Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
“There is no such thing as ‘suction’ in the sense of a pulling force created by a vacuum. Fluids are never pulled; they are always pushed by a region of higher pressure into a region of lower pressure.” — David Halliday, Robert Resnick, J. Walker (Fundamentals of Physics, 2013)
“In the free expansion of a gas... the gas expands into a vacuum. This process is inherently irreversible and results in an increase in entropy. The gas will continue to expand until it fills the entire available volume.” — Enrico Fermi (Thermodynamics, 1937, p. 50)
Ever wondered how the glider was invented ? Let me guess. Surely, you say, as part of the Science-cult, Copernicus the confused, Galileo the blowhard self-promoter (who like the Communist Popov invented everything), Apostle Newton, Messiah Einstotle, or the guy in the wheelchair, were the key contributors? Decisive interventions you state. How can any peasant invent a glider unless we apply 21 layers of abstract geometry and have it peer reviewed and approved? Indeed. What a conundrum.
Cayley in Yorkshire England (1849) figured out that the wings of a gliding vehicle must be curved to allow more air over the top of the wing. The pressure system would lift the object, depending on its weight, and allow it to glide. No need for flapping feathers. By analysing seagulls near his house, Cayley devised a practical design for a glider premised on basic physics which he intuited but did not mathematically render. His design was never ‘peer reviewed’. He saw, he designed, he built, he glided.
Cayley formally knew naught about physics, nor mathemagicianism. He was a practical engineer not a wizard. No magic, geometry or tortured tensor equations necessary. Again, back to pressure systems, observations, trials and prototypes. Cayley the engineer realised his paper design, through hard work and innate intelligence over a long period of time. He did not have an -ology degree. He simply understood how systems of pressure operated. Back to the aether which apparently, according to the smartest-people-evah, does not exist.
With Cayley in mind let’s walk over to an everyday appliance named the ‘vacuum cleaner’. They do love their propaganda. A vacuum cleaner is simply an air pump based on pressure dynamics (Halliday et al 2013).
An electric fan inside the machine rapidly blows air out the back. This forces the air pressure inside the machine to drop slightly below the atmospheric pressure of the room.
The higher-pressure air in your living room immediately rushes in through the hose to equalize the pressure, dragging dirt and dust along with it.
It is pure, basic fluid dynamics (Fermi, 1937). Yes air is a type of fluid. There is no magic. No vacuum. No Einstein. No Standard Model. Your cleaner is a mechanical pump, not Einstein’s magic gravitational suctioning (not to be confused with the fraud of gravitational ‘lensing’). More here
Mechanical engineering and real world innovation has nothing to do with ‘The Science’. In fact, in most cases, they are built in defiance of the same. We manufacture shoes, ergo we are ‘The Science’. Right on Fanboy. Your genius is unbounded. Just a gentle information-note, ‘electricity’ was discovered and put into use by aetherists and…oh no…even worse…’men who had faith’. Anything but that.
“Wait, hey you there at the medieval construction site, yes you, stop, hold on, put down the tools. It is 1140 A.D. You idiots are in a dark age; you even believe that male genitalia indicates maleness. Fools. You cannot build this Cathedral to your imaginary friends with an enormous spire, tower, massive columns, pointed arches, vaults, flying buttresses, stained glass windows, using wood, iron, stone masonry and complex engineering and mathematics to render perfect symmetry. You morons. Saints Kepler, Newton, Einstein and Hawking have not yet arrived to enlighten you with ‘science’ and ‘truth’.
How can you possibly innovate without maths, models, peer review and consensus! You don’t even bathe! Stop now, stop I say you deniers of science, you must wait 500 years for the ‘Enlightenment’!”
Who are the morons I wonder? Sorry mi ‘lord, tis only 900 A.D., we cannaught build the bridge, just cannaught, we don’t have ‘the science’ and peer review to do it mi majestick benevolence, beset as we are by flying viruses, whirling planets, terrifying seasoning changening, womenly men, bearded missus’, labour ant specie tis penurious mi grandly greatness… (ashamed, bowing, holding hat in hand)….Yes our age is certainly ‘the age of science’.
Let’s have a walk through the creation of our Solar System and this planet as granted to us the toothless, bent-over vassalised-mass by our superiors from, ‘The Science’.
“Gather round children. Here we have a story explaining our existence, by ‘The Science’. It is fascinating, illuminating and frightening, but magically, it has a happy ending…Get close my lovelies, that’s it, here are your blue blankets, science plushies and warm milk, now listen to the People’s history, the ‘science’ children of how we came to be….
Billions of years ago children, from absolutely nothing, for no reason, and completely unexplained, an egg was built and contained all the material and matter for the universe….this small egg exploded children, yes it erupted little ones, and all matter was ‘created’ by this fantastic creation event. Yes you are right to express surprise and amazement children. Imagine the egg in our refrigerator being so omnipotent children! This little object also possessed magical skill my little ones, a fantastical power, where it could generate space itself, materials and variant light speed during and after the explosion….truly inspiring and multi-talented my little ones….
Then children, after some time, almost 10 billion years in fact, in a lonely stretch of the self-generated, self-forming Milky Way galaxy, our own galaxy children, an unimportant, small, impoverished galaxy on the edge of nowhere….a giant molecular cloud, vast and ageless, drifted silently through space. Think of it children this cloud, alone, without direction and purpose, just drifting….how terribly depressing children…then….
As this insignificant cloud travelled it ingested swirling hydrogen gas and glittering cosmic dust. Gentle turbulence, magnetic fields, and internal pressure, all derived from an original nothingness, all created by an eternal nothingness, held the cloud together children. This cloud fought children, yes it fought, quietly and desperately, resisting the pull of gravity, a force generated by an unknown factor, contrived by other unknown powers but one capable of the most extraordinary feats of strength….Yes you are right to be afraid and tense for it was a monumental battle children, indeed a frightening and uncertain time, the balances of natural law, forces emanating from nothing and still ‘evolving’ arrayed, in combat, all was flux…..but then….
A cataclysmic moment arrived children when a nearby star reached its end of life. Yes children, over endless time a star had formed, manufactured from these same terrific forces created by nothing, it passed through life children, all the stages and as our cosmic cloud travelled nearby, this star, sadly, suddenly, died…Yes you are right to have sad faces and look down, no children it was not killed by a non-existing virus but died in a staggering, translucent blinding flash. As this poor, innocent star died children, an ancient George Floyd, yes, yes you are right to wail children, the material irrupted and within an instant it became a ‘supernova’, the iron core collapsed before exploding with incomprehensible ferocity. A violent shockwave raced across the darkness, slamming into the newly forming giant gas-dust cloud……it was frightening children, beyond our ken, a terrifying collision, but then it becomes even more distressing…..More here
“The best explanation for the Moon is observational error—the Moon does not exist.” — Irwin Shapiro (Former Director of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics).
“The isotopic similarities between the Earth and the Moon have thrown the giant impact hypothesis into a crisis... The standard giant impact model cannot easily explain this isotopic likeness.” — H. Jay Melosh (Distinguished Professor of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, 2014 Royal Society publication)
Shapiro was making a famous, cynical joke among astrophysicists, but it highlights the poverty of the propaganda.
The mathematical and dynamic parameters required for the Moon to exist where it does, at the size it is, necessary for life on this planet, are statistically so improbable that it is mathematically easier to assume the Lunar node does not exist, than to try to explain how it was formed from the standard gravitational model.
You remember Newton’s God called ‘Gravity’. It assembles, it forms, it attracts, it repels, it explodes, it implodes, it organises, it disorganises, it aggregates, it destroys, it manufactures life but also scary singularities like Black Holes; and it keeps the lid on our atmosphere even as you use a $50 Walmart air pump (‘vacuum cleaner’) and clean your carpets overcoming this holy spirit of a force. Just the mere thought of this divine being brings you to your knees in supplication and mumbling. Don’t forget to transmute iron into gold.
The second quote above describes a very specific disproof of astrophysics’ explanation of Moon formation. They can’t avoid the obvious. Chemical fingerprints do not lie. But the ‘Standard Model’ does lie and if can’t outwardly lie, it will tie you up in layers of mathematical knots that can never be unravelled. Easier and more fun to chew off your right arm.
Here is the issue:
The Standard Model (SM) cannot explain the ‘Moon’. The SM cannot explain the Moon’s existence, creation, materiality, its precise distance from this planet, its lack of rotation, why it is pinned to the Earth, and the SM will never discuss its impact on the aetheric flows of energy and pressure within space, which impact this planet (see Allais). Other than that, the SM is ‘expert’ on all things Lunar - especially ‘landings’.
We discussed previously why the Moon has almost no impact on tidal flows and why the SM (as usual) is completely wrong on ascribing the complicated ‘heaving’ and ‘lifting’ of 370.000 Gigatonnes of water globally every day within large basins in patterns which have nothing to do with the Moon’s precession, to an orb 1/81 the mass of this planet. More here
