RSS Output
French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands.  Cults everywhere:  Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from.  It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori - Time Flies Remember Death 

Back     Printer Friendly Version  

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, April 21, 2016

The Holy Church of Atheism and its dogmatic miracles

Magic happens! Dead matter created life and nothing created everything.

by StFerdIII

 

Atheists are very religious. Their cult has an unlimited set of dogmas, an extensive liturgy, mindless rituals and a great capacity to fit observations which run contrary to science, reason, and logic, into their Bible. Abiogenesis which is impossible is one example, though Atheists will say 'of course we don't believe in life from dead matter...' But Atheism by its own insipid illogic, demands only natural explanations, including the origins of the universe, of life, and the creation of multi-cellular organisms from nothing. Complexity by chance and chaos, spiced with time. This is the holy trinity of Atheism.


 

Here are five major examples of materialists believing in magic (and there are more), or miraculous events without any sufficient explanation or cause for those events.

 

Below is edited from here.


 

1. Origin of the Universe

Materialists (atheists) once tried to believe that the universe was eternal, to erase the question of where it came from. The famous British atheist Bertrand Russell, for example, took this position. However, this is not tenable. The progress of scientific knowledge about thermodynamics, for example, means that virtually everyone has been forced to acknowledge that the universe had a beginning, somewhere, sometime—the big bang idea acknowledges this (ideas like the multiverse only put the beginning more remotely, but do not get rid of the pesky problem).4

 

The big bang attempts to explain the beginning of the universe. However, what did it begin from and what caused it to begin? Ultimately, it could not have come from a matter/energy source, the same sort of stuff as our universe, because that matter/energy should also be subject to the same physical laws, and therefore decay, and it would have had a beginning too, just further back in time.


 

So, it had to come from? Nothing! Nothing became everything with no cause whatsoever. Magic!

The universe burst into something from absolutely nothing—zero, nada. And as it got bigger, it became filled with even more stuff that came from absolutely nowhere. How is that possible? Ask Alan Guth. His theory of inflation helps explain everything.”

So proclaimed the front cover of Discover magazine, April 2002.

 

Physicist Lawrence Krauss, one of the loud ‘new atheists’, has tried to explain how everything came from nothing; he even wrote a book about it.5 However, his ‘nothing’ is a ‘quantum vacuum’, which is not actually nothing. Indeed, a matter/energy quantum something has exactly the same problem as eternal universes; it cannot have persisted for eternity in the past, so all their theorizing only applies after the universe (something) exists.6 Back to square one!


 

Materialists have no explanation for the origin of the universe, beyond ‘it happened because we are here!

Materialists have no explanation for the origin of the universe, beyond ‘it happened because we are here!’

There are other aspects of the big bang, the ‘mainstream’ model of the universe’s origin, that are also miraculous. The ‘standard model’ has a period of very rapid expansion called ‘inflation’. There is no known cause for the initiation of this supposed expansion, no known cause for it to stop and no physical mechanism for the extremely rapid expansion (many orders of magnitude faster than the speed of light). However, these three associated miracles must have happened or the big bang does not work because of the ‘horizon problem’. More magic!

 


 

2. Origin of stars

.there had to have been two phases of star formation. Phase 1 involved the formation of hydrogen/helium stars (which are called Population III stars7). Here is the first problem: how do you get gases formed in a rapidly expanding primordial universe to coalesce together to form a critical mass so that there is sufficient gravitational attraction to attract more gas to grow a star? Gases don’t tend to come together; they disperse, especially where there is a huge amount of energy (heat).8 Hey presto! Cosmologists invented ‘dark matter’, which is invisible undetectable ‘stuff’ that just happens to generate a lot of gravitational attraction just where it is needed. More magic!9

 

...Phase 2 supposedly comes in here. Exploding stars (supernovas) from phase 1 produced sufficient pressure to force hydrogen and helium together to make new stars that made all the heavier elements (which astronomers call ‘metals’), including the elements of which we are made. These stars are called Population I and II stars.


 

Now here is another problem: how do exploding stars, with matter flying at great speed in all directions, cause stars made of all those new elements to form? There has to be a coming together of the elements, not a flying apart.... supernovas are not common events, especially multiple ones at the same time in close proximity. Thus, this scenario requires a huge number of very improbable events to account for the vast numbers of the heavier stars.

This is more magic; miracles without a miracle worker.


 

3. Origin of life

Astrobiologist Professor Paul Davies said,

How did stupid atoms spontaneously write their own software … ? Nobody knows … there is no known law of physics able to create information from nothing.”10


 

Not only must the DNA code be explained (how can a coded information storage system come about without intelligent design?), but the incredible machinery that reads the information and creates the components of life from that information has to be explained as well.


 

Former hard-nosed English atheist philosopher Antony Flew abandoned atheism/materialism because of the growing evidence for such design in living things. He said,

It now seems to me that the findings of more than fifty years of DNA research have provided materials for a new and enormously powerful argument to design.”11


 

This research,

has shown, by the almost unbelievable complexity of the arrangements which are needed to produce (life), that intelligence must have been involved”.12

 

That is, only an incredibly intelligent designer could account for the information systems in living things.


 

Well-known American atheist philosopher, Thomas Nagel said,

What is lacking, to my knowledge, is a credible argument that the story [of cosmic evolution] has a nonnegligible probability of being true. There are two questions. First, given what is known about the chemical basis of biology and genetics, what is the likelihood that self-reproducing life forms should have come into existence spontaneously on the early earth, solely through the operation of the laws of physics and chemistry?13 


 

The scientific knowledge of life grows daily, and as it does the prospects of a naturalistic (materialistic/atheistic) explanation for its origin recede into the distance. The origin of life is another miracle.14 ‘Stuff happens’? More magic.


 

4. Origin of the diversity of life (Design? What design?)

The origin of life is only the beginning of the problem for the materialist. Along with other atheistic biologists, Richard Dawkins has spent his life trying to deny that living things exhibit supernatural design. In the book that ‘put him on the map’, he wrote,


 

Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.”15

… how do you get gases formed in a rapidly expanding primordial universe to coalesce together?


 

 

The diversity of life is a huge problem. How did a microbe change itself into every living thing on earth, ranging from earwigs to elephants, from mites to mango trees? For almost a hundred years, mutations and natural selection, the mechanisms of ‘neo-Darwinism’, or ‘the modern synthesis’, have been said to explain this diversity of life. However, with our modern knowledge of living things, this has proved useless as an explanation.


 

In July 2008, 16 high profile evolutionists met, by invitation, in Altenburg, Austria. They had come because they realized that mutations and natural selection did not explain the diversity of life, and they had come together to discuss this crisis in evolutionary biology. The only consensus was that there is a major problem, a crisis.16


 

Thomas Nagel (continuing from the earlier quote) put it this way:

The second question is about the sources of variation in the evolutionary process that was set in motion once life began: In the available geological time since the first life forms appeared on earth, what is the likelihood that, as a result of physical accident, a sequence of viable genetic mutations should have occurred that was sufficient to permit natural selection to produce the organisms that actually exist?17


 

Think of the supposed origin of humans from a chimp-like ape in six million evolutionary years. Modern comparison of the genomes shows such large differences (of at least 20%) that this is just not feasible, even with highly unrealistic assumptions in favour of evolution.18Actually, it was not even feasible when the difference was incorrectly trumpeted to be about 1%.19


 

Materialists have no sufficient explanation (cause) for the diversity of life. There is a mind-boggling plethora of miracles here, not just one. Every basic type of life form is a miracle.


 

5. Origin of mind and morality

The origin of mind and morality from energy and atoms has long been a problem for the materialist. It is a major theme of philosopher Thomas Nagel’s book, Mind and Cosmos, already referred to.


 

A fig tree produces figs, not apples. That seems obvious. Likewise, physics and chemistry produce physical and chemical outcomes. However, mind and morality are not just matters of physics and chemistry. Sure, creatures that are physical and chemical have mind and morality, but how did such non-material things arise from the material? This is a serious problem for materialism, and the atheist Nagel candidly admits it, to the extreme annoyance of his atheistic colleagues.22


 

The famous (and reluctant) convert from atheism to Christianity, C.S. Lewis, put it well when he wrote,

If the solar system was brought about by an accidental collision, then the appearance of organic life on this planet was also an accident, and the whole evolution of Man was an accident too. If so, then all our present thoughts are mere accidents—the accidental by-product of the movement of atoms. And this holds for the thoughts of the materialists and astronomers as well as for anyone else’s. But if their thoughts—i.e. of materialism and astronomy—are merely accidental by-products, why should we believe them to be true? I see no reason for believing that one accident should be able to give me a correct account of all the other accidents. It’s like expecting that the accidental shape taken by the splash when you upset a milkjug should give you a correct account of how the jug was made and why it was upset.”23


 

The atheist has no sufficient cause to explain the existence of mind and morality. Magic happens!


 

  1. Batten, D., Superstition vs ChristianityCreation 29(1):6, 2006; creation.com/superstition-vs-christianity. Return to text

  2. I hope there is no God!”, Thomas Nagel quote; creation.com. Return to text

  3. There is ‘black magic’ where Satan is the sufficient cause for the events; for example, the Pharaoh’s magicians in Egypt, where they threw down their staves and they became snakes. Return to text

  4. Grossman, L., Death of eternal cosmos: From the cosmic egg to the infinite multiverses every model of the universe has a beginning, New Scientist213(2847):6–7, January 2012. To say this we assume that the same laws of physics applied at the beginning, and that the Second Law applies to the whole universe (this is consistent with all experimental evidence). This is nothing more than the uniformity of nature in time and space, a foundational principle of science. Paul Davies said, “Yet the laws [of physics] that permit a Universe to create itself are even more impressive than a cosmic magician.” See, The singularity—a ‘Dark’ beginningReturn to text

  5. Reynolds, D.W., Godless universe untenable: A review of A Universe from Nothing: Why There is Something Rather Than Nothing by Lawrence M. KraussJ. Creation 27(1):30–35, 2013; creation.com/krauss-review. Return to text

  6. See, Hartnett, J., The singularity—a ‘Dark’ beginning, July 2014; creation.com/dark-beginning. Return to text

  7. See, Hartnett, J., Have Population III stars finally been discovered?, 2016; creation.com/population-iii-stars. Return to text

  8. Bernitt, R., Stellar evolution and the problem of the ‘first’ starsJ. Creation 16(1):12-14, April 2002; creation.com/first-stars. Return to text

  9. Hartnett, J.G., Stars just don’t form naturally: ‘Dark matter’ the ‘god of the gaps’ is needed, September 2015; creation.com/stars-dont-form-naturally. Return to text

  10. Davies, P., Life force, New Scientist 163(2204):27–30, September 1999. Return to text

  11. Habermas, G., My pilgrimage from atheism to theism: an exclusive interview with former British atheist Professor Antony Flew, Philosophia Christi, Winter 2005; illustramedia.com. Return to text

  12. Famous atheist now believes in God: One of world’s leading atheists now believes in God, more or less, based on scientific evidence, 2004, Associated Press; sciencefindsgod.com. Return to text

  13. Nagel, T., Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False, Oxford University Press, 2012. Return to text

  14. Batten, D., Origin of life, November 2013; creation.com/origin-of-life. Return to text

  15. Dawkins, R., The Blind Watchmaker, W.W. Norton & Company, New York, p.1, 1986. Return to text

  16. See ReMine, W.J., Desperate attempts to discover ‘the elusive process of evolution’, A review of The Altenberg 16: An Exposé of the Evolution Industry by Suzan MazurJ. Creation 26(1):24–30, 2012; creation.com/review-altenberg-16. Return to text

  17. Ref. 13, p. 6. Return to text

  18. Batten, D., The myth of 1%, Creation 36(1):35–37, 2014; creation.com/1-percent-myth and Batten, D., Haldane’s dilemma has not been solvedJ. Creation19(1):20–21, 2005; creation.com/haldane. Return to text

  19. 1% difference still adds up to 30 million base pairs (chemical ‘letters’) difference, which is a huge problem for an evolutionary scenario of random mutations and natural selection over supposedly six million years. Return to text

  20. Bates, G., That quote!—about the missing transitional fossils; Embarrassed evolutionists try to ‘muddy the waters’; creation.com/pattquote. Return to text

  21. Batten, D., Living fossils: a powerful argument for creationCreation 33(2):20–23, 2011; creation.com/werner. Return to text

  22. Nunn, W., Thomas Nagel—The atheist who dared to question materialism, March 2014; creation.com/nagel-materialism (and articles referenced therein).Return to text

  23. Lewis, C.S., The Business of Heaven, Fount Paperbacks, U.K., p. 97, 1984. Return to text

  24. Full quote Amazing admission


 

 


 


Article Comments:

Related Articles:

Cult of Darwin

10/16/2016:  Evolution's absurdity is revealed when you look at DNA

10/8/2016:  4-D Genomic software code disproves Evolution

9/28/2016:  Cyanobacteria and disproving Evolution. Nano-Technology does not 'evolve' by chaos.

9/15/2016:  Evolution's non-science; abiogenesis and proteins

9/10/2016:  Evolution's ignorance of science, bio-chemistry and math is profoundly disturbing

9/5/2016:  Bananas and Chimps are the same as humans! So says the 'science' [fiction].

8/29/2016:  Evolution's Fantasy world. A pagan religion, not a science.

8/21/2016:  Evolution offends the basic laws of Physics and Thermodynamics

8/12/2016:  Evolution's magic friend mutations does not support its theology

8/5/2016:  Evolution-denying the decomposition of DNA with magic hand-waving

7/28/2016:  Great French Mathematician Schützenberger, knew Darwinism was a false idol

7/20/2016:  Human embryology disproves the Cut of Evolution

7/4/2016:  Evolution cannot explain the formation of amino acids, DNA or RNA

6/17/2016:  The Nitrogen cycle and the processes of Life are not explained by the cult of Evolution

6/9/2016:  Dr. D Russell Humphreys Phd Physics on why he left Darwin's cult and did some real science

5/25/2016:  Evolution, no positive mutations can be identified, so that makes it all about science....

5/8/2016:  Not one single experiment or observation proves Evolution, abiogenesis, or life from chance

5/8/2016:  Evolution fails basic math and biochemistry

5/1/2016:  Dragons, cultures and reality

4/21/2016:  The Holy Church of Atheism and its dogmatic miracles

4/9/2016:  Cult of Evolution; complex molecules do not last millions of years

4/2/2016:  No beneficial genetic mutations turning algae into the Alchemist are known. None

3/28/2016:  Evolutionists admit single cell is too complicated to develop from 'nothing'.

3/19/2016:  Jerry Bergman and the nexus of Darwinist and Marxist evil

3/14/2016:  Evolution: an epic fail in probability and common sense

3/9/2016:  Feathers disprove the cult of Evolution [as do 1 million other facts]

3/2/2016:  Eugenics, Nazi theology and Evolution

2/19/2016:  Bubonic plague and deleterious mutations which deform, destroy, eradicate

2/10/2016:  Apes to Men myths, bio-chemically impossible.

1/14/2016:  Cell complexity and software is not supported by Darwinism

1/7/2016:  Iron preserves soft tissue for 75 million years ? LOL

1/3/2016:  Design cannot arise by randomness

12/9/2015:  DNA is software code and software code cannot self-create, repair, instruct, design.....

11/22/2015:  Nobel Prize for DNA self-repair. Evolution offends basic bio-chemical science.

11/16/2015:  Software and cellular repair - both offend the cult of Darwin's simplistic view of life.

11/15/2015:  Water: Darwinian theology cannot explain the core miracle of life.

11/7/2015:  Genetic Entropy & The Mystery of the Genome, by John C. Sanford,

10/30/2015:  The bio-chemically ignorant believe in Evolution

10/17/2015:  Evolution's illogic and lack of ontology. No science here. Meet the platypus.

10/11/2015:  So you are a rational-scientist-enlightenment-realist ?

10/3/2015:  Darwin's cult is mathematically impossible. It also offends basic science.

9/26/2015:  Everett Koop and the bleedingly obvious. The cult of Darwin is not based on science.

9/21/2015:  Homo Naledi and the missing science, and the missing proof, in the missing link claim

8/29/2015:  Benjamin Wiker: 'Moral Darwinism', the case against the cult of pond scum to people

8/15/2015:  Darwin's cult is long dead. Time to move on.

8/4/2015:  Jerry Bergman, Freud's atheism built upon the failed theology of Darwinism

8/3/2015:  Jerry Bergman and Freudian theology derived from Darwinism

7/30/2015:  Everything proves Darwinism! A typical cult belief.

7/24/2015:  Darwinism is anti-science.

5/28/2015:  Darwin's cult is ignorant of the obvious: 'In the Beginning Was Information', by Werner Gitt

5/23/2015:  DNA mutations mean that the Human species must be 20.000 years or less in age

5/20/2015:  From E Coli to Yeast and Humans ?

5/10/2015:  Dr. J. F. Ashton, 'Evolution Impossible'.

5/2/2015:  Darwin's magic friends and going from grass to humans!

4/27/2015:  Complex information systems arose by random chance! No science here !

4/8/2015:  Nothing Created Everything: The Scientific Impossibility of Atheistic Evolution by Ray Comfort

3/27/2015:  Hooved animals to Whales ! Oh yeah, this is 'science'

3/26/2015:  Evolution propaganda is anti-science. It retards scientific inquiry.

3/20/2015:  Stephen Meyer, Signature in the Cell. The Magic Fairyland of Darwinism.

2/27/2015:  Nazi Darwinism. Borman and the Nazi hatred of the Church.

2/20/2015:  Insulin by itself disproves Evolution

2/13/2015:  Evolution is a Fraud and Non-Science.

1/19/2015:  Ribosome's and the cell's factories - all by random chance and luck!

1/7/2015:  Benjamin Wiker, '10 Books that Screwed up the World' - Darwin's 'Descent of Man'

12/23/2014:  The Darwin Myth, The Life and Lies of Charles Darwin, by B. Wiker Phd

12/12/2014:  Darwin's Dissenters. Surely the cult will punish them.

12/10/2014:  The unscientific cult of the Phd. Quackery and letters do not make science.

12/4/2014:  Hitler the Atheist Evolutionist and Darwin cult member.

11/17/2014:  Cult of Darwin: There is no tree of life and mutations degrade

11/6/2014:  The Brain dead cult of Darwin - basic math mocks this cult

10/26/2014:  Bio-chemistry makes a mockery of Evolution

9/27/2014:  'Evolution's Achilles Heels' and the cult of Darwin

9/22/2014:  Evolution's Achilles Heels - and there is plenty of them

9/16/2014:  Apes did not 'evolve' into humans. Genes and our software make this obvious.

9/3/2014:  The fossil record does not support Evolution. Neither does reality.

9/1/2014:  Evolution - no evidence, no fossil proof, no bio-chemical proof....

8/25/2014:  Stove and the abject miserable philosophy of Darwinian cant and dogma

8/20/2014:  Evolution Science Fiction: The Tree of Life, and the ignorance of DNA

8/6/2014:  The Evolution Conspiracy, Exposing Life's Inexplicable Origins & The Cult of Darwin, Lisa Shiel

7/31/2014:  Darwinism-the greatest joke er hoax on earth. Particles to Professors you say?

7/24/2014:  Photosynthesis and the Human Eye laugh at Darwinism and order from chaos

7/18/2014:  DNA disproves evolution - software code is not written by chance

7/15/2014:  Tax money funding Darwin's cult - a state attack on science and Deism

7/8/2014:  Bergman, 'Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview'

6/19/2014:  Why I left the cult of Evolution - it is not science, it is fantasy

6/13/2014:  Evolution is not science, DNA and Anatomy make a mockery of Ape to Human theorizing

6/5/2014:  Darwinian dogma at the root of the Nazi leadership belief system

6/2/2014:  'Strange Glory', by Charles Marsh - a book about the Nazis vs the Church

5/31/2014:  Hitler and the Nazis hated the Catholic Church

5/31/2014:  The Barbarism of Evolution

5/30/2014:  Bergman, Darwinism And The Nazi Race Holocaust

5/22/2014:  Conway: 'The Nazi persecution of the Churches' - What else would good Darwinists do?

5/20/2014:  The Nazis appealed to 'science' to sell their Fascism

5/6/2014:  Darwin was not a scientist: 'The Dark side of Charles Darwin', by Jerry Bergman

5/5/2014:  The Dark Side of Charles Darwin, by Jerry Bergman PhD

4/30/2014:  The Dawkins Proof, by R. Barns

4/6/2014:  From Darwin to Hitler, Prof. Richard Weikart [3], Darwin and Racism to Communalism

4/4/2014:  Co2 was much higher in times past, today's level is 'below normal' so why the fuss ?

3/29/2014:  10 Reasons why Evolution is not science

3/28/2014:  List of Evolution's better known frauds. Criminality is now Science!

3/25/2014:  Sagan, Tyson and the Science Fiction of Evolution and the Universe

3/22/2014:  Age of the Solar System - we don't really know the age of anything

3/19/2014:  Quackery about 'why the earth rotates', not much science here

3/18/2014:  Big Bang, Big Fraud, Big Atheism

3/15/2014:  From Darwin to Hitler, Prof. Richard Weikart [2]

3/7/2014:  Book Review: 'From Darwin to Hitler', by Prof. Richard Weikart

2/10/2014:  Geneticist says the obvious; Evolution is absurd

1/21/2014:  Proofs of God's Existence by Richard Wurmbrand

1/6/2014:  What Your Atheist Professor Doesn't Know (But Should) by Stephen Williams

12/19/2013:  Evolution is for the dead of brain: 'Vanishing Proofs of Evolution', by Thomas Heinz

12/12/2013:  Ferrell: Evolution Handbook, part 4 – Science fiction as 'science'

12/3/2013:  Evolution handbook, by Vance Ferrell part 3

11/26/2013:  Evolution handbook, by Vance Ferrell part 2 The Big Bust

11/22/2013:  'Evolution Handbook', by Vance Ferrell

11/13/2013:  A Moslem scientist's view of the cult of Darwin

10/29/2013:  Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False, Thomas Nagel

10/23/2013:  What Darwin Got Wrong by Jerry Fodor, Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini

10/17/2013:  The cult and illiteracy of Scientism. Quacks as experts.

10/10/2013:  Evolution: Fact or Fiction? - The Secret Truth Darwinists Don't Want You to Know by Randy Ruggles

10/2/2013:  The Devil's Delusion, by David Berlinski

9/26/2013:  Evolution is Stupid! By John Verderame

9/19/2013:  Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? by Jonathan Wells

9/11/2013:  The Mysterious Epigenome, by Thomas E. Woodward, James P. Gills

8/30/2013:  Darwin's Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life by Stephen Meyer

8/22/2013:  Darwinism, beyond faith into fantasy.

8/14/2013:  The Church of the Holy Evolution and Sacred Heart of Random Chance

8/8/2013:  Cell's Design: How Chemistry Reveals the Creator's Artistry by Fazal Rana

7/25/2013:  Answering the New Atheism: Dismantling Dawkins' Case Against God by Benjamin Wiker, Scott Hahn

7/19/2013:  Evolution is science ? So too are little green men from planet X.

7/9/2013:  Michael Denton, 'Evolution: A theory in crisis' – No kidding.

6/12/2013:  Book Review: Darwin's Black Box, The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, M. J. Behe

5/29/2013:  “Darwin on Trial” by Phillip E. Johnson

5/4/2013:  The cult and theology of Darwinian stage theory. Junk and Bunk as 'science'.

2/13/2013:  Immanuel Velikovsky, 'Earth in Upheaval', 1955 reprinted 2009, 263 pages