Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
This post is for any who are interested in the claims by NASA that Artemis II, which will be launched on February 6 2026, (though some sources say February 5th), will do a ‘fly by’ of the Moon. This has been promised every year for a decade. We can play with probability numbers and derive different results but in essence, if we apply ‘success probability’ to historical antecedents and the detailed components within the proposed Artemis II flight, we end up with a statistically insignificant probability of success. NASA’s own study from 2025, confirms this.
This admittedly facile analysis is rarely if ever discussed. No one, and no organisation, will deploy into ‘production’ until they are 99%-100% certain that everything has been tested in a simulation environment which imitates the production environment.
Not so with the space-games apparently. The first time these guys try something in the ‘go live’ environment, end-to-end, it succeeds. NASA has never had a manned journey above 400 miles in altitude. Yet they are going to send 4 ‘astronauts’ on a 500.000 mile journey. Sure if you say so.
In 1971 Shepard was playing golf on the moon and just 3 years later in 1974, NASA demised the most powerful rocket yet created – the Saturn V. 1974 is thereby the true and official end of the Apollo program. This is when the rocketry is retired and supposedly, by the 1990s, the plans and designs are lost or destroyed. The core principles of polymorphism and reuse violated.
But now there is ‘Artemis’, a new rocket, new systems, a new capsule (Orion), new fuel, digital technology and a new flight path. Who cares about Apollo Chud? Old news, older technology. So what if NASA destroyed or lost everything? Irrelevant Chud old boy. Move on to Orion and the Moon-bus.
You are told that light speed invariance in a ‘vacuum’ is 186,000 miles per second. No proof of this claim exists. There is no such thing as invariant light speed in a ‘vacuum’.
Vacuums in space, or in nature simply do not exist.
A vacuum is absolute nothingness. No energy, radiation, rays, particles, waves, light or sound would be transferred. In a true medium-based physics, using proper experimentation, different frequencies will return different speeds. The medium or an aether exists, notwithstanding the howls of the ‘science’ Fanboys.
In the real world, in the real universe, there can be no constancy of a light speed within different media of transmissions. Ascribing to space the concept of ‘nothingness’ to make equations balance and to satisfy philosophical-Copernican requirements is anti-science and a fraud. The aether as a medium of transfer obviously exists.
The only debate, never enjoined, is what is the aether’s impact on the Earth’s translational or rotational velocities, and if such impacts can be mechanically and physically proven, and if so, what does that mean in our understanding of this planet and its position within the solar system and universe at large.
The invariance speed of light (along with the Earth’s translational velocity), was comprehensively destroyed in the 19th century from Arago in 1810, to Airy in 1871. It was further eviscerated by Michelson-Morley from 1887-1923, Sagnac in 1913, Dayton Miller from 1920-1935 and many other physicists in the past 100 years. More here
There are many problems with the ISS (international space station) narrative. The ISS is mostly funded by NASA and has consumed more than U$250 billion in the past 30 years. NASA itself has gorged on some U$ 1.5 Trillion since 1958. The ISS will be flown into the Pacific to die and will be replaced by ‘Axiom’ by 2030.
The word ‘Axiom’ means a self-evident, quite obvious truth such as ‘the government is corrupt’. Axioms are used quite freely by ‘The Science’, including Saint Einstein of the Relativity, ‘If we accept the axiom that my first theory is correct….then logically….my 2nd theory is also a law that we should obey, therefore feel free to prostrate yourself in front of my altar in the Church of the Holy Scientism.’
‘Axiom-The-Self-Evident-space station’ will continue the money-looting and laundering. It will provide another platform for more ‘science’ and space propaganda, designed to acclimate the population to space fantasies (a meander to Mars, a venture to Venus) and to distract them from the Apollo fraud.
Supposedly NASA landed and retrieved 12 men from the moon, more than 50 years ago for a similar amount of funding that the ISS has now consumed. These landings were a deceit of course, but even so, the ISS is a major fail and a useless investment. U$500 billion later, and the best NASA can concoct is a couple of large interconnected tubes in near ‘space’ and scores of faked photos and videos. Nice one.
From probability theory in construction integrity, to outright manipulated and false images, photographs and videos; to 0 G planes and the Johnson Space Centre training pool and its ISS replica; we see a dissonance between the claims of the ISS and reality. The ISS may exist in some form, but what they are telling us does not comport to what we see or intuit, using our common sense. More here
