Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
The micro-world of atoms and particles is still a recent discovery when viewed historically. The electron was discovered in 1897 by J. J. Thomson; the proton in 1911 by Rutherford, Wein, et al., the neutron in 1932 by James Chadwick, and the positron was first theoretically identified in 1928 by Paul Dirac.
The American physicist Anderson (1905- 1991) confirmed Dirac’s anti-matter (positron) theory. In 1927, Anderson had begun studying X-ray photoelectrons (electrons ejected from atoms by interaction with high-energy photons). In 1932, Anderson experimentally confirmed the existence of the anti-matter positron. More here
Reality does exist. In the real world anti-matter or the lack of it, is one of the great puzzles for ‘The Science’. Pace the Big Bang and Relativity, the universe should be suffused in anti-matter. It isn’t. Most of what we see is simply matter. But given the supposed cosmic egg ‘explosion’ (billions, trillions, brazilians of years ago etc), this can’t be right. We must have anti-matter just based on the laws of probability alone.
Paul Dirac had predicted the discovery of the positron, or anti-matter, in 1928. Dirac’s famous equation predicted that the entire universe was composed of electron-positron pairs, or as they are now termed ‘electropons’. Positrons would fill a gap in the scientific understanding of how matter and anti-matter are created. More here
Einstein must have known by 1920 that the aether, and the aether drift, had been proven by the Americans Michelson, Morley in 1887; Morley and Miller from 1900-1905; and Miller from 1905-1913 with hundreds of thousands of light interference readings. Einstein took the aether out of science in 1905 with his ‘Special Theory’ of Relativity but as any good magician is wont to do, the great philosopher reinserted the aether into his 1915 ‘General Theory’. Given the aforementioned light experiments and mechancial proofs, he had no choice.
This aether ‘resurrection’ (Einstein’s word) was an ‘imponderable’, largely mass-less, pseudo-gaseous entity, not of any great materiality or mobility (see quote above). He used it to explain ‘gravity’ within his 4th dimension of the unproven spacetime merger. This conjuring was of course a philosophical trick, it was not based on experimental evidence. More here
Fizeau’s water experiment found no movement of the Earth. Neither did the Michelson-Morley effort of 1887. For Einstein, Relativity became an imperative premised on the supposed anomaly he found between Maxwell’s electromagnetism and mechanical motion, namely the lack of the Earth’s mechanical motion.
To explain heliocentricity Einstein had to contend with the failures of the Fizeau, Michelson and Airy experiments on the one hand, and with the widely accepted aether and electromagnetic theories and equations of James Clerk Maxwell on the other. After 1887 he had to reinterpret these catastrophic failures to save the Copernican phenomena.
“It is no doubt that Michelson’s experiment was of considerable influence upon my work insofar as it strengthened my conviction concerning the validity of the principle of the Special Theory of Relativity.”2 (March 17, 1942)
The above statement is classic Einstein. He purposefully misinterprets what the Michelson-Morley (MM) experiment actually found and tautologically declares that as supporting proof for his mental gymnastics! More here
1887 was a year of disaster for ‘The Science’ and Copernicans. The most complex light-interference experiment ever tried in history had failed to detect the Earth’s motion through space. The MM experiment was not unique but replicated across more than 300.000 similar experiments.
Tell me again the list of experiments Einstein performed to ‘prove’ ‘Relativity’? Oh, there aren’t any? Other than tortured, tautological, complex maths, and incorrect claims of phenomena description, what mechanical proof is there for Relativity?
More here
In Relativity, space and time are merged. As given above it is false. Many posts have outlined why space-time is fiction, and why dozens of scientists and physicists do not agree with this postulate. Scientific objections to ‘spacetime’ date back to pre-World War I. This post addresses the incorrect technical aspects of Special Theory of Relativity (STR) and time and space.
Space and time were merged to allow Einstein and Relativists the opportunity to explain away the lack of evidence for the Earth’s mobility, and the reality that interferometer experiments had detected the aether. Space and time must be merged within Relativity to allow for the distribution of energy, the creation of inertia and gravitational fields in space. It is not that anything was proven. It was that the maths required a 4th dimension to impose Relativistic velocity and calculations. Any sentient human understands that we live in 3 dimensions.
Herbert Ives an American physicist and engineer, in the 1930s disproved, through hands-on experimentation, the key postulates of Relativity. Ives disproved the invariant speed of light, and proved the existence of the aether. Needless to say, ‘The Science’, so heavily invested in Einstotle’s magical world of make-believe, was uninterested. Turner and Callaghan’s volume preserves Ives’ papers, experiments and conclusions. They are incontrovertibly valid.
Ives was not alone in disproving Relativity in the 1930s. During the 1920s and 30s, the great and unknown American physicist Dayton Miller, over 20 years, eviscerated Einstein’s theories with some 200.000 inteferometer experiments, which validated the Michelson-Morley results of 1887. These men, along with Sagnac, Gale, Anderson, Dirac, Airy, Lodge amongst many others this substack has discussed, are rarely if ever taught. If they are mentioned, ‘The Science’ will mendaciously state that their efforts support Relativity! This is a lie. They disprove Einstotle’s philosophical maths.