Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from. It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?
Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death
Evolution makes great science fiction. In the days of non-scientist Darwin, a man who suffered from various mental ailments and who never did perform one single experiment to confirm that pond scum became the professor of climate theology; a single cell was considered just a globule of 'jelly'. This 19th century 'age of science' belief still holds sway in the 'scientific community' of Darwinism, despite the fact that the single cell is more complicated than an urban center. No one has ever shown, or even come close to proving, that a single cell can arise from nothing; self-assemble; manufacture its own code; repair itself; and produce complicated enzymes and proteins from 20 amino acids into specified chains of 50 or more.
Even 'science' publications sound befuddled and alarmed when trying to fit the obvious fact that biological organisms are systems of software and information; into the box that 'a single globule of life became a 100 trillion cell complexity, achieved by random chaos and unguided processes.' One could apply this same theology and metric to software and web systems perhaps......
It does not matter where you look at the bio-chemical level, Evolution does not explain anything.
(From Science Daily): “Scientists have studied protein synthesis in ribosomes for decades now, and that knowledge of how nature builds proteins could pay off big time. The potential for artificially manufactured proteins is enormous: “Making these miniature factories cell-free, which eliminates the maintenance of a living system, simplifies the process and lowers cost.” An example is helping soldiers on the battlefield with life-saving proteins.”
How is a manufacturing process, based on blueprints from DNA software, possible by random chance ? Are car plants also formed by chaos, producing complex vehicles by luck and trial and error ?
Science Magazine reported results of a new study that shows reprogrammed adult stem cells (induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPS) are just as good as embryonic stem cells.
“Researchers who hope to use stem cells—the unspecialized cells that produce all of our tissues—to treat diseases face a dilemma. Stem cells from embryos (ES cells) could provide a wealth of new cells but spark ethical objections. Stem cells produced from adult cells (so-called induced pluripotent stem [iPS] cells) avoid the ethical difficulties, but some scientists have questioned whether they are as powerful as ES cells. A new study suggests that the two types of stem cells are equivalent and may help soothe worries about the capabilities of iPS cells.”
Well that should end the destruction of innocent babies for 'science' should it not ?
Evolution absurdly claims that life arises from natural processes only; meaning that inanimate objects can create living matter. The first law of thermodynamics expresses reality, namely that only energy and matter, beget energy and matter. Life develops only from life.
"Pasteur’s discovery of chirality is one of two major obstacles he erected in the path of evolutionary theory, obstacles that have only gotten higher over time. The early hopes of the Darwinians should have died in their tracks with discoveries of Pasteur and Mendel. ..
The other obstacle Pasteur raised to evolution was his law of biogenesis, the principle that only life begets life. Since the Greeks, and probably long before, philosophers and commoners believed that life could arise out of nonliving material. Is it not a common childhood observation that maggots and flies and all sorts of vermin seem to magically appear out of nowhere? The myth of spontaneous generation seems silly today, but was a common opinion throughout most of history. Leeuwenhoek opposed it with rigorous observations through his microscope, and the “macro” version of spontaneous generation eventually succumbed to the experiments of Redi and Spallanzani. (These are often used as textbook examples of the experimental method.)”
Not one single evolutionary 'scientist' has demonstrated the following:
-a complex single cell arising from dead matter
-a functioning single cell arising from chaos
-chirality from natural chaotic processes
-DNA software being formed either from nothing or from RNA [a favorite pathway of Darwinians, to explain the software encoded in each cell].
Science is proof not story telling. Evolution is thus a theology of metaphysics.