Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from. It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
“Evolution has become state-sponsored religious dogma, dictating belief not only on the subject of origins, but decreeing a complete, exclusive worldview.” [J.D. Morris, F.J. Sherwin]
Evolution cant and cult dogma. The illogic is thus:
-Evolution is true, no other explanation for the 2 million species of flora and fauna on this planet; or the cosmos in general, is allowed.
-All 'evidence' and facts must fit into the Evolutionary theology.
-Facts which compromise Evolution are ignored.
-Rhetoric and hyperbole replace science, observation, data, evidence, and reality.
-Pretty pictures and 'trees of life' with wonderful diagrams are issued along with endless state-financed propaganda.
-Ad hominem campaigns against 'deniers' are mandatory.
As a theory, Evolution belongs in the neolithic era. There is precious little which is intelligent about it. It is just a materialist 'religion' used to justify Atheism, the belief of choice of Nazis, Soviets, Maoists, Marxists and other sundry geniuses and those who profess 'humanism'.
To paraphrase a song, 'What do the fossils say' about Darwin's cult ? Source, J.D. Morris, F.J. Sherwin 'The Fossil Record':
“Not one basic type or phylum of marine invertebrate is supported by an ancestral line between single-cell life and the participants in the Cambrian explosion. Nor do the basic phyla seem to be related to one another. How did evolution ever get started?”
“There is no hint of an evolutionary “simple to complex” history, for life was complex from the very start. Instead, the overwhelming message of the fossil record is one of stasis, not evolutionary change. The fossils often give testimony to violence at the time of their death and burial.”
“..where there is abundant fossil data, there is no hint of evolution. When clam fossils, for instance, are found, there are no identifiable ancestors present.”
“..fossils speak clearly of the sudden appearance of abundant complex kinds, separate from others...”
“Evolutionist Robert Barnes was candid regarding the origin of invertebrate animals when he said: 'The fossil record tells us almost nothing about the evolutionary origin of phyla and classes. Intermediate forms are non-existent, undiscovered, or not recognized.'”
“...fossils of bony fishes are found long before (i.e., in much lower strata) than those of cartilaginous fishes (sharks and rays), even though most evolutionists continue to believe cartilage came first and evolved into bone.”
“..animals were already walking on land before the supposed appearance of Tiktaalik.” [a 2003 fraud, posited by Darwin's cult as a walking fish.....whatever].
“...scales of a fish are quite different from the smooth skin of an amphibian. Both are also quite different from reptile scales, and all are different from bird feathers and mammalian skin. The evolution of one into the other would involve major alterations, not just in the outer layer, but in the physiology. Each animal type is well-designed as is and could hardly survive for any length of time while gradually changing to another type. There is no evidence for such gradual change, but there is for the sudden appearance of the fully formed covering for each type.”
“Snakes and turtles are well-recognized today and as fossils. They are so different from any other animal, it seems to pose an unbridgeable gap for evolution. What non-snake gained so many vertebrae to become a snake? What non-turtle gained the upper and lower plates to become a turtle? Turtles are so easily fossilized, one could hardly make the claim of poor representation in the fossil record for a lack of transitional forms.”
“Birds are “knee walkers,” not hip walkers. This poses a seemingly insurmountable barrier to the dino-to-bird theory.”
“...red blood cells, cartilage, soft tissue, and blood vessels have also been discovered in dinosaurs. yet these fresh-looking remains are dated by evolutionists as being millions of years old.”
“...birds’ existence that long predates Archaeopteryx, according to standard dating. There have been fossil tracks of birds found in strata dated at 212 million years ago (in the Late Triassic), long before Archaeopteryx.” [Archeo raptor is another fraud, the supposed 'missing link' between reptiles and birds. Whatever].
Evolution explains nothing. Why would a single cell whose complexity is confirmed by bio-chemistry emerge from nothing ? Why would algae mutate into sponges ? Why would a fish, adapted to his watery world, suddenly and magically start to drag himself around on land and how would he survive ? Who did he mate with ? Why would reptilian scales, along with a reptile's body skeleton, organs, brain, and sexual reproduction methods 'mutate' by 'natural selection' into a bird? How is that even remotely possible ? Why would a dino become a bird – for what reason and how ? Is 6 million years of 'evolutionary' magic really enough time to take an ape to a human ? The differences between the two run into the billions of DNA letters. How did the genomic code change so much and why ?
Evolution is a neolithic system of materialism, devoted to natural causes and 'nature' with Gaia or some unknown variable such as chance or selection as a god. Evolution is truly a cult, as divorced from science as the cult of warm is.