Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

The UK ‘Conservative’ party is replacing Boris Johnson and will choose a new ‘leader’ and Prime Minister from Liz Truss, a former anti-Brexiteer and socialist, who is affiliated with the WEF and an Indian born globalist whose billionaire wife through her ownership of IT colossus Infosys has deep ties with the WEF and China.  There is no ‘Conservatism’ in the views of either, though both give idle promises about ‘tax cuts’ and ‘unleashing the potential of this or that’, and ‘standing up for the Ukraine’.  In essence both want endless war, neither care much about securing Brexit or the borders, and neither has an affiliation with, or sympathy for British or English history and culture.  Both view WEF policies as the future including the chimera of green energy, net zero, and medical totalitarianism in the guise of Corona or some future plandemic which Gates and the WHO have promised us, or which the climate fascists want to create.  There is no ‘Conservative’ departure from the 3-year reign of Boris Johnson, a man whose government enjoyed parties and feasts while the country was terrorised, diapered, locked down and told to avoid contact with anyone. 

In the UK there is the peculiar but common situation that a ‘Conservative’ Party has no real connection to orthodox Conservative belief, espoused from the 18^th to 20^th centuries in various means, including political parties starting with the Burkean Whig faction (18^th century), Disraeli, Churchill and Thatcher.  The modern British ‘Conservative’ party is about as conservative or in the 19^th century view, orthodox-Liberal (capital L), as the ‘Labour’ party is concerned about labour or the working man (it could care less about either).  The ridiculous monikers of ‘left’ and ‘right’ are useless attributes, purloined from the age of the pre-French Atheist revolution to characterise those who advocated reform either in part or whole and who sat on the ‘left’ in the French parliament, against those who wanted to conserve many aspects of the monarchy and Catholic heritage including history and culture, who sat on ‘the right’.  No such demarcation exists today.  Everyone in politics sits on the ‘left’.  The ‘right’ is vacant.

There are two salient features about modern ‘Conservatism’ which offends the very idea of being a Conservative.  The first is that all modern political parties subscribe to similar dogma, with perhaps at best, a slight disagreement on emphasis, depth, speed or extent of the policy or ideological issue under implementation or scrutiny.  Second, the very idea of being a ‘conservative’ is now linked with ‘right wing Nazism’ (even though Nazism was and is a socialist-communal phenomenon), white supremacism, intolerance, selfishness, anti-science ignorance, a disregard for public safety and morality, and whose members are affiliated with domestic terrorist groups, racist outfits, and subversive criminal elements.  This is a remarkable example of propaganda deployed by the Marxists and Communists within governments and their controlled media, to demonise anyone who dares to question the prevailing narrative. 

The best outline of Conservative ideology is that espoused by the doctrines and philosophies of Edmund Burke and Winston Churchill.  Both subscribed to the ethos of what was usually termed ‘Orthodox Liberalism’ married with a need to ‘conserve’ the traditions, culture, religion, institutions, heritage and historical legacy of the UK.  The ‘Conservative’ mind does not only hearken back to tradition and the past.  It seeks to preserve what is necessary and to ‘prudently’ adapt and change to modern conditions and opportunities.  ‘Conservatism’ does not object, nor fear change and improvement, but rather embraces both in a measured, careful, and intelligent matter, knowing that civilisation and societal advancement are holistic, and that new developments must build on and support our past and the foundations of our existing order.  Tearing down everything will lead to chaos, strife and in many cases injury and death.  ‘Conservatism’ as defined by Burke and Churchill includes inter-alia:

History-A deep appreciation and regard for the past, its wisdom, learning, failures, successes and complicated development; with a profound admiration for those who built and created our cultural artefacts, institutions and legacies.

Tradition and Life-A deep satisfaction and understanding of why tradition is important, why norms which work need to be preserved, the sanctity for example of the heterosexual family, the reality of Men and Women and of Man and Wife and the preservation of life from conception to end.

Pride-Real pride is centred in an appreciation of past national achievements, successes, the creation of the modern world, and learning from mistakes and epochs which were immoral, unsavoury, or bloody and unjust.

Immaterial-A certain knowledge that religion and faith, emotions, associations, habits, cultural values, character and virtue and a balance between the material and immaterial were and are fundamental to real progress and to the holistic development of people and society.

Free speech-The ability to speak and think freely, without repression or being subjected to violence.

Individual choice-The ability to choose and to manage one’s own life, free from hate, coercion, vilification, or being enslaved or violated.

Governance-A respect for governmental separation of powers and checks and balances, either through a constitutional-monarchical system, or a clearly delineated republican system, both reliant on representative participation by the population.

Power-A distinct limitation on the size, extent, power and irresponsibility of government.  The larger the enterprise of government, the more fraud and violence is enacted over the ruled.

Fraud-An intolerance of corruption, fraud, coercion, or mendacity within government, or between those being ruled and their rulers.  

Virtue-The absolute demand for virtue in the public square, good character, common sense, truth-telling, and honesty.  Fair play and being ‘human’ prized above the corruption of morality and dishonesty.  Common sense and reality esteemed before irrational, incomprehensible gibberish, and obfuscation.

Innovation-Action, energy, and innovation to try new ideas, develop new systems, and gestate improvements and advancements, as being in the personal and national interests.

National Interests-Protection and regard for the nation state above all else in foreign affairs.  The sanctity of the state cannot be compromised in any way and independence needs to be a predominant concern.

Trade-Fair trade sometimes erroneously called ‘Free Trade’ (in reality no trade is free or without costs), which allows economic development and which benefits the local population, but which does not put the country at risk of economic subservience to foreign powers, or de-industrialisation.

This list is not exhaustive but outlines the praxis of a ‘Conservative’ and the parameters of the ideology.  There is not a single ‘Conservative’ politician in the UK, who believes in this list.  Not a single one.  The test of that assertion is simple.  Apply the list to Corona, and the Corona 2020 Act, which give the government ‘emergency’ powers, suspended Parliament, allowed the creation of an unaccountable group called SAGE to run the country, allowed the Conservative party with its parliamentary majority to shut down the country, destroyed 250.000 businesses and forced people to ingest a mRNA poison which did nothing to stop the transmission of a virus, nor reduce any symptoms, but since the December 2020 rollouts (4 now), has killed some 50.000 and injured 4 million, half seriously.  These death totals will only increase and be completely ignored.  The lockdowns may have killed 50.000 or more, with purportedly some 30.000 older people murdered in long-term-care-facilities with midazolam and other end of life drugs during April and May 2020, their deaths attributed to Corona.  Fake PCR tests were used to declare some 170.000 to have died over 2 years from Corona, when the tests only pick up DNA fragments of the common cold not SARS II.  The real dead total from Corona over 2.5 years, from and only from the virus is less than 20.000, far below an average year of flu deaths, which has now disappeared of course.  The IFR from Corona if you accept the data fraud was 0.1% or the same as the flu.  The real IFR if you strip out the fraud is and was, 0.03%.  For these rounding errors we were subjected to the most ferocious fascist assault in history.  It goes without saying that the criminal pharmaceutical industry has deep and convoluted financial ties with all governments and the media.  It goes without saying that many politicians and sundry ‘officials’ did very well from the plandemic.

The Corona plandemic, whose planning antecedents date back some 20 years, is the clearest example of mass criminal governance and anti-humanism imaginable.  On every single level it was and still is, a colossal assault on free men and women, and the terrorisation of children with the attendant stabbing of the young and those at no risk to a viral disease, supersedes the worst of dystopian novels.  Yet here we are, with at least half the population in full throttle voice of support, ready to engage in violence to defend their new religious cult and imperative.  Not a single ‘Conservative’ politician had much to say about the Corona Fascism, none of the successors to Johnson discussed it, it was never debated, with the closest admission to wrong doing being a speech on freedom from disgraced former PM Theresa May who tried to derail Brexit, who surprisingly, stood up in the House of Commons and criticised lockdowns and the brutal, atavistic policies of coercion.  The rest of the Conservatives in the UK were largely silent and those in Parliament mostly useless.

Churchill was the last of the real ‘Conservatives’ with Thatcher a close imitation.  The Corona totalitarian episode, which is not over and will likely metamorphosize into the ‘Climate emergency’ revealed how compromised both the UK government and the UK Conservative party are; and how beholden to international powers (WHO, US CDC, WEF etc) and corrupt criminal industries like Pharmaceuticals they both are.  During World War II Churchill and his government allowed free speech (within reason if war plans were not compromised), free press, political opposition, parliamentary discussion, private industry and trade to proceed, and life to carry on as normal as it could.  No one from that generation including Labour leader Attlee would have considered or believed that a ‘Conservative’ government over a faux-demic would implement a totalitarian-Gestapo state premised on medical Nazism that would crush the absolute life out of society, demonise those who did not want to partake of a medical experiment and viciously assault any who dared to question the narrative.  The fact that the Conservative leadership had and still has, little to say about this, and that a Conservative government under Johnson believes that the 2.5 years of fascism and rolling out detrimental and unsafe drugs to the population 4 or more times is their greatest legacy says it all.

Conservatism in the UK has long been dead.