Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Corona, 'The Science' or Scientism, Islam, the State, the cult of Gender Fascism, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion...
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
Human 'Wrong' Commissions; criticising Islam and the Speech Gestapo
Something is very wrong and sick in society.
by StFerdIII
The abuse of Human 'rights' Commissions [HRCs] is wrong. These abuses take basically two forms. First, there is the shutting down of any criticism of Islam by these commissions. Second, any opinion which offends the mainstream view on gays, feminists or multi-culturalism is attacked by the state as fomenting 'hate speech'. Islam is also protected, since it is portrayed as a religion – which it clearly is not. It is an ideology. HRCs are a very real threat to society, and a plethora of attacks recently on sites, bloggers and writers illustrate this fact.
Muslims and their Western lobby groups have done a fantastic job at portraying any criticism – any – of Islam, as hate-speech. This is akin to national socialists, fascists or communists, whining that complaints directed against them are premised on 'racism' not facts. The fact that a state would set up 'commissions' to attack its own citizens for criticising an ideology is government coercion of the most perverse and lurid variety. It is an attack on freedom.
Muslims are deeply offended at any critique which centers itself upon the 1400 years of Islamic jihad, violence and the killing through war of some 300 millions. Going through the Koran, the Hadiths [sayings attributed to Mohammed]; Mohammed's history as a military leader who murdered thousands; and the Arab-Muslim spread of empire and its attendant costs is somehow 'hateful'. If this is true, then we must not discuss the origins of the Second World War, its 70 million dead, and we certainly should not trace the roots of the conflict back to Hitlerism. Nazism and the Hitler cult ensured war. Without Hitler and the Nazi party, there would not have been a war.
Without Islamic intolerance, violence and demands for supremacy there would be no current conflict. As Samuel Huntington so boldly wrote 15 years ago, Islam's borders are very bloody indeed. And so too is Islamic society with internecine warfare; Arab cultural and tribal warring; honour killings; attacks on Jews and Christians; repression of women and outright racist genocide in places like the Sudan where Arabs are slaughtering Muslim blacks.
But don't worry hating and criticizing Jews, Whites, Christians and Anglo males is perfectly okay. Mosques can cry out that the Jew and Westerner should be converted or killed, but a simple blogger, writer or author in the US, UK or Canada can be hauled into jail, for daring to quote Islamic doctrine, the Koran, sayings of Imam's or historical fact, back to an internet audience.
Something is very sick indeed in the West.
In the UK a blogger by the glorious name of 'Lionheart' [note to Muslims, Richard the Lionheart defeated Saladin many times including after Acre when Saladin broke the truce agreement and slaughtered Christian prisoners], has been arrested for inciting hate-speech. His crime? A website which chronicled the Koran, honor killings, Islamic doctrine and Muslim war and violence.
If you read his site Lionheart blog there is nothing hateful about it. The blogger simply points out the obvious – Islamic doctrine at its core and root has nothing in common with Western society and is a threat to freedom.
If you disagree with that idea, that is fine. You can then argue the point as to why it is false. Since when does a commission or any foreign funded group like a Muslim activist organisation have a right to silence an idea or viewpoints? Isn't this the 'fascism' that the Bushitler crowd constantly yelps about?
But it isn't Bushitler or the Jews who are shutting down free speech.
An example from the blog that offended the Muslims is this ironic fact: 'I had to close my business, I lost my home, I had to bankrupt myself and I became a vagrant in my own country because of Pakistani Moslems wanting to kill me [after he helped police catch a Muslim murderer] and the British police's failure to help me even though I had just helped them.' So are British Moslems offended by the blog, his actions in arresting one of their own, or a simple desire to eradicate criticsm?
Why are the police even wasting time with this action against a lowly blogger, bankrupted by Muslims who threatened his life? Who knows.
The Muslims usually go after bigger fish. Muslim organisations are very active in shutting down free speech. In the US many media and even TV shows [24 is one example] have either been sued or threatened with law suits for anti-Islamic presentations and viewpoints. Authors from Hirsi Ali, to Michael Savage have been sued, threatened with death or verbally assaulted by Muslims and Muslim groups.
Yet there is nary a whimper from the mainstream media.
In Canada, Mark Steyn, a world famous conservative writer, was sued by the Muslim Congress of Canada [a Wahhabi-Saudi funded group]; for quoting a Muslim Imam's remarks outlining Islam's desire to dominate the world. In his book 'America Alone' from which the far-left Canadian magazine 'Maclean's' created an article, Steyn criticises Islamic demography. In their deposition against Steyn, the Muslim Congress said Steyn's portrayal of Muslims 'breeding like mosquitoes' was hate speech.
Sadly for them, he took it from a Norwegian Imam. 'That line certainly appears in my text, but they're not my words. Rather, they were said by a prominent Scandinavian Muslim, Mullah Krekar, to a respectable Norwegian newspaper. The imam was boasting at how Islam would outbreed Europe: "We're the ones who will change you . . . Just look at the development within Europe, where the number of Muslims is expanding like mosquitoes. Every western woman in the EU is producing an average of 1.4 children. Every Muslim woman in the same countries is producing 3.5 children.”' In any event the lawsuit failed, but it cost Steyn tens of thousands in legal fees. The Muslims paid nothing since the HRC process is 'free' ie. the defendant pays the system, and the claimants pay nothing. This is a 'legal' process ?
The litany of HRC abuses is legion. Why would anyone sue a magazine for the statement that a diverse group breeds like an insect ? Because someone was upset ? If you object to the mosquito classification than say why and criticise the author or the source. Why do you need to censure a book, an article, a magazine and a writer because he or she uses descriptive techniques to illustrate a truism – Muslim women in the West have 4 children on average and Western women have 1.5 or less. Are Muslims that insecure, vapid, sensitive and childishly fascist that any references to demography or their ideology have to be censored ?
And since when are HRCs designed to uphold intolerance and fracture dissent ? Where are the cases against Muslims, their Koran, their mosque leaders, their Imams, their websites who spread supremacism, anti-semiticism and advocate violence ? None exist of course.
Islam is not a religion. Even if for some misguided reason, abetted by unnatural substances or propaganda you believe it is, and someone criticises it, so what? Scurrilous attacks on all cults, faiths, and ideas abound in the internet age. If you find them repulsive, then debate them, ignore them, fight them with logic and rationality or expose them. You can't shut them down. Not even Mein Kampf, one of the most turgid, irrational, hate-filled, supremacist and overtly racist tracts ever penned by the hand of a mad-man should be banned. In fact people should be encouraged to read it, to better understand the evil-fantastical and demonic character of left-wing fascism.
Not allowing people to criticise Islamic history, or any history which is imparted by differing cultures races, doctrines and historical activities, is simply irrational and immoral. It is akin to negating criticism of Russian Communist imperialism and the 30 odd millions who died at the hands of the Lenin-Stalin cult. Negating a critique of Islam would be similar to arresting a blogger for objecting to Hitler's plan of lebensraum, or the white-fascist groups which still honor his legacy of death and evil today.
Throughout the West, councils of un-elected legal bureaucrats, are shutting down debate, speech and dissent over Islam. In one of history's most mindless and mad Orwellian horror stories, the intolerant ideology of Islam – the one of the 12th century Sharia law – is to be 'protected', whilst any criticism of Muslims, Islamic doctrine or even atrocity is to be condemned.
Islam needs to be reformed, and you only reform something through inquiry linked to criticism. Islam is not a race. Muslims are not a race. Islam is an ideology premised on an ancient Arabian cult, suffused with Jewish ideas of monotheism. Criticising an ideology has nothing to do with hate; race; or ignorance. The great fetish for 'tolerance' so beloved by the left-liberals and Marxists apparently does not apply in any sense to that most intolerant of ideologies, Islam. Islam demands submission. Read the Koran, there is not much about tolerance and love or diversity within Islamic theocracy. Islam needs a reformation - not politically-correct fascist protection.
==
For a good overview of Muslim groups who are attacking free speech in the West, see this interactive list Discover the Muslim Network which highlights the radical proclivity of foreign funded Islamic lobby groups and indoctrination organisations. Funded by Saudi, Syrian and Iranian money, these Muslim organisations have embarked on a radical attack to fetter and shut down freedom of speech across the West.
