 

To explain heliocentricity Einstein had to contend with the failures of the Fizeau, Michelson and Airy experiments on the one hand, and with the widely accepted aether and electromagnetic theories and equations of James Clerk Maxwell on the other. After 1887 he had to reinterpret these catastrophic failures to save the Copernican phenomena.

“It is no doubt that Michelson’s experiment was of considerable influence upon my work insofar as it strengthened my conviction concerning the validity of the principle of the Special Theory of Relativity.”2 (March 17, 1942)

The above statement is classic Einstein. He purposefully misinterprets what the Michelson-Morley (MM) experiment actually found and tautologically declares that as supporting proof for his mental gymnastics!   More here

The Michelson-Morley 1887 experiment; their not-null results, the Aether and implications.

Thousands of light experiments negate the mainstream 'science' narrative supporting 'Relativity', 'vacuums' and call into question Copernicanism.

 

1887 was a year of disaster for ‘The Science’ and Copernicans. The most complex light-interference experiment ever tried in history had failed to detect the Earth’s motion through space. The MM experiment was not unique but replicated across more than 300.000 similar experiments.

 

Tell me again the list of experiments Einstein performed to ‘prove’ ‘Relativity’? Oh, there aren’t any? Other than tortured, tautological, complex maths, and incorrect claims of phenomena description, what mechanical proof is there for Relativity?


More here