Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

How rational and progressive ! You can almost see the frolicking and giggling of the really smart people, the cultural Marxists and relativists; as they dance merrily around in their red high shoes, extolling the virtues of 'hate speech' legislation; limiting the right to criticize; or the ability to 'hurt someone's feelings'. Oh the poor dears. Someone might cry if you are mean to them. But such 'laws' would never apply of course to the protected species of Gays, Muslims, Arabs, Blacks or minorities. These groups can hate-monger all they want! Unequal justice for all ! A hallmark of course, of civilized development. Any politician who supports 'hate crimes' should be impeached and removed from office including the Black Jesus.

The Great Black God himself, the Obamed, the most important deity in history [outside of Allah] helped sponsor the recent UN hate-crime legislation. Apparently his holy Prophet-ness feels that by groveling yet again to Islam he can help secure the peace. His ignorance of Islam is legendary. [see here for a critique of his insipid Cairo apology speech http://www.craigread.com/displayArticle.aspx?contentID=1022&subgroupID=28]

Robert Spencer writing on October 8^th had it right when he laid out the implications of the Great Prophet's acclamation of Islamic intolerance within the UN system:

“The Obama Administration has now actually co-sponsored an anti-free speech resolution at the United Nations. Approved by the U.N. Human Rights Council last Friday, the resolution, cosponsored by the U.S. and Egypt, calls on states to condemn and criminalize “any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.”

What could be wrong with that? Plenty.

First of all, there’s that little matter of the First Amendment, which preserves Americans’ right to free speech and freedom of the press, which are obviously mutually inclusive. Any law that infringed on speech at all -- far less in such vague and sweeping terms -- would be unconstitutional.

“Incitement” and “hatred” are in the eye of the beholder -- or more precisely, in the eye of those who make such determinations. The powerful can decide to silence the powerless by classifying their views as “hate speech.” The Founding Fathers knew that the freedom of speech was an essential safeguard against tyranny: the ability to dissent, freely and publicly and without fear of imprisonment or other reprisal, is a cornerstone of any genuine republic. If some ideas cannot be heard and are proscribed from above, the ones in control are tyrants, however benevolent they may be.

Now no less distinguished a personage than the President of the United States has given his imprimatur to this tyranny; the implications are grave.” http://europenews.dk/en/node/26802

The implications are grave indeed. What we have is the UN attempting to subvert national laws and constitutions. Only in the USA is freedom of speech an enshrined principle. It does not exist in Canada or Europe, nor of course in the Muslim world – which as we all now know is infinitely superior in all ways to our own. Muslim fascism can only exist, expand and take control of national political and cultural processes if we allow it. Not criticizing a 7^th century Meccan male moon cult; and not identifying what is actually in the Koran, Arab imperialist history or the expansion of Islam over 1400 bloody years, is not 'progressive' or intelligent but mind-numbingly ignorant. It will lead to disaster.

As the Center for Security Policy makes clear:

“Most Americans would quite understandably be shocked at the evidence presented by the International Legal Conference.  Speaker after speaker documented a rising tide of infringements on free speech and freedom of religion and warned that more were in prospect - particularly as a result of the U.S. co-sponsored "hate speech" resolution in the U.N. Human Rights Council, concisely critiqued here by UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh in the liberal online magazine The Huffington Post. The reporting and analysis presented at the conference is more needed today than ever.   Efforts by the Muslim Brotherhood and its ilk to keep it from being widely disseminated must be strenuously resisted.” http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/p18215.xml

The Islamic agenda within Europe and North America is clear. Control what information is presented about Islam. Take over the schools and the media and present a Muslim-friendly version of Islamic doctrine and history. Rewrite reality and history books to make Muslims look like victims. Yelp, scream, bitch and cry every time a Muslim is harassed or critiqued. Call anyone who declaims against the Meccan male moon cult lots of bewildering and angry names. Make sure that any center of resistance or opposition to the Muslim agenda is crushed beneath legislation – including of course 'hate crime laws'.

It is pretty obvious what Muslims and Islam are trying to do. They are attempting to isolate and destroy any opposition to the Islamic agenda. The fact that a President of the US is now complicit in this policy and stratagem is extraordinary indeed. If the great Prophet is trying to elevate UN 'law' over the US Constitution he should be impeached and removed from office. The same should apply to any politician who attempts to eradicate democratic ideals to the depravity of Islam.