Gab@StFerdinandIII - https://unstabbinated.substack.com/
Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
In 1972 42 top European and American ‘scientists’ wrote a hysterical letter to President Nixon outlining the catastrophe to food and water from Globaloney Cooling and the new ice age - a consensus prediction. The letter states that a ‘global deterioration of climate…larger than any hitherto experienced by civilised mankind… may be due very soon.’ They cite lower food production, more rain in Central Aisa and Eastern Europe and more extreme weather due to natural causes which caused the last Ice Age (no one really knows why the last Ice Age occurred). None of those predictions came true. There were even demands for the Americans to set off nuclear bombs in the Arctic to save the world from GlobaloneyCooling.
50 years later the same language is used regarding extreme weather, lower food production and how the ‘warming’ of 1.5 C will cause migrations and wars. But this time it is a man-made disaster, if one views a tepid 1.5 C or less temperature increase as a ‘disaster’ and even that increase is unlikely given that many regions are colder than they were 120 years ago.
But no worries the EU Reich is going to save us. Geoengineering to the rescue.
https://www.rt.com/news/578817-eu-blocking-out-sun-bloomberg/
The European Union is joining an international scheme to investigate whether major interventions in the Earth's natural processes, including deflecting some of the Sun's rays, can help mitigate climate change, Bloomberg reported on Monday.
The agency cited a draft document that might be made public later this week, aimed at assessing the consequences of global warming on water and food scarcity, and the risks of them triggering new conflicts or mass migration waves.
The paper will also feature plans to study atmospheric re-engineering technologies and the dangers associated with them.
Such projects could range from reflecting a certain percentage of sunlight back into space to altering weather patterns, Bloomberg noted. The EU is seeking international discussions on the schemes and the potential to set down rules for this field.
So in 50 years we went from natural causation to man-only or anthropogenic causation all due to ‘fossil fuels’ which don’t exist but are in reality hydrogen-carbon energy, abiotic, self-generating, but when burned apparently produce ‘carbon emissions’. The entire premise of this cult is plainly stupid but that is where we are in our anti-reality world.
Supposedly, the ‘science’ claims that the only variable which controls climate is the man-made production of Co2. Co2 is a 4 parts per million gas by weight in the atmosphere, and pales in comparison to nitrogen, water or oxygen in the atmosphere. Humans emit maybe 5% of the total. So the ‘science’ is saying that 0.05 (5%) x 0.000004 (4 parts per million) is the end of the world. Gaia’s 95% emission of Co2 is okay and to be ignored. It is the ‘radiative heat’ of the human-only emissions which matters.
Globaloneywarming is not an issue. The Earth might be cooling not warming, no one really knows. In any event it is a non-issue. If it is warming naturally, it is a very limited amount of warming which has no impact on Gaia - except the benefices of more oxygen, plant growth and food. Real science would advocate ‘warming’ if pace above, the concern is with ‘water and food scarcity’. But that is not the EU Reich’s goal. It is to control water, food and the weather. It is to impose self-created emergencies on its population to force changes in behaviour including the loss of hydrocarbon energy, the use of digital IDs to track hydrocarbaon usage and compliance to laws, and the tool of lockdowns and passports to limit travel, consumption and other ‘climate changing’ activities. Climate Change and Globaloneywarming are frauds with a purpose.
As with the quackcine, stabbination industry, there is zero science in the cult of climate and a lot of stupid and evil.
$cientism. Chemtrails are well known to have existed since the 1950s. Kill Gates and others while rubbing their ample stomachs have opined on managing the weather - after all they are Gods in their own minds. The WEF mentions the same in their ridiculous books Covid 19 The Great Reset and the 4th Industrial Revolution.
Geoengineering is another attack on normal people. When they start playing with the Sun, they will destroy plant, food, animal life and complex cycles which create water, carbon and other vital chemicals. They will create crises and of course use the same solutions we saw used during the Corona scamdemic.
No-Pride month drags on. Demon month is a better name. A display of perverts, drug addicts, porn addicts, child porn manufacturers and imbibers, naked men showing genitalia to children, an act which contravenes any number of laws, and endless propaganda in the classroom where ‘teachers’ subject innocent children to non-science, gender dysphoria, self-identification of gender, or in the case of a UK Catholic trust school, a teacher screaming at 2 brave girls who objected to a 13 year old’s choice that she is a cat. Yes that is how stupid ‘Western civilisation’ has become. A girl can be a cat, taught by a tax paid ‘teacher’ who should not be allowed near a school.
Nudity in 2023 Toronto Canada, no pride pervert parade. Men walking around naked shaking it in front of children. Idiot parents clapping with children beside them. Sick, stupid, demented.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1673112469072654342
The science of biology is simple: there are only 2 genders, based on x and y chromosomes, DNA, mitochondria and associated functionality and body structures. The rest are mental illnesses. Queers and Tranny’s suffer from a long list of behavioral, psychological, social, mental and even economic afflictions. Rampant drug and pornography usage is one example. Many were abused as children. Others who join may do so to ‘belong somewhere’, feel a part of a group, or crave acceptance given that in ‘normal’ society they are failures. Child abuse and child porn are legion (some 50% of child porn comes from the Queer cult). In short, there is little to be ‘proud’ about in this group and the real world attributes of this cult certainly does not justify a month long orgy of propaganda, freek shows, evil and stupid. All of it paid by and supported by big government and their big corporate partners.
(https://www.retreatbehavioralhealth.com/blog/lgbtq-mental-health/)
(Drag queens, June 24th 2023 show in NSW Australia, no mental illness here….)
There are 3 key reasons the Queer-Tranny mental illness is being mainstreamed as ‘science’.
1-Deconstruction of Christianity and the family. Cultural Marxists and Communists have always identified the Christian Church as the key enemy. The Bible rightly condemns sexual dysfunction and immorality including men pretending to be girls. Christianity is premised on Adam coupling with Eve, a heterosexual family, faith and reason including defending normalcy and God’s biological design.
For Marxists and Globalists a gender confused society would obviously mean an end to families, the severing of the link with Adam and Eve and hence the Bible, and the promotion that biological sexuality and reality is subjective and is a continuum of choice. The ‘state’ would take care of children - a remark often made by criminals such as Clinton or Biden. The entire ethos of Christianity is being deracinated, cut off at the roots, with the heteronormal family raised by a mother and father under a full throated pagan attack.
2-Transhumanism and the ’Evolution’ or the ‘evolving’ of the human into a sexless automaton or cyborg. In this world people are bred, there is no need for a family, children, love or heteronormity. This is always sold as ‘science’ or ‘progress’. It is neither. The WEF, UN and the Davos ruling elite constantly push this theme.
3-Money and power. Most people do not understand that the criminal Pharmaceutical industry owns entire governments and governing institutions. The Queer-Tranny cult is big business for pharma and by extension their partners in government. Given that most governments are anti-Christian, pagan and saturated with secular evil, it is not a surprise that the ‘corporatism’ or alliance of big business and big government is firmly invested in ending the normal family, profting from endless drug revenues and creating a society of atomised avatars, which are much easier to control and confuse.
(crowd in 18th century London, watching Quack Doctors perform on stage with their magic merlin potions)
Fun Fact and inconvenient smallpox mortality truth: death rates went up after the smallpox quackcines were forced onto the population, sound familiar?
If you want to explode most people’s heads and induce mental anguish just raise sceptical claims about any of 4 major strands or tenets within the Religion of ‘The Science’ or $cientism, namely Darwinism, Climate, the moon ‘landings’, and Stabbinations including, but not limited to the Rona mRNA injections. If you really want people to explode in anger, mention the quackery of the original smallpox stab-fraud.
The smallpox stab-fraud is important because it elevated medical ‘science’ to the holy chair of ex-cathedra divinity, unassailable with all future stab-concoctions referring to the revelation of the Holy Smallpox elixir as proof of their relationship with the divine and unreproachable. The myth is that the stabs, indeed all stabbinations, have saved millions and reduced mortality. No evidence supports the myth. If one views just the smallpox debacle there are countless observations from normal people and 19th doctors with a conscience which contradict the myth, in which it is obvious that the medical interventions made smallpox mortality worse. It is all a lie.
The Religion of the Vaxxed and Quacked is deeply held by most ‘adults’, who profess to venerate ‘science’ and want to ‘protect the children’, though such attitudes are largely absent when Queer-Tranny-and mental illness perversions and mutilations are offered to the innocents. The professing of child safety also goes missing when children die, contract autism, encephaly, nervous disorders or unhealthy and poorly functioning immune systems, post the endless jabs by the criminal pharma-government-military industrial complex. Suddenly most of these ‘concerned’ parents who fall to their knees and whimper in veneration at the word ‘science’, are nowhere to be found. In fact the geniuses will defend the quackery by saying that their autistic child would have been so much worse off without the injections….
The quackcines are simply one of the greatest marketing lies in history. A criminal industry has convinced you that without stabbing your 2-year-old 20-70 times over his/her/its lifetime, they will die from smallpox, cholera, influenza, or whatever bullshitpox they can make up.
For 300 years starting with ‘incoluations’ in the early 1700s, the sheeple have been told that smallpox is a contagious, virulent, and deadly virus, killing millions world-wide in indiscriminate slaughter. Only in 1796, did Saint Jenner a ‘scientist’ concoct the lifesaving admixture, and become the divinely appointed Apostle of the Stabs. In this myth the country quack saved us from certain death with his magic Merlin potion of cowpus and cowpox. Jenner was not a scientist or immunologist. He was a quack looking to make money. We just experienced the same phenomena with the Rona quackcines. Like the Corona mRNA darts, Jenner’s poisons and propaganda was funded by the British government.
The actual death from smallpox in the 17th - 19th centuries was less than 1 per 1000 and usually far below that. Smallpox eradication had nothing to do with the jags, after which the death rates from either the disease or the jabbinations went up, in some decades even doubling. Regardless, a 0.4% average death rate is not a pandemic. Yes, smallpox was a serious issue, but it was not a world in which most children would die from smallpox or cowpox. That is simply a lie. As worker ghettoes were built and expanded to support the sweatshops of fast-industrialising Britain, so too did infectious disease spread through the filth and inhumane living conditions of the working poor.
The locus for smallpox was in the urban slums. The construction of London’s sewers, which began in 1766, was completed by the mid-1860s, and sanitation and health throughout the country continued to improve with the introduction of the Public Health Act in 1875, which laid out detailed plans for more effective drainage, clearance of waste and rubbish, and regular maintenance of sewers. Sanitation not quackery ‘saved the children’. More here
Data fraud is a central tenet of $cientism. Blind the masses with ‘science’. Corrupt data sources to present a narrative. Don’t allow audits or access to the source data (Globaloney-warming, Evolution, and other religions are famous for this). Hide the declines, inclines or any data which challenges or worse disproves the narrative. The smallpox quackcination story is no different.
Was smallpox as ‘destructive’ as we are told? Was it the raging malady, which would kill 30, 40, 50% of children? Or was the actual death rate like the modern flu, less than 1% even for those most at risk? Was the actual smallpox death rate far less than 1 in 1000? And if it was, why is that an ‘epidemic’? What does that word even mean? Or is ‘epidemic’ used to frighten, cajole, inject and profit? Smallpox affected mostly slums and areas of poverty reeking with filth and unclean water. That might have been a clue about how to stop the disease.
Most of the data sources related to smallpox mortality from the 19th century, with those wonderful and quite fraudulent graphs showing a marked decline as soon as Jenner rolled out his profitable cowpus injection beginning in 1796, emanate from one single source: Edwardes (1902) A concise history of small-pox and vaccination in Europe. H.K. Lewis. Available online here.
All online artefacts (world in data etc) and school textbooks will have their nicely coloured graphs using this source and only this source. It is curious that one source controls them all, yet few bother to read this source and critique it.
If you read through Edwardes’ book, there is no proof whatsoever that the data from 1796 to 1838 is accurate (more on this in another post). In fact, the sources used in most cases cannot be verified and the claims made using that data would fail a statistical analysis. Yet this book is the foundation for everything you have been taught about smallpox and how the stabbination reduced mortality! An example is below. But let’s assume Edwardes’ data is valid. If we simply accept Edwardes’ analysis, we see that the UK government’s shrill and livid pronoucements of vaccine efficacy, based on their very own data, which are trumpeted ad infinitum from 1820 onwards, are false, misleading, mendacious and absurd.
https://ourworldindata.org/smallpox The sources at the end list Edwardes as the reference material for the 19th century. By 1840 ~80% of the UK population has been stabbed yet epidemics occur in the 1840s, 1850s, 1870s and into the 20th century.
The first country to stab for smallpox was England, starting in 1796, with quackcines made mandatory in 1853, though regulations and laws before 1853 (example 1840 given below) were in place to force parents to quackcinate their new-borns. There is little proof that the smallpox quackcines resulted in decreased mortality, indeed it appears the mortality rate actually increased.
Sanitation projects and slum clearances starting in the 1840s had a far greater role in disease reduction, than cowpus injections. Epidemics still raged post 1838. The quacked died as well as the unquacked. Many variables would have been in play, none of them acknowledged by the vaccine religious. The actual death rate from smallpox was small in any event, never more than 1/1000 or 0.1% and often 0.02% or below. This was true before 1838 as it was after. Why is a death rate of 0.1% an epidemic?
Before his ascension to Vaxx-heaven in 1823, Jenner was inundated with complaints about death and injury from the cowpus injection or ‘lymph’ node juice and intervention into a human shoulder. Jenner lamented the problems, but his professionalism was so crude and impoverished that he cared little about data which contradicted his milk-maid fantasy that cowpus or cowpox prevented smallpox. Jenner never did post stab analysis with control groups or over a longer period of time. The UK government was never interested in adding up the dead and injured post cowpox intervention.
Jenner had no idea about immunology and could not fathom that injecting festering cow pus or lymph liquid from an infected cow might cause injury and harm in the recipient. There is no proof that either Jenner or his government enablers cared much about accurate and auditable record keeping. Any death or injury post-stabbination was ignored, a lie imitated by the Corona-jab cult. They were good at ‘cherry picking’ their cases, as the Corona Vaxx cult would imitate some 200 years later.
In 1818 Thomas Brown a Scottish doctor, a vaxx-religious and surgeon with 30 years of experience, described how no one in the medical profession “could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice.” But after vaccinating 1,200 people and discovering that many still contracted and even died from smallpox, he wrote the following to a journal as a warning and mea-maxima-culpa.
Experience has also shewn [shown], that the natural smallpox have made their appearance, when the vaccine puncture had previously existed, surrounded with the areola of the most perfect appearance for more than two days, and not in the least modified, but in the highest degree confluent, and followed by death. Smallpox pustules, too, existed within the very areola of the vaccine puncture… The accounts from all quarters of the world, wherever vaccination has been introduced… the cases of failures are now increased to an alarming proportion; and from a fair and impartial examination appears, where the smallpox contagion has access to operate upon vaccinated cases of upwards of six years standing, and the contagion applied in a concentrated and lasting form, nearly the whole of such cases will yield to the influence of the smallpox contagion.
Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, “On the Present State of Vaccination,” The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. 15, 1819, p67.
As with Corona, the dead and injured from smallpox injections were ignored by the establishment and those making money from the predation.
According to the UK Government figures in 1820, 85.000 children were ‘inoculated’ or stabbinated with Jenner’s cocktail of cowpus or lymph node-based injections. By 1821 the vaccination-cult was in full roar over its benefits – mostly because there was government income to be obtained, some £2 million p.a. in today’s money, rising to £10 million by the mid-1820s. An example of the propaganda is below. More here
The Corona Stabbination program has much in common with Jenner’s 1796-1823 (when he ascended to Vaxx-heaven) program for smallpox. The original smallpox quackcine by the country quack and hack Jenner had enormous death and injury associated with it, did nothing to stop 19th and early 20th century smallpox epidemics, and was built on 1-fraudulent data (no experimentation worthy of science, no control groups, no variable controls, no long term studies, poor record keeping, false declamations of efficacy, disavowal of death and injury, always a scariant or sthg else to blame….) and 2-massive government investment. By the time of Jenner’s death in 1823, the UK government had invested £30K with Jenner, or roughly £3.6 million in today’s money and £10 mn annually after 1823. Quacks and clinics were paid to Stabbinate. Once invested the politicians and government were never going to admit failure, or death and injury from the stabs. Same story with the Rona stabbulations. Simply put - a criminal industry, one for profits, not for health.
It was clear even during the time of Saint Jenner, that the Smallpox stabbination was unsafe, and ineffective, the same as the Corona mRNA interventions designed for profit and perhaps gene therapy depending on your viewpoint. Just before he died Saint Jenner the Holy Apostle of the Vaccination religion lamented that he was beset with nothing but perplexity and problems. He was immersed in responding to endless letters and complaints of death, injury and insalubrious outcomes. The quack had failed, it would take historical rewriting to raise him to Sainthood as the deliverer of mankind, the Prometheus of medical ‘science’.
Smallpox epidemics raged long after Saint Jenner’s ascension to Vaccine-heaven in 1823 (See the graphs at the end). A fact that ‘the science’ of stabbinations cannot explain, given that 80% of the population was stabbed by 1855, thanks to the law mandating the smallpox vaccine in 1852. Yet a catastrophic national smallpox epidemic ensued in 1871-72, followed by another in 1901. How could this occur if the cocktails were safe and effective? As with the Corona stabs, the vaxx-zealots had plenty of excuses why the safe and effectives were largely useless (but it would have been so much worse in 1901 if everyone was not stabbed….)
(Morning Leader - Wednesday 25 September 1901)
During and after Jenner’s life many doctors, journals, and newspapers trumpeted the failure of cowpus, or cowpox, to prevent smallpox. It was common knowledge amongst cow doctors that Jenner’s quackcine premised on this non-existent relationship was a sham. Jenner’s milk-maid induced fantasy, which offends basic science, but which most importantly had attracted some £130.000 by 1825 in UK government funding, is yet another example of state mismanagement and mis-investment. Once invested in the idea of ‘safe and effective’ drugs, the English government had no intention of admitting failure or fraud. Hence a criminal industry was born. Does this sound familiar in the era of Corona fascism and totalitarianism with the government and the drug industry’s relentless ‘safe and effective’ drug propaganda, combined with ‘jab or forfeit your job and life’ (but you are not being coerced)?
(Dundee Advertiser - Tuesday 25 July 1899. In 1896, 190 cases of smallpox reported in Dundee as an example, 116 had been stabbed. Between 1870 and 1884, 1306 cases of smallpox in stabbinated children resulted in 137 deaths or 10%.)
More here
After the massive failure of the smallpox quackcines in the 1871-72 epidemic, most people viewed Jenner and the cowpus, cowpox derived potions built in his name as quackery. There are 2 statistical points which highlight the truism that the smallpox vaccine did nothing except accrue profits and power for the medical establishment, druggists and government:
1-The smallpox death rate for children was no more than 1 % before and after the quackery of Jenner. In fact, the death rate from smallpox was in many years much higher post stabbinations than in years without forced and paid for injections. See here
2-Jenner was not a scientist, did not perform replicable experiments and never kept detailed records of his potions, injections or after-effects. He denied any culpability in injuries or deaths post-injection. In fact his career was full of deceit and guile. He bought his medical certificates, he never studied immunology, or virology. See here
Walter Hadwen wrote a book about the Quack Edward Jenner, ‘The Case Against Vaccination’. It is worth reading. Below are excerpts he wrote to a newspaper in 1898, which reflected the hated ‘anti-vaxxers’ facts on vaccination affirmed by a majority of the population at the time who could see the quackery for the fraud it most assuredly was. Hadwen makes 9 vital points you won’t read online, in museums, books or puff-opinion pieces on Saint Jenner, the ‘great man’. He was not great. He was just another quack, a snake-oil salesman, so common and prevalent in the 19th century. A social plague. A man who wanted to make money, to resolve in his own words his own poor pecuniary position.
Jenner never studied medicine - he bought his degrees.
o He knew nothing about the immune system, immunology, or virology. Not a single source can be identified, written by Saint Jenner, which proves he knew anything about this domain.
o His methods were never proven, never peer reviewed, never replicated to be efficacious.
o He lied about outcomes, results and benefits.
o Government invested £30.000 in total in his vaccine process. This immediately forced the UK government to become partners, enforcers and propagandists for the quackcine.
o The government investment quickly grew to $100.000 p.a. an enormous sum in the early to mid 19th century which continued to grow every year (by contrast the total money spent from 1845-1852 on Irish famine relief was a paltry £8 million or 10 x that of the vaccine program for another government created tragedy and what could be called genocide). Government was now the main beneficiary of Jenner’s quackery.
o Jenner complained of being impecunious and needing money. The quackcines were the surest path for his own wealth creation. Surely this motivation needs some more investigation. He was no poor, monkish, saint working to save the children.
o He lied to the Royal College of Physicians on more than 1 occasion, about the nature of cowpox, different types of cowpox, how or why cowpox prevented smallpox and why horse-hoof grease which he called an elixir of life could be used in quackcination (he was forced to retract this claim).
o He never kept detailed records, information or recorded what happened to injected subjects. No long term studies. No control groups. He denied any connection between his ‘discovery’ and the deaths and injuries suffered by tens of thousands of young children.
North East Lanark Gazette, December 31 1898
More here
Part 1 which shows that there is no correlation between smallpox ‘vaccines’ and reduced mortality is here.
The religion of the Vaxx is largely based on the reduction of smallpox from epidemic scourge to an affliction less severe than chicken pox. The manufactured and marketed myth of an injection being ‘safe and effective’ against a virus, was formed during the early 19th century – an era famed for quacks, charlatans and frauds. One of its greatest quacks and snake-oil salesman, and the creator of injections against infectious disease, was the country doctor Sir Edward Jenner, the Holy Apostle of the Vaccination Church. Sir Edward has statues and honours aplenty testifying to his sainthood and the revelatory miracles of his magic cow-pus cocktail used against smallpox.
Online, in books, in ‘documentaries’ and in ‘medical’ journals, Saint Edward Jenner of Gloucestershire is always hailed as a ‘scientist’, an innovator and indeed, the saviour of tens of millions of lives. You cannot find anything negative about him online. Jenner is holier than Christ. Jenner’s ‘vaccination’ remedy in mythological and religious lore, saved everyone in the 19th century from the smallpox virus and certain death. In actual fact the death rate from smallpox in 1800, was 0.3% or the same as the modern flu.
The vaccine liturgy is so strong that in every state in the world, all babies and young children must be stabbinated with the smallpox-concoction which is part of a stable of between 20-70 stabbinations for the new-born and young. In many districts, children cannot attend school without the jab, and in some jurisdictions, the parents will be threatened by the police for child abuse and labelled ‘anti-vaxxers’. The reality is that health and sanitation improvements, begun in earnest in 1842 in England, and repeated worldwide, including water sanitation, city clean up, sewage removal, air quality improvement, hovel and ghetto reformation, along with improved diets, living standards, clothing and shelter, carried forward into the 20th century, ended smallpox and most contagious diseases.
There is plenty wrong with the Jenner myth and ‘accepted wisdom’. For starters he knew nothing about immunology or virology, objections made today by ‘the science’ against any who oppose stabbinations. It is ironic that such allegations directed at ‘anti-vaxxers’ questioning their qualifications are not levelled against Jenner.
In 1796 Jenner injected his first victim a boy called James Phipps age 8. Jenner’s ‘science’ was extremely bizarre. Jenner took what he believed was cowpox from a milkmaid’s calloused cow-milking hand, and injected Phipps with the material. He then exposed the boy to smallpox. When Phipps did not contract the disease, he declared that cowpox vaccination was responsible. Based on this one sample, Jenner declaimed that one cowpox jab provided lifelong immunity against smallpox, later revised down to 3 years, and then 1 year. The entire episode is an experiment which defies common sense. Some problems:
· The injection of an innocent like Phipps was unethical, and there is no proof that Phipps or his parents give informed consent.
· A sample size of one is unscientific.
· Where is the control group and comparison?
· Length of time Phipps was observed is not related?
· Was the milkmaid’s callouses from cowpox or something else?
· Did Phipps have prior exposure to smallpox and thus immunity?
Phipps later died in 1853 age 65. It is unclear if Jenner stabbed all his son’s or just the eldest. Again, there is a paucity of professional recording keeping and experimental control by Jenner. Jenner never admitted to complications, issues or deaths from his experimental concoctions.
Phipps was Jenner’s only real experiment on cowpox and due to the anecdotal nature of his experiments, Jenner could arrive at whatever conclusion would suit his predetermined outcome. We would call this ‘Scientism’. As one critic noted:
The only real experiment in the paper on cowpox, as originally offered to the Royal Society, was the inoculation of James Phipps; the results of it, as we have seen, were recorded with a brevity which enabled Jenner to suppress the true and suggest the false. It is absurd to claim the dozen old cases of cowpoxed milkers, who were subsequently inoculated with smallpox, as experiments; there were many cowpoxed milkers… who submitted to inoculation along with others, whenever a general inoculation was afoot; and Jenner's cases were only a few, favourable to his contention… he himself stands for the man who “peremptorily decides on the truth or falsehood of a theory, on the supposed authority of a few solitary instances.”
Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, p. 59.
More here
In 2016 a group of academics published a book entitled ‘Scientism: The New Orthodoxy”, edited by Richard Williams a professor of psychology at Brigham Young University, and Daniel Robinson a fellow in philosophy at Oxford. How prescient in an era of monstrously fake science including Corona, the Climate, Transgenderism and other illiteracies, cults, and totalitarian theologies. The book is worth reading if anyone is interested in understanding the crucial differences between Scientism, which many of us would define as a ‘religion of Science’, as opposed to real scientific inquiry. It is refreshing to see some academics pushing back against the imposition of Globalism, or the ‘military-industrial’ complex mentioned by Eisenhower, which is the takeover by the state, of inquiry, education, information, philosophy, culture and material investigations. Scientism as a metaphysical exercise comes right out of the ‘Enlightenment’ and the deracination of the past including culture, history and tradition.
The cult or religion of Scientism is a metaphysical and philosophical program. The intent is to capture all of humanity’s endeavours within its unitarian, uniformitarian, and quite totalitarian construct. All human experiences, whether in ‘hard science’ or ‘material’ matters, or in softer-metaphysical and immaterial realms, will be managed by ‘The Science’. Scientism is thus like spilled water; it knows no natural boundaries. There is a chapter for example by philosopher Roger Scruton which appropriately analyses the corruption of the humanities and ‘social sciences’ by this cult of Scientism, including history, archaeology, art and even music.
Scientism is a frontal assault on every aspect of material and immaterial existence. Daily we are now told that women don’t exist, the family unit is right wing fascism, an increase in plant food means the end of the world, a virus mandates poisoned injections, time is endless and unchanging, the shrew became you, and only ‘government’ can discern and spread truth and real ‘information’. ‘Follow The Science’ demands the cult and religion of Scientism.
So, what is Scientism according to this book? First and quite obviously it is clear that criticising Scientism is not itself a critique or a disavowal of real science. The two concepts have little in common. In essence Scientism is the corruption and bastardisation of real science.
‘Rather, it (Scientism) attempts to hijack science to support metaphysical commitments in which science has no particular interest, and to which it owes no particular debt.’
‘The point is that scientism entails a metaphysical commitment to naturalist reductive, or emergent materialism and tries to define science in a way that includes not only a commitment to empirical methods, but also to this particular metaphysics’. (p. 3)
More here
Velikovsky was a 20th century Russian polymath who studied under Freud, knew Jung and his acolytes, was friends with many scientists, was a man of many doctorates, a professor in anthropology and psychology, a founder of the first university in Israel, an unorthodox Jew and someone interested in ancient history. A researcher, reader, aggregator with a broad intellect, he assembled multi-disciplinary information to propose not a revolution in ‘science’ but a return to truth which had been lost. In essence Velkovsky had the courage to defiantly challenge the reigning scientific paradigms which have done so much to distort and poison real scientific progress. However in my opinion (see below) he is in essence a materialist himself and some of his ideas are unscientific and badly thought out.
His 1950’s work, Worlds in Collison outlined the global catastrophes of the Bronze Age initiated by the comet Venus interfering with the Earth’s orbit in 1500 B.C. and Mars and Venus becoming entangled and impacting the Earth in 747 B.C. Velikovsky’s attempt to link these cataclysmic events to the Old Testament miracles of the Exodus, Sinai, the Sun standing still at Beth-horon, and the rise of Judaism and monotheism was a best seller, with an immediate impact on students, teachers, the religious, and the laity for whom it was written, calling into question the iron ‘laws’ of Newton, Darwin, endless ages and chronometric ageless time. His second book, which is really the first in his series, In the beginning, is the preface to Worlds in Collison going back beyond the Bronze Age to the Deluge and Global Flood of Noah, a story found in every culture, an event caused in Velikovsky’s opinion by Saturn and Jupiter becoming embroiled with the Earth.
[Below: Westmorland Gazette, England, Dec 19th 1824, describing yet another vast assemblage of exotic animals, destroyed and piled up in a catastrophe]
His best book, though containing some obvious errors (below), was Earth in Upheaval, which provides overwhelming proof for catastrophic climate and Earthly upheaval and destruction in the Bronze Age, with the complete eradication of not only civilisations, but entire species in a very short period. In this scenario the end of the ‘last ice age’ was no more than 3000 years ago, not the 10-12.000-year period embedded in uniformitarian-Darwinist theology. One could add countless more proofs to this book and extend it given the rather long list of archaeological and paleo-logical finds which support the catastrophic theory. Some students and scientists need to attempt this and update this important book with more volumes of facts. This would indeed be a worthy PhD project.
His last work in the series ‘Mankind in Amnesia’ is less convincing based on long-discredited Freudian theology, but nonetheless does possess an echo of truth about it – who wants to remember a catastrophe or times of deep struggle and pain? Velikovsky believes we have buried our past and refuse to confront it. He cites modern proofs as well as historical. The population of a city once tormented by a tornado soon lose all memory of the event and when the sirens ring for a possible attack by another tornado, ignore the warning and carry on with their business. Is this what has happened to the human collective memory?
Is it possible that the human race for some psychological reason still unfathomed, refuses to acknowledge past cosmic and terrestrial catastrophes? Is it just too much for us to comprehend that perhaps the universe is not as stable as our priests-of-science tell us? Does this help explain the latent self-loathing and self-fear impelling the modern Climate-Crazy millenarians to propose the eradication of civilisation? Is the Climate-cult no more than the expression of the flagellants in the Black Death, the cults of doom in the time of Christ, the warnings of Isaiah in the 8th century, and the writings of Egyptians given to Solon the Athenian in the 6th century, of past Earthly destructions? Is not the climate-religion an expression of the suppressed memories of past and not so ancient eradication?
Velikovsky’s 4 book series is a large collection of material and source notes to plough through, well over 1000 pages in total. In reading them, and in cross-referencing some of his sources, and in re-reading tracts of the Old Testament, there is no doubt it is well researched, compiled, written and validated. In every book, within every major section, Velikovsky had secular scientists and experts, check his statements, his claims and his sources. He can rightly declare that this work was ‘peer reviewed’. Unlike most of us, Velikovsky knew the ‘Science’ and its elite and gatekeepers. Before 1950, he had access to many resources. After 1950 the gates were closed and the heretic kept outside the walls, pelted by the ruling mob from on high with calumny, opprobrium, threats and taunts.
I tried to summarise some of his ideas and what I believe are the good and bad about them. I am not ‘the science’ but applying common sense and what we do know about such matters, it is not difficult for the layman, the peasant, to form an opinion on Velikovsky and his courageous challenge to the powers of the materialist-uniformitarian scientific elite. In no uncertain terms was he violated, beaten, ostracised, ridiculed, and physically threatened. All doors to academia and ‘the science’ were shut to Velikovsky as they are shut to anyone who dares question ‘the science’.
A grossly simplified summary of Velikovsky’s key ideas.
There is good and bad in Velikovsky. In essence he himself is a materialist, applying only physical phenomena to explain miracles and the unexplainable. No supernatural or immaterial powers for Velikovsky. All is reduced to matter. As a Jew he does not have much interest or knowledge of Christianity for example and no knowledge of molecular biology, DNA and organism complexity. I can see by reading his works that over time he tried to appease the secular Gods of ‘The Science’, tossing out some scraps to keep the Darwinian-Aristotelian religious happy, a few odes of joy to the long agers, a bundle of mea-culpas to the cosmologists and some purported self-doubting to entice the physicist and astronomer. The tepid appeasement won him no new friends. All it does is water down his main theory.
The importance to me of Velikovsky is the absolute disdain and lack of interest by the establishment in his works, much of which is painfully detailed and supported; echoing that of the reaction by those invested in Ptolemy to Copernicus. There is not even a shred of real curiosity by most in what he proposes, which even if only 10% of what he proposes is true, would completely invalidate much religious-scientific dogma which governs our world. This is why the establishment simply memory-holes his ideas. Velikovsky revealed that The Religion of Science called $cientism has no clothes and is incredibly corrupt and intolerant. Money, power, control, the use of technology, abstract maths, big words, longer sentences and fake studies and data. No tolerance for dissent or curiosity to investigate. That is where we are.
Velikovsky wrote many works on ‘catastrophism’, that is the concept that the Earth, the solar system, the universe at large, has been in flux, change and prone to disasters in times not so far distant in the past. Earth in Upheaval is perhaps his best work, giving irrefutable proof of catastrophism around the globe, which is anathema to a society bludgeoned to insensitivity by endless propaganda on long ages, stable states, gentle and unchanging time, evolving mutation-driven-life forms (mutations destroy, they don’t add value), and the Gods of magic species metamorphosis, with the shrew becoming you.
A fair question to ask is, ‘what is real about modern science, and what is propaganda?’ Such a question falls out of the ‘Velikovsky affair’, or the vicious, pagan, bloody assault on a man who simply asked tough questions, and proposed some pretty novel remediations to age old problems. The reaction - fascistic, intolerant, ignorant - paints a picture of science that is the opposite of the public’s facile and naive impression of a cadre of enlightened Olympians, selflessly engaged in the heroic pursuit of knowledge and wisdom.
A key point posed by the ‘controversial’ works of Velikovsky is that of ‘Science’ itself. What is ‘science’? If someone, with excruciating detail, develops a theorem that contradicts the reigning paradigm how should that person be treated? Should they be publicly censored? Humiliated? Delicensed? Prevented from publishing? Attacked verbally and even physically? Killed perhaps? We saw this fascist violence against the ‘other’ during the Corona scamdemic, in which the end of the world was preached over a virus with a death rate of 0.3%, and the ‘only’ solution was a series of experimental mRNA gene therapy stabs which has murdered 3-5x more people than the flu-death rate virus itself.
‘The Science’ vilifying and demonising Velikovsky, was a pre-packaged template used by the modern cults of $cientism to silence dissent and demand compliance.
Velikovksy and his theory of ‘catastrophism’, which as a body of thought and proofs, goes back to the ancient Greeks and was an article of belief in the 19th century promulgated by geologists such as Agassiz and Cuvier, has overwhelming physical support in the real world and in the geology all around us and under our feet. However, ‘The Science’ wedded to the opposite religious belief, sits in judgemental defiance, descrying ‘catastrophe’ as irreligious and outside of its canon and liturgy. ‘The Science’ promotes the unfounded and unproven religion of endless time, with millions-billions-soon trillions of years of cosmological and terrestrial stable, steady-state, once and always perfectly organised and constructed, with no variation or disruption.
The clock of Newton, working endlessly and without a change in chronometry. The ‘evolving’ selections of Darwinism, working through endless epochs, competitively driven, with creatures striving in eternal struggle to achieve a material advantage, pushed forward by chance, and directed by the Gods of time, natural selection, and mutations. The wind and rain gently beating down on land to produce sand. The rivers flowing lazily over millions and billions of years to form a canyon. The sun always rising in the east. The axial tilt of the planet always at 23.5% to the vertical mean. The Continents slowly and serenely drifting away, propelled by some unproven motive force. The constellation of planets, forever in their place, forever following the same pattern over billions of years.
Such are the fairy tales proposed by 19th century Victorians Charles Lyell (a lawyer) and Charles Darwin (a pigeon breeder), along with the 17th century polymath Newton who wrote more on scripture than he did on cosmology and physics and who happily admitted his own ignorance when he said that he stood on the shoulders of giants, and who would likely be equally at ease with being wrong.
All of it reads as a bad fiction novel. In fact, it is absolutely embarrassing that our modern ‘Science’ is construed on top of 3 men, their acolytes and cults, whose works if anyone bothers to read the sources, are full of errors, dialogues of doubt, statements without facts, conclusions without experimentation and even in the case of Newton, thrown out as irrelevant. The entire Church of Darwin for example is a shell of nothing else other than word-salads and ‘what-ifs’. Not a single scientific experiment or observation supports species metamorphosis.
It bears repeating, ‘The Science’ vilifying and demonising Velikovsky, was a pre-packaged template used by the modern cults of $cientism to silence dissent and demand compliance. This is the norm and censorship is the future. Who can deny this probability when it is used daily and when the ‘media’ and ‘government’ have erected ‘fact-checkers’, ‘verifiers’ and ‘trusted sources’? Dissent from any of the ‘rules’ and ‘laws’ which you must follow, will not be allowed. The endless rivers of money which flow into and sustain the $cience, have corrupted truth, honesty and inquiry, and it really is as simple as that, a fact confirmed in the warnings issued by Eisenhower and Kennedy.
In order to try and salvage his copious works, Velikovsky turned to a fellow Jew, Einstein. There was a healthy debate and meetings between Velikovsky and Einstein. Einstein was part of the establishment of course, a de facto leader of ‘The Science’. The ‘scientific establishment’ had a nuclear meltdown after Worlds in Collision was published in 1950 with its theme of cosmic catastrophe, and Venus portrayed as the chief villain, a new planet formed from a comet, assaulting and over-turning the Earth. With demonic energy, they sought to destroy Velikovsky. The Russian wrote to, and visited with the German, appealing to him to look at the evidence and defend the right under free speech and scientific inquiry, to promulgate and defend contrarian views, without being slandered and calumnied by the establishment ‘scientific’ elite, most of whom had not bothered to read his works in detail, nor knew much about the sources and arguments they contained.
Einstein was originally hostile by the challenge to Darwinian and Newtonian ‘laws’ proposed by Velikovsky. After meeting Velikovksy he relented somewhat and admitted that a catastrophe was the only way to explain an Ice Age. He disagreed with the Russian on the details of what sort of ‘catastrophe’ would cause an Ice Age, supporting ‘terrestrial sources’ and the discredited ‘continental drift’ by Wegener as the prime movers in the formation of an Ice Age, without citing sources or proof (you need massive immediate heating of the entire planet, the condensation of 300 or more feet from the oceans into cloud cover, volcanic eruptions, the darkening of the atmosphere, an immediate and overwhelming temperature reduction, and deep cold in the northern and southern latitudes to produce the hail of snow and ice, to form ice sheets).
Einstein could not fathom how the innumerable global-cultural sources used by Velikovsky supported his rather straight-forward idea that an exogenous non-terrestrial force caused not only the ‘miracles’ of the Old Testament, and the ‘shaking’ of the Earth’s core, but the flipping of the poles, an Ice Age or even Ages, the utter destruction of most Bronze age civilisations and the massive world-wide accumulation of preserved dead fauna from vast distances piled up and aggregated together, when these creatures had no geographic connection, with many of these sites hundreds or feet or more above sea level. Like Dr Baffled after seeing younger people die after being stabbinated, Einstein was confused. More here
Scientism is the religious belief in the overpowering majesty and divine right to rule of ‘Science’ whatever that may mean. This ‘Science’ utilises the magic of experiments, either real or fraudulent, tooled with complicated technology, expressed with complex words embedded within treasured treatises suffused with complex mathematical hieroglyphics to impress upon the laity its opulent magnificence and godly powers. The artifacts of ‘The Science’ can only be divined by the priestly caste of those educated in the arts of entrail divination and the translation of oracle-whispers into commandments. It is not for the hoi-polloi to question the priestly caste.
From 1910 to about 1955, ‘The Science’, or the religious imperative of ‘Scientism’ embarked on a ceaseless propaganda war to convince the masses that life existed on Mars and Venus. There was some dissent. Some articles from that era believed life was impossible. Some claimed that Venus was too close to the Sun (about 60 million miles) and too hot with a surface temperature of 115 F. In reality, the surface is about 1000F. But much of the Science-media proclaimed the likelihood that some form of life existed.
Velikovsky, who attempted to provide cosmological proof for the miracles of the Old Testament and to reinterpret Greek mythology using cosmological events, for some reason believed that Venus’ atmosphere was full of insects. Others believed that vegetation was flourishing. Many wondered if Venus and not Mars was more likely to have advanced civilisations. Evolutionists predicted that even if no life existed on the planet, it was sure to flourish soon given its chemical composition. UFO believers cited Venus to be a pirate haven of violent aliens who at times terrorised earth. Fiction writers in the 1950s described Venus as a friendly, green planet, with advanced technology.
In reality, Venus is hell, not a lovely woman, (Aphrodite is the goddess of love and the moon, not Venus), and you don’t hear much about Venus today. ‘The Science’ never apologised for its previous positions. It ignores much about Venus – why is it an immature planet, why after billions of years hasn’t it cooled, why after billions of years is its atmosphere so primitive, why do the ancients discuss Venus (Athena) fighting with both the Earth (Hera) and Mars (Ares)? Why is Venus so low on the horizon when the ancients say it was active and high in the sky? Why is Venus so hard to see now and not as bright as before? Why doesn’t Venus appear in ancient astrological records before the 1rst millennium BC when Mars, Jupiter, Saturn and the Moon are known and revered? ‘The Science’ does not care. More here
